Update at end: NBC5's Bob Sirott responds to this post
Persuading Americans that Barack Obama is an effective president won't be easy. So local news outlets are lending a hand when they can. This was obvious last night on Chicago's NBC5 News at 10. Anchor Bob Sirott reported:
And now to a sign the president's economic stimulus is working. Bank of American today announced a $2.8 billion profit for the first quarter. That report was much better than expected and followed positive results from other banks. It also comes after a loss of more than $2 billion for the last three months of 2008. Bank of America received $45 billion as part of the financial rescue package.
Sirott's positive assessment of Obama's plan isn't justified. The big profits he touted are largely illusionary. Andrew Ross Sorkin explained why in "Bank Profits Appear Out of Thin Air," which appeared in yesterday's New York Times:
This is starting to feel like amateur hour for aspiring magicians.
Another day, another attempt by a Wall Street bank to pull a bunny out of the hat, showing off an earnings report that it hopes will elicit oohs and aahs from the market. Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup and, on Monday, Bank of America all tried to wow their audiences with what appeared to be — presto! — better-than-expected numbers.
But in each case, investors spotted the attempts at sleight of hand, and didn’t buy it for a second . . .
Story Continues Below Ad ↓Sydney Finkelstein, the Steven Roth professor of management at the Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth College, also pointed out that Bank of America booked a $2.2 billion gain by increasing the value of Merrill Lynch’s assets it acquired last quarter to prices that were higher than Merrill kept them.
“Although perfectly legal, this move is also perfectly delusional, because some day soon these assets will be written down to their fair value, and it won’t be pretty,” he said.
Investors reacted by throwing tomatoes. Bank of America’s stock plunged 24 percent, as did other bank stocks. They’ve had enough.
The truth is there's scant evidence that Obama's taxpayer-funded efforts are having much of a positive impact. Spending our way out of financial distress isn't really a solution to anything. Still, hesto-presto, even local newscasts are finding slivers of hope. Perhaps it's part of the magic of Obamamania.
****NBC5 anchor Bob Sirott has reacted to this post. His email to me:
just read it. you know what.....i remember reading that story, and rewriting it a bit, but i should have changed the first line, which i did not write, because that was more along the lines of editorializing, and although i do that on the 5pm nbc5 news (one more thing) that particular story was part of the first section of the ten o'clock newscast and should have been reported without comment. it didn't need that first line. some may think it was an example of the stimulus package working, others may not..but that's beside the point. thanks for pointing it out.
It's not often that those in the media respond to criticism. I appreciate Mr. Sirott's thoughtful appraisal.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
small wonder
April 21, 2009 - 11:43 ET by RowaneSmall wonder they can show profits after raising the credit card and other fees on thier customers.
Somehow
April 21, 2009 - 11:45 ET by Mike BatesI can't help but wonder if that infusion of $45 billion from taxpayers didn't help at least an itsy bitsy amount.
BAC
April 21, 2009 - 12:24 ET by JDWTheir stock did not realize the amazing benefit.
JDW
DAILY WAVE
The government works for me, not the other way around
I'll now refer you to Rush's
April 21, 2009 - 11:43 ET by oldArmyI'll now refer you to Rush's "Barack the Magic *#!*@" parody.
Hmmm
April 21, 2009 - 11:45 ET by pwozI wonder how a bank could be making a profit.. I dunno.. maybe it's because most (if not all) of their new customers were VERIFIED to be able to pay back the loans + interest?!!?!
two months of stim
April 21, 2009 - 11:51 ET by katainkentif I recall correctly the majority of the money isn't even supposed to be disbursed until next year. According to Recovery.gov about $12.8 billion of the "currently available" $64 billion has been disbursed from the $782 billion. So it would be great if the economy was perking up. Then we could just put all that money back. Right?
Putting the money back
April 21, 2009 - 12:24 ET by Mike BatesRight?
Absolutely. That way, The One could deliver even bigger tax cuts.
