After getting a huge amount of publicity for accusing the media elite of being "in the tank for Obama," the popular NBC show "Saturday Night Live" is trying now to combat allegations that it is biased in favor of Hillary Clinton. Matea Gold of the Los Angeles Times reports:
Executive producer Lorne Michaels has long maintained that the show risks its comedy credentials if it appears partisan. So he is troubled by the recent chatter that the venerable late-night program has exhibited a pro- Hillary Clinton bent.
"That's a major concern," Michaels said. "I can assure you that there's no agenda, that there's only a reaction to what's going in the world."
Story Continues Below Ad ↓Since returning to the air in late February after a hiatus forced by the writers strike, the NBC comedy showcase has zoomed back into the political zeitgeist.
When media toughened its coverage of Sen. Barack Obama after a "SNL" sketch portrayed the press as fawning over him, analysts credited the show in part for the shift. (Obama even joked that he was going to call Michaels to complain.)
A series of other bits in recent weeks have contributed to the perception that the program is trying to sway public opinion toward Clinton. Guest host Tina Fey gave a shout-out to the New York senator, saying women like her "get stuff done." The candidate herself made a lighthearted appearance the following week, appearing in a matching brown tweed suit with cast member Amy Poehler, who plays Clinton on the show.
Two days later, Clinton performed strongly in the Ohio and Texas primaries.
Seth Meyers, one of show's three head writers, said he was amused by suggestions that "Saturday Night Live" changed the momentum of the race.
"We don't quite feel we've affected it as much as people want to give us credit for," he said.
There's a lot more interesting stuff in the article so I highly recommend reading it. This is yet another case of Gold getting an interesting angle that her colleagues missed.
The last part of the excerpt above is interesting. It dovetails nicely with something that Ace said earlier today about the power left-wing media criticism has on "non-biased" elite media:
When the left makes an issue of media failings, the MSM falls over itself to either 1) correct those alleged failings or 2) defend themselves and claim they're doing their jobs just fine.
Steven Colbert poked fun at the media for being (hah!) lapdogs for Bush. They all vowed to be tougher and stop giving him the free pass he'd enjoyed for five years. SNL, which is basically just Newsweek's Conventional Wisdom Watch with recurring characters, knocked the media for fawning over Barack Obama. Suddenly they decided they had to start actually covering Obama like a political candidate rather than the Risen Christ.
On the right, we've been knocking the "Obamessiah" goofery for a frigging year. Did anyone notice? Nope. It took the left-wing crew at SNL to get the media's attention.
They don't even bother responding to us on the right, even in a clear-cut and provable systemic and deliberate case of a bias such as this. They don't even bother defending themselves. They just ignore us. Because they're not even reading us and even if they did, what we think just doesn't matter.
When various leftist bloggers attack MSM figures, the response is usually fairly immediate. Joe Klein spent weeks defending himself from lefty attacks; Paul Krugman just posted a blog entry defending himself against the charge he had dared to deny the divinity of Barack Obama.
This argument is pretty much on the money. See our earlier study about how Time magazine routinely overquotes lefty bloggers versus conservative/libertarian ones.
As far as "SNL" goes, I would definitely agree that it is much more politically fair than a lot of the other television comedy shows. Unlike the "Colbert Report" and the "Daily Show," Democrats get made fun of routinely, more now that committed lefty Tina Fey isn't tilting things. The show still lists leftward but far less than its cable competitors.
Any "MADtv" viewers care to comment on that show? I rarely catch it so don't want to venture an opinion on it.
—Matthew Sheffield is the creator of NewsBusters and its Executive Editor.



















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
On the right, we've been
March 13, 2008 - 15:22 ET by motherbeltOn the right, we've been knocking the "Obamessiah" goofery for a
frigging year. Did anyone notice? Nope. It took the left-wing crew at
SNL to get the media's attention.
They don't even bother responding to us on the right, even in a
clear-cut and provable systemic and deliberate case of a bias such as
this. They don't even bother defending themselves. They just ignore us. Because they're not even reading us and even if they did, what we think just doesn't matter.
I said before it proves that they can ignore criticism, but they can't stand ridicule. But maybe it's more than that. I think Ace is right; it's not the criticism, it's the source. They can ignore criticism from the right, but criticsm (in the form of ridicule) from their buddies on the left just cuts them to the quick!
Awwww the poor
March 13, 2008 - 15:28 ET by mattmAwwww the poor SNL...They've been Left-Leaning Clinton-Kissers for years and now they have too much of a pro-Hillary image....boo hoo.
(And jokes about billy's sexual improprieties don't measure up to issue/philosophical lampooning which they use against conservatives)
Yes that is true
March 13, 2008 - 15:32 ET by Matthew SheffieldUsually TV humor shows when they make fun of Democrats tend to focus on personal flaws and don't criticize their political stances.
It's part of a larger phenomenon, though. The same thing exists throughout the entire media. Liberalism very rarely gets challenged on philosophical grounds (i.e. is called evil or stupid) by most "objective" media outlets.
Matthew, do you have any
March 13, 2008 - 15:57 ET by balboaMatthew, do you have any examples of this?
Your own comment actually
March 13, 2008 - 16:04 ET by Matthew SheffieldNotice the things that Democrats were accused of. It was not maliciousness or inferior intelligence. Same with the skits of John Kerry and Al Gore. Bush and Cheney, meanwhile, routinely come in for both of those criticisms.
Hillary is accused of being personally rude but her agenda is not described as malicious. That is very different from the Darth Cheney persona that dominates TV political humor.
I don't know...I think this
March 13, 2008 - 16:16 ET by balboaI don't know...I think this cuts both ways, at least on SNL. Most of the humor comes out of the personalities of those involved.
With Kerry and Gore, they were depicted as incredibly dull. Because they were.
Bush as stupid because he can't talk. Cheney as Darth Vader because of his constant grimace, his "he's a real asshole" quote, and the fact that he shot someone in the face.
I don't watch SNL so much
March 13, 2008 - 22:36 ET by JerI don't watch SNL so much these days...but, I am not aware of Cheney being the butt of "inferior intelligence" jokes, there or elsewhere. Bush has been, inappropriately.
Jer
Plus, didn't SNL just make
March 14, 2008 - 09:18 ET by balboaPlus, didn't SNL just make fun of how HRC always goes on and on about health care reform?
I don't think SNL is
March 13, 2008 - 15:45 ET by balboaI don't think SNL is bemoaning this idea. They disagree. And I don't think they were kissing Clinton's butt with all the skits with Phil Hartman and Darrel Hammond as Clinton, or more recