Open Thread


For general comment and discussion...

Read comments

Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Assassination

It will be quite interesting to see how the assassination in Pakistan will play out here. It probably won't be long before the "liberals" start to blame President Bush or the Republican candidates. I already heard Ackerman of New York mention Iraq in connection with this. Sheeze!

NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"

The important point is NOT

The important point is NOT to jump to conclusions , initial reports are likely to be wrong.

R2P...

Are you questioning the report that Bhutto is dead? 

Rush Limbaugh stated that of the top 5 Republicans running for the presidency, only one was a true conservative. http://www.fred08.com/ 

Had same reaction

(I'm answering for myself, not for R2P.) I also take it for granted that initial reports are almost always wrong. I don't question that Bhutto is dead, but so much depends on the assassin. Was it a pro-Musharraf militarist? Was it an ex-Taliban or al-Qaeda? Drudge reported that Musharraf was at her bedside when she died. Was that true? Was it trumped up? We don't know anything certain yet, and I'll bet various groups will blame others, exploiting the moment.

We know nothing, at the moment. Once the assassin is identified, and observers are confident who did this, then the story will sort itself out. It's way too soon to respond.

The death is confirmed by

The death is confirmed by multiple sources enough to have no doubt on that, it's the details , some of which I have already heard corrected more than once on smaller details.

The news is out. Now is the time to sit back and wait for it all to shake out and see how it plays out.

Idle speculation at this point will not change anything and it is likely that three days from now the whole story could have a different look.

al Qaeda will be the one

al Qaeda will be the one behind.  They have made threats against her.  They are looking to destablize the Government there.  Theories will fly accross the wires that it was President Musharraf or the US fault but Musharraf has more to lose by her death.  Riots and her supporters will come after him and blame him while the war lords and al Qaeda sit in lawless area of Pakistan and wait.

Time to drop some bombs I believe.

Already

Check out the Koz Kidz. They already have it figured out that it was "Bush's imposed dictator Mushariff." The fact that Mushariff came to power prior to 2000 is of little consequence.

 

Fake moderates

Dems who vote "no" on a procedural motions to inflate their ratio of votes against the party line.

How long do they think this little trick could work before the voters noticed?

As powerline said on this

As powerline said on this earlier....the opposition campaign commercial just write themselves on this issue.

Jason Altmire ran on

Jason Altmire ran on accusing the Repub incubant, Melissa Hart, as being a Bush lackey, claiming Hart voted with Bush 93% of the time. Altmire has voted almost 80% of the time with the party line.

Meanwhile, Bobby Casey ran on a platform that Rick Santorum was a "rubber stamp" for Bush, too. Casey's record? Votes along party line 93.7% of the time. Shocking.

 

Santorum lost because he did

Santorum lost because he did not want to win.

He did not campaign in Philadelphia or Pittsburgh pretending that middle of PA somehow would counter-balance every minotiry/union vote that Casey was to get in those two cities.

Best Story of 2007

This story gets my nomination: http://www.baltimore...

In addition to believing that "within the lifetimes of his two cats" all of Gore's dire predictions of global warming are going to come true, and many of the Red areas of the country will be swamped or left barren, he also sees that this great upheaveal will be the salvation of the Democrats!

Putting aside the fact that the Earth has already seen an increase in ocean heights that equals what Gore is predicting, and we haven't seen even an appreciable area of a beach go under yet alone a whole coastal area, this idiot thinks that if you drown all the God fearing Republicans or let them die from dehydration, that all will be well with the country. The USA will become a Liberal Utopian environment where he can do all the drugs he wants, abortion will never be challenged, and the environment will always get the respect it deserves. He seems to completely overlook the fact that if you wipe out the folks who are generating the revenues to make all this happen... it ain't going to happen.

It's almost sad that his view of the coming wrath of global warming is so delusional. How fun would it be to watch him try to round up all his forest fairies and get them to stop hitting the bong and get some work done before the utopian society collapses under the weight of it''s own excesses.

Oh yeah! That's a winner!

Oh yeah! That's a winner!

Bruz

I see we were thinking along the same lines.

Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!

It only proves that the

It only proves that the left has an offical religion now called the Church of Global Warming. 

My question:  Isn't it the left who complain about seperating church and state?

Worthy articles

Some days, all the op-eds are predictable and boring, but today is an exception. If you want to read three terrific, thought-provoking articles, I suggest the following.

  1. Kissinger's analysis of Putin in Time magazine. I don't trust Putin, and I suspect he manipulates Iran indirectly. But Kissinger disagrees, and gives solid reasons. I may actually have to change my mind here.
  2. George Will on McDonald's. I love the final observation where Will notes that both Ray Kroc and Walt Disney, founder of two iconic American corporations, were born close to each other, not long apart, and served in the same Red Cross outfit in WWI. Something in the water, perhaps?
  3. Jay Lefkowitz in Commentary, telling the behind-the-scenes story of how Bush's stem cell policy developed. A must read for the media, and a good story on how policy really develops.

Well since Iran is putting

Well since Iran is putting their finger in pies all over the mideast and is now playing around in south and central america they have an amazing match to all the places the USSR used to push to play world chess and Russia itself only has modest presence in most of these places now.

I tend to think that Iran and North Korea are being used as proxies by Russia rather than playing the game up front like the used to.

On a warmer note, Dave

On a warmer note, Dave Lindorff, has out done himself with a commentary published in the Baltimore Chronicle and Sentinel. The title?

"Global Warming Will  Save America from the Right...Eventually".

Rather catchy, dont you think? What he is saying is that the Red states will become inundated or drought stricken and uninhabitable. Not considering that we may move to the enlightened neighborhoods, (where he resides, I assume), he instead writes, bold is mine...

"There will be much work to be done to help the earth and its residents—human and non-human—survive this man-made catastrophe, and we can’t have these future refugee troglodytes, should their personal disasters still fail to make them recognize reality, mucking things up again.

It should be considered acceptable, in this stifling new world, to say, “Shut up. We told you this would happen.”

Now is this the party that preaches tolerance...or what?

I guess this is licnese to tell SF and LA, after the next earth quake, "Shut up. We told you this would happen." Is this right Dave?

Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!

Great Minds

Think alike!  We must have been typing at the same time, bassndude! 

Ecce potestas casei!

"Global Warming Will Save America from the Right...Eventually".

That's OK since abortion will save America from the Left long before GW saves it from the Right.

Malkin has a good post up

Malkin has a good post up now about this with an excellent thumbnail history of some of his past over the top stuff.

Check it out.

That op-ed made me laugh.

That op-ed made me laugh. Were intelligent people writing for the paper still out of town because they have life and spent it doing Christmas get-togethers? Or does Balt-Chronic always treat to the lowest common denominator?

He preaches tolerance (he's a libtard), but he practices hatred, bigotry, and sheer ignorance.

A little research (hint: read some blogs by Noel!) and this guy would be shut the hell up.

In actuality, this "editorial" is fit to print in:

The Rocky Mountain Collegian: Illustrating Idiocy

Way late, I know

I USED to live in Baltimore, they are all (including my relatives) brain washed. They like to threaten to dis-own you and crap like that. Unless you believe of course. I go home just to slap around the idiots who have stolen my great city. No wonder my Orioles suck, Karma. The News Papers there have removed all debate from those folks, they just follow anymore.

 

"Always do right. This will gratify some people, and astonish the rest". Mark Twain

Tim Graham on radio NOW

Tim Graham on radio NOW

Tim is appearing on KSFO 560 talk radio internet broadcast on

www.ksfo560.com at 08.11 PST (like check it dude right now)

Check out my exclusive edit of BBC News America's interview with Mrs Clinton: It's news to me!

AGW just gets worse and worse

I ran into this article while perusing Drudge today.  According to the writer, Dave Lindorff, global warming is going to save the world from us conservatives.  As the sea level rises, we're going to be drowned and blue states will prevail.

"So the future political map of America is likely to look as different as the much shrunken geographical map, with much of the so-called “red” state region either gone or depopulated.