BofA is into the taxpayers
April 21, 2009 - 12:02 ET by robert108BofA is into the taxpayers of America for $45 billion, and after a $2 billion dollar loss, it finally shows a $2.8 billion dollar "profit"? The reality is, there's no actual profit until the gains exceed the total loss, including the loan(plus interest), and that's just good business. Whether anything Obama "did" is responsible for even this "drop in the bucket" remains to be proven with cause and effect reasoning, and this administration is very deficient in that area.
Inherited
April 21, 2009 - 12:08 ET by cvgbuckeyeWAIT A MINUTE NOW!!! Must not we say that Chairman Obama will blame this economic recovery to "Another thing that he inherited from the Bush Administration"?
Heavens people. Give him a chance. He has only been in office less than 100 days and now you are trying to blame the recovery on him. Will you Right Wing Conservatives never stop?
What recovery?
April 21, 2009 - 12:20 ET by MrSnugglesWhat recovery?
Inherited
April 21, 2009 - 12:28 ET by Mike BatesObammy didn't "inherit" anything. He bought it, and it cost him hundreds of millions of other people's dollars to buy it.
As outstanding a job as he's doing, I may move over to being a left wing conservative.
Cheers!
April 22, 2009 - 04:28 ET by LetFreedomRingCheers!
This is about as accurate
April 21, 2009 - 13:04 ET by Chris NormanThis is about as accurate as me saying, "In a sign that Chris Norman's "Lighting the World" project is working, the sun rose this morning and made the world bright. The economy and it's component parts will always recover on their own, in fits and starts. The fact that Obama has a mad scientist - like scheme to "help it, may bear absolutely no influence on this bit of news and this local guy has no way of knowing it, one way or the other.
The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.
The real reason
April 21, 2009 - 13:30 ET by Kingfish17Bank of America stock was off 24% yesterday, not because of their earnings report. The reason that ALL of the bank stocks got clobbered yesterday was because the Obama Administration started talking up bank nationalization again over the weekend. Here is a link to an article about "Backdoor Bank Nationalization" in the Wall Street Journal:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124027165661037073.html
The nationalization of the banking industry would be the final nail in the coffin on the move away from capitalism toward European socialism with regards to our financial system.
Some of you people, even though you are conservative, need to stop being ignorant about "the evil bankers". It's time to wake up and see what the Obama administration is trying to pull off.
Kingfish17, you are
April 21, 2009 - 16:00 ET by jdhawkKingfish17, you are right. The market and in particular the bank stocks were reacting to the rumor that the Obama administration was going to convert preferred non voting shares to voting common stock shares for the 19 largest financial institutions in the country that accepted TARP money. This would have, in most cases, severely diluted the market share of the common stockholders. Moreover, the common shares that the government would then own would give them largest shareholder status and enable them to control the board of directors of these banks.
That rumor seems to have ben quelled as today the market rebounded as did the bank stocks.
As the article points out, there are still several stupid measures that Congress is itching to put into law. For that reason, while I have been making money day trading the financial stocks, I do not hold them over night. They are great trading vehicles, but it may be a long time before they become suitable for the average investor to own. Bank of America (BAC) was up 8.5% today.
Wouldn't surprise me......
April 21, 2009 - 16:21 ET by Kingfish17I wouldn't be surprised if people in the Obama administration are day trading financial stocks as well. Or maybe it's just George Soros. Maybe that's part of the pay-off.
HMMMMMMMMMMm
April 21, 2009 - 13:49 ET by rick007Let me see now. They show a profit of 2 billion after borrowing 45 billion.
To show a profit they should have made 47 billion if my math is correct?
The way I see it they just lost 43 billion of what they got from TARP so far.
It's all how you word it. Remember it's all acording to what you mean by is,is from the Perv?????
Cooking the books
April 21, 2009 - 14:02 ET by Mike BatesI don't pretend to understand complicated, contradictory accounting practices that come up with whatever numbers are desired.
What I do know is Obamanomics hasn't worked, won't work and can't work.
And that the MSM are, even at the local level, in the tank for His Messiaship.
Let me guess, rick007.....
April 21, 2009 - 16:14 ET by Kingfish17Are you a math teacher in a public school system?
