McCain Was P.O.W. When Obama Buddy Bombed Pentagon

Photo of Matthew Vadum.
  • Bookmark and Share

John McCain has many, many, many faults -chief among them that he is at best a lukewarm conservative- but whatever his shortcomings the Vietnam veteran and former prisoner of war is not in the habit of clinking champagne glasses over brie with living, breathing, remorseless terrorist traitors who continue to seethe with hatred for the United States.

Barack Obama, on the other hand, doesn't have a problem with such people until he gets nailed on it. In fact, Obama has a close personal relationship with a man who did everything in his power to hurt John McCain and other U.S. personnel serving in Vietnam.

But more on that in a moment.

The most famous example of Obama unloading a troublesome associate is the case of the anti-American firebrand Rev. Jeremiah Wright who preached hatred from the pulpit of Obama's church for decades. The Democratic presidential nominee-in-waiting continues to hang out with people who really don't like America, such as Obama campaign advisor Cornel West, a radical Princeton professor who denounces his native land as racist and patriarchal and who embraces Venezuela's leftist strongman Hugo Chavez. Chavez allows terrorist groups Hezbollah and Hamas to operate in his country and has been backing communist rebels trying to overthrow the democratically elected government of Colombia. Another politically radioactive Obama friend is Rashid Khalidi, a Palestinian-American and former Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) spokesman who is now Edward Said Professor of Arab Studies at Columbia University.

However, among Obama's many unsavory associates, no one stands out quite like the unrepentant Pentagon bomber William Ayers, a self-described revolutionary communist who even today is proud of what he did. Ayers was a leader in the Weathermen, or Weather Underground, a homegrown American terrorist group dedicated to the destruction of capitalism and the violent overthrow of the United States government. Ayers's group planned but failed to succeed in a 1970 plot to detonate a bomb and kill hundreds of U.S. soldiers in Fort Dix, N.J.

And Obama's close personal friend is proud even to this day of waging war against America. Ayers said he had no regrets about bombing New York City police headquarters, the Capitol, and the Pentagon in the 1970s. "I don't regret setting bombs," Ayers said in a New York Times interview that happened to be published September 11, 2001. "I feel we didn't do enough." When asked if he would do it all again, he said, "I don't want to discount the possibility." The home page of Ayers's personal website is, unsurprisingly, graced with a photograph of mass murderer Che Guevara.

On April 16 when Obama was asked about his relationship with Ayers, with whom he had served on the board of the left-wing Woods Fund of Chicago, Obama was indignant as he tried to downplay the relationship.

Throwing out a rhetorical red herring, Obama said he was just a child when Ayers bombed U.S. landmarks. Obama said he had little contact with "a guy that lives in my neighborhood... who I know and who I have not received some official endorsement from. He's not somebody I exchange ideas from [sic] on a regular basis. And the notion that somehow as a consequence of me knowing somebody who engaged in detestable acts 40 years ago when I was eight years old, somehow reflects on me and my values, doesn't make much sense..."

It is true that Obama can't be blamed for terrorist acts committed by another when he was a boy, but the Illinois senator omitted important background information critical to understanding the extent of his relationship with Ayers.

It has been widely reported already that Ayers hosted a fundraiser in his home in 1995 that helped launch Obama's political career, but hardly any media outlets have reported on the Annenberg connection.

In his 49-page curriculum vitae posted online, Ayers describes himself as a co-founder of the 1995-2000 Chicago School Reform Collaborative project, a.k.a. the Annenberg Challenge. Obama was its first chairman of the board. (See "The Chicago Annenberg Challenge: The First Three Years," Consortium on Chicago School Research, 1999. PDF of report available here. Ayers is identified as co-founder at page 11. Obama is identified as chairman in endnote 15, page 54.)