There is a poetic justice to this of course. It is conservatives who are giving us the candidates who steadfastly refuse to have the nation take steps that could slow the pace of climate change, so it is appropriate that they should bear the brunt of its impact."

The interesting part is at the bottom of the article.  It seems Mr. Lindorff is the co-author of, "a well-regarded book on impeachment, The Case for Impeachment."  The book describes the legal case for impeaching President Bush. 

I'm shocked I tell you, shocked.

Ecce potestas casei!

Aren't the coasts mostly all

Aren't the coasts mostly all Democrat states?

Check out my exclusive edit of BBC News America's interview with Mrs Clinton: It's news to me!

Nope

Not in La La Land, Jack.  

Ecce potestas casei!

Lindorff for racist of the year

Lindorff is a racist. Remember Kanye West's enlightened statement that "Bush hates black people" because of the perceived lack of federal response to Katrina??

So Lindorff is advocating for a Katrina-like event times 1,000,000??

That entire article, even if it was intended for satire, was completely retarded.

here here     "Get

here here

 

 

"Get off the phone you big dope!!!!!!!!!!" Mark Levin

I think the media will try

I think the media will try to spin this a few ways:

 1. Bhutto was pro-democracy, therefore any blow to democracy is a blow to Bush and his attempt at democracy in the Muslim world, vote for Hillary if you don't want this to happen.

2. Bush is secretly pleased with the death of Bhutto because he likes Musharraf more and wants more crackdowns on extremists everywhere which Mushy is willing to do- vote for Hillary if you don't like these types of "secret" alliances.

CR... I just wonder how

CR...

I just wonder how long if not already the looney leftist sites will be saying that President Bush and the neocons in his administration really really are the people who assassinated Bhutto.

I'm not wrecking my day by going to those sites....I just know how some or better yet most of those sites are.

Of course Hillary has already claimed what good friends her and Bhutto were...blah blah blah....anybody can take it from there when it comes to her and her typical blather...why she will take care of situations like this immediately when... not if... she is President after the election.

As an after-thought, not to be morbid but this took the tiger killer story off the air .....

It's already started.  Bush

It's already started.  Bush did not do enough, Bush did too much with Iraq.  Bhutto would still be alive if not for Bush's policies, yadda yadda yadda.  If you want the world to be free of nukes, vote Hillary.  If you don't want people to die, vote Hillary.  If you don't like violence, vote Hillary.  If you want Pakistan to be our friend, vote Hillary.  I truly believe that the media thinks that they are going to defeat Bush in 2008 by playing every news story against him...... even though he can't run again!!

Here's an example

Del... That was an

Del...

That was an excellent piece.

Thank you.

Ditto.....sums it up very

Ditto.....sums it up very well.

They are a strange bunch of

They are a strange bunch over at Kos land in a lot of ways. One time I posted a partial cut and past from over there at a blog and had linked it but the blog software ate the link in my comment.

I wasn't like maybe 3 minutes later one of the front page people from Kos was on the site complaining all about not providing a link back to them which I did about the same time as their complaint post. They might have even noticed the link if they had refreshed prior to posting their gripe.

They must have some search spiders running to see if anyone uses their stuff on the right side of the world. Paranoid to say the least.

 

This Baltimore guy is CRAZY

This article everyone is referencing (and I just read thru your posts, thanks) is so far out I cannot believe this guy is serious. I have a hot flash for him (pun intended) about the hot areas of Phoenix and Tucson he is speaking about, right now it is 0945 and 35 very cold degrees here in Tucson. We have hard freeze warnings for the next few nights. I do realize that does not seem like much to those in other areas of the country, but it is COLD here.

Bhutto was dumb as a post and now dead as one

With no disrespect intended to the dead, I blogged here months ago that Bhutto was not only dumb as a post but that she was tossing what would amount to nuclear bombs on a dynamite of Pakistan.

She is completely responsible for the dead in Pakistan in her return as much as those she took with her today. That is the plain reality.

Now while idiots like the McGlaughlin group WERE SAYING JUST LAST WEEK THAT Musharrif was a bad guy for clamping down........one sees why he clamped down as that nation is a cesspool of Russian sponsored Islamocommunist terrorists.

For the record, al Qaeda did this as both bin Laden and Zawahiri intend to get the Pakistan nuclear arsenal "to use on the west" as the Russians mandated that their bombs are not to be used on America ........as all uranium is able to be traced.

All this has done is made Pakistan a worse situation for America BY ANOTHER LIBERAL WOMAN meddling in politics, you can see the mirror in Hillary, Obama and Edwards as they are all liberal females as much as Huckabee and Ron Paul are too.

My concern if for the United States and for our policy Musharrif must be kept alive and in power and the McGlaughlin group can apologize for being the morons they are again.

 

*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS

LC.... I share your

LC....

I share your sentiments....

Bhutto knew exactly what she was up against and what she was doing...and was a liberal....and the terrorists were after her big time before the upcoming elections. 

Now our candidates are of course using the situation to attempt to show who is the most Presidential in this situation that Bhutto put us in here with her death...and we will get to hear non-stop from the rest of the world, the UN ect...and Musharraf is in a no-win situation once again, plus he has escaped nine attempts on his life so far...looks like Osama and his ilk are winning this one for the time being.

Sad all the way around.

Cherry...

Although I share some of your sentiments, I think it is wrong to blame Bhuto for her own death. Her death was the direct result of some scumbag nutjobs, and I like to blame the ones that actually do the dirty deed. 

Rush Limbaugh stated that of the top 5 Republicans running for the presidency, only one was a true conservative. http://www.fred08.com/ 

-

I like to blame the ones that actually do the dirty deed.

Yes, that way, they don't escape responsibility.

leave it to lame cherry...

To say the dumbest things.

 

Most of the sites I read

Most of the sites I read from that area of the world tend to place the puppet player in the region not as Russia , even though they have some fingers in the pie, but the bigger player in Pakistan is China using it to keep India off balance plus smaller countries in south east asia. Remember Russia is selling armaments to India and they would have to be playing both ends against the middle to work in a major way with Pakistan at the same time and India has to good of an intelligence service to let that slip by them.

Remember

Remember: China and Pakistan are allies. Why?  The common enemy: India.  Anyone who makes trouble for India will have friends in Islamabad and Beijing.

Res tantum valet quantum vendi potest.

Al-Kayda claiming perverted

Al-Kayda claiming perverted "responsibility" for murdering Benazir Bhutto and twenty other poor souls.

Democrats claim Al-Kayda never in Pakistan.

9/11 troofers claim controlled demoltion from Langley.

Rosie O'Donnell claims this is first time in history suicide bomb melts steel car.

Google Gulf of Tonkin, steel and nutjob, people. DO IT.

Check out my exclusive edit of BBC News America's interview with Mrs Clinton: It's news to me!

Jack... Wow... How did

Jack...

Wow...

How did you ever reach those wonderful sites listed with those three words?

Just very curious....

LOL BT... you are

LOL BT... you are right.

You can actually get loony web links from those "Rosie" suggestions.

Check out my exclusive edit of BBC News America's interview with Mrs Clinton: It's news to me!

I called it! Now the left

I called it!

Now the left will blame Bush for pushing them out of Iraq and Afganistan, making the rest of the region unstable.

Man this is just too easy to predict, I better go make some lottery picks.

-

Democrats claim Al-Kayda never in Pakistan.

No gays in Pakistan, either, Jack.

(... no, wait, that's Iran.  I'm getting my nutcases mixed up ...)

"Homicide" bombing. Ugh.

"Former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto dies at hospital after being shot in neck and chest moments before homicide bombing at Rawalpindi campaign rally." - Fox News.com

Does it drive anyone else a little nuts that Fox News uses "homicide bombing" to describe "suicide bombing"? A homicide bombing is just a bombing. A suicide bombing is when the bomber takes his own life in the process. It sounds like they don't know what they're talking about every time I hear it.

Other than that, Fox News is great.

