Anonymous Reporter: 'Fix Is In' for Obama

Photo of Matthew Sheffield.
  • Bookmark and Share

From the department of truth admission comes this email from inside a major newsroom:

Off the record, every suspicion you have about MSM being in the tank for O is true. We have a team of 4 people going thru dumpsters in Alaska and 4 in arizona. Not a single one looking into Acorn, Ayers or Freddiemae. Editor refuses to publish anything that would jeopardize election for O, and betting you dollars to donuts same is true at NYT, others. People cheer when CNN or NBC run another Palin-mocking but raising any reasonable inquiry into obama is derided or flat out ignored. The fix is in, and its working.

And this:

I have a couple friends who work in the MSM, too, and one of them tells me the newsroom is (exact words) “unbelievably cavalier” about any complaints viewers register about their reports, what they ignore, their bias or the way they edit Republicans vs. the way the treat Dems. “Cavalier” as in the fix is in and they don’t even have to pretend to care what half the country thinks or wants.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

WTF?

*sigh*  can we please not post articles that can't be verified instead of "someone over there said".  Come on people  I think this is same when the MSM says "some people say".  Please dont try this BS here - I dont want to have to waste time reading non-articles.

 

 

 

Sam, are you reading comprehension challenged?

Sam, are you reading comprehension challenged? Read it again... slowly. This is not a "someone said." There is physical evidence in the form of an email. And it just verifies what everyone suspects to be true. No BS here, except inside your head. You might want to squirt some toilet bowl cleaner into your ears.

Gotta agree with Sam here.

Gotta agree with Sam here. If "anonymous" thinks it so important to get this info. out, (as if we don't know it already), then "anonymous" should grow a pair and stand behind the email. I realize that whoever this is might be putting his/her job at risk in doing so, but others have risked much more to do what is right.

"This liberal would be all about socialize -- uh, uh, would be about basically taking over and the government running all of your companies."-Maxine Waters 2008

easy for you to say Restless - your job isn't on the line

A memo from Mark Halperin was captured and posted on Drudge in the 2004 election where he told colleagues at ABC to give more weight to Bush's misstatements than Kerry's and it didn't change anything.  This guy would be risking his job for nothing.  He'd get fired and nothing would change.
It's obvious that this is happening. If it were not so clearly obvious then I doubt NB would use it without the source.

Dee, I guess we're just

Dee, I guess we're just supposed to believe that all the bias, all the ignoring of Obama's and Biden's gaffes, the mis-statement and mischaracterization of Palin's words, the obvious favoritism shown by the media are happening in a vacuum. 

It just so happens that everything Obama/Biden do is right, and what McCain/Palin do is proof that they are not qualified.

And that's why they are all on the same page.  

Right MB - it's so over the top

and it's so obvious to anyone who pays attention. 

Jeez, guys. I'm not saying

Jeez, guys. I'm not saying that I don't believe the letter to be true. We here don't need convincing. The posters at Media Matters, won't be convinced. It is the people in the middle that need convincing, and they won't be swayed by "anonymous". If the emailer cares so much about getting the information out, then he should know that being anonymous won't get anything done. If he/she has proof, then the only way to combat it is to bring it out and stand behind it.

"This liberal would be all about socialize -- uh, uh, would be about basically taking over and the government running all of your companies."-Maxine Waters 2008

sorry rest

I have to agree with Dee on this one. Even if this letter came notorized with Katie Couric's signature on it, nothing would change. The people would not be convinced. People believe what they want to believe.

The poor guy would get his name out there, instantly be attacked as a turncoat, some dirt dug up to make him look like a liar, some bullying from a "truth squad" and a statement from his editor that the charge is false. Then the guy would lose his job and the election would go on as planned.

I doubt Matthew actually thinks someone out there will change their minds because of this email. It's just something interesting for us to toss around.

No need for sorry. This may

No need for sorry. This may come as a surprise to the trolls, but we do disagree here from time to time.

Now, if the prevailing thought is that nothing will get fixed anyway, why did the emailer feel a need to bring it up? We demand verification from each other all of the time, but this guy gets a pass because we agree with him? Not buying that line of thought. Either we fight this or not, but if we are going to, then someone besides Lou Dobbs will need to put their name behind it.