In addition to serving as the Annenberg Challenge's first chairman, Obama served on the "Leadership Council" of the Chicago Public Schools Education Fund, the Challenge's successor organization. Obama served on this council alongside Ayers's father, Thomas, and his brother, John, in 2001 and 2002, according to the Fund's annual reports. Obama and John Ayers also served on the council in 2003 and 2004, according to the Fund's annual reports. (Thomas Ayers, who died in 2007, had been CEO of Commonwealth Edison.)

Obama and Ayers also appeared on academic panels together. One panel dealt with juvenile justice issues, and at that time Obama said Ayers's book on the topic was "a searing and timely account." Both also worked to reform Chicago's education system. (New York Times, May 11, 2008)

It is hard to believe that the two passionate left-wing activists who both live in the ultra-leftist environment of Chicago's Hyde Park neighborhood exchanged no ideas about political goals and tactics in all their interactions together. After all, they have so much in common and so much to discuss. Ayers could easily have served as a Marxist mentor to Obama.

But apart from offering a perfunctory denunciation of Ayers's past actions during the debate and a lame attempt to spin the facts on his website, Obama has failed to denounce the rabidly anti-American radicalism of his friend. Both Ayers and Obama refuse to discuss their relationship. Why?

And after a brief flurry of media coverage following the April debate, the issue has gone dormant.

But it shouldn't. It should be on every TV news and talk show and on the front coverage of every newspaper. Here's why:

Decades after Ayers bombed the Pentagon in May 1972, he giggled about the experience in his memoir. In a 2001 Wall Street Journal column about a book signing event for Ayers's memoir, John Tabin noted: "In his book, he writes: ‘It turns out that we blew up a bathroom and, quite by accident, water plunged below and knocked out their computers for a time, disrupting the air war [in Vietnam] and sending me into deepening shades of delight.'"

Added Tabin: "In those four little words, ‘disrupting the air war,' there is the dark prospect of American soldiers in jeopardy."

And who might one of those soldiers in jeopardy at the time have been? While Ayers interfered with America's war effort and cheered for a North Vietnamese victory over the United States, John McCain, whose A-4 Skyhawk attack aircraft was shot down over Hanoi in October 1967, was held in captivity by the North Vietnamese and tortured regularly. Now the Republican Party's presumptive presidential candidate in 2008, he was released by the Communist Vietnamese government in March 1973.

As McCain languished in the Hanoi Hilton, Obama's friend Ayers spent the 1970s waging war against the United States and fleeing justice. He surrendered in 1980 but a legal technicality led to all charges being dropped. Ayers gloated: "Guilty as sin, free as a bird, America is a great country." And what a forgiving country it is! After he retired from his distinguished career in terrorism, he was welcomed with open arms by the academy. Ayers is now Distinguished Professor of Education at the University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC) and he uses his position to spread his gospel of revolution.

In an age of terrorism when national security issues are of great national importance, why aren't journalists asking more questions about Obama's connections to a known terrorist whose actions might have had an impact on another presidential candidate?

It's way too good a story to ignore.

(Much of the above appears in "Barack Obama: A Radical Leftist's Journey from Community Organizing to Politics," by Elias Crim and Matthew Vadum, published by Capital Research Center in Foundation Watch, June 2008.) (Blog entry cross-posted here)

—Matthew Vadum is Editor of Organization Trends and Foundation Watch at the Capital Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

"He's not somebody I

"He's not somebody I exchange ideas from [sic] on a regular basis. And the notion that somehow as a consequence of me knowing somebody who engaged in detestable acts 40 years ago when I was eight years old, somehow reflects on me and my values, doesn't make much sense..."

Not on a "regular basis". But he has exchanged ideas with him. I feel better.

And, according to his logic, being a neo-nazi is okay, since Hitler was at his peak over a half-century ago, and any neo-nazi kid today wasn't born yet. Check.

He's the Terrorists' candidate!

