The Republican presidential candidates, minus Rudy Giuliani, are having their last face-off tonight at the Reagan library at 8pm ET. The event will be broadcast on CNN and is hosted in cooperation with the Politico and the Los Angeles Times. You can also watch online here.
Post your comments on this thread or join the live NB chat.














Comments Policy
Is it me or does it just
January 30, 2008 - 20:10 ET by USA4freedomIs it me or does it just tick you off that Giuliani announces his support of Mc Cain at the Reagan library. (I know that is where the debate is but it still kills me.)
Standing over the podium with Reagan name on it to endorse the biggest Republican In Name Only. Makes me want to puke.
These are the boys of Pointe du Hoc. Ronald Reagan- 40th Anniversary of D-Day
It should be interesting to
January 30, 2008 - 20:15 ET by USA4freedomIt should be interesting to watch to see if Huckabee and McCain go after Mitt. ( I hope and pray that Mitt kicks their ass.)
I think that they will try to take him out, and Mc Cain will look out after Huckabee after the primaries.
These are the boys of Pointe du Hoc. Ronald Reagan- 40th Anniversary of D-Day
They won't take him out,
January 30, 2008 - 20:37 ET by Conservative VoiceThey won't take him out, Huck is out of money. The race is between McCain and Romney.
Romney has been fighting an uphill battle the whole way, against the party elites...which makes me like him all the more.
You make a really good
January 30, 2008 - 23:44 ET by Clear thinkerYou make a really good point.
Ronald Reagan is probably turning over in his grave right now wondering who the hell these guys are that's running for his party.
It's a shame all these RINO's have to disgrace his library.
The Conservative movement is about to be reborn.
New York Trifecta
January 30, 2008 - 20:23 ET by ThisnThatFirst out -- Rudy.
Next out -- The NY Giants
Finally -- H Clinton.
My prediction: New York is going to be home to a bunch of losers this year.
___________________________________
If you can read this, thank a teacher. If it is in English, thank a Soldier. - My barber
And Boston will win out! Am
January 30, 2008 - 20:27 ET by wiwfAnd Boston will win out! Am I right?
Red Sox
Pats
Mitt
STOP JUAN MCCANT
The Rocky Mountain Collegian: Illustrating Idiocy
Debate scheduling
January 30, 2008 - 20:29 ET by billbIs it my imagination, or have ALL the Republican debates been prior to the democrat debates? Timing is everything!
Let the piling on begin!!
January 30, 2008 - 20:44 ET by timotheActually, I'm not sure if they are going to pile on Romney or just try to marginalize him. But make no mistake, the Republican establishment is actively trying to remove Romney from the race.
I'm glad Thompson didn't participate in the Romney blackballing. The rest of them can kiss my fanny.
I've never felt so betrayed in my life.
(except when I saw the girl I had a crush on in 6th grade kissing the neighbor kid.)
That makes two of
January 30, 2008 - 21:01 ET by USA4freedomThat makes two of us.
These are the boys of Pointe du Hoc. Ronald Reagan- 40th Anniversary of D-Day
It appears our horse has been chosen for us
January 30, 2008 - 21:18 ET by Lame CherryOK it appears by hook and crook the GOP now has McCain as I doubt Romney can rebound and with Huckabee being a prick bleeding off votes........our horse we will have to rides is Amor Loco, Dr. Strangelove, John McCain.
In knowing this, how do Conservatives make certain to force John McCain to pick a Dick Cheney to uphold our policies?
McCain can not swing left as it will infuriate the Conservatives and Christians who already regard him as Teddy Kennedy with only the right testicle.
McCain wants to win this so he will have to shore up the base past his 30% dropping number past Independents.
Fred Thompson I do not believe is a choice as Tennessee was carried by Bush with Gore and there is no sense in putting him on the ticket.
For states, Jeb Bush would bring in Florida and the hispanics with El Busto jr.....but will the Bush factor turn off voters even if Jeb is more Conservative than bro.
Arnold is a no go being a European and I do not see Romney appearing on the ticket as he is still iffy in Massachuesettes and Michigan.......and Conservatives are not exactly sure of him.
No one in the Senate nor House carries Conservative clout and governors could be Tim Pawlenty out of Minnesota, but is Minnesota worth trading for a bigger prize.
The person I would like to see John McCain pick is:
A Conservative
Brilliant
Articulate
Has been vetted
Can divide the liberal vote
The person I ask Newsbusters to consider and start discussing is the person I suggested for Fred Thompson.
That person is Lynn Cheney.
Think of her Conservative credentials and her ability to difuse the Democratic skirt factor in voting. Lynn Cheney can add to a ticket those crazy women who will only vote for a woman plus give the confidence we all have in Dick Cheney for a continuous link to the next presidency.
If McCain is smart, he will pick Lynn Cheney. She is the gorilla with satin gloves on in the room. It will be the first time a woman appears in national politics who is there as a person who can kick everyone she debates butt.
She is the closest thing we have to Maggie Thatcher.
Let the discussion begin beyond debates of the GOP as Fred Thompson wins debates and he does not have people vote for him.
If John McCain in the Rasmussen Poll runs 47% to any democrats 40%........what better situation than to shore up the Conservatives and peal off 10% more in female liberal votes.
That is talking landslide and perhaps the House and Senate will go back to the GOP. Veg Tim Johnson will be running against Gov. Mike Rounds of SD. Rounds will win.......that is one pick up already.
Let think now and plan on winning. Even if we do not like McCain, he is the horse chosen for us.......we have to get the jockey to ride him and find the whip to move him.
*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS
Lynn Cheney ? I know nothing about her
January 31, 2008 - 17:19 ET by JayTeeIf she inherited her mother/dads brains, she can't be bad and has to be better than hillary. But the MSM would complain that the Cheny's have a VP Dynasty, and Obamaram would be yelling "We need CHANGE !!"
Stimulis: Congress and the president are now agreed on remedies that will not work, expending money they do not have, to fix a problem that may not exist. Steve Chapman
McCain is coming off as a smart ass.
January 30, 2008 - 21:19 ET by CTWhen Jaun McCain thinks he's in the catbird seat he really does show his ass.
Carbon Credits Smoke'em if you got'em!
Ann Coulter's new column
January 30, 2008 - 21:54 ET by Gary P JacksonAnn Coulter's new column has it right.
If McCain is the candidate, we may as well let Hillary have it. She makes a good argument. We will have roughly the same end result. Same stupid bills, same Socialist government, without the guilt!
It will be a lot easier to trash Clinton for the mistakes, when the wheels come of the wagon, rather than have to explain McCain.
Judges
January 31, 2008 - 02:51 ET by KC MulvilleIn my opinion, Gary, we can't afford that. Supreme Court nominations are mistakes that can't be fixed. These are mistakes we can't afford to make. If it wasn't for the fact that Supreme Court nominations are irrevocable, I'd agree with you. But since they are impossible to fix, we can't sit out an election, not even one.
McCain may still nominate an in-between candidate, but we'll have far more leverage against it than if we had a Democrat president working with a Democrat Senate.
KC...
January 31, 2008 - 03:06 ET by JerJust curious...If you had your choice, would you prefer nine Scalia conservatives on the Supreme Court, or some other combination as long as conservatives were in the majority?
Jer
You could go that way. Or
January 31, 2008 - 05:07 ET by Gary P JacksonYou could go that way. Or find 9 Clarence Thomases. Or 9 Robertses, or........ you get the idea.
And damn right we want the majority. Scratch that, we want 100% of the Justices. Most of the insane crap going on in this country can be traced back to liberal judges that think it's their job to make new laws, which it isn't
The Court's job, any court, is to interpret the law, as it pertains to the case they have before them. It is really that simple.
Gary P
January 31, 2008 - 05:43 ET by Cool ArrowWhere we got the idea the Constitution was a primer on situational ethics is beyond me.
The Constitution is treated as something to be trivialized and nibbled away at by rats wanting to legitimize their own legal perversions.
♣ a seal
Have some fun
January 31, 2008 - 12:25 ET by KC MulvilleI’m compelled to anticipate where your question might lead, and so I hesitate. You’re teasing me, of course, leading me into a deeper discussion. Since I enjoy that kind of thing, I’ll go for it.
Let me answer this way. I believe that the proper role of any judge is to interpret the law as it was written, because that’s what the people agreed to, and we live in a system where the consent of the people is the basis of authority. Scalia believes the same thing. So, the surface answer to your question is, yes, I wish all the judges would abide by that rule. If that’s the part of Scalia that I’m asked to endorse, then yes.
Scalia, however, is a real life person. I find him interesting, funny, and brilliant to the point where he knows he doesn’t need jargon, and he speaks plainly. I admire him. But like any other human being, I’m certain that he has other opinions on things that I might disagree with. Given a choice between two values, he may have chosen to be practical where I might have chosen principle, or vice versa. (Watch me covering my escape routes here! But I’ll bite. My basic answer would be yes.)
Ball’s in your court.
KC...let me dribble for
January 31, 2008 - 17:04 ET by JerKC...let me dribble for awhile before I shoot.
Jer
Yay for Judges
January 31, 2008 - 11:57 ET by candanceA lot of the judges who decided Roe v Wade were put in there by Republicans past. A SCOTUS with a Republican majority did nothing to help Terri Shiavo.
I believe the judges, but
January 31, 2008 - 12:07 ET by Dan The Man 2I believe the judges, but we cant let teh party sccot to teh left any more. I will vote for Rommy and how I will vote in November depends on who is running. I think a vote for Obie will set the GOP on fire to counter it. We may be in teh wilderness but I am not alone, I have God with me.
Nuke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark.
Can't Do It
January 30, 2008 - 21:56 ET by Pete WilsonI just can not bring myself to vote for Juan McKain. He has shown his true colors too many times for me to believe his schtick that he is a "conservative who can unite" anything. He has shown that he has no use for the United States Constitution via amnesty and campaign finance. Just cant do it! Gosh, I surely do hope that Romney can pull his numbers up. I really do not believe that the Guilliani endorsement does much, as tey are both running on "National Security". Oh well. That's my rant. Back to you, Brit.
I cant' bring myself to
January 30, 2008 - 22:09 ET by BlazerI cant' bring myself to vote for Juan (is that a burrito in your pocket or are you just happy to see me) McCamnesty either.
I have not missed a vote, local, state, or national since 89'. voted for GOP every candidate, and conservative every issue, and unless soop-tuesday is our redemption, I will not miss this one either, I'll vote the Dem in.
I'm a conservative first, Republican last.
"You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious. "
- Ben Kenobi on Liberals, and the MSM.
" The Cake is a lie."
NEVER WILL I VOTE FOR Sen. McCain
January 30, 2008 - 22:43 ET by IndyIf by chance Sen. Obama wins I will vote for him. Eventhough he would make a terrible Prez, at least I will know what to expect, and I also think maybe in some way he could help the racial devide in this country. If Mrs. Clinton wins I wont be voting this year. If I was Clinton I would constently play up all the things McCain has done to back stab our Prez. and the "gang of 14", and that would probably make me mad enough to vote for her. God help me.
If McCain is the nominee, I will probably vote for him
January 30, 2008 - 23:04 ET by RJ...at least as of today. Of course, once nominated, he may say and do things that just make me walk away in disgust.
Let me make myself clear: I think McCain is a disgusting, petty man.
Still, he is not Hillary or Obama. With those two, we know exactly what we'll get.
But with McCain, there's at least a chance he'll do the right thing in some areas. Recently, he's been forced to state specific conservative positions, and I think the possibility of his ego forcing him to live up to them is worth trying to make sure Hillary or Obama isn't the next President.
I also believe the fact that the man is a known appeaser can work for him. Sure he'll give some stuff away, but I suspect he'll require tit for tat. And a Democrat congress is less likely to stonewall him the way they did Bush. Small rewards, to be sure, but still better than the alternative.
Well put, RJ. I think
January 30, 2008 - 23:17 ET by motherbeltWell put, RJ. I think that's about where I am right now, and for the reason you stated (there's at least a chance he'll do a few things right).
But IMO he came off very badly tonight. He looked smug and acted petty, in contrast to Mitt's mature, respectful demeanor. Maybe it will put some people off him. We'll see when the debate post mortems come out.
You gotta love Huckabee.
January 30, 2008 - 22:07 ET by Gary P JacksonYou gotta love Huckabee. Right off the bat he's ready to bring the WPA back. What a moron!
Yea...
January 30, 2008 - 22:56 ET by celatorYea, Huck never was, and never will be, ready for Prime Time.
Liberal's Basic Rule For Discourse: I don't care if you agree with my premises, but I demand that you agree with my conclusions.
Why not write in?
January 30, 2008 - 22:15 ET by c5thenLet all these conservative wanna be's and RINOs know exactly how much support they DON'T have. Write in the candidate you ACTUALLY want to vote for in your primaries and in the election is necessary. Voting for a liberal, either Hillary or Obama, is not the answer.
The day that "politician" became a career choice is the day we started losing the Republic. Let's get it back! Alan Keyes '08.
The dead can vote, but they
January 30, 2008 - 22:20 ET by Conservative VoiceThe dead can vote, but they can't run for office, here's missing you Ronald Reagan!
Why not write the
January 30, 2008 - 22:30 ET by BlazerWhy not write the candidate in?
What's the difference either way, same result, Dem win's.
Just like Bush said " fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me" of course it got flubbed when he actually said it but, I believe "fool me once GOP shame on you, fool me twice GOP, I'll cut your friggin' throat".
"You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious. "
- Ben Kenobi on Liberals, and the MSM.
" The Cake is a lie."
So, instead of writting in a candidate that you want
January 30, 2008 - 22:39 ET by c5thenYou will allow the MSM and the GOP "king makers" to decide which of two choices you have?
I understand the reluctance to wtite-in in the actual election, but there is very little drawback in the primary.
I just saw where RINO McCain will be endorsed by fellow RINO Shwarzenegger tomorrow. The GOP keeps moving to the left and the Democrats keep moving to the left and all the conservatives are left behind wondering WTF!
The day that "politician" became a career choice is the day we started losing the Republic. Let's get it back! Alan Keyes '08.
Nope c5, since the GOP
January 30, 2008 - 22:48 ET by BlazerNope c5, since the GOP want's to stick a knife in my back, I think I'll stick two more in my loyalty to them.
"You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious. "
- Ben Kenobi on Liberals, and the MSM.
" The Cake is a lie."
A write in vote during the
January 30, 2008 - 23:19 ET by Gary P JacksonA write in vote during the prmary will do nothing but seal the deal for McCain.
Fred Thompson had his chance, and blew it. Forget Fred Thompson. Honestly, the same goes for Alan Keyes. Two great men, but they suck at campagning! And if you can't get the job, you can't do the job.
There's really only one vote. Mitt Romny.
Gary, I strongly
January 30, 2008 - 23:56 ET by Clear thinkerGary, I strongly disagree.
Right now we have thousands of people joining us in a write-in campaign for Fred Thompson. We know Fred won't win but that's not the point. Our primary goal (no pun intended) is to be able to hold our heads high and vote for principle, true conservative principles. Secondly, we hope it's enough to get the GOP to wake up. Many of us, including me, wanted to walk out of the GOP, but have since changed our minds. The GOP is our party and we want it back!
And yes, each and every one of us is willing to stick it out for the next 4 years no matter which of the pathetic crowd wins. Sometimes it's very hard doing the right thing, and it's NEVER easy.
The Conservative movement is about to be reborn.
Yes, you can hold your head
January 31, 2008 - 02:37 ET by Gary P JacksonYes, you can hold your head high, that way you can see McCain staring back at you!
Romney actually has a chance of being our nominee. A stunt like yours would hurt his efforts, and McCain would be our boy.
So by all means, go make your empty (and meaningless) gesture. If that helps you sleep at night. But don't whine when McCain is the nominee, and don't make a sound when you hear the words Madam President.
Gary, since when is pushing
January 31, 2008 - 12:10 ET by Clear thinkerGary, since when is pushing for conservative principles a STUNT?
As one of our fellow members posted earlier.... "Remember that choosing the lesser of two evils is still a choice for evil."
The Conservative movement is about to be reborn.
McCain drives me nuts with
January 30, 2008 - 22:40 ET by BruzillaMcCain drives me nuts with his boasting about his military service. He was not the commander of the largest squadron in the Navy... he was the commander of the largest attack squadron in the Navy. Even so, he was in charge of between 300 and 400 people. Compare that to a captain of an aircraft carrier who's in charge of 5,000+ people, or a Fleet commander who's got 50,000 people under him.
Speaking of higher command, the truth of McCain's service is that he was denied higher command because he was a screwup. The "great leader" of the military went from being a squadron commander to being a liason officer at the Senate. That, for civilians, is not normal and indicative of an officer who's gone as far as he's going to go and who's given some busywork until he can retire. Commanders who perform well at the unit level go to higher-level admin commands and then to large surface commands or airwing commands and on up the chain... they don't get pidgeonholed with the Senate. McCain was a failure at the naval academy, he had major disciplinary problems throughout his career, and his status as a former POW was enough to forgive enough of those sins to get command of a squadron, but that was it, and once he realized he would never rise to be a real leader in the Navy, he left and ran for office.
Lastly, squadron commanders are not leaders nor managers... they are administrators. The sailors in a squadron have no say in what's going on. They follow orders or they get punished. There's little leadership involved. Also, everything the squadron commander does stems from orders he's getting from the real leaders above him/her. He gets the orders, and gives orders to those under him to make things happen. Business people are much more effective leaders because their people can always leave if they don't like the boss, so you have to lead and encourage your people as you don't have an option to put people on report if they don't listen to you.
I think if I hear “a foot
January 30, 2008 - 22:45 ET by USA4freedomI think if I hear “a foot soldier for Reagan” one more time, I think I will puke.
These are the boys of Pointe du Hoc. Ronald Reagan- 40th Anniversary of D-Day
All all puked out..
January 30, 2008 - 23:06 ET by celatorI'm all puked out at McCain's self-aggrandisement by association to Reagan, as well. Reagan and McCain are polar opposites in every possible way--from their take on the role of government, truthfulness, conservative philosophy etc. McCain has no recognizable consistent core values, I am sad to say. Reagan was as solid as a rock.
Liberal's Basic Rule For Discourse: I don't care if you agree with my premises, but I demand that you agree with my conclusions.
McCain drives me nuts with
January 31, 2008 - 00:10 ET by motherbeltMcCain drives me nuts with his boasting about his military service.
Thanks, because every time he opened his mouth I was thinking "Again with the military stuff; give it a rest! We KNOW you were in the military!!!"
Glad to know I wasnt' the only one.
I think it's a fine thing
January 31, 2008 - 09:01 ET by BruzillaI think it's a fine thing that he served, and I think he should talk about his service. What bothers me is that he's claiming his time in service gives him the knowledge and experience to be Commander-in-Chief, and his service record doesn't bear that out.
If the Navy found him unfit for higher command, why should we find him qualified based on the same record?
I thought Romney and Huckabee did great. McCain was nasty
January 30, 2008 - 22:49 ET by Dee Bunkand got very few applause. He's not going to win
Mc Cain did himself no
January 30, 2008 - 22:54 ET by USA4freedomMc Cain did himself no favors by sitting there with that smirk on his face. What a pompous ass.
How about the complete duck on the economy and started talking about the surge??? I hope all of America saw it.
These are the boys of Pointe du Hoc. Ronald Reagan- 40th Anniversary of D-Day
Smirk earlier in the day
January 30, 2008 - 23:09 ET by celatorI saw the same "gosh, I'm clever" look on McCain earlier today when Giuliani was tooting McCain's horn at the press conference.
Liberal's Basic Rule For Discourse: I don't care if you agree with my premises, but I demand that you agree with my conclusions.
USA - That smirk showed his true colors. He's extremely
January 31, 2008 - 00:17 ET by Dee Bunkarrogant
Romney missed a big one
January 31, 2008 - 03:08 ET by KC MulvilleDuring the debate, two questions were supposed to "bookend" Romney and McCain. The first question was to McCain, to explain how a man with no business experience could be qualified to lead an economy. But the second question was to Romney, to explain how a man who never served in the military could be qualified to be commander-in-chief?
Romney sputtered. He knew there were some people, he said, who thought only a serviceman could understand how to run the military. But, Romney said, other presidents didn't serve in the military ...
If ever there was a question that was a softball waiting to be smashed out of the park, that was it. But Romney never saw it, and whiffed at it.
Juan McCain is an automaton
January 30, 2008 - 22:55 ET by CTWhen asked a question he immediately replies with one of his numbered reponses without variation. No nuance for this straight talker (God I don't want to hear that again) just a preprogrammed canned response. Its like a religious ritual amen and so mote it be, but no thought. We are so used to hearing his repetitions that we don't always hear what he is saying, but the bottom line is he was a patriot because he worked not for profit. Think about it, Juan McCain is BIG government dictatorial commander wannabe, not a leader. Juan McCain is a hero and a legend in his own mind, just ask him.
Ronald Reagan? We all knew
January 30, 2008 - 23:12 ET by USA4freedomRonald Reagan? We all knew Ronald Reagan, Mc Cain is no Ronald Reagan.
These are the boys of Pointe du Hoc. Ronald Reagan- 40th Anniversary of D-Day
DEFEAT JOHN McCLINTON!
January 30, 2008 - 23:19 ET by R D HelmI emplore all of you real conservatives who will be participating in the Super Tuesday primary, please vote against McClinton.
He MUST be defeated.
I will be voting for Romney.
None are so hopelessly enslaved as those who falsely believe they are free. -J.W. von Goethe
RD,Uh, I think you're
January 30, 2008 - 23:27 ET by Chris NormanRD,
Uh, I think you're preaching to the choir here. :) It's those other Republican voters out there you've got to get that mesaage out to. Where they are, I don't know. Because, apparently : They only come out at night - to vote in the primaries and are never heard from again...
Chris,
January 30, 2008 - 23:28 ET by R D HelmI was just ahh, practicing. Yeah, that's it. Practicing. Lol.
None are so hopelessly enslaved as those who falsely believe they are free. -J.W. von Goethe
The only way you can tell
January 30, 2008 - 23:29 ET by USA4freedomThe only way you can tell they were there is the knife in your back..
These are the boys of Pointe du Hoc. Ronald Reagan- 40th Anniversary of D-Day
R D Helm... I don't think
January 30, 2008 - 23:48 ET by Clear thinkerR D Helm...
I don't think you have anything to worry about with McCain. Obama will be our next president so voting for any of the RINO's won't help at this point.
I'm not liking it, just reading the Tea leaves.
The Conservative movement is about to be reborn.
Ct,
January 30, 2008 - 23:56 ET by R D HelmSadly, I think you may be right.
And the really sad part is, Obama will surrender to Osama before his behind even settles into the chair in the Oval Office.
Even Broom Hilda is not that stupid!
None are so hopelessly enslaved as those who falsely believe they are free. -J.W. von Goethe
R D... There is one small
January 31, 2008 - 00:03 ET by Clear thinkerR D...
There is one small advantage to having Obama as our POTUS for 4 years. His inexperience will screw things up so badly, people will be screaming for a conservative again.
The Conservative movement is about to be reborn.
Ct,
January 31, 2008 - 00:07 ET by R D HelmThat is precisely what I am counting on.
None are so hopelessly enslaved as those who falsely believe they are free. -J.W. von Goethe
Clear
January 31, 2008 - 00:10 ET by BlondeYou know I love you dearly....but time for tough love.
Wake the hell up!
Obami would be worse than Jimmah Catah. I can't abide the thought of malaise again.....we have to do everything we possibly can to defeat the socialist left....even if that means a vote for McAmnesty. I'll do it. I won't like it...but I'll do it. And you should too, and everyone else who is a true conservative.
We can't afford five minutes of these two liberal twits...much less four years. As awful as it may be....we can't let them even close to the Oval Office.
David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive
Blonde, I love you too,
January 31, 2008 - 00:21 ET by Clear thinkerBlonde,
I love you too, really!
I'm not going to try and convince you to do the same as I, and I hope you respect that. Here's the bottom line for those of us that are taking our chosen path....
If we continue to elect RINO's, we will continue to get RINO's. When do you say ENOUGH? We are just saying that the time has come.
The Conservative movement is about to be reborn.
Well, Clear
January 31, 2008 - 00:27 ET by BlondeIt seems we are at an impasse.
I respect the theory....but I'm a realist. And I just can't imagine passively allowing HRC or Bambi a clear path to the Oval Office.
Fat Teddy, and all of the rest deserve to be smacked down each and every time they get out of line....and if all we have to do that is a RINO....well, we have to go to war with the Army we have. To quote a great man.
