On Wednesday's "Countdown with Keith Olbermann" on MSNBC, Chris Wallace of Fox News was designated as one of Olbermann's "Worst Persons."
OLBERMANN: Our runner up tonight, Chris Wallace of Fixed News, explaining to the TV critics of America, who were gathered tonight in solemn assembly in Los Angeles, insisting that during the primaries Fox had the straight news reporters anchoring the election coverage, and not someone like Keith Olbermann, who was delivering ten-minute screeds against President Bush, telling him to shut the hell up, telling Hillary Clinton to get out of the campaign.
Chris, I never told Senator Clinton to get out of the campaign. I never even suggested it.
Really? On his April 23, 2008 program, Olbermann talked with MSNBC political analyst Howard Fineman. He brought up possible retribution against Clinton if she didn't drop out of the campaign:
OLBERMANN: After last night, nobody is going to do anything. We‘re going to see how these next two votes take place. If she doesn‘t deliver in the way that she thinks she can on May 6th, are we now talking about retribution or the threat of retribution to get her out of the race? Are we now—is it as bloody back as it is emanating from her campaign?
FINEMAN: Oh, I think there‘s been talk of retribution. I know there‘s been talk of retribution for weeks. Well, that‘s only beginning behind the scenes and that‘s what Democratic leaders, if that isn‘t a complete oxymoron is all about. That‘s what they‘re worried about.
What this is going to require, at some point, all of Chuck‘s excellent numbers aside, there‘s some adults somewhere in the Democratic Party to step in and stop this thing like a referee in a fight that could go on for 30 rounds. That‘s what‘s going on. Those are the super-super-superdelegates who are going to have to really decide this.
OLBERMANN: Right. The one—somebody who can take her in a room and only he comes out that kind of a question.
Take Clinton in a room and only he comes out? Perhaps Olbermann doesn't view his words as "suggesting" Clinton close down her campaign. Others did. Two days later, Salon's Joan Walsh wrote: "Rachel Sklar is my hero today for this (Huffington Post) blog post calling out Keith Olbermann for his vivid, seemingly violent comment about how to get Hillary Clinton out of the Democratic primary race on Wednesday night."
A month after his take-her-in-a-room suggestion, Olbermann had a "special comment" on Clinton's reference to Bobby Kennedy's assassination. Why Olbermann designates these rants as "special" is unknown to me; the only difference is he occasionally foams at the mouth slightly more than when he's airing his "normal" unspecial comments. From the May 23 transcript:
OLBERMANN: The politics of this nation is steeped enough in blood, Senator Clinton. You cannot and must not invoke that imagery anywhere at any time!
And to not appreciate, immediately—to still not appreciate tonight just what you have done today is to reveal an incomprehension of the America you seek to lead. This, Senator, is too much because a senator, a politician, a person who can let hang in mid-air the prospect that she might just be sticking around, in part, just in case the other guy gets shot has no business being, and no capacity to be, the President of the United States.
No business, no capacity to be president. Apparently, that's not "even" a suggestion she drop out.
Perhaps that's how he actually sees things. Olbermann has long demonstrated a detachment from reality. Little wonder he's a hero of the Left.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Well, to say has no
July 18, 2008 - 11:14 ET by motherbeltWell, to say has no business being, and no capacity to be, the President of the United States.
doesn't mean she should get out...he never said that.
You're just reaching.
<sarc>
I didn't think it was physically possible, but this both sucks and blows. -Bart Simpson
By Jove
July 18, 2008 - 11:36 ET by Mike BatesI'm busted!
Great catches. Not once but
July 18, 2008 - 11:35 ET by Jack BauerGreat catches. Not once but twice...
Olberman is hoist by his own retard
Coffee-sputtering alert
July 18, 2008 - 11:54 ET by KC MulvilleFrom that same show, Keith addressed an absent Chris Wallace, who surely wasn't watching ...
Between Chris Wallace, Brit Hume, and Keith Olbermann ... Olbermann thinks that the other two are thousands of times more guilty of bias and unprofessionalism? My God, the cost of that many narcotics and hallucinogens must be staggering.
Olbie's sources
July 18, 2008 - 12:15 ET by Eileen RightHis statement is correct, when your sources for complaint data is HuffPo, DailyKos, etc
Not to mention ...
July 18, 2008 - 13:07 ET by KC MulvilleMy mistake. I wondered how much the drugs cost. I completely skipped over the cost of all those interns filing complaints with the FCC or at polls conducted by MSNBC.
Now, now, KC...it doesn't
July 18, 2008 - 14:10 ET by motherbeltNow, now, KC...it doesn't cost anything, because Olbermann has "A Beautiful Mind".....