If there are any investigative journalists (is it now a contradiction in terms?) left, I wish they'd investigate the relationship between BO-Ph (Barack Obama the phony) and the Ayer Family. It seems that they've been supporting BO-Ph for his entire life, at least since he went off to his gaudy higher education. I want to know, "Who IS backing the BO-Ph train?" Wouldn't it be nice to know we have our first Weatherman President?

I have a feeling this book won't be on the

NYT best seller list or if it does it will not be ledgible.

Darn ink smudges.

 

 

The 2ND Amendment exists to secure the rest

OMG....Cornel West

OMG....Cornel West too....he alone is bad enough. 

You know, people had better wake up and smell the enemy within.

Excellent blog/article here.

You said everything Mr. Vadum

"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh 

The way everybody keeps

The way everybody keeps slamming politicians based on who they have associated with at some point in their lifetimes.

At this point Obama could stab Ayers to death on national television and people would still be trying to draw the connection that Ayers 40 year old position is what Obama would cling to as president. 

Advice for Mr Obama and Mr McCain.  Disavow everybody.  Including your spouses.  Spend the next five months in an isolation chamber.  That might help.

"I don't want your 'us or them'..."  --  The Cure

Cureboy... Just how many

Cureboy...

Just how many connections of associates of Obama's do you need to ask yourself why does he associate with people who hate this country, plus have other ideas of what and where this country should be delving in?

"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh 

Yeah,

Just like the 90% of the media that always votes dhimmicrat without affecting the way they cover the issues. He still associates with radicals until he's called on it. No effect at all.

  MSM - shaping all the perceptions you need to believe, then confirming it with a poll.

Ayer's position is not 40

Ayer's position is not 40 years old.

Not only has he never apologized for anything, he adds insult to injury (the heinous physical injuries to bystanders he was responsible for), Ayers, to this very day, takes it multiple steps beyond that in his consistent stand "We didn't do enough."

The only upside to Ayers and his inept Weathermen crew (my apologies to Al Roker) was that they were more successful in blowing themselves up rather than blowing up their fellow citizens to make their political point.

You are correct. Ayers

You are correct. Ayers holds the same views today, as we read on the website "Progressives for Obama"

Edward Renehan Jr, in his article "Roots of a Rhodes Scholar Radical" (George Mason University's History News Network), reminds us of what Ayers and Dorne ARE all about. He writes about Ayers showing up for an interview with the New York Times some time after Sept 11, 2001 wearing a red-star revolutionary pin.

Renehan writes that when Bernadine Dorne showed up in 1969 at the founding of the Weatherman Underground (a far nastier group than the mere Weatherman), she nominated Charles Manson as an example of a true revolutionary, joking about Manson's victims as she did so. She said:

“First they killed those pigs, then they ate
dinner in the same room with them, they even shoved a fork into a
victim’s stomach! Wild!”

Renehan writes: "Later that same year, Ayers attempted to extort
money from the Vietnam Moratorium Committee — demanding $20,000 to
abstain from violence during a planned peace protest." During that same meeting, Ayers was asked what he really wanted, and Ayers responded "Kill all rich people."

Reminded then that he, Ayers, himself came from wealth, Ayers responded with: "Bring the war home. Kill your parents.”

Ayers, Barack's buddy, has not changed his revolutionary ways. You can bet on that. That's why Barry likes him so much.

Ayers...

I always keep a pocket Constitution with me wherever I go. Mr. Ayers keeps a pocket sized 45 Communist Goals for America http://www.nationmakers.com/com_goals.htm

I also have a little book

I also have a little book with all our precious founding documents. I re-read them about once a month to remind myelf of what an amazing group of people the Founders were.

Cureboy, your not the

Cureboy, your not the "Cure", your the desease. You and your kind, with your mind set. The only cure is understanding. Without understanding, you will continue on in the delusional direction of socialism. That is, untill you wake up one day, and own nothing of your own, and are allowed to have only what the state gives you.

Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!