Don't want to draw this out too much, as there are more important things to discuss, and I apologize for the hijacking of the thread.

"This liberal would be all about socialize -- uh, uh, would be about basically taking over and the government running all of your companies."-Maxine Waters 2008

I would say the reporting is comprehensively challenged

Sorry I didn't get a chance to reply faster - as I'm at work and dont always get the time.... 

You mention physical evidence - what about the physical evidence of Monica and Bill's Blue dress.  If you don't put a name on it - it's just another splattered dress isnt it?  That is basically my point plain and simple.

 

 

 

Not to worry Sam

I've been trying to hold down the fort for you. :)

"This liberal would be all about socialize -- uh, uh, would be about basically taking over and the government running all of your companies."-Maxine Waters 2008

Sam and

Sam and Restless,

     At what point does unattributed become unbelievable?  We have had similar stories here at NB before.  Because the example shown came from a Treasury person, does it make it more or less believable?  If it comes from ASAO (a senior administration official)?  A "source that asked not to be named because the information had not been approved for release"?

     I contend that believability is generated by specificity, with details confirmed at either the time of release or proved at some point in the future.  An ASAO who releases info before approval is vetted by actual release of that material at a later time.  The Treasury example above generates belief through the inability of anyone to articulate how the $700B figure was obtained (other than by the method described)

     I will concede to your responses here that there is nothing in this email specific enough to generate much credibility.  However, credibility might be provided if, with even the minimal details provided in this email, a witchhunt produces a cashiered victim.  The lack of attribution, though, should not be the sole (or even the main) driver for whether information is credible (or not).

JoeBob 

Without recognizing the ordinances of Heaven, it is impossible to be a superior man. - Confucious

Oh for Pete's sake!!!

I never said I don't believe it. I am coming from the point of view that NB posters are not who need to be convinced. The middle of the road people do, and they will demand more that "some say", "anonymous", or whatever. If the emailer really wants to make a stand about the bias, he/she need to put their name behind it for veracity.

As to your other examples, yes I would say the same thing.

"This liberal would be all about socialize -- uh, uh, would be about basically taking over and the government running all of your companies."-Maxine Waters 2008

Fair enough.  Don't get

Fair enough.  Don't get bent out of shape.

I was suggesting that you are using the wrong criteria for judging believability (lack of attribution), but I am happy to see that you are at least applying your judgement even-handedly.

However, many of the middle of the road people you refer to do not maintain the same integrity; they will believe the Treasury spokesperson, the ASAO, the Dept. of State employee.  That may be from a judgement on their part regarding the authority of the source (a criterium that I consider also flawed, if the source is unattributed).

My point was that the proof is in the pudding, whether that proof is accessible now, or whether you have to wait for it.  If it's of the type where you have to wait for it (the case most of the time with unattributed sources), IT DOES NOT negate the legitimacy, nay, even the need, for the original story, since the emergence of the proof in the future may very well depend on the existence of the original, unattributed story.

That's what Sam was arguing, and that's why I'm arguing agin' it.  Not saying I believe the story myself, but I defend the necessity of printing it, attributed or not.

 Without recognizing the ordinances of Heaven, it is impossible to be a superior man. - Confucious

Not bent out of shape Joe,

It's just that I have posted that I don't doubt the legitimacy of the email three times now.

My need for verification of evidence can probably be attributed to too many debates on NB. :)

"This liberal would be all about socialize -- uh, uh, would be about basically taking over and the government running all of your companies."-Maxine Waters 2008

I just heard Rush open his

I just heard Rush open his show with this on my way home, and was eager to see if you had it here.

This is not surprising.

We have known this for a while, and have even said that they don't bother to hide it any more.

But to have someone in the media admit out loud, so to speak, they see no reason to hide it is jaw-dropping.

All I can say is I hope it produces a backlash of epic proportions!

Just a thought...

Since a "source" inside the MSM is now openly admitting (albeit OTR) that the MSM is actively campaigning for the Obamessiah, would a complaint to the FEC carry any weight?

At what point does the MSM's "coverage" of Obama cross the line to in-kind campaign contributions? At what point is "equal time" violated?

=====
"There are some who use change to promote their careers, and then there are those who use their careers to promote change."
--Sarah Palin

This is different from ACORN how?

