Howard Wolfson has become the latest prominent Democrat to join forces with Fox News Channel during the general election, hailing it for its "comprehensive and fair and evenhanded" coverage during the primaries.
That's quite an endorsement coming from one of the Democratic party's biggest communications mavens, and not one known for being especially soft-gloved. It's the equivalent of MSNBC suddenly getting endorsed by the likes of Mary Matalin or Ari Fleischer, something which is far less likely to happen. New York Times reporter Jim Rutenberg broke the story:
Howard Wolfson, who was a top strategist for the presidential campaign of Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton, is going where some Democrats were unwilling to go during the early days of the election season: the Fox News Channel. [...]
Mr. Wolfson is joining a network that Democrats shunned for a time, complaining that its coverage was unfair. But aides to Mrs. Clinton came to view Fox News as distinctly fair to her in a news media climate that they believed favored Senator Barack Obama.
Story Continues Below Ad ↓“I thought that Fox’s coverage during the primary was comprehensive and fair and evenhanded,” Mr. Wolfson said Monday in a telephone interview from Liverpool, England, where he was vacationing. “It’s a huge audience, and it is important to have a strong, progressive voice on the network.” [...]
Mr. Wolfson’s decision to join Fox represents a general feeling among Clinton partisans that the network treated her more fairly than did other networks it viewed as overly friendly to Mr. Obama.
The night Mrs. Clinton won the Pennsylvania primary, several months after Mrs. Clinton joined other Democrats in opting out of a debate that Fox News was to sponsor, her campaign chairman Terry McAuliffe declared live on Fox, “Fair and Balanced Fox!” (The network was first to declare her the victor that night.) Last month the network signed Lanny Davis, a former special counsel to Bill Clinton and a vocal support of Mrs. Clinton, as a contributor.
The list of FNC Democrats continues to grow. One thing that is notable about this trend is that, in contrast to the resident conservatives at CNN and MSNBC, Fox's liberals like Wolfson, Davis, and Susan Estrich, generally tend to be more "on-message" than CNN's and MSNBC's conservatives such as Tucker Carlson, Joe Scarborough, and Amy Holmes.
—Matthew Sheffield is the creator of NewsBusters and its Executive Editor.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Tucker Carlson, Scarborough
July 8, 2008 - 03:15 ET by niner-four-whiskeyTucker Carlson, Scarborough and Holmes, "conservative?"
Yeah, uh-huh.
Honestly, I can read Susan Estrich, but man, her voice is like nails on a chalkboard.
So I'm gonna go out on a
July 8, 2008 - 05:47 ET by motherbeltSo I'm gonna go out on a limb here and guess that you don't like Carol Channing? LOL
As for the others being "conservatve," relatively speaking, on CNN that's true.
in a news media climate that they believed favored Senator Barack Obama. (emphasis added)
That's the howler of the piece!
Shoot 'em all; let God sort 'em out! - Marge Simpson
Wow have the tides turned.
July 8, 2008 - 06:52 ET by athoughtor2Wow have the tides turned. If I am not mistaken Hillary and co didn't want to participate in a debate on Fox. Now they are all about FOX. I've heard of any port in a storm, but... "You guys are so unfiar and biased at FOX." Now they are evenhanded....Where have they been for the past 15 yrs.
→ Wolfson
July 8, 2008 - 07:11 ET by Cool ArrowMakes perfect sense.
Rove & Wolfson would be hypergeometrically more interesting than Manitee and Clowns.
LYDSEXICS UNTIE
If you ask me
July 8, 2008 - 07:13 ET by BobAnthonyFox News is awfully close to jumping the shark. And I triple dog dare those on the commie fascist left to call Fox News Faux News again.
Some of the places I go for news, aside from NB and Media Research Center (news about the news) are World Net Daily, NewsMax, One News Now (from American Family Association) and many bloggers like Michelle Malkin, Debbie Schlussel, Tammy Bruce and Ms Underestimated. I will also go to Fox News' website and Drudge. And of course I do have the NYC all-news radio stations (WCBS and WINS), but they seem to be drive-by outelets run by corporate bean counters.
For the left, well, Estrich is a good writer, but as mentioned DO NOT LET HER SPEAK FOR MORE THAN FIVE MINUTES AT A CLIP! YOU'LL BE SORRY! I also, believe it or not, try to listen to Pacifica's Democracy Now. But the minute a story airs where hippie daughter Amy Goodman blasts Israel or this country disguising it as news...I SWITCH STATIONS!