Just what we need: political

Just what we need: political advice from Jeff Spicoli wearing black fingernail polish. Dude, you're like, totally bogus.

Ah. Well said.

Ah. Well said. Intelligent and well thought-out. I admire that. Though you left out "goth freak", "marxist" and, my personal favorite, "Queerboy675". But nevertheless...

But still, I'm not quite sure why this deserves to be "on the front coverage of every newspaper". Unless I missed the press release where Obama has promised to make this guy Secretary of State? If it wasn't this guy, the right would be pouring over every article and every archive and I guarantee you they would find somebody who, at some point in their life, raised money for Obama and who also, at another point in their life, did something controversial.

Why should that influence my vote? If I honestly felt that Obama believed the same way as this guy and Reverend Wright, then I would be voting for somebody who doesn't have a mind of their own and surrounds himself with yes-men who completely agree with him 100% of the time. (By the way, we have a president like that right now and it hasn't done us a lot of good).

Speaking of Reverend Wright, that story *was* on every talk show and the front page of every paper for several days. That sermon was shown over and over and over (I think I could recite it verbatim).

And how much impact has that had? And why should this be any different??

Cb... I'm jus going to

Cb...

I'm jus going to cut to the chase...

You are showing your true colors since you started here...and for that I am thankful.

Then again..I knew you would anyway.

You know exactly what I am talking about too, it has nothing to do with your announcement of you being gay either...so don't evn try to use that.

Have a good 4th. 

"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh 

Ah. So by true colors, you

Ah. So by true colors, you mean somebody who doesn't agree with everything everybody else here says 100% of the time?

Doesn't that get old?

-- "Yes, I couldn't agree more!"

-- "LOL, well said, I completely agree!"

-- "You hit the nail right on the head!"

-- "Amen, you are exactly right!"

Seriously. That's all you see here. And anybody who dares to disagree is a troll or a marxist or a socialist, no matter how calm and non-confrontational (meaning not resorting to personal attacks) they might be.

Cb... You're smart by

Cb...

You're smart by half.

I am done with this ...I know you know...I know.

Please..really I enjoy you...carry on...have a good 4th and all that jazz.

I mean that. 

"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh 

Alrighty then. Godspeed.

Alrighty then. Godspeed.

CB: You absolutely have

CB: You absolutely have every right to disagree and make your point. But you also have to use facts in your arguments. 

You said Ayer's anarchy is ancient history - it is not. He's still preaching (and teaching) it as we speak.

I see nothing in this

I see nothing in this article that indicates he is still preaching anarchy. The only reference made is the fact that in his book he states that, 35 years ago, he was pleased about disrupting the air war.

I have no idea if the man is today proud of what he did. I can't read his mind (Then again, neither can anybody else). What he did 35 years ago was disgusting and he should have paid a price for that and he didn't. But nobody can change that either.

So I'm still not convinced this guy is still preaching anarchy today. If he were, I think we'd be hearing more about it than some obscure reference in a book that can easily be interpreted in different ways.

And you know what, even if he were still preaching anarchy, there is nothing that has convinced me that Barack Obama feels the same way. Nobody has drudged up anything Obama has said or written that can even be interpreted that way...And not for a lack of trying. I know people are feverishly looking.

You're right Cureboy, we

You're right Cureboy, we shouldn't care that a presidential candidate has friendships and in some cases long relationships with a seemingly endless list of radicals who despise and loathe our country. We shouldn't care that they have been an influence on him as evidenced by the voting record which swings radically left. We shouldn't care that many of these people hold Marxist ideologies because Obama can't hold those ideas simply because he's running for president and what leftist radical would run for President of the USA? That's crazy talk!

It also shouldn't be important that one of Obama's good buddies who played a role in launching the poltical career of the said candidate is a terrorist that should have been executed for his crimes. None of that is important because this election is about change and hope and irregardless of what that really means when spilling out of the mouth of a politician, it makes people feel good and that is a good enough qualifier for someone to be president of the most influential and powerful country in the world.