ACORN is accused or guilty of felony voter fraud in numerous states. Why? They are trying to influence the outcome of our elections. The same is true of the MSM, though, unfortunately, no law holds them to task for being biased. But make no mistake, their aim is the same: to influence the outcome of our elections. This is both dispicable and alarming. Something needs to be done, but what?

PBFFFTT........

Come on, Matt. Get out there and find some bias we didn't know about. Get to work, man!

Anonymous???

Personally, I am very suspicious of "anonymous" as a source, no matter what he says.

"This liberal would be all about socialize -- uh, uh, would be about basically taking over and the government running all of your companies."-Maxine Waters 2008

Just as I suspected..

Hey, Restless, I just got it from an anonymous source that 2 plus 3 equal 5 and pi is approximately 3.14159.  What do you think?

Impunitas semper ad deteriora invitat.

I think anonymous should

I think anonymous should stand up and take a bow, but thanks for misconstruing my point.

"This liberal would be all about socialize -- uh, uh, would be about basically taking over and the government running all of your companies."-Maxine Waters 2008

no upside for journalist pariahs

What would be helpful is for a journalist to put his/her name to the bias and initiate a discussion.  That discussion won't happen until after the election and that assumes there isn't an adorable missing child somewhere that week.  Then we'll all have accepted the election results and the media will proclaim their problems unnewsworthy, as there's no impetus for attention-deficit consumers to care.   

Give some journalists an incentive to break ranks, and maybe they would.

 

 

Oh, right; that would be

What would be helpful is for a journalist to put his/her name to the bias and initiate a discussion. 

Oh, right; that would be helpful.

<insert hysterical laughter>

Bernard Goldberg said similar years ago and still does; and the discussion is ongoing.  

Seen any change?

nondefeatist ideas are welcomed, of course

Obviously from my post, I'm not optimistic either.    I thought this item was weak due to the lack of specificity; it smacks of the sort of innuendo that passes for news on the other side.

This is weak stuff

Sam is right. This e-mail lacks a disclosed source. We do not know which news room it cam from or which journalist. This supposed journalist also lacks basic writing skills. If we are advocating higher journalistic stantards we have to practice them as well.

Marvl, it is odd that you accuse Sam of having a dirty mind. You are clearly the one with the potty mouth. Stop insulting anyone who doesn't tow the party line here. We are adults and we can disagree.

Oh please - it's not nearly as weak as the Palin smears

This writer is obviously using abbreviations while sending off a quick e-mail.  It is not representative of his writing skills just like most of our comments here are not. 

Of course it's weak but it rings 100% true.  We all know it.  It's obvious.  It's much more reasonable than the Palin smears against a Governor with an 80% approval rating. 

Now Dee

Several polar bears have confirmed those msm smears.So it isnt like they were from a unknown source.

Who knew?

Anonymous Reporter: 'Fix Is In' for Obama

 

 

"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg

Obvious to the most Casual Observer - doesn't need anonymous

If you can Count . . and watch TV at the same time . . you can see the FIX.
The Advatage for "FAIR" News is the FAST internet runs circles around NYT and MSM outlets. . .TV AP or USA 2day.
We need another Goldberg whistle blower . . . Younger and more Disallusioned....to step forward with DOCUMENTATION !!. . . MAYBE THIS IS A BEGINNING ?
The Republican Revolution will not be Televised

anonymous fix

I thought "anonymous sources" were sources that KNOWN reporters wish to keep secret - now we have "anonymous reporters"-?

This election is becoming a war of attrition: wear down the conservatives and repub's so they'll stay at home and give Hussein a victory.

BTW, electing Hussein IS the decapitation strike the Muslims hoped for.

 

 

 

Good Point

I got a chuckle out of that one.

 

 

 

Even Joe Said So

Even Joe Scarborough had said that MSNBC staff were jeering and mocking President Bush during his State of Union speech.

Anyways, it's so very apparent that the MSM in in the tank for Obama and is their not-so-secret weapon in this campaign.

It's getting to the point now where they're constantly playing clips by Tina Fey to draw comparisons to Gov Palin. Pretty soon, people won't be able to distinguish between the parody skit and real life.

Agenda, agenda,

Agenda, agenda, agenda...