*****

"There are no stupid questions. Only stupid people who ask questions." - Chris Berman 

I always thought of this as

I always thought of this as an attempt to linguistically re-envision the ideological approach of certain issues. Like Freedom Fries, a neologism for which our government should be eternally embarassed. I think the logic behind "homicide boming" is the precept that "suicide bombing" takes the focus off of the victims of the attack and gives the bomber some sort of authority or mastery that we shouldn't allow terrorists to have. While this may be a worhtwhile point, as you point out, it's stupid because it does nothing to distinguish is from normal bombings (ie where the bomber does not die because he/she has a remote-detonation device or what have you). Suicide bombing is a unique threat and to de-emphasize that its practitioners are more than happy to take themselves out along with the target is to provide an inaccurate analysis of it.

"He was, and is yet, most likely, the wearisomest, self-righteous
pharisee that ever ransacked a Bible to rake the promises to himself
and fling the curses on his neighbors."
-Emily Bronte

Hero

I think that Fox is spot on.  I could careless about his suicide when he kills men, women and children without regret.  That is a Homicide.

AF...I agree.To me

AF...

I agree.

To me suicide implies killing ones self.

Homicide kills others, who cares if it includes the cowardly S.O. B. who did it.

I heard FOX use this term this morning and was glad they called it exactly what it was in my eyes...

Btw....No offense meant here Hero... 

But shouldn't there be some

But shouldn't there be some sense of differentiation between suicide bombing and the kind of bombing that doesn't take the life of the bomber? I mean, for the sake of tactical strategies and understanding how to deal with the threat, if nothing else, is it really wise to downplay that aspect of it? Wouldn't it have been silly to pretend the Japanese kamikazees weren't willing to kill themselves in order to hit their target?

"He was, and is yet, most likely, the wearisomest, self-righteous
pharisee that ever ransacked a Bible to rake the promises to himself
and fling the curses on his neighbors."
-Emily Bronte

Didn't the kamikazees hit a

Didn't the kamikazees hit a target that had some kind of a uniform on, that were not everyday people including children outside doing everyday things like these homicide bombers are doing?

This is also why I say cowardly...by the ay according to the news this guy had a gun too that killed Bhutto before blowing up others, including himself. 

We are in a different war in a different time.

JMHO

It's about being descriptive

A kamikaze bomber would be a more apt description. (or should we be calling them "homicide pilots"?)

I do appreciate the idea of not giving the bomber recognition. However, simply not using the perpetrator's name seems to satisfactorily accomplish that.

"Homicide bomber" gives no indication whether or not the bomber took his or her own life. To me, that's simply synonymous with "bomber." Although at Fox, it now is synonymous with "suicide bomber." So how is it giving any less recognition to the bomber?

I'm sure Fox and the other news outlets will be aggressively trying to find out more about this bomber and motives, which is far more telling of who the bomber is than calling him a homicide or suicide bomber.

I just think Fox is overthinking this. (Then again, I probably am, too.)

*****

"There are no stupid questions. Only stupid people who ask questions." - Chris Berman 

I would think the Mooslim

I would think the Mooslim community would be offended by the use of a heathen Shinto term such as that. Do not call down the wrath of IRB upon yourself!

JasonC

Try to put your self in the martyr’s mind set for that is how he sees himself.  If he accomplishes his mission it is not suicide.  He is going out to right the wrongs.  He is an instrument of his God to bring down the infidel.  To him it is a promise of eternal blessings from his God.  His intention is to kill.  The suicide is just a step toward achieving his goal.

It is Murder.  Cold, calculated, and without remorse.  The suicide is the tool, the outcome is the Homicide. 

A Homicide Bomber.  

 

Of course it's cowardly,

Of course it's cowardly, and is different from kamikaze missions in some respects. Please don't assume that I'm defending it in any way. I don't think it should be phrased a certain way out of any sort of deference to the bomber. But I do think a distinction should be maintained between, say, a bomber who pushes a button from a mile away and one who takes him/herself out in order to do it. Not out of some martyr-like respect to the bomber (if I must reiterate that) but to emphasize the added dangers and complications that suicide bombing presents.

"He was, and is yet, most likely, the wearisomest, self-righteous
pharisee that ever ransacked a Bible to rake the promises to himself
and fling the curses on his neighbors."
-Emily Bronte

JasonC

We will again agree to dis agree.  I see what you say but in the Exstreemist veiw this is not a bad thing.  Suicide in this fashion is not a sin to them.  By calling it Murder or Homicide it degrades it.  By doing this it sends a message to those who thinking about it. 

If we glorify it then it just justify it in the eyes of martyr. 

Homicide is Homicide.

Suicide is a sinful act,

Suicide is a sinful act, correct? I see no problem attaching a sinful moniker to someone who commits such a  horrific act.

*****

"There are no stupid questions. Only stupid people who ask questions." - Chris Berman 

I see no rational reason to

I see no rational reason to justify use of "suicide bomber" in religious terms. I simply think it is semantically appropriate. The noun "bomber" still adequately conveys the fact that it is an act of aggression, not one limited to the death of the person doing it.

"He was, and is yet, most likely, the wearisomest, self-righteous
pharisee that ever ransacked a Bible to rake the promises to himself
and fling the curses on his neighbors."
-Emily Bronte

I only put it in religious

I only put it in religious terms since most of the suicide bombers referenced are doing so. 

suicide - taking one's life.

bomber - one who bombs.

Hmm. Not to counter my own argument, but I guess you could say that "suicide bomber" only implies that the bomber killed himself.

*****

"There are no stupid questions. Only stupid people who ask questions." - Chris Berman 

Correct.  I don't like the

Correct.  I don't like the use of "homicide bomber" either.  In its intent to clarify, the term becomes totally confusing and redundant.

-PJ

"Trake: Your lofty convictions are another blemish on the rump of congregational sectarianism." -Tumbler 5/15/07 

On Homicide Bombers

Fox explained why they use that phrase and for me it works.  It to me is a reminder that the guy/gal that does the deed isn't doing it just to kill themselves (which can just as easily be achieved at home or an open area with no one else around).  

Res tantum valet quantum vendi potest.

Hey Hero... Hope you

Hey Hero...

Hope you don't mind me chucklin' here, hopefully with you kind sir.

I'm just kind of gettin' a kick out of this all....the different definitions and how we all see it through our eyes. 

Words are all we have BT. 

Words are all we have BT.  Distorting the language for hyperbole/rhetoric sake is a form of deception IMO. 

-PJ

"Trake: Your lofty convictions are another blemish on the rump of congregational sectarianism." -Tumbler 5/15/07 

Chuckles are what I'm all

Chuckles are what I'm all about, BT.

*****

"There are no stupid questions. Only stupid people who ask questions." - Chris Berman 

How about "Homicide/Suicide

How about "Homicide/Suicide Bomber"?  It would seem to cover all the bases.

Hero

But in the eyes of the martyr it is not a sin.  By calling it Homicide degrades the act to them.  Extreemist Muslims only see glory in the act of suicide. 

Homicide makes it a demeaned act.

So do you want to use the

So do you want to use the homicide version simply to deny the bomber the adjectival prefix that he had in mind? So you can "demean" him? There has been far too much of this coining of neologisms in the WoT, in my opinion. Similar to how people disapproved of the term "insurgents" in Iraq and wanted them to be referred to simply as "terrorists", even though there are broad and obvious differences between those who organized to fight our troops in Iraq and run-of-the-mill terrorists. This is what I mean about re-envisioning things ideologically. Isn't it just a weird inversion of the goals of PC language?

"He was, and is yet, most likely, the wearisomest, self-righteous
pharisee that ever ransacked a Bible to rake the promises to himself
and fling the curses on his neighbors."
-Emily Bronte

Welcome to English

 There has been far too much of this coining of neologisms JasonC, welcome to the English language, humanity's largest language. 

Res tantum valet quantum vendi potest.

Murder-suicide attack?

I heard an even more apt description on a radio report last evening: "Murder-suicide attack." 

1. Murder is far more impactful than "homicide" and tells you that people perished in the attack. 

2. "Suicide" describes that the bomber took his own life in the process.

3. Using "attack" instead of "attacker" or "bomber" references the act, not the actor. Hence, the bomber gets less recognition.

That, to me, accomplishes everything we have been discussing here. (Unfortunately, I probably returned too late to the party for anyone to notice.)

*****

"There are no stupid questions. Only stupid people who ask questions." - Chris Berman 

Unsane, you're one to be

Unsane, you're one to be boasting about English comprehension, considering you took my statement completely out of context, not even bothering to complete the sentence I wrote. Yeah, that's it, I think we should just stop allowing new words and phrases into the English lexicon. If you want to swoop in and try to put me in my place with a one-sentence zinger, at least be honest about it. You can start with my reply to your barely-worth-replying-to statement about my "relentless hatred of capitalism."

Oh, and Chinese is more widely spoken, smart guy. Of course, your statement is so vague and pointless that I don't know if by "largest" you mean most commonly spoken or simply range of diction. Just letting you know.

"He was, and is yet, most likely, the wearisomest, self-righteous
pharisee that ever ransacked a Bible to rake the promises to himself
and fling the curses on his neighbors."
-Emily Bronte

JasonC, I am disappointed

JasonC, lighten the f*!k up. I was merely highlighting your upset at neologisms, because we ALL have to get used to them no matter the purpose.

I might be guilty of changing the subject but that is all.

And, my dear hyper-intellectual, Chinese is the MOST WIDELY SPOKEN LANGUAGE. When I said English is the “world’s largest language”, I meant that as literally as possible. English is the world’s largest language. For example, French has something like 100,000 words. English, last time I checked, has 750,000 words. Hence, the world’s largest language.

You were saying something about “reading comprehension”?

Res tantum valet quantum vendi potest.

Most neologisms in the WoT,

Most neologisms in the WoT, such as "Homicide Bomber" serve the singular purpose of allowing us to reinscribe accepted terms with our own ideological veneer. It's the new PC.

As to the "largest language", yes, you are correct, and I alluded to that.

"He was, and is yet, most likely, the wearisomest, self-righteous
pharisee that ever ransacked a Bible to rake the promises to himself
and fling the curses on his neighbors."
-Emily Bronte

Sure .. because as we know

Sure .. because as we know Suicide Bomber has a long history, being first coined in the Bible.

And who can ever forget the Shakespeare sonnet: Love Doth Come Like A Suicide Bomber on a Summer's Morn

How dare people try to invest a new phrase to replace this eon's old example of the beautiful  English language.

Check out my exclusive edit of BBC News America's interview with Mrs Clinton: It's news to me!

Confused...

And the problem with that is what?  There was a neologism created in German in the 1920s that was coined for a political purpose.   

This is English.  Neologisms are coined for less in this language.   

Res tantum valet quantum vendi potest.

Here is what Fred Thompson

Here is what Fred Thompson had to say regarding the assassination of Bhutto...and here is AL Qaeda claiming they did the assassination.

At least Fred gets it...

At least Fred gets it... which is a lot more than many

This is an international war we are engaged in," he emphasized. "Bhutto's assassination is not a law enforcement matter. This is a global conflict, and al-Qaida wants to bring Western civilization to its knees."
Fred Thompson

Check out my exclusive edit of BBC News America's interview with Mrs Clinton: It's news to me!

Exactly the real

Exactly the real point Jack.

I agree Jack

This is not just Iraq.  It is all over and the enemy wants to kill us.  They had progress and they hate any Doctrine outside of Sharia Law.

We need someone who get it in the White House and the Dems are not it.

AF... Bingo! Thompson/Hu

AF...

Bingo!

Thompson/Hunter '08!

BT

Good day,

I am down to 2 people I want to vote for.  Fred is one of them.  Still waiting to make up my mind but I like Fred so I am torn right now who I will vote for.

We will see.

AF... If for some reason

AF...

If for some reason Thompson doesn't make it....Romney is my number two choice so far.

Unfortunately Hunter doesn't have the money and msm attention....and John Bolton isn't running...dang it all anyway...lol.