Today's Chicago Sun-Times treats us to Andrew Greeley's thoughtful analysis, "Palin, McCain stir up storm of ugly racism." Greeley begins:
"South Pacific" is a morality play for our time. Sarah Palin is the Ensign Nellie Forbush -- an All-American girl as racist, this time a racist with her eye on the White House. She can stir up crowds to shout "Kill him!" at the mention of the presidential candidate of the other party a couple of weeks before the national election.
And later:
Playing the race card explicitly merely guarantees what I have thought from the beginning -- racism in this country precludes the possibility of a sepia-colored man becoming president. However, the last-ditch attack on him guarantees that McCain and Palin will be blamed as the candidates who were content to hear crowds calling for the death of Obama.
Then Greeley completes his trip around the bend:
McCain increasingly acts like an angry, befuddled cancer survivor and treats his rival like a field n----- who is just barely human. He does not talk to him, will not shake hands with him, will not even look at him, walks behind him when he is speaking to distract the audience. Obama's languid, legs-crossed security on the bar stool must infuriate McCain all the more. Who does he think he is? He has no right to run for president and McCain does. Has not he served his country all his life? Has not he traveled the whole world? Has not he been involved in every major event of the last four decades? Does he not know everyone who is worth knowing? And what does his rival have to offer besides intolerable arrogance? Black skin and glib language? Is not Obama the one who is playing the race card? Therefore he must be exposed as what he is -- a pushy fellow with a glib tongue who has no right to challenge a great American like John McCain.
Greeley writes a column of commentary. He's entitled to his own opinion - as twisted as it may be - but he's not entitled to his own facts.
There's absolutely no evidence that John McCain and Sarah Palin are "content to hear crowds calling for the death of Obama." Taking a handful of instances and claiming they're frequent occurrences, Greeley contends the GOP is "playing the race card explicitly." But when did either McCain or Palin introduce race into the campaign? Liberals hate to acknowledge it, but Obama brought the subject up.
It was Obama who said: “We know what kind of campaign they’re going to run. They’re going to try to make you afraid of me. ‘He’s young and inexperienced and he’s got a funny name. And did I mention he’s black?'"
It was Obama who said: "So nobody really thinks that Bush or McCain have a real answer for the challenges we face, so what they’re going to try to do is make you scared of me. You know, he’s not patriotic enough. He’s got a funny name. You know, he doesn’t look like all those other presidents on those dollar bills, you know."
In attacking McCain and Palin for alleged racism, Greeley himself employs the most hurtful term in the racist lexicon, the n-word.
It's becoming more apparent as Election Day draws closer, that for Obamatons any iota of opposition to The One can only be explained by virulent racism. The derangement syndrome rages on.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Dear potential Obama-voters
October 15, 2008 - 11:54 ET by Paul AtreidesI hope that you like what you are reading from Greeley, because you are going to be seeing a lot more of it with an Obama presidency. Any criticism, bad poll number, tough question, etc. will be greeted with a charge of racism. Once any heresy of the official dogma is uttered you will have a white hood placed over your head.
Obama criticism
October 15, 2008 - 11:57 ET by Mike BatesAny criticism, bad poll number, tough question, etc. will be greeted with a charge of racism.
Presuming any criticism, bad poll number, tough question, etc. is permitted during The One's reign.
True, we may be suffering England's fate:
October 15, 2008 - 12:10 ET by Paul AtreidesThe BBC will tackle Islam differently to Christianity... and we won't make jokes about it, admits its Director General
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1077816/The-BBC-tackle-Islam-differently-Christianity--wont-make-jokes-admits-Director-General.html
Exactly
October 15, 2008 - 12:21 ET by KC MulvilleLove the name, by the way - Muad Dib
Greeley's gone past the deep end. The Catholic church wants to align itself with the poor, and properly so, but too many within the clergy interpret that to mean adopting the secular political attitudes of inner-city minorities. It's the cheapest and quickest way to get approval from the poor. You become especially popular if you rant against the rich and powerful, subtly implying that the reason your parishioners are poor is because someone is keeping them down.
