Yanquis for Chavez

Photo of Matthew Vadum.
  • Bookmark and Share

Question: What do you get when you help terrorists seek dirty bombs, give sanctuary to Hezbollah and Hamas, taunt America, and threaten war on U.S. ally Colombia?

Answer: Hugs and kisses from members of Congress like Senator Chris Dodd and Congressman Dennis Kucinich, academics like Cornel West, and Hollywood celebrities like Danny Glover - and a pass from the press.

And what's there not to love about Venezuela's Marxist strongman Hugo Chavez, who crushes dissenters, muzzles the media, and takes from "the rich" to give to "the poor"? With a Kennedy clan member as his spokesman, he even gives discounted home heating oil to the shivering masses of the U.S. oppressed by the capitalist system. ¡Viva la Revolucion!

Latin America's newly preeminent thug is, after all, the kind of anti-American buffoon that American leftists instinctively swoon over. Chavez fancies himself a revolutionary leader, protégé and presumptive successor to Cuba's Fidel Castro, who stepped down last month after nearly a half-century in power.

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Since becoming president in 1999, Chavez has called for political upheaval in Latin America and flirted with violent anti-government guerrilla movements in neighboring Colombia, with which Venezuela shares a porous 1,300-mile border. He's a good friend of America's enemies and myriad unsavory world leaders. Chavez supports Iran's Holocaust-denying president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Iran gave Chavez its highest honor, the Islamic Republic Medal. He's visited the dictator of Belarus, Alexander Lukashenko, and called for a strategic alliance between the two countries. He's met with Vladimir Putin and purchased $3 billion in Russian arms, including fighter jets, military helicopters, and 100,000 Kalashnikov rifles. Chavez has offered safe haven to the Palestinian terrorist group, Hamas, and the Iranian-funded Hezbollah, in Venezuela's capital city of Caracas where both groups currently keep regular office hours.

Recent Events

In recent days, Chavez has threatened war against U.S ally Colombia. (Note: A late press report suggests tensions between Venezuela and Colombia are cooling. Stay tuned.) The Miami Herald reported Wednesday that documents found in a dead terrorist's laptop computer (recovered by the Colombian government in an Ecuadorian excursion) indicated that Chavez was helping the narco-terrorist Revolutionary Armed Forces of Columbia (FARC). A FARC confederate said the group could buy and resell at a markup 50 kilos or more of uranium to a government. Connect the dots: uranium can be used to make a dirty bomb.

The same article also reported Chavez was more than just a cheerleader for FARC; rather, he was complicit in scheming with FARC guerrillas and offered them $300 million and a cachet of arms. Although he previously claimed "by God" that he never backed FARC, in recent days, Chavez lavished praised on FARC while condemning Colombia for greasing rebel boss Raul Reyes, whom he called a "good revolutionary."

He's long given (at a minimum) tacit support to the communist FARC and the smaller National Liberation Army (ELN) and angered Colombia by urging it to stop calling FARC "terrorists." Calling FARC and ELN "true armies," Chavez described them as "insurgent forces that have political and Bolivarian goals, and here [Venezuela] that is respected."

Self-styled investigative journalist Greg Palast, a reliable apologist for leftist thugs everywhere, is already spinning out of control to defend a fellow traveler. The reporter for the uber-leftist Nation magazine sniffs that the laptop documents are fake: "The US press snorted up this line about Chavez' $300 million to ‘terrorists' quicker than the young Bush inhaling Colombia's powdered export."

Meanwhile, on Thursday, the notorious international arms dealer Viktor Bout, also known as the "Merchant of Death," was arrested in Thailand in a sting operation by U.S. agents posing as FARC rebels. While an unnamed U.S. government official denies any link between the recovered FARC laptop and the arrest, some of the $300 million Chavez offered for arms may well have been intended for Bout.

The Strongman

Chavez has long been an antagonist of the United States. On September 20, 2006, he stood before the U.N. General Assembly to insult President George W. Bush, the previous day's speaker. Chavez called Bush "the Devil" and theatrically crossed himself, adding "it smells of sulfur still today."

Chavez held up Hegemony or Survival: America's Quest for Global Dominance, a book by the humorless linguistics theorist Noam Chomsky, a radical critic of U.S. foreign policy, and urged his audience to read it. Within days the dreary tome that asserts humans are a "biological error" and uses the phrases polyarchy, internalized acceptance, and imperial grand strategy, jumped to the top 10 in sales at the Amazon and Barnes & Noble websites, and its publisher, Henry Holt, ordered a reprinting.

So apart from lawmakers, professors, and movie stars, it seems the Venezuelan president, who rules his supposedly democratic nation by decree, has a legion of loyal chavistas in the U.S. Chavez's American boosters all sing the praises of his so-called Bolivarian Revolution. Anti-war poster child Cindy Sheehan says Chavez is a well-intentioned idealist who wants to help the poor, and that he is indeed a modern-day Bolivar. In early 2006, Chavez met in Caracas with Sheehan, whom he calls "Mrs. Hope." The activist urged the world to help bring down "the U.S. empire" and declared she would rather have Chavez in the White House than President Bush. Princeton professor Cornel West, who makes a living denouncing his native land as racist and patriarchal has said, "We in the United States have so many lies about President Hugo Chavez and the Bolivarian Revolution." West said he visited Venezuela in 2006 "to see the democratic awakening taking place."