Nothing else matters to them, nothing.

"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh

Good Times?

I can just imagine the reaction to this leak at the BO Campaign Headq...er...NY Times;  Someone forgot to tell Kristol there remains some national secrets we don't leak to our enemies.

The song of Obama - coming from children!

This video is living proof that the dimwitocrats will try anything - even getting into the minds of our children!  If you want to hear grade school children sing for Osama Bama, click on this one!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TW9b0xr06qA

If they were singing for McCain/Palin, this would have been all over the MSM!

Freakin' unbelieveable!

"Mediocrities everywhere! I absolve you! I absolve you!" - Antonio Salieri in "Amadeus

 

Hey gt... LOL...I just

Hey gt...

LOL...I just posted that on OT too...

You're right it would be all over the msm if this was reversed, lets be glad this isn't...at least I haven't seen it yet, it is pure torture to listen to IMO...

Poor kids don't even understand a danged thing about his at all, they are too young to understand how they are being used by the communists in Hollywood...

Jeff Zucker leading the way!

"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh

BT, Isn't this how...

...it all started in Nazi Germany? With the youth singing the praises of Hitler?

Now it's Obama! Hmm - I see a connection here.

"Don't crush that drawf, hand me the pliers!" - Firesign Theatre

What can we do about the biased MSM?

We can stop supporting them.  We can let their sponsors know that we will not buy their products as long as they advertise on those shows.  We can change the channels. 

I have long stopped going to movies with anti-American stars.  I stopped watching the MSM news shows.  I wrote NBC about putting Olbermann on Monday Night Football and change the channel if his ugly mug appears.

The only way to hurt the MSM is to take their $$ away.  Hit them where it hurts...their advertisers.

Jeff Lebowski

www.angrywhitedude.c...

I have too Jeff, but it

I have too Jeff, but it seems futile sometimes. The msm is getting so bad even my diehard liberal friend are getting upset about it. I have been trying to think what there ultimate goal is? Do they even have one, is distorting the truth ever good for anyone? The out come cant benifit them anymore then the rest of us?

 

"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg

Hi gc... The ultimate

Hi gc...

The ultimate goal is to get leftists elected everywhere all the time.

Period.

Costs/profits/ratings be damned...it is their agenda..

Nothing more, nothing less.

"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh

Psssst!  Hey Jeff- He's on

Psssst!  Hey Jeff- He's on Sunday Night Football.  Monday Night Football is on ESPN.  Either way, though, Bathtub Boy is a total wank.

We Need A Spy

Two years ago I asked Michelle Malkin and Brent Bozell why they do not use their network of conservatives to place a spy or a mole in the media.

I find it hard to believe that in our huge family we do not have a single persion that is qualified to work in a newsroom at AP, NBC, CBS, MSNBC, CNN or ABC or whatever.  They can pretend to be a liberal democrat, and really find out what's going on, and document the bias first hand.

Imagine all we could learn from this person working on the inside. Image all we could expose.

We could use a tiny fraction of donations for a salary, or get one of the 5%'ers to donate for the cause.

I'm am tired of fighting the media in every election. It's time to destroy them from the inside out.

RightWired.

"How do you tell a Communist? Well, it's someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-Communist? It's someone who understands Marx and Lenin." - Ronald Reaga

Problem is...

...you can only ask so much sacrafice from a person. Any self respecting conservative immeresed in the liberal media for any length of time would no doubt require debriefing and rehab lasting months and months! Of course there is always rapid detox...that's right, 28 straight days of Rush Limbaugh playing 24/7.

"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...

If McCain can survive 7

If McCain can survive 7 years in a POW camp, a reporter can survive at least a year at the AP...maybe 6 months at CBS.

RightWired.

"How do you tell a Communist? Well, it's someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-Communist? It's someone who understands Marx and Lenin." - Ronald Reaga

Well, that explains it

Why half the country is watching FoxNews and the others have to try and fight and scrape to get a portion of the other 50%.

Anyone want to bet that the famous Neilsen ratings boxes are in a disproportionate number of liberal households?

 

You want change? Give me a dollar.

Tina Fey Theory

This theory is interesting (i.e., that the MSM is trying to smoke and mirror the difference between Tina Fey and the person she parodies - Palin.  But it wrongly presumes that the American people are so ignorant that they would consider Tina Fey to be both intelligent and attractive.  Fey is neither during her skits, or at any other time.

I support the skits continuing for at least the next 8 years, since that would be a consequence of Obama bin Biden losing this November.  I have faith in Americans to insure it - unless of course, all Americans hail from the City of Detroit. 

At some point, with enough heat, all sand turns to glass - My dad

Left bias is accepted and enforced

From personal experience as an editor in a newsroom, I can tell you there is enormous peer pressure to lean left. It is de rigeur. If you make even a peep the other way you are forever branded a "right-wing kook". If you breathe a word of support for Bush they conclude you're a bible-thumping nut, a racist, a fascist, and probably a child molester. So you simply keep your mouth shut. Why? Because you have to work with these people the next day. And, you won't change their minds. It's their religion.

The MSM newsroom I worked in had about 20 on staff. I knew of only three (including myself) who were centrists and of course we simply didn't talk about it. The rest of the folks would crow over the latest revelation about Cheney or the Iraq war and say things like "Oh yeah! We've got the bastards now!" And I mean right out loud. There would then be chortling and the sound of keyboards furiously being worked to hurry up and get "the truth" out. And all the other usual lefty diatribes-- endless (and boring) "Bush is a moron" remarks and jokes. Trading funny web sites in email and on IM that always attacked the right (never, and I mean not ever, the left- they are absolutely humorless about that).

Some were openly pro-socialist and all openly espoused mixtures of views that were anti-U.S., anti-globalization, anti-middle America, anti-gun, anti-Republican (of course!), anti-consumer, anti-religion, and strangely (I thought at the time anyway) even anti-science. And of course pro-anything at all that smacked of "alternative", no matter how ridiculous.

Btw, these were all childless white college-educated well-paid people 25-35 years old. Plenty of money and few responsibilities. But their attitudes were those of spoiled children. They openly resented the material wealth and freedom that they had handed to them, their good jobs, and the world in general. Unhappy people, really.

 Anyway, I've moved on from that career, but at least from my experiences, reports of liberal bias in newsrooms underestimates the depth and fervor. It is rife. All the public sees is the thinly-disguised end product and they imagine a cadre of "professional" "journalists" on the other end. 

 

Off The Record, Not Anonymous

As I understand it, the identity and veracity of the source is known, but is being witheld by the trustworthy outlet that made the original report. If it's ok to protect sources who have illegally leaked classified info (spare me any Plame nonsense, wasn't classified, wasn't leaked), it's certainly ok to protect sources inside the propaganda wing of the DNC.

 

(typos corrected)

 



Obama, the reality of his brother and sisters Keeper

This is a good place to take up the media fix as it leaves a greater share of Truth to sound loudly than the din of the entire media.

My problem is not the MSM as they are always Marxist shills. My problem is with O'Reilly cuddling up to Obama and not one thing coming out of Rush Limbaugh making any sense.
By this I mean, Rush was fuming on Monday about the way the Democrats are screwing over the economy.

Monday night here on Newsbusters I posted an exclusive exposing Pelosi deliberately tanked the Congressional vote to help Obama and they did it so Obama can look thoughtful and probably take credit for the final deal to save the world.

I know O'Reilly is nothing but a shill for Murdoch now, but does Mr. Limbaugh, Hannity and Ingraham not get the facts which the American public are interested in?
Explain it is the patrician Bush GOP trying to sink Palen. Explain like below in real terms that Obama wants to  run the United States and he can't even keep his promise in being his brother and sister's keeper.

Call out the National Enquirer on why they stopped stories on Obama and went after John Edwards and his cancer battling wife.
WHY did they do that with Edwards out of the race?

http://lamecherry.bl...

 

Obama, thy brother and sisters Keeper

Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them; Matthew 7:20

The
mark of any person in their life is how they treat not just friends and
family, but how they treat their enemies. As Barack Obama mandated at
the Democratic Denver Convention that he WAS his brothers and sisters
keeper, it would be fitting to review the facts in how Mr. Obama
actually cares for others to find the real Barack Obama.