Religious leaders should be able to do both. They should be able to confront sinfulness and preach forgiveness for both individuals and society as a whole. And that's the sign of credibility: can you confront sin and promote forgiveness wherever you find it, or only when it makes you popular? You know it's cheap when the priest is a pushover with individuals, but he rushes to the pulpit to shriek rage against society.
I don't agree with the
October 15, 2008 - 11:58 ET by balboaI don't agree with the racism charges, but I do think it's disturbing the crowd reactions to Obama's name.
From what I've read
October 15, 2008 - 12:08 ET by Paul AtreidesThe "kill him" was directed at the mention of Ayers.
I think you're right about
October 15, 2008 - 12:13 ET by balboaI think you're right about that one. But there are still disturbing comments.
Hey Bal....
October 15, 2008 - 13:24 ET by connmanis there any chance that the loud raucus "kill him" comments over the past three weeks are coming from or initiated from ACORN plants at the rallies? Just wondering.
No way! No how! Nobama! Keep the change! ...Sen. Clinton
it wouldn't take plants
October 17, 2008 - 12:07 ET by TruthMongerit wouldn't take plants really
the MSM can just make stuff up - enough swing lemmings out there will just accept whatever is said - reference the Stern street interview
Journalism is the opium of the liberals
With all the reporters out there. . .
October 15, 2008 - 15:46 ET by WingletDriverI find it very strange indeed that all of these "disturbing comments" are somehow unrecorded on digital or magnetic media. Are these reporters aware of the advances in audio and video recording equipment?
I've seen crowds chanting "NObama" and saw the one person yell "Kill him" (obviously at Ayers' mention). But I haven't seen anything as depraved as the "Bros before Hos" or "Palin is a . . ." t-shirts at Obama rallies. Of course, the media have the proof on the ugliness of Obama/Biden supporters and choose not to show it. But they'll report all day at how ugly the mood is at McCain/Palin rallies yet somehow forget to turn their cameras on.
"Bros before Hos"
October 15, 2008 - 18:32 ET by Mike BatesMaybe Hillary will sport one of those shirts to show solidarity with her party's candidate.
The "kill him"
October 15, 2008 - 12:13 ET by Mike BatesThe "kill him" was directed at the mention of Ayers.
But why mess up a perfectly good story line with something as bor-ing as a fact?
rasicm
October 15, 2008 - 13:00 ET by Mr XSuffice it to say, there are PROBABLY places where O'Bama is holding rallys were it COULD be dangerous for a white person to even show up.
But we all know, rasicm is only capable of being perpetrated by whites.
O'Bama
October 15, 2008 - 18:28 ET by Mike BatesSuffice it to say, there are PROBABLY places where O'Bama is holding rallys were it COULD be dangerous for a white person to even show up.
O'Bama? Faith and begorrah! No wonder he's winning in the polls.
Bal,
October 15, 2008 - 12:12 ET by R D Helm...but I do think it's disturbing the crowd reactions to Obama's name.
Perhaps if the people in the crowds in late 1920's Germany had reacted with similar derision to Adolf Hitler, imagine the hell that could have later been avoided.
And don't bother telling me that the rabid support for Obama isn't reaching Hitlerian proportions in many areas of this country.
Besides, I have yet to see ANY reaction to Obama that even approaches the vile hatred and ill wishes that many, many libs have shown towards McCain, not to mention GWB and Cheney.
Funny, I have lever heard a lib complain about that.
-Dave
>>> Dee saves Dave from approaching insanity! <<<
Support for Obama is
October 15, 2008 - 12:15 ET by balboaSupport for Obama is ridiculous in many corners, goofy Hitler reference not withstanding.
The yelling of "traitor," "terrorist," etc., is very angry.
I've always been against people going to those same lengths when talking about Bush and company.
When we see you make a
October 15, 2008 - 12:33 ET by Indiana JoeWhen we see you make a post that is only critical of the hatred coming from the Obama side, maybe we'll buy your logic.
But as long as Obama's folks are "ridiculous" and "goofy," while McCain's are "disturbing" and "very angry," your credibility on this is marginal.
Jesus Christ was crucified by "community organizers."