Never mind that the real Simon Bolivar, the great 19th century liberator of South America (whose statue stands three blocks from the White House), was no socialist. "Bolivar would be embarrassed to see Venezuelans being oppressed by the same kind of Latin American caudillo (strongman) from which he fought to free them two centuries ago," writes the Heritage Foundation's James M. Roberts.

But facts rarely get in the way of leftist zealotry.

The Celebrities

It should come as a surprise to no one that Chavez's regime enjoys enthusiastic support from actors Danny Glover, Kevin Spacey, Sean Penn, Ed Asner, singer Harry Belafonte, and supermodel Naomi Campbell. Campbell speaks of her "amazement" at the "love and encouragement" that Chavez pours into social welfare programs. She calls him a "rebel angel." Moviemaker Oliver Stone calls Chavez a "great man," adding, "I'm a fan."

Last year Chavez's compliant parliament returned Hollywood's favor by approving $20 million in financing for two films by Lethal Weapon star Glover, a longtime Chavez business partner. Glover serves on the advisory council for the Chavez-funded La Nueva Televisora del Sur ("The New Television Station of the South"), also known as teleSUR. Representative Connie Mack (R-Florida) says teleSUR, "has teamed up with Al-Jazeera to spread anti-democratic messages across Latin America."

And it would be hard to forget Harry Belafonte's pilgrimage to Venezuela in 2006, when he bellowed: "No matter what the greatest tyrant in the world, the greatest terrorist in the world, George W. Bush says, we're here to tell you: Not hundreds, not thousands, but millions of the American people...support your revolution."

The Useful Idiots

Former Congressman Joseph P. Kennedy II (D-Massachusetts) has become Chavez's goodwill ambassador to the American public. His nonprofit Citizens Energy Corporation ((2005 assets: $58.3 million) provides public relations cover to Chavez by hawking CITGO's home heating oil to low-income families program. CITGO is owned by the government of Venezuela and controlled by Chavez, who appointed a Venezuelan army general as its CEO.

Years ago Joe Kennedy's group won praise for working with heating oil dealers and state and federal agencies to provide fuel delivery to those in need, but it's become a tool of Chavez's efforts to win public support from ordinary Americans for his regime.

Kennedy rarely mentions Chavez publicly, but the television and radio messages that advertise his charitable program are paid for by Venezuela by way of CITGO. In the ads, Kennedy invites those who need help to call 1-877-JOE-4-OIL, and he thanks "our good friends in Venezuela" for their help. In one ad, Kennedy pontificates:

"...Yet our own government cut fuel assistance. And the Big Oil companies with oil and money to burn all said ‘no' when we asked for help. All but one. CITGO, owned by the Venezuelan people, is donating millions of gallons to non-profit Citizens Energy...Some people say it's bad politics to do this. I say it's a crime against humanity not to because no one - no one - should be left out in the cold."

The Kennedy charity is another public relations ploy. It's designed to win sympathy for Chavez, and it's working, at least in some quarters. For instance, media critic Jeff Cohen, founder of the watchdog group Fairness & Accuracy In Reporting (FAIR), urged Americans to buy CITGO gas to back up "a democracy with a president who was elected on a platform of using his nation's oil revenue to benefit the poor."

We'll never know what Kennedy's father, the late Senator Robert F. Kennedy, a man who called communism "a tyranny that holds its captives in a vice-like subjugation," might think of his son's collaboration with a communist. As a young man Senator Kennedy was an anti-Communist who had worked for Senator Joseph McCarthy on his anti-subversion subcommittee. The two were so close that RFK made the famous Red hunter godfather to his firstborn child, former Maryland Lieutenant Governor Kathleen Kennedy Townsend.

More of Chavez's dupes have offices in the U.S. Capitol.

Senator Chris Dodd (D-Connecticut) has actively defended Chavez as a "democratically-elected" president. Representative Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio) previously penned a letter along with Rev. Jesse Jackson and Marxist writers Howard Zinn and Naomi Klein endorsing Chavez's reelection.

Speaking to the International Terrorism panel on the House Committee on International Relations, Representative Brad Sherman (D-California) urged American patience with Chavez while commending Venezuela's "free press." (Of course, under Chavez it is now illegal to "practice" journalism in Venezuela without joining the National College of Journalists and holding a journalism degree.)

House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers (D-Michigan) wrote a letter along with 12 other members of Congress to President Bush complaining that the U.S. wasn't doing enough to support Chavez.

The Media

British journalist Richard Gott declares that the U.S. government's assessment of Chavez's dictatorial rule is "entirely invented." When asked in 2005 what Chavez's Venezuela would look like 10 years hence, Gott, a hard leftist alleged to have been a KGB "agent of influence," gushed:

"Venezuela will be a model for the rest of Latin America-a society that's come to terms with its black and indigenous poverty-stricken populations, and where those populations participate fully in the democratic process. Because it's a new generation it's a little open-ended as to what will happen, but Chavez recognizes that. He says ‘Let the people decide,' and I think he means it."