Barack
Obama has a brother, George, who lives in Huruma, Kenya outside
Nairobi. Huruma is a violence infested area akin to East LA. George
exists in an 8 by 10 foot hut on 300 dollars a month in poverty.
Mr.
Obama raised half a billion dollars in his campaign which he could have
set up a hundred thousand dollar account for George to be his "African
campaign manager for Americans" in Africa, thereby providing George
with a lifetime wage in one year, but instead Barack Obama left him in
squalor.

Grandma
Sarah lives in Kenya too. She exists in a hut in a rural area without
running water. She proudly proclaimed before her grandson, Barack, was
to visit that once he was there that the money would flow in from
America to make all their lives better.
Not one penny of Obama's personal fortune and not one cent of American taxpayer money has been appropriated for Kogelo, Kenya.
Mr. Obama has a $1.6 million dollar Chicago mansion and Grandma Sarah sits in destitution.

Ryan
Jopek is a typical American Soldier. He laid down his life for his
American nation to which his mother gave in her grief, Barack Obama his
KIA (killed in action) bracelet so Mr. Obama would know his name.
Instead
Mr. Obama used the bracelet as a political device to the horror of the
family, has gone against their desires in making it a political
statement, Mr. Obama could not ever remember Solider Jopek's name when
using it in a debate having to fumble around and read it when speaking
about it, and has gone against the family's request in not using it
anymore for political gain.

Mya
Soetoro Ng, Mr. Obama's sister by his mother Stanley Ann Dunham. Mr.
Obama was a professor at the University of Chicago, graduated from
Harvard, and yet, Mya and her husband Konrad of Canada, have not been
provided any mainland help in advancement in their careers.
Mr. Ng
is only an assistant professor at the University of Hawaii. Mya is a
history teacher who teaches night classes at the University of Hawaii.
With
Mr. Obama's connections they could be both professors of tenure at any
university in the United States and yet both his sister and brother in
law struggle.

Stanley Ann Dunham, the one statement states it all by Mr. Obama, "I wish I could have been there when my mother died".
As
he was not in prison, under house arrest, in the military overseas,
there is only one person who did not make the time for his own mother
in being there when she died. That is Barack Hussein Obama.

Madelyn Dunham, is Barack Obama's grandmother. She still resides in the 10th floor apartment where she raised Barry Obama.
Mya reports she takes Grandma Dunham out after sunset for fresh air which makes it sound like she is treated like a dog.
As
noted above, Barack Obama is sitting in a million dollar mansion in
Chicago. He has room for Grandma and at the least in his wages could
have her in a better environment than where she is isolated each day
and only brought out after Mya is done with her day's work.

Hillary
Clinton, her saga as an Obama opponent is well known. Defeated in the
nomination, Mr. Obama went out of his way to slap her around abusively
in public. He hired her former assistant humiliating Mrs. Clinton.
Mr.
Obama further went on to in a most unchivalrous act in not paying off
Mrs. Clinton's campaign debt. He instead rationed her money from his
half a billion dollar account.
The surest sign of any person is how they treat a defeated enemy.

John
Edwards, the adulterous low life who cheated on his cancer battling
wife, Elizabeth. Someone made certain that information was fed to the
National Enquirer and as the Enquirer was at that point investigating
Mr. Obama's relationships with gay men Lawrence Sinclair and Donald
Young, and then stopped, to soon focus on John Edwards the Obama rival.
It is evident who was orchestrating the Enquirer in a quid pro quo.
It
was not enough for the Obama campaign to remove Mr. Edwards, but
instead with most likely Clinton support, ruined John Edwards by
exposing this before the Denver Convention not once taking into account
the health of Elizabeth Edwards. Kicking a woman with cancer is not the
mark of being a sisters keeper.

Sarah
Palin, is but another heinous example of Mr. Obama dispensing libel,
smearing, slander in breaking the Commandment of God in not lying about
someone else. The Obama campaign has termed her crazy, a slut, an
adulteress, airhead, cradle robber and other reprehensible lies all
sanctioned by Barack Obama.

The
9 11 dead were given a real opportunity to see the up close and
personal side of Barack Obama when he went there and threw a rose at
the memorial.
Mr. Obama would tell the Chicago press that his wife,
Michelle, was not at the memorial, because she was busy taking care of
their two daughters.
Michelle Obama and Barack Obama lied. Michelle was at a campaign rally in another location.