»→ That's true IndyJoe
October 15, 2008 - 13:04 ET by Cool ArrowSeems like the liberals prefer to slink when a member of their side comes to an Obama rally wearing "Palin is a 'c' " emblazoned on their shirt.
That's not just one shouted epithet, it's a continuous shout that the campaign workers allowed for the whole rally.
Obama Campaign is therefore, a Misogynist Convention.
Say and display anything as long as it glorifies the master.
Underdog & Pitbull 08
Where am I slinking too?
October 15, 2008 - 17:58 ET by balboaWhere am I slinking too?
»→ Slinking too?
October 15, 2008 - 18:17 ET by Cool ArrowI don't know where you're slinking "too"
I must have missed where you condemned the T-shirt people.
It's possible.
Underdog & Pitbull 08
»→ Funny
October 15, 2008 - 18:23 ET by Cool ArrowFunny, I see no posts by you anywhere in this thread.
Not that you slinked, or anything like that.
Underdog & Pitbull 08
True, I didn't join in that
October 15, 2008 - 18:31 ET by balboaTrue, I didn't join in that thread. I guess I didn't see anything to add that wasn't already being voiced.
Thankfully you're not
October 15, 2008 - 17:57 ET by balboaThankfully you're not getting caught up in semantics or "nuances."
...goofy Hitler reference
October 15, 2008 - 20:03 ET by R D Helm...goofy Hitler reference not withstanding.
Yeah, I'm quite sure that the people who survived WW II (which includes a few members of my family who are still living) would refer to that as a "goofy Hitler reference," too.
Go back and read your history, bal. Pay particular attention to Germany in the mid 1920's.
-Dave
>>> Dee saves Dave from approaching insanity <<<
Sorry, R D, but your
October 16, 2008 - 09:43 ET by balboaSorry, R D, but your attempt to portray Obama's following as an omen of Hitler-esque times to come is laughable.
»→ I agree bal
October 16, 2008 - 09:55 ET by Cool ArrowThe use of Hitler is out of place with Obama.
I do believe "socialist" is an appropriate descriptor, in a Western European sense. But throwing in the Hitler thing doesn't fit.
Underdog & Pitbull 08
Bal, I was illustrating a point.
October 17, 2008 - 11:56 ET by R D HelmOne that seems lost on you.
It may not be quite as laughable as you might want to believe.
-Dave
>>> Dee saves Dave from approaching insanity <<<
Joe the Plumber for President!
Dave, It's that soft
October 15, 2008 - 12:19 ET by Chris NormanDave,
It's that soft racism of caring more about the feelings of an African American than of some old white guy's.
McNotObama '08
Chris,
October 15, 2008 - 19:57 ET by R D HelmLOL-Sounds a lot like "white guilt" to me.
But hey, bal is bal. :-)
-Dave
>>> Dee saves Dave from approaching insanity <<<
I knew you'd reply sooner
October 15, 2008 - 19:59 ET by Chris NormanI knew you'd reply sooner or later, I just knew it! :)
McNotObama '08
Chris,
October 17, 2008 - 11:57 ET by R D HelmLOL-Been a little busy. My mid-life career switch didn't go very well.
-Dave
>>> Dee saves Dave from approaching insanity <<<
Joe the Plumber for President!
»→ Crowd Reactions
October 15, 2008 - 12:16 ET by Cool ArrowYou don't think there is any booing at Obama rallies when John McCain is mentioned?
I think I'd boo when Obama is mentioned if I were at a McCain rally.
I can understand how Obama is so sidled up to a domestic terrorist whose ticket to unrepentent redemption is that he was less successful than Timothy McVeigh. Political expedience.
Obama has chosen his friends wisely, I'll give him that. And those friends have an understanding with him that he must publicly distance himself from them to advance the cause.
Undeniably Brilliant.
Underdog & Pitbull 08
Do you find anything the
October 15, 2008 - 12:17 ET by mattmDo you find anything the Left does disturbing, like calling Palin a c**t, or mocking McCain's age, or throwing piss-bombs at GOP delgates, breaking windows and throwing bricks etc., or engaging in vote fraud, or otherwise insulting and vilifying anyone who doesn't fall in line with their leftist ideology?
