Goal of Planned Parenthood Founder: 'To Stop the Multiplication of the Unfit'
If you aren't creeped out by the No Birth Control Left Behind rhetoric of the White House and Planned Parenthood, you aren't listening closely enough. The anesthetic of progressive benevolence always dulls the senses. Wake up.
When a bunch of wealthy white women and elite Washington bureaucrats defend the trampling of religious liberties in the name of "increased access" to "reproductive services" for "poor" women, the ghost of Margaret Sanger is cackling.
As she wrote in her autobiography, Sanger founded Planned Parenthood in 1916 "to stop the multiplication of the unfit." This, she boasted, would be "the most important and greatest step towards race betterment." While she oversaw the mass murder of black babies, Sanger cynically recruited minority activists to front her death racket. She conspired with eugenics financier and businessman Clarence Gamble to "hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities" to sell their genocidal policies as community health and welfare services.
Outright murder wouldn't sell. But wrapping it under the egalitarian cloak of "women's health" — and adorning it with the moral authority of black churches — would. Sanger and Gamble called their deadly campaign "The Negro Project."
In other writings, historian Mike Perry found, Sanger attacked programs that provided "medical and nursing facilities to slum mothers" because they "facilitate the function of maternity" when "the absolute necessity is to discourage it." In an essay included in her writing collection held by the Library of Congress, Sanger urged her abortion clinic colleagues to "breed a race of thoroughbreds." Nationwide "birth control bureaus" would propagate the proper "science of breeding" to stop impoverished, non-white women from "breeding like weeds."
Speaking with CBS veteran journalist Mike Wallace in 1957, long after her racist views had supposedly mellowed, Sanger again revealed her true colors: "I think the greatest sin in the world is bringing children into the world — that have disease from their parents, that have no chance in the world to be a human being practically. Delinquents, prisoners, all sorts of things just marked when they're born. That to me is the greatest sin — that people can — can commit."
Sanger also elaborated on her anti-Catholic animus, telling one of Wallace's reporters that New York Catholics had no right to protest the use of their tax dollars for birth city birth-control programs: "(I)t's not only wrong, it should be made illegal for any religious group to prohibit dissemination of birth control — even among its own members." When Wallace pressed her ("In other words, you would like to see the government legislate religious beliefs in a certain sense?"), Sanger laughed nervously and disavowed the remarks.
Fast forward: Five decades and 16 million aborted black babies later, Planned Parenthood's insidious agenda has migrated from inner-city "birth control bureaus" to public school-based health clinics to the White House — forcibly funded with taxpayer dollars just as Sanger championed.
Several undercover stings by Live Action, pro-life documentarians, have exposed Planned Parenthood staff accepting donations over the years from callers posing as eugenics cheerleaders who wanted to earmark their contributions for the cause of aborting minority babies.
"We can definitely designate it for an African-American," a Tulsa, Okla., Planned Parenthood employee eagerly promised.
What has cheap, easy and unmonitored "choice" for poor women in inner cities wrought? Nightmares like the Philadelphia Horror, where serial baby-killer Dr. Kermit Gosnell and his abortion clinic death squad oversaw the systematic execution of hundreds of healthy, living, breathing, squirming, viable black and Hispanic babies over 40 decades — along with several minority mothers who may have lost their lives in his grimy birth control bureau.
City and state authorities looked the other way while jars of baby parts and reports of botched abortions and infanticides piled up. Beltway Democrats who now bray about their concern for "women's health" were silent about the Gosnell massacre and countless others like it in America's ghettos. Why?
The Obama administration is crawling with the modern-day heirs of the eugenics movement, from Planned Parenthood golden girl Kathleen Sebelius at the Department of Health and Human Services to the president's prestigious science czar John Holdren — an outspoken proponent of forced abortions and mass sterilizations and a self-proclaimed protege of eugenics guru Harrison Brown, whom he credits with inspiring him to become a scientist.
Brown envisioned a government regime in which the "number of abortions and artificial inseminations permitted in a given year would be determined completely by the difference between the number of deaths and the number of births in the year previous." He urged readers to "reconcile ourselves to the fact that artificial means must be applied to limit birth rates." He likened the global population to a "pulsating mass of maggots."
Listen carefully as this White House dresses its Obamacare abortion mandate in the white lab coat of "reproductive services" for all. The language of "access to birth control" is the duplicitous code of Sanger's ideological grim reapers.
- Michelle Malkin's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
⇒ Thank you Michelle Malkin
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Tue, 02/14/2012 - 5:02pm.
Except for a few tight-jawed liberals here at NB, you're preaching to the choir.
Even today PP continues to aim its suction hose at the black woman. The appeal is to her freedom but the target is her blackness.
Bader Ginsberg refers to them as "those we didn't want too many of"
I literally cannot identify
Submitted by bkeyser on Tue, 02/14/2012 - 5:09pm.
on any level with ardent abortionists. I can understand why people say abortion should be safe and legal. I can understand why a college co-ed would make the decision to abort rather than carry to term. This is not to say that I agree with it, but I can understand why someone would make that decision. What I can't understand is why people are so off the rails for unfettered abortion. Why they are single-issue voters centering on abortion. I mean, what really is the argument? "You can't tell me what to do with my own body?" Thse same people support the health insurance mandate! They support Bloomberg's 'eat only what I tell you to eat' initiatives. There's just no consistency there. It's completely illogical. It's borderline psychotic, I would think.
Sins of the father but not the mother
Submitted by CO2Maker on Tue, 02/14/2012 - 7:13pm.
I posted this on another blog, but it's appropriate here:
-
How come the sins of the founding fathers, especially racial animus and slavery, are often used to impugn the original documents and the foundation of this country. Thomas Jefferson was great, yeah, but, well, he was a white man with land and slaves, yadda yadda yadda. They wrote a constitution that was okay, I guess, but look, they counted Negroes as 3/5 of whites, so how good could it be?
Etc. The sins of the founding fathers are used to denigrate [can I say that?] the accomplishments of the sons and to cast doubt on the high moral purpose of our modern institutions of government.
But daughters are exempt from the taint of the sins of their mothers.
I am referring specifically to the racist purposes of Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood and advocate of eugenics to control the number of less desirable classes (and you could tell who they were just by looking). Planning parenthood, i.e., birth control, means fewer darkies, imbeciles, and—who else?—gypsies and Irish immigrants? If you bring that up to PP supporters, they dance a jig [can I say that?] and say that she wasn't really espousing that eugenics stuff and besides that was 80, 90 years ago and doesn't have any bearing on today, etc.
Logic for thee but not for me.
Funny how Sanger is hardly ever mentioned by PP proponents
Submitted by Jack Coleman on Thu, 02/16/2012 - 11:27pm.
They have no problem, though, perpetuating her legacy