I try to be open-minded, but since about 1995 and before 9/11, I have been very much an indie-leaning conservative. This year I will be voting for Chuck Baldwin of the Constitution Party. And I will boycott all media if there is no 3rd party debate...yes the Green/Socialists and the Libertarians should go as well, even if it is Bob Barr for the Libertarians.
Being in radio...
July 8, 2008 - 08:34 ET by Iowa Boy...I get to hear killer female voices all day long but, I think Susan Estrich's voice is a hoot! She's animated, on-point, and let's face it, she makes great TV. She's also often wrong. but I still get a big kick out of watching her on FNC anyway.
Yet for a voice I can't stand to hear, it's Fran Drescher hand down.
"I'd rather be governed by the first 2,000 people in the Boston
telephone directory than the 2,000 faculty at Hardvard Unversity." -
William F. Buckley Jr.
CNN.com crap
July 8, 2008 - 08:54 ET by ort777This morning on CNN.com
CNNMoney: Stocks set to open lower
So I've been watching the Dow for the first 20 minutes and everything is up. I think I see a trend.
ort777 - CNN's watching U
July 8, 2008 - 11:48 ET by Gary HallLooks like CNN saw your comment and updated their view. It just might be your day! (;~> gary
yeah, right
July 8, 2008 - 12:49 ET by ort777And they don't post my comments on their site??? I doubt they pay much attention to me but thanks for the ego boost.
A new crop
July 8, 2008 - 09:06 ET by KC MulvillePunditry must be like ballplayers who become announcers. As ex-players, their experience makes them valuable, but unless they can deliver that experience in short, concise, crisp soundbytes, they usually fail on TV. Johnny Unitas may have been the greatest quarterback who ever lived, but on TV he just couldn't put it into words. On the other hand, Jim Palmer was a great athlete, but he may be an even better announcer because he can deliver his insights in a concise, entertaining way. Some guys are good at it, some aren't.
In politics, when one administration leaves office, their ex-players flood the airwaves for a while. And especially in the beginning, they're all eager to justify their time in office, and to continue the battle with the Other Side. Like ballplayers, though, they have to make the transition from knowing the game to explaining the game.
Wolfson's one of those guys you hate when he's with the other team, but when he's on your side, you love his tenacity. He could be a lot of fun. We'll have to give him a little time to get the battles out of his system, but he has some potential. If he turns out to be a hack, well, Rockefeller Center is within walking distance of Fox headquarters.
Well spoken, KC
July 8, 2008 - 14:09 ET by Matthew SheffieldThanks.
Scenic Liverpool England
July 8, 2008 - 09:48 ET by Hero SquadOK, this was the thing that struck me: "while vacationing in Liverpool, England."
Really? I've been to Liverpool on two separate occasions (family friend lives just south of the city), and really, it takes about an afternoon to see everything you'd want to see... which is all taken care of on the Beatles' "Magical History Tour," and ending with a Ferry 'Cross the Mersey trip. Not sure what you'd do the rest of your vacation time.
And if you're not a Beatles fan, it's like going to Cooperstown, but you hate baseball.
*****
"People only insist that a debate stop when they are afraid of what might be learned if it continues." - George Will
"...hailing it for its
July 8, 2008 - 10:08 ET by Chris Norman"...hailing it for its "comprehensive and fair and evenhanded" coverage during the primaries."
Uh-oh. Let's hope Fox News doesn't "grow" even more "fair and evenhanded" as the campaign progresses - they'll end up like the rest - know what I mean?
McNotObama '08
I've noticed that FoxNews is moving more to the left
July 8, 2008 - 10:14 ET by c5thenWhen covering political issues esspecially, they are tending more and more to have only the liberal side represented by a 'guest'.
The day that "politician" became a career choice is the day we started losing the Republic. Let's get it back! Alan Keyes '08.
c5, I haven't seen many
July 8, 2008 - 10:27 ET by Chris Normanc5,
I haven't seen many sole liberal guests yet (except on H&C - on occasion) - but I don't watch FNC as much as used to. However, I have noticed a lot more new liberal faces than the small group of ususal suspects they used to have in the rotation. Either FN is reaching out or there are a lot of under-employed Democrat "strategists" with time on their hands to appear frequently.
McNotObama '08
The unseen hand
July 8, 2008 - 12:10 ET by pocomocoI have a tingle up and down my legs that Rupert Murdoch had a hand in this.
Fox News
July 8, 2008 - 18:18 ET by BarrackFox News Channel has moved from bland to outright disgraceful..
Evidence is very strong that Wolfson lied about Hillary's largest donor in 2000.
www.paulvclinton.com
www.benbarrack.com