I guess all those illegals Bank of Amigo gave credit cards to...
April 21, 2009 - 16:48 ET by R D Helm...haven't started defaulting on their payments yet.
Or have they, and the $45 billion the government raped the treasury to give them covered it?
Hmm.
-Dave
This coup has gone on long enough. The time to put it down is NOW.
Credit Card Assets
April 21, 2009 - 17:14 ET by Kingfish17Credit card assets get bundled into securities and sold to investors, just like mortgages.
And if you didn't like the way BofA gave credit cards to illegals, wait until you see their lending practices if they are ever taken over by the Obama administration.
Kf17
April 21, 2009 - 17:38 ET by R D HelmI have been posting around the threads of this site since, oh, around Jan. 21, that the Obamanistas were going to nationalize the banks long before the next mid-term election.
In fact, I have pretty much been saying that the bulk of his handler's socialist agenda will essentially be in place by that time, which will pretty much render whatever happens at the ballot box in 2010 irrelevant.
As for their lending practices once they have taken control of the banks, political correctness will be the order of the day. They will be using their control of lending standards for social engineering schemes that most people aren't going to believe.
-Dave
This coup has gone on long enough. The time to put it down is NOW.
Deep Recessions and Banks
April 21, 2009 - 19:22 ET by Kingfish17I concur. My biggest concern is bank nationalization. I think the Democrats in control of our government are being successful in whipping up enough anger against our financial system where it is making bank nationalization a very good possibility. We aren't there yet, but we are closer then I ever thought possible.
I hope that conservatives understand that even if they hate the banking system, it's a whole lot better off then having the banks nationalized. If the government couldn't run FHLMC and FNMA, which ARE bankrupt, then it scares the crap out of me when it comes to the rest of our financial system.
Re banks
April 21, 2009 - 21:56 ET by slickwillie2001Yep. The pols whip up populist anger over 'greedy Wall Street', but greedy politicians are far more dangerous to our liberty than Wall Street. Politicians from both parties are greedy for power and money, and once they take power they rarely surrender it.
Hear! Hear! to all of you
April 21, 2009 - 22:09 ET by bigtimerHear! Hear! to all of you above...my sentiments are the same.
I wished to heck this country would wake up about this.
Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart
BT-- Ammendment X
April 21, 2009 - 22:17 ET by botgThe powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
well, the states have abdicated their power, so it is our power that is being grabbed. (We are the people, right?)
"Outside of a dog a book is man's best friend,------------inside a dog it's too dark to read" ---Groucho
botg... That we are my
April 21, 2009 - 22:44 ET by bigtimerbotg...
That we are my friend...that we are!
Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart
All GREEN Peacock
April 21, 2009 - 20:39 ET by DoktorFrankenLeave it to the Chicago media to be one of the first in the world to turn the multicolored (Diversity?) peacock into all Green (Environmental?).
How the station can be "Green" is beyond me. Unless, of course, they recycle the same old Leftist canards.
The Chicago Spin
April 22, 2009 - 08:39 ET by QueenMumHere's another example of the Chicago spin machine:
Solar power plant on South Side.
Call me a skeptic, but does one think of Chicago when one thinks about sunshine?
Civilization is the progress toward a society of privacy. The savage's whole existence is public, ruled by the laws of the tribe. Civilization is the process of setting man free from men. - Ayn Rand
Good Day Sunshine
April 22, 2009 - 09:08 ET by Mike BatesCall me a skeptic, but does one think of Chicago when one thinks about sunshine?
I usually think of Little Mister Sunshine, Richie Daley.
A Little Off-Topic, But...
April 22, 2009 - 08:56 ET by EdCoyneMaybe not so off-topic.
In light of the new administration's position on prosecuting prior administration officials for "war crimes", what's to say that the next administration, hopefully conservative, will not want to prosecute this administration (and members of the Democratically-controlled Congress) for it's many constitutional violations?
NBC5 anchor responds to NewsBusters item
April 22, 2009 - 21:30 ET by Mike BatesPlease see update at end of post.