David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive
But if the RINO is not
January 31, 2008 - 00:36 ET by HermanoBut if the RINO is not going to smack down Fat Teddy, then what good are they? Since the Founders were wise enough to put some safeties in place. Hopefully we will not wind up with an extra Trillion or so on the tax bill by the time her first two years are over and the Republican Congress takes over.
As an aside, my wife was relating a story to me this evening about seeing Teddy in a alley in DC taking a handoff about the time of the Anita Hill thing. She wonders what that was all about.
Ct, repeat after me; RINO is better than a democrat, again
January 31, 2008 - 00:28 ET by upcountrywatera rino is better than a DEMOCRAT...
cha cha change, AIN'T workin for me.
iranian uranium; iranian uranium, iranian uranium..
Oh joy to the world, 19 more atomic power plants!
ucw... Do as you see
January 31, 2008 - 00:32 ET by Clear thinkerucw...
Do as you see fit.
The Conservative movement is about to be reborn.
"His inexperience will screw
January 31, 2008 - 00:21 ET by Chris Norman"His inexperience will screw things up so badly, people will be screaming for a conservative again."
Or screaming as terrorist bombs go off in American cities or new planes fly into buildings. That's the kind of screaming I'm worried about.
Chris... I worry about
January 31, 2008 - 00:29 ET by Clear thinkerChris...
I worry about the same thing every single day precisely because I don't trust any of the candidates running to keep us safe.
The Conservative movement is about to be reborn.
I would think terrorists
January 31, 2008 - 00:34 ET by balboaI would think terrorists would want to make another attack right after the election, whomever wins.
bal... Is there something
January 31, 2008 - 00:37 ET by Clear thinkerbal...
Is there something your not telling us?
The Conservative movement is about to be reborn.
No, but I probably just got
January 31, 2008 - 00:45 ET by balboaNo, but I probably just got myself on some kind of list... :-\
balboa Yea!
January 31, 2008 - 00:38 ET by upcountrywaterJust like the Spain train thing.
iranian uranium; iranian uranium, iranian uranium..
Oh joy to the world, 19 more atomic power plants!
Clear,I've got to say Obama
January 31, 2008 - 00:51 ET by Chris NormanClear,
I've got to say Obama worries me most of all with his youth and naiveness. He will gut the military in a misguided and idealistic attempt to "get along" and pay for massive new social programs designed "to bring us together" - in the middle of a target.
Clear thinker
January 31, 2008 - 00:48 ET by shawn228As much as this sounds like neener neener, I swear it is not. I believe in polls and you constantly say polls are not accurate. You mentioned how polls were not accurate about Fred Thompson, but he did not finish any better than third right? Yes the polls got it wrong for Clinton in NH, but that does not happen very often.
Now many people are saying that polls are biased because they say McCain has the momentum and is the frontrunner, I believe this is true. Romny has to have a incredible Super Tuesday or it is all over.
"Suck it"
Pop Tech
shawn, I don't want you
January 31, 2008 - 12:21 ET by Clear thinkershawn, I don't want you getting the wrong idea, or anyone else for that matter, so let me clarify my position on polls.
I don't trust polls for the following reason.... The vast majority of citizens still get their news from liberal MSM sources. Because of the bias in their reproting the general public get's biased views/news instead of the facts. If the public is getting bad info via bias, they are not getting the truth. Then they get called by a polling company and give answers based on flawed info. Get it?
If the MSM ever goes back to reporting the news without bias, then I may take another look at polls. In the meantime it's still 'garbage in, garbage out'.
The Conservative movement is about to be reborn.
"You know I love you
January 31, 2008 - 03:54 ET by ckc1227"You know I love you dearly....but time for tough love.
Wake the hell up!
Obami would be worse than Jimmah Catah. I can't abide the thought of
malaise again.....we have to do everything we possibly can to defeat
the socialist left....even if that means a vote for McAmnesty. I'll do
it. I won't like it...but I'll do it. And you should too, and
everyone else who is a true conservative.
We can't afford five minutes of these two liberal twits...much less
four years. As awful as it may be....we can't let them even close to
the Oval Office. "
Wow, no dumb blonde are you. Nice to know I'm not the only one here with a brain. McCain isn't the perfect candidate by far, but, if I only dealt in perfection, I'd never get anything done. Hell, I wouldn't even get out bed each day. What would be the point?