 

(Is that enough sarcasm for now or do we need more?)

 

Honestly. Everybody keeps

Honestly. Everybody keeps saying that Obama and this guy are "good buddies" or are "close personal friends". And the evidence this article has to back that up? The fact that this guy raised money for Obama **13 years ago**. And the fact they served together for two years on a public school education fund.

So basically, we are to assume that a candidate must hold the exact same philosophies as every single every person that has ever, at some point, raised money for them as well as the same philosophies as every person they, at some point, worked with?

Seriously, stick with Reverend Wright as the evil albatross. That is at least a little bit easier to swallow. But saying Obama has the same philosophy as Ayers because Obama and Ayers' father served on a Leadership Council together back in 2001? Not so much.

 

→ Cureboy

Suppose there is an up and coming (OK, pun intended) local political figure who happens to be gay.

And he announces his candidacy for State Legislature from the home of the State chairman of NAMBLA?

He gets elected to State Legislature and later moves on to get elected as State Senator.

Do you mean to say that early association with NAMBLA is not a political issue should he decide to run for President? 

Now, substitute NAMBLA with Admitted Terrorist.

Or am I stupid in thinking there is a problem with either association?

We all know Obama is a mad

We all know Obama is a mad bombing elitist, radical Muslim/Christian (depending on the day of the week), terrorist fist-jabbing, America-hating, not-all-black-not-all-white, bad-bowling, big-eared, old school Chicago politician who won't wear political bling-bling, etc., etc.

 

Hey gb... You're finally

Hey gb...

You're finally getting some clues...regardless of your exaggerations.

Proud of ya'.

"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh 

For me, facade and

For me, facade and flim-flam are the descriptors I would use for him.

"Fighters are fun but bombers make policy"

we all know obama is a lifelong....

devout marxist,except for the 18 to 25 crowd. they will have to learn the hard way.

we all know obama is a lifelong....

devout marxist,except for the 18 to 25 crowd. they will have to learn the hard way.

 Goldbar, you don't know

 Goldbar, you don't know how glad I am that describing Obami in those terms irks the crap out of liberals. He is all of those things and more.

 By the way, your sarcasm doesn't rise to the level of any real satirist. But I will give Obami credit, he can shuck and jive with the best I've ever been around. He doesn't mean any of the crap he's spewing. He doesn't even know half of what he's talking about. I'm telling you, I seen this game played my whole life. How the hell he stops himself from winking or fist bumping his dawgs after saying any of his BS is beyond me.

He could have gone the other way, but he chose his path. I'll criticize his sorry ass any way, any day, I care to. That my friend, is the 1st amendment biting Obami square in the ass.  

Cureboy

Hmmm, I won't associate with local politicians (that live in the same complex) that don't have my same viewpoints even though they regularly invite me to their fundraising parties etc.

When someone is wrong, we do our best to:

a. Not help them in any way

b. Not expose ourselves to there filth

c. Not get caught up in guilt by association

Hangin on the street corner with druggies and hookers will get you in trouble everytime.  Hangin with terrorist is 10 steps below this.

If it smells like it, looks like it, then it probably is it.  Sen. Obama has strong leanings to radical ideas.

Evil Leftists...

It may not be this election cycle, but one day those bastard marxists (libs) will take this country down.  It must be their end goal - nothing else makes sense. 

but he couldn't remember much about it

This reminds me of the summer that Bill Clinton vacationed for six weeks or so in the USSR. On the day that Clinton was participating in an anti-American war march in Moscow, Ross Perot was denied permission to overfly the USSR in his private jet (which would have made the trip much shorter) which he was using to deliver medicine and mail to Americans being held prisoners in the Hanoi Hilton. It's a tenuous link, but it's important to remember what kind of values these people have ALWAYS held.

Later, when asked about his summer of fun, Clinton couldn't remember much about it.