Tony Rezko, Barack Obama's financial mentor and friend in Chicago who assisted in creating him.
Mr.
Rezko was caught in money fraud and convicted. Mr. Obama as he did in
other friends like terrorist Bill Ayers would later distance himself
from them and act like he never knew them that well after he had
stomped on them on his way to the top.

Barack
Obama informed ABC's Diane Sawyer, he just did not understand how his
black Arab father could be with so many women and not take care of his
children.
Where is the difference between Barack Sr. and Barack jr in using people for one purpose and then dumping them like garbage.

Barack Obama is doing this to family, friends and enemies. There is a pattern in this which repeats in the most offensive ways.

Barack
Obama can not even keep his brother and sister, so how can he be
believed he can keep an entire nation of 300 million people.

agtG 288

And Cain said, I know not; Am I my brother's keeper; Genesis 4:9

You break the laws, you hustle, you deal, you steal from us all, you would steal from a dog.

 

Obama, thy brother and sisters Keeper

Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them; Matthew 7:20

The
mark of any person in their life is how they treat not just friends and
family, but how they treat their enemies. As Barack Obama mandated at
the Democratic Denver Convention that he WAS his brothers and sisters
keeper, it would be fitting to review the facts in how Mr. Obama
actually cares for others to find the real Barack Obama.

Barack
Obama has a brother, George, who lives in Huruma, Kenya outside
Nairobi. Huruma is a violence infested area akin to East LA. George
exists in an 8 by 10 foot hut on 300 dollars a month in poverty.
Mr.
Obama raised half a billion dollars in his campaign which he could have
set up a hundred thousand dollar account for George to be his "African
campaign manager for Americans" in Africa, thereby providing George
with a lifetime wage in one year, but instead Barack Obama left him in
squalor.

Grandma
Sarah lives in Kenya too. She exists in a hut in a rural area without
running water. She proudly proclaimed before her grandson, Barack, was
to visit that once he was there that the money would flow in from
America to make all their lives better.
Not one penny of Obama's personal fortune and not one cent of American taxpayer money has been appropriated for Kogelo, Kenya.
Mr. Obama has a $1.6 million dollar Chicago mansion and Grandma Sarah sits in destitution.

Ryan
Jopek is a typical American Soldier. He laid down his life for his
American nation to which his mother gave in her grief, Barack Obama his
KIA (killed in action) bracelet so Mr. Obama would know his name.
Instead
Mr. Obama used the bracelet as a political device to the horror of the
family, has gone against their desires in making it a political
statement, Mr. Obama could not ever remember Solider Jopek's name when
using it in a debate having to fumble around and read it when speaking
about it, and has gone against the family's request in not using it
anymore for political gain.

Mya
Soetoro Ng, Mr. Obama's sister by his mother Stanley Ann Dunham. Mr.
Obama was a professor at the University of Chicago, graduated from
Harvard, and yet, Mya and her husband Konrad of Canada, have not been
provided any mainland help in advancement in their careers.
Mr. Ng
is only an assistant professor at the University of Hawaii. Mya is a
history teacher who teaches night classes at the University of Hawaii.
With
Mr. Obama's connections they could be both professors of tenure at any
university in the United States and yet both his sister and brother in
law struggle.

Stanley Ann Dunham, the one statement states it all by Mr. Obama, "I wish I could have been there when my mother died".
As
he was not in prison, under house arrest, in the military overseas,
there is only one person who did not make the time for his own mother
in being there when she died. That is Barack Hussein Obama.

Madelyn Dunham, is Barack Obama's grandmother. She still resides in the 10th floor apartment where she raised Barry Obama.
Mya reports she takes Grandma Dunham out after sunset for fresh air which makes it sound like she is treated like a dog.
As
noted above, Barack Obama is sitting in a million dollar mansion in
Chicago. He has room for Grandma and at the least in his wages could
have her in a better environment than where she is isolated each day
and only brought out after Mya is done with her day's work.

Hillary
Clinton, her saga as an Obama opponent is well known. Defeated in the
nomination, Mr. Obama went out of his way to slap her around abusively
in public. He hired her former assistant humiliating Mrs. Clinton.
Mr.
Obama further went on to in a most unchivalrous act in not paying off
Mrs. Clinton's campaign debt. He instead rationed her money from his
half a billion dollar account.
The surest sign of any person is how they treat a defeated enemy.