People need to stop focusing on the similarities of the candidates, and instead focus on their differences. They are substantial on some important issues, like the Supreme Court. Heck, there are even differences between McCain and the dems on
amnesty, and not a good difference. The dems want even fewer
restriction than McCain!
The only chance we have to stop the slide to socialism in this country is to get back control of the Supreme Court, as that's where the slide began when liberal justices chose to ignore the Constitution. McCain will be good on this. Yes, I know, he had a problem with Alito, but he likes Roberts. If he appoints more "Roberts", we're good to go. Obama or Hillary? It's over. And remember, those appointments are for life.
Blonde has it right: Wake the hell up, people! Seriously, do you folks run the rest of your lives using this "all or nothing" mentality? If so, I don't see how YOU ever get anything done.
Hear, hear. I will be
January 31, 2008 - 07:11 ET by SchnikeysHear, hear.
I will be voting for and pushing for Romney all I can for Super Tuesday, but if McCain gets the nomination, then I'll vote for him on premises like the ones you put forward, ckc1227.
Although, I have always sort of viewed the GOP as sort of an "army" for the conservative voices of America. But as I said...if McCain gets the nomination (which I'll do my best to prevent, my favorite of the two being Romney), I'd rather take a "maybe" bad thing (McCain) over a "definite" bad thing.
ckc, spoken like a true
January 31, 2008 - 12:23 ET by Clear thinkerckc, spoken like a true moderate.
The Conservative movement is about to be reborn.
McShame
January 30, 2008 - 23:31 ET by richardWhat a mumbling stumbling fool, are you sure he's going to be only 72 yrs. old, he sounds like he's just one rung above Robert Byrd in communication skills. Also a Johnny one note with his repeating of "time tables" over and over. I guess the Penn Central RR should quit using "time tables" when they speak about the train schedules or maybe grade school teachers should no longer call multiplication basics "time tables."
For the life of me, I can't understand why so many so-called Republican leaders are throwing their support to this lying little clown. It seems that nearly all conservative bloggers are totally against this phoney "foot soldier" - does that make us more in tune with the facts, or are we all clueless? I think not!
McCain needs to go try running his wife's beer business so he can understand how economics works and not just keep using his experiences as a flight wing commander in the Navy to justify his leadership skills. Anyone who has been in the military knows full well that the commanders are mainly figure heads and that the actual leaders are the mid level officers and most especially the senior NCOs.
McCain's mother had it right, most Republicans will hold their nose while they cast their vote for this jerk (if he gets the nomination) soley to keep Shillery from destroying our country.
Lastly, notice how the MSM continues to try and steer folks to their desire to get McCain the nomination, which they definitely want because he's really a Democrat in disguise. If you took notice of the unfairness of how the questioning went during the debate, Mitt Romney was asked "first" to give his response to each question 80% of the time. It's common sense that the number one guy has a disadvantage because his answer has to be immediate without time to think of a good response, whereas everyone after that has time to reflect on their answer and "goes to school" on the first persons statments. Having said that, McCain still had troubling coming up with cogent answers beside "I was proud to be a Reagan foot soldier," over and over and over..........
I wanted to reach thru the screen and strangle him.
California Hated McCain and Loved Romney
January 31, 2008 - 00:05 ET by Dee BunkThat was the impression I had from the audience and I just watched the CNN analysis and the undecided people that they monitored thought McCain was nasty also. His ratings went further down every time he spoke and Romney's went up.
Paulnuts infiltrated the
January 31, 2008 - 00:23 ET by wiwfPaulnuts infiltrated the debate, text the mothership!
The Rocky Mountain Collegian: Illustrating Idiocy
wiwf - it wasn't the Paul people who were applauding Romney
January 31, 2008 - 00:31 ET by Dee Bunkwiwf - it wasn't the Paul people who were applauding Romney
Wasn't talking about that,
January 31, 2008 - 01:06 ET by wiwfWasn't talking about that, just the paulies in general. I simply hit reply on the last post in the thread at the time. Don't think I was responding to you, it was simply an accident/happenance!
The Rocky Mountain Collegian: Illustrating Idiocy
wiwf - it's confusing - they should have an "add comment"
January 31, 2008 - 01:10 ET by Dee Bunkbutton at the bottom also.
I've read all your posts
January 31, 2008 - 00:35 ET by <