I didn't think it was physically possible, but this both sucks and blows. -Bart Simpson
True, but
July 18, 2008 - 17:15 ET by KC MulvilleI'm sure they pay him a huge salary. Think, however, how much he could save. For him, a little humility would have serious cash value -- it would save him millions!
BATH-TUB-BOY...
July 18, 2008 - 19:09 ET by danybhoyKC,
The reports I have heard/read say GE/NBC pays Olbermann about $4.5million a year. As well as Mathews, think about that, about $9-10million a year for those 2 ratings turds. This for a network that is losing money left & right. I don't get it, but then again, GE's stock price has fallen over the last 7-8 years, so this acceptable to the shareholders. If it was not, they would have demanded changes be made, thus far, they have not.
I get the feeling that Olbermann really needs to be carefull how he covers the elections this fall, along with the rest of the NBCnews family. I will be curious if there will be any accountablity for bad/misleading/biased reporting, because as bad is they are now, THEY WILL GET WORSE BECAUSE THEY CAN NOT CONTROL THEMSELVES.
"...it's still We The People, Right?" Megadeth
Good point
July 18, 2008 - 21:19 ET by KC MulvilleI've heard people call them ideological loss leaders. They take a bath financially, but it's worth it to GE because they push the liberal agenda. For a while, I've been suggesting that since Olbermann is just a bomb-thrower, sooner or later one is going to explode in his hand. Maybe he realizes it, too. Maybe he'll be extra careful.
Of course, if McCain wins, Keith will become a Looney Tunes character, steam bursting from his ears, screaming at the American public at how stupid he thinks they are. I'm not McCain's biggest fan, but if he wins, I will enjoy every minute of the left wing explosion. Remember when the Death Star exploded in Star Wars, how everyone cheered? It'll be that level for me.
Same here KC... This is
July 18, 2008 - 21:25 ET by bigtimerSame here KC...
This is the only thing I am looking forward too...
Well, if the House and Senate win seats instead of lose would top it off too...(they could if they are smart enough to play their cards right and fight, grow a back-bone)
Now that would put the cherry on top!
As far as I am concerned,
July 18, 2008 - 11:58 ET by mjgAs far as I am concerned, Olberman should designate himself as the worse and most biased person in network news. He can't hold a candle to Wallace.
What a vile little troll
July 18, 2008 - 12:08 ET by BigSpoon65BigSpoon65
Keith Olbermans hate filled vitriolic rants are not news! This guy is a little troll whose purpose in life seems to be as the mouthpiece of the left-wing hate America crowds who frequent sites like the DailyKos, MoveOn.org, and CodePink. I wouldn't even know who this miscreant was if he hadn't come from ESPN. I hate when NBC allows him to speak during their telecasts of the NFL games. Guess they are throwing him a bone since they know that MSNBC's viewing audience is so small. You could call it mercy airtime. CBS does the same thing for Katy Couric. Liberal media fails consistently yet they try to portray their socialist views as mainstream. Maybe they are in Red China or the Soviet Union.
Olbermann is one angry psycho.
July 18, 2008 - 12:13 ET by jazboWhich is why, despite him having the correct leftist credentials, he's never be an anchor. He's too high risk.
Those who believe in nothing will believe anything.
Olbie is delusional... He
July 18, 2008 - 12:20 ET by bigtimerOlbie is delusional...
He repeats his own lies enough and believes them...
Fits right in with the leftists...he just expounds it more on his very on hate-filled show....with his very own agenda.
The word insane was created just for him.
So does lying punk.
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh
Keith Goobermann, honest? Hahahaha...
July 18, 2008 - 12:27 ET by Guy Arthur ThomasKeith Goobermann honest about something he said in the past? Hahahahahaha! That's like Jesse Jackson protesting the use of the word "nigger" and then using it himself. They not only lie to you and me but first and foremost they lie to themselves.
Next Please! If you claim to be a conservative, please don't disgrace yourself and conservatism by thinking and arguing like a liberal.
Energy Sap-ping
July 18, 2008 - 14:21 ET by AmericanEnergistKeith Olbermann is a waste of binary...he is all zeroes.
www.ArmchairEnergist...
Whats next?? Is Krazy
July 18, 2008 - 14:52 ET by nicksmith112Whats next??
Is Krazy Keith going to deny the once schoolboy crush on Bill Clinton and the giant check he presented to Bubba...lol.
He also repeated that both Sean Hannity and Bill O. have anchored the desk on election coverage nights.
He has repeated this several time. Is this true?? I never remember seeing Sean or Bill O. working the election desk like Mathews and Olberloon???
I'm a refugee from the Democratic Party.