Or do you merely "disagree" with that kind of disgusting crap?
So they boo Obama's name.
October 15, 2008 - 12:24 ET by Indiana JoeSo they boo Obama's name. Some nut shouted "kill him," or maybe it was "kill 'em," you think? Nah, you don't, because that's shouted at high-school football games, and can't be spun to show "hatred" and "racism."
Obama's folks boo McCain's name at rallies. Is that "disturbing?" Sure, Obama made a token "don't do that" recently. Once, that is, he realized that the accusations against McCain backers applied more to his backers by a factor of about 10.
There's no racism or hatred at the Republican rallies. Anyone who buys that is just parrotting talking points. The hateful generalizations are all coming from the left, directed at McCain and even more so at Palin.
Truth. Not "my" truth. Not "our" truth. Just truth.
Jesus Christ was crucified by "community organizers."
Not booing. Who cares about
October 15, 2008 - 12:26 ET by balboaNot booing. Who cares about booing.
"Terrorist," "Muslim terrorist," etc.
»→ That's wrong
October 15, 2008 - 12:35 ET by Cool ArrowI don't think Obama's a terrorist or a muslim either.
Of course, Obama does lend legitimacy to at least one terrorist. But I'll overlook a lot for control over $60 million dollars too, wouldn't you?
Underdog & Pitbull 08
Oh, booing is not "very
October 15, 2008 - 12:40 ET by Indiana JoeOh, booing is not "very angry" or "disturbing?"
I guess you should be more specific in your charges, then. When did McCain or Palin accuse Obama of being a "terrorist" or a "Muslim terrorist?"
Don't bother quoting "supporters." I can get as bad or worse about McCain/Palin just by visiting DailyKos. And anyone can go to a McCain rally, or claim to be a McCain supporter.
<edited for clarity>
Jesus Christ was crucified by "community organizers."
IJ, I _never_ said that
October 15, 2008 - 16:37 ET by balboaIJ, I _never_ said that McCain or Palin called Obama a terrorist. What they've done instead is tell their base that Obama can't be trusted, and "How much do we really know about him?" That leaves it open for pundits and right wing bloggers to fill in the blanks, which then gets everyone all worked up to where THE CROWDS start yelling "terrorist!" when Obama's name is mentioned.
Hey bal,
October 15, 2008 - 13:23 ET by Indiana JoeThis guy agrees with you. Maybe it did happen!
"McCain has been rabble-rousing, calling Obama a terrorist and a Muslim."
Now, if someone can find a link to the actual quote, I'll concede your point, and apologize for doubting you.
That's a mighty big "if," though.
Jesus Christ was crucified by "community organizers."
"Terrorist"? No.
October 15, 2008 - 15:52 ET by Mike BrattonBut is Obama a terrorist sympathizer?
Yes--as demonstrated by his associations and statements.
--Mike
www.thebrattonreport...
Suck it up whitey
October 15, 2008 - 12:00 ET by Rackie"Today we are all Black" (if you know what's good for you).
Keep it up, race-mongers.
October 15, 2008 - 12:01 ET by mattmKeep it up, race-mongers. Pretty soon you'll have McGovernites voting for McCain. People only tolerate being accused of racism up to a point.
Good point and one worth
October 15, 2008 - 12:34 ET by dscottGood point and one worth repeating, many Clinton supporters were put off by the race baiting of Obama's supporters. I had one Democrat tell me bitterly that Obama was a racist. She didn't appreciate being called a racist for supporting Hillary.
I strongly suspect that Obama's poll numbers are more of Democrats fearfully talking the party line and come election day, they will vote McCain or not at all. We all saw how wrong the polling data was prior to the 2004 elections. I suspect that when many Democrat rank and file are questioned during a poll they think in the back of their minds they had better say what the pollster wants to hear lest they pay for it somehow later. The idea of one's responses are private and not subject to retribution is under a cloud.
Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, starving the poor one gallon of ethanol at a time. Fill your tank with E85 and cull a village.