To Time's Tim Padgett, Chavez's policies are all George W. Bush's fault. The Venezuelan's ascendancy "is a lesson in what can happen when the U.S. disses an entire continent."

For the most part, the U.S. media, which is only too eager to label politicians on the right, can't bring itself to call Chavez a socialist even though he is a self-described Che Guevara admirer whose political party is called the United Socialist Party of Venezuela.

A Washington Post review of a Chavez biography was headlined "Petroleum Populist." Another Post story calls him a "fiery populist leader," and a New York Times story calls him a "populist leader."

But every once in a while, accurate, meaningful adjectives sneak past the copy desk. For example, a CNN report in 2006 called him an "anti-American socialist."

(This blog post is based on a longer article, "The American Friends of Hugo Chavez: Dial 1-800-4-TYRANT," by Ana Maria Ortiz and Matthew Vadum, that was published in the March 2008 issue of Capital Research Center's Organization Trends.)

—Matthew Vadum is Editor of Organization Trends and Foundation Watch at the Capital Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Kucinich, Dodd, Sherman,

Kucinich, Dodd, Sherman, Conyers all need to be called out on the floor about this.  It just takes one Republican to call them out. What's to lose?  These are the folks that undermine the United States. It couldn't be any more plainer.  If a young Republican wanted to make a name for himself, nows the time to do it. Force them to explain their Un-American support. They need to at least try it, the people would back them on it, at least the people who count.  Or do we let another opportunity roll by with a shrug? I'm writing my congressman and senator about this crap.

Comeon, Matthew, lighten

Comeon, Matthew, lighten up! What's a little Populism among friends?

Hmmm, Populist: Is that the new euphemism for Marxist dictator?

They don't care what he does...the important thing is he badmouths President Bush and the US.

This is a case of "the enemy of my enemy is my friend."

Another fracture in our body

Another fracture in our body politic. We have been long time supporters of the legitimate government in Colombia and their fight against the druglords and the Marxist narco-terrorist rebels that are a force in their country. If the Democrats win the White House and we have a majority of Democrats in congress are we now going to side with the marxist Chavez against Colombia? Marxism is a drug which we have expended a lot of effort to free South and Latin America from. It seems that particular drug is once again taking over those countries. More importantly why would anyone wish to be the ally of the U.S. when the Democrats freely abandon any ally at the first sign of trouble or ideological whim.  

"Legitimate" government???

Sorry, but down there the right/government side is just as corrupt as the left/rebel side when it comes to narcodollars. One side's a bit more blatant about it, but both sides are fully owned by the druglords. We've stupidly bought into one corrupt side of their war over coca-control as if communism is somehow an actual economic threat.

Folks, this is the tax and spend drugwar expensively-failing while spreading the communism we all (at least claim to) despise, at US taxpayer expense. We need to look to our Constitution for a change if we want to end these bipartisan failures, because this policy clearly isn't working to end cocaine or communism problems under a Republican, and electing a Democrat will not change the expensive failure.
JMR

A corruption-story the TV media will-not cover.

I think it is time for Hugo to go.

And I really don't care how.

Theme for Election '08: I want my mommy!

Dodd's "democratically-elected" blather

Dodd's "democratically-elected" blather regarding Chavez makes as much sense as efforts to democratize the Middle East. That Hugo Chaves was democratically elected is irrelevant. He remains a despot. For all of the Chavez supporters, it's only self-serving words. Where in our world is there a dictatorship, justified as socialistic, where the "people" are not destitute?

El Salvador Redux?

Just a thought: What if there's a large enough contingent of democrats in the house and senate, and even the White House? Wouldn't Hugo Chavez be emboldened to move against Columbia, a la Daniel Ortega's push in Salvador in the '80s? Why wouldn't he? The US legislature came up with the Boland amendment, which outlawed US support of the Contras. (The Dems said it was too risky, that it could be another VietNam, that we had no place in the struggle against communism is South America.)

The same creepy scenario is developing: US celebrity worship of Chavez, US Democrats praise - worship - of Chavez. Ortega was even feted in New York by Leftists in the entertainment community at the height of the Sandista's attempt to take over the country. (Ortega lost the first election held. The people of Venezuela have yet to be smashed enough by communism to vote out Chavez.)

The circumstances may be different, but the battle is essentially the same: A Marxist dictator of a South American Country is supported by American Marxists, which includes entertainers, the MSM, and elected democrat party officials.

Many of us fought long and

Many of us fought long and hard during the cold war to keep Marxism away from our shores. Now members of Congress are stooges for the likes of Chavez, Castro etc. We've lost many lives defending freedom and in the end were those lives lost in vain? Where is the American resolve to defeat evil?

Evil has declared war on us, whether it's Islam, Marxism or a cadre of Anti-American groups on campuses or on the streets "protesting". It's time we fight back.