What a jerk.

I wish I could go through life with all the answer cards in my hand too because then I could look smarter than everyone else.Maybe Alex would like to compare his education to George Bush's?

Hey Janet Napolitano...I'm proud to be a Right-winger.

Please...

...Grow back the mustache.

Your intellect ain't helping you too much.

Ster.

I think it's fairly obvious that Trebek went to the Axelrod School of Joke Crafting.

Enjoy! 

Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart

I subscribed to both the National Geographic and the Smithsonian magazine for several years. Both are excellent and enjoyable. Here's the however: I began to notice articles that really didn't pertain to what I thought they should have. Articles like "
Venezuela According to Chávez
Hugo Chávez won the presidency of Venezuela by a landslide in 1998. Has he also won the hearts of his people?Sorry about the formatting, but this was a typical article I thought might be more appropriate in the NYT. This was in the National Geographic! The Smithsonian has published Darwin vs Lincoln vs Slavery all with my preception of bias, the "history" of Lebanon since 2005 and similar articles over the years concerning the Polar Bears, climate change, etc. I don't know if I became just another right wing nutcase, but I did take offense at some of the positions taken, at the seeming change in the mission of the magazines, and at the idea that my dollar was helping to present some of the drivel. I tend not to be hasty, so about two years after I realized the change had taken place I did not renew. Were I a significant person, I would expect all manner of correction, attack, and a deluge of data, exemplars, and mail concerning my lack of the basic human brain. I am not, so there!

Whether Alex meant Bush or not is neither here nor there.  What ticks me off is this grown man insulting a 13 year old at a national competition and embarassing him.  Does that make Alex a real man to pick on middle-schoolers?  How pathetic!!!

“It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds”

Samuel Adams

They like the idea of BHO and Marxism.

That neither works out is immaterial.

If we lived in a traditionally Leftist country these knuckleheads would be in love with Rush Limbaugh. 

They will be contrary to whatever the status quo is.  What's truly amusing/sickening is that in a Socialist system high-paying jobs like theirs wouldn't even exist.

One of the 34% who thinks George W. Bush was a great President. One of the 61% who wants to bring back the stock and pillory (yep...approval for Congress now at 39%...do you believe that!?).

Everybody be nice to Mr. Treebark.  He's much better than the rest of us, as clearly indicated by his career reading questions and answers--written by others--on TV for a quarter century.

A: This celebrity attended a military academy, but washed out after only 6 days.

Q: Who is...Woody Allen?

Host:  Ohh...  No.  It's me.  "Alex Trebek" is the correct answer.  

"Beauty is only skin deep, but liberal's to the bone." - me

Even if Tribeck didn't mean President Bush, I've had it with all the insults and garbage leveled at this decent American man! What examples the Communist Democrat party puts forth for morality!

Barney Fag, Digger O'Harry, Morticia Pelousy, Chris Dung, Teleprompter Obamessiah, Ted the Swimmer, Michael Moore and Moore and Moore and Moore, Alec Baldbrain, Jane Fondacoms, Al NotSharpButDumb, Jesse Jackass [Sr. and Jr.!], and the list goes on!

Liberal Communist Panzies, put a plastic bag over your head and see if you can get rid of your hiccups! Oops! I mean paper bag!

I have personally met Mr. Trybeck twice.  And I have to say, in person, he is a bigger pompous ass then on tv.  This man if so full of self importance it is comical.  The fact that the kid was from Texas furthur illustrates that Mr. Pompous was refering to Bush.  Pompous-"full of ostentatious dignity and self importance."