This is one of those
October 15, 2008 - 12:12 ET by Chris NormanThis is one of those columns that was written and held just waiting for any excuse to publish it.
McNotObama '08
Hey, Greeley, try
October 15, 2008 - 12:14 ET by SickofLibsHey, Greeley, try worshipping one God at a time. As in the one you signed up with.
Sure, McCain-Palin rallies are only thinly disguised necktie parties. Well, Greeley did nail one thing: Obama really does have nothing to offer other than intolerable arrogance. If you like that type of thing.
And his use of the adjective 'languid' in describing Obama, I believe, has a a hidden sexual connotation. Women are languid; men, it's kinda weird.
Greeley is an unbandaged, festering sore on Catholicism. I'm Catholic, so I get to say it.
Greely is an embarassment
October 15, 2008 - 12:17 ET by ncstevemGreely is an embarassment to the Catholic Faith. His bishop (Cardinal George) should have silenced him long ago. Fortunately the Vatican II 60's retreads are retiring/dying off and the younger priests are much more orthodox to the Faith.
Plan on seeing many more bishops holding 'Catholic' politicians feet to the fire over abortion and other cultural issues in the future.
Cleaning house with Cardinal George
October 15, 2008 - 12:20 ET by Mike BatesHis bishop (Cardinal George) should have silenced him long ago.
And taken care of Father Pfleger as well.
Michael, I guess allowing
October 15, 2008 - 13:06 ET by Chris NormanMichael,
I guess allowing radical left priests to vent their political bile is "the Chicago way".
McNotObama '08
The Chicago way, Chris
October 15, 2008 - 18:40 ET by Mike BatesUnfortunately, Chris, unless McCain can kick it into high gear, in a few months all of America will be subjected to the "Chicago way."
"...the younger priests are
October 15, 2008 - 19:12 ET by celator"...the younger priests are much more orthodox to the Faith."
I have noticed that also. We are also getting far more ordinations per year than, say, ten years ago, in our diocese. Many, most probably, have had far more real life experience in the work place than the previous generation.
In the last five years of ordinations in the diocese, I can think of one engineer, two accountants, several served in the military (one was a Navy SEAL), a couple of former high school teachers, one physician. And others. They are all very high quality people, centered, very smart, well grounded in Scripture and theology, etc. All absolutely loyal to the Magisterium.
I like this trend.
Priests
October 15, 2008 - 19:20 ET by Mike BatesIn the Archdiocese of Chicago this year, 11 men were ordained. None was born in the U.S. Five are from Poland.
This will make you sick...
October 15, 2008 - 12:36 ET by mizflame98Check out this Halloween display on Democratic backer's lawn.
http://www.stargazette.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20081014/NEWS01/810140328&referrer=FRONTPAGECAROUSEL
After the head of thelocal chapter of the NAACP was shown a picture of this disgusting display, this was her response:
"It looks friendly but I am concerned not so much about this display, but in general about the fear and hate that have entered the campaign," Verdier said. "This display appears friendly to me. But that's my take. A young lady passed by and had other feelings. We need to be concerned about that. I think we all need to be careful about what messages we send. The message we send is not always the message received."
Having a McCain dummy dressed as a KKK member holding a bat while chasing an Obama dummy looks friendly?! Are these liberals for real?!
“Anybody gone into Whole Foods lately and see what they charge for arugula? I mean, they’re charging a lot of money for this stuff.”
B.H. Obama
You're right, miz,
October 15, 2008 - 13:18 ET by Indiana JoeIt did make me sick! Especially this line:
"McCain has been rabble-rousing, calling Obama a terrorist and a Muslim."
Another one! Please, could someone provide a link, or at least a quote, as to when and where McCain called Obama a terrorist or a Muslim? If this is true, I'd like to know it.
Because if it's true, I owe balboa an apology, I just asked him to prove the very same charge.
And what kind of person would describe this as "friendly?"
Jesus Christ was crucified by "community organizers."
»→ Rest easy Indy
October 15, 2008 - 13:21 ET by Cool ArrowMcCain hasn't done anything of the sort. Even balboa knows that.
Underdog & Pitbull 08
No problem, CA,
October 15, 2008 - 13:25 ET by Indiana JoeI was pretty positive of that.
