Today's Chicago Tribune carries a front page story on the late Jesse Helms, "5-time senator 'great patriot' who held fast to his beliefs."
The piece's author, Los Angeles Times staff writer Johanna Neuman, states:
Often he was the lone voice of dissent in the Senate. He was the only senator to vote against confirming Henry Kissinger as secretary of state during the Nixon administration. And he was the only senator to vote against making Rev. Martin Luther King Jr.'s birthday a holiday.
Both assertions are wrong. MSNBC reported in a 2005 article on secretary of state Condoleezza Rice that Henry Kissinger was approved by the Senate in a 78-7 vote. And the King Center notes on its Web site that the King holiday bill, sponsored by Senator Edward Kennedy, passed in the Senate by a vote of 78-22.
In its eagerness to portray the late Senator as an isolated, extreme extremist, the mainstream media are making up their own "facts."
He may be dead, but Jesse Helms is still driving liberals to distraction. May he rest in peace.















Editor at Large

Comments Policy
the mainstream media are making up their own "facts."
July 5, 2008 - 12:57 ET by wizardjrYou say that like its a surprise. It comes under the heading of business as usual as far as I can see.
Ah, another writer from the
July 5, 2008 - 13:35 ET by Republic1Ah, another writer from the LA Times. That paper can't go out of business fast enough for me.
"Whoever changed his Islamic religion, then kill him." -Muhammad
And when Sen Byrd dies...?
July 5, 2008 - 14:04 ET by Gary HallAnd when Sen Byrd dies...?
Needless to say, we don't expect to see a lot of focus on Byrd's historic fillibuster to stop the passage of the Civil Rights Bill. Nor will we expect to see a lot of attention to his earlier allegiance to the KKK:
Yes, over time once closely held views do change. Neuman also spent a bit of effort taking on Helms on HIV/Aids. Looks like she decided not to mention his historic push later in his Senate career to put up, as he joined with Presiedent Bush. From Citizen-Times.com:
Certainly something that the LA Times will always do it's best to keep out of the heads of it's gulible readers.
Deja vu all over again
July 5, 2008 - 17:53 ET by Michael M. BatesI see a commenter on the Chicago Tribune's Web site notes:
Gee, that sounds familiar. Wonder where I saw it before?
I would have voted against a
July 5, 2008 - 19:38 ET by mostlymoderateI would have voted against a MLK day and I would have voted against Henry Kissinger being secretary of state. So I guess I like Helms more than I thought.
show me in the rules
July 6, 2008 - 07:31 ET by SouthJersey1953Show me in the LA Times rule book where it says they have to use facts in their reporting. I am pretty sure it isn't in there.
LA Times and Helms Voting Record
July 6, 2008 - 11:53 ET by GoodieIt does not surprise that LA Times writer cannot simply go to the Internet and get facts on past votes in the Senate. So, she gets paid for not doing her job? I will take this as her last blast clearly stating her Liberalism in a Paper that will close the doors soon.