John
Edwards, the adulterous low life who cheated on his cancer battling
wife, Elizabeth. Someone made certain that information was fed to the
National Enquirer and as the Enquirer was at that point investigating
Mr. Obama's relationships with gay men Lawrence Sinclair and Donald
Young, and then stopped, to soon focus on John Edwards the Obama rival.
It is evident who was orchestrating the Enquirer in a quid pro quo.
It
was not enough for the Obama campaign to remove Mr. Edwards, but
instead with most likely Clinton support, ruined John Edwards by
exposing this before the Denver Convention not once taking into account
the health of Elizabeth Edwards. Kicking a woman with cancer is not the
mark of being a sisters keeper.

Sarah
Palin, is but another heinous example of Mr. Obama dispensing libel,
smearing, slander in breaking the Commandment of God in not lying about
someone else. The Obama campaign has termed her crazy, a slut, an
adulteress, airhead, cradle robber and other reprehensible lies all
sanctioned by Barack Obama.

The
9 11 dead were given a real opportunity to see the up close and
personal side of Barack Obama when he went there and threw a rose at
the memorial.
Mr. Obama would tell the Chicago press that his wife,
Michelle, was not at the memorial, because she was busy taking care of
their two daughters.
Michelle Obama and Barack Obama lied. Michelle was at a campaign rally in another location.

Tony Rezko, Barack Obama's financial mentor and friend in Chicago who assisted in creating him.
Mr.
Rezko was caught in money fraud and convicted. Mr. Obama as he did in
other friends like terrorist Bill Ayers would later distance himself
from them and act like he never knew them that well after he had
stomped on them on his way to the top.

Barack
Obama informed ABC's Diane Sawyer, he just did not understand how his
black Arab father could be with so many women and not take care of his
children.
Where is the difference between Barack Sr. and Barack jr in using people for one purpose and then dumping them like garbage.

Barack Obama is doing this to family, friends and enemies. There is a pattern in this which repeats in the most offensive ways.

Barack
Obama can not even keep his brother and sister, so how can he be
believed he can keep an entire nation of 300 million people.

agtG 288

And Cain said, I know not; Am I my brother's keeper; Genesis 4:9

You break the laws, you hustle, you deal, you steal from us all, you would steal from a dog.

 

 

*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS

nothing to see here

Nothing proven just an opinion. I would however think that a video of people who claim to have no bias (Cambelle Brown, Wolf Blitzer and the whole CNN cast comes to mind) were to be placed on YouTube people would pay attention and it would impact the election (or at least how the election is being covered). If you're on the inside get us t he video!

Of course the fix is in,

Of course the fix is in, all we needed was one of them to come out and say it. Thanks for providing! Boy oh boy, I would love to know the author.

McCains pick of Sarah Palin threw the media off for almost a week, but now the blood is in the water and the sharks smell a meal.

Palin Is Caught And Her Career Is Over!

 

 

Making Fun of AGW http://giovanniworld.wordpress.com/  

Which newsroom...

At least tell us which newsroom the message came from.

From the Ministry of Truth

"Anonymous sources" are nothing but gossip mongers without the guts to back up their claims; now we have ANONYMOUS REPORTERS???  Is this a joke?

NB should NEVER engage in this, or you'll lose your credibility: conservatives and libertarians aren't the sharks in the water looking for chum, nor are we the ones you should be hunting.

Wouldn't it be great to see TV journalists "reporting" incidents and so-called facts, with their own faces blotted out for the purpose of "anonymity"? News Anchors could be disguised like Mafia rats!

 

 

 

 

"We the People"

"We the People" are a nuisance, obstacles to TOTAL POWER over us. 

Apparently this 451+ page "anonymous" bailout to Goldman and the other biggy piggy bankers will authorize the Treasury to ENSURE rather than PROTECT, with vast and vaguely granted powers to an UNELECTED BUREAUCRAT.

As Bob Grant would say - "it's sick and getting sicker."

 

 

 

 

 

MSM Scary

The MSM is scary. I know they are in a conspiracy together to make me believe what I don't believe. Where do I turn?