Just having some fun. What's the point of being right if you can't rub it in? ;^)
Jesus Christ was crucified by "community organizers."
Greeley is even further
October 15, 2008 - 12:42 ET by Indiana JoeGreeley is even further around the bend than your average leftist Obama media member.
But in all fairness to the others, he had a big head start.
Jesus Christ was crucified by "community organizers."
If They Want Racism...
October 15, 2008 - 12:49 ET by ChasvsI cease to be surprized...
The Left has shown just how ugly and vile they can be to those who don't toe the line. If they think for one minute I'll submit to their rule they have another thing coming!
STOP OBAMA and his RACIST Pals NOW!
If anyone is treating blacks like "Field N*****s"...
October 15, 2008 - 12:53 ET by Prester John...it's the Democratic party, the Congressional Black Caucus, and the local Democratic "leaders" in our nation's largest cities, who after 44 years of the Great Society and the outlay of trillions and trillions of dollars, continue to condemn millions of black Americans to fatherless families, a disproportionately high percentage of abortions, lousy schools, crime ridden neighborhoods, miserable housing, an entire generation of young people who consider themselves lucky to reach age 20, and little more than a subsistence (on the taxpayer teat) living.
The loyalty of Black America to the Democratic Party is no different, and perhaps even worse and less understandable, than the loyalty that black slaves had to the plantation owners in the South.
How would Andrew Greeley know
October 15, 2008 - 18:34 ET by panzerakchow "Field N******" were treated?
How Greeley knows
October 15, 2008 - 18:43 ET by Mike BatesMike Pfleger filled him in.
Amazing
October 15, 2008 - 13:16 ET by ArtisteBut hey, Greeley, it's quite alright for your side to routinely shout out death to President Bush or hang him in effegy.....Puh-leeze. Quit whining and recognize that most really don't give a squat that Obama is black. What most DO care about is that he is an anti-American marxist with communism on his mind and the ultimate destruction of a country we love. Period!!
These liberals just disgust me
October 15, 2008 - 13:48 ET by c5thenThey are so far down the "end justifies the means" road that they have no idea where they are even going.
The only thing about this campaign that is racist is that the liberals keep trying to insinuate that unless you are planning to vote for their candidate, you are racist. And it's almost always a white guy saying this.
Mr. Bates, let me correct one thing.
October 15, 2008 - 15:30 ET by Mike BrattonWhen someone bases an opinion on specious information, on "facts" that are too easily disproven, that individual is not entitled to his (or her) opinion. Particularly when he (or she) foists it upon others as viable.
Greeley is nothing but a fraud, someone who pretends to be a clergyman while pumping out sexually-explicit pulp fiction and hate-laden newspaper diatribes. And he is a donor to the Obama campaign.
Just because someone like Greeley holds an irresponsible opinion doesn't mean he's entitled to it.
--Mike
www.thebrattonreport...
Now here's an interesting
October 15, 2008 - 15:58 ET by dscottNow here's an interesting comment that speaks to how the Dem leadership feels about older Democrats:
“There’s no question Western Pennsylvania is a racist area,” said Mr. Murtha, whose district stretches from Johnstown to Washington County. “The older population is more hesitant.”
http://michellemalkin.com/2008/10/15/john-murtha-my-constituents-are-raaaacist/
Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, starving the poor one gallon of ethanol at a time. Fill your tank with E85 and cull a village.
What the heck is he doing?
October 15, 2008 - 17:32 ET by mizflame98Is he trying to give away PA to McCain? It probably wouldn't matter either way. Obama will carry Phila. and without that city, McCain won't take PA. Those "racist" voters will just have to deal with the fact that their congressman has just dissed them to the nation and cling even tighter to their guns and religion while that black man wins their state.
“Anybody gone into Whole Foods lately and see what they charge for arugula? I mean, they’re charging a lot of money for this stuff.”
B.H. Obama
Murtha
October 15, 2008 - 18:37 ET by Mike BatesA sad commentary is that Murtha can say stuff like that and still be re-elected for as long as he deigns to "serve" those racists.