Educated, but not smart and ignorant of how America works.

They don't need any proof that he's smart, aside from the fact that he talks like he's smart, and he went to Harvard and Columbia.  And the liberals are smart just because they voted for him.

That's liberals in a nutshell.  They want to be governed by the "smart" and that makes them smart.

"Cerebral" is one of those adjectives people use when they don't want to offend, but they just don't know what to say.

"How do you like my drawing, dear?"

"Wow.  It's...well...very INTERESTING."

I also like the definition from Random House: "betraying or characterized by the use of the intellect rather than intuition or instinct: His is a cerebral music that leaves many people cold."

Definitely leaves me cold. 

"Beauty is only skin deep, but liberal's to the bone." - me

if Walsh has ever heard Obama answer a tough question, without having a teleprompter or script in front of him?  Anyone that has would probably place the O somewhere between "mouth-breathing simpleton" and "booger-eating moron."

Gun Control - The theory that a woman found dead in an alley, raped and strangled with her own pantyhose, is somehow morally superior to a woman explaining to police how her attacker got that fatal bullet wound.

There's a pile of information on the Bamster that remains very well hidden, and when a politician goes to great lengths to hide something, it must be bad news. The Bamster's bad news are his SAT and LSAT scores, IQ test results, actual transcripts, bar exam results. That data was available for President George W. Bush, and Al Gore for comparison, but not for the Bamster. Something is being hidden.

I see him as above-average intelligence, but only barely. Until winning the Presidency, he had never been tested in the real world. He hadn't run anything, even a lemonade stand as a child or a newspaper route.

Prove it.

Err, given what happened last November...lol-loaded question, that is.

-Dave

Our elected representatives have failed us.  

Perhaps the correct term is "indoctrinated."

-Dave

Our elected representatives have failed us.  

When journalists (i.e., liberals) get all aroused about how "cerebral" one is, what they are actually all excited about is how that person seems able to express themselves in intellectual sounding babble (goodness they love reading Frank Rich and Paul Krugman). Obama can look at a grey slate and see colors.. then he contemplates how it applies to the world.. perhaps a thesis will be in order on the subject. Ah.. Obama is a thinker. He does not see in black and white (he sees shades of grey). What was before is no more. What was right and/or necessary before, should be different now.   Can he see clearly enough to actually lead? Can he decide? Is he a decider?

My guess. Obama indeed has an excess of white brain matter in his cerebral cortex.

Allow me to quote:

A USC study has found the first proof of structural brain abnormalities in people who habitually lie, cheat and manipulate others.
 
While previous research has shown that there is heightened activity in the prefrontal cortex – the area of the brain that enables most people to feel remorse or learn moral behavior – when normal people lie, this is the first study to provide evidence of structural differences in that area among pathological liars...

...The liars had significantly more “white matter” and slightly less “gray matter” than those they were measured against, Raine said.

Specifically, liars had a 25.7 percent increase in prefrontal white matter compared to the antisocial controls and a 22 percent increase compared to the normal controls. Liars had a 14.2 percent decrease in prefrontal gray matter compared to normal controls.

More white matter – the wiring in the brain – may provide liars with the tools necessary to master the complex art of deceit, Raine said.

“Lying takes a lot of effort,” he said.

From researchers from the University of California, Irvine and the University of New Mexico:

Gray [matter] is central to processing information and plays a vital role in aiding skills such as mathematics, map-reading, and intellectual thought. White matter connects the brain's processing centers and is central to emotional thinking, use of language, and the ability to do more than one thing at once.

White matter has to do more with the wiring in the brain (how it communicates and at what speed), while gray matter [brain cells] has more to do with actual IQ.
 
Interestingly, studies indicate that those with more white matter tend to be more liberal (teachers, writers, journalists etc.). The study suggested that women have more white matter than men.

Bottom line: Liberals lie more than conservatives - because they simply have a more difficult time making a decision. I expect the examples should not be too difficult to locate.

Speaking of decisions - just how is Afghanistan coming along?

(;~/ gary

It seems "cerebral" is the new "gravitas."

I do tire so of the State-Run Media...

_________________________________________

"An armed society is a polite society" -- Robert A. Heinlein

Wow, that is like freaky...I was just reading an article that said out of the last 20 White House Chief Correspondents Kenneth Walsh was the least cerebral.   

Stay Free!!!

It was Jimmah. Why do you suppose they didn't compare O'Bama to Jimmah, a nuclear scientist, naval submarine officer, peanut farmer, and race monitor emeritus? And don't forget, Bill was a Rhodes Scholar and holder of the Priapean Chair at Oxford.

As his failures become more apparent and he sinks in the polls, they
now hope to persuade us that electing this "cerebral" man was the smart
thing to do.

They're trying to persuade themselves if ya ask me.

They're the used dumb-arses.

'Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea'~Breitbart

Rather than being "cerebral" this man is clueless. In fact he outshines all the blondes in the world as far as having not a clue is concerned.

The fact that he is not moving on Afghanistan is very telling. It is the exact opposite of the Bush reactions.Put it this way, I did not agree with GWB about going into Iraq, but I did change my mind when I saw the reaction of the common folk in Iraq who had put up years and years of Saddam Hussein's reign of terror. I thought that GWB was being "gung ho" and was impatient about the situation as it existed. Of course what I was ignoring was the fact that Jacques Chirac the French traitor was prevaricating over the invasion that more or less had to take place in order to rid Iraq of a dictatorship. The Iraqi people did not vote Saddam Hussein into power. He took power with the barrel of a gun....... he deserved to lose power through violence.

Now what we have is a person in power who does not understand the ordinary Afghani people. Members of code pink went to Afghanistan and the women told them that they did not want the Taliban to be put back in power. Instead of carrying the real message of the Afghani women, Code Pink has instead betrayed them with a list of demands about the region. The Afghani women suffered at the hands of the Taliban when they were in power. The Taliban protected Osama Bin Laden, and Bin Laden was in Afghanistan under the protection of the Taliban when September 11 took place. Nothing has changed in that scenario, yet now we have a bunch of goofballs talking about "moderate" Taliban.... they are all so clueless. They are not smart despite their claims to having a degree... well I have one of those from Melbourne University... so what..... 

Why stop at five? Why not six? Are we to believe that Obama's cerebral personality can't match the foreign and domestic policy genius of Jimmy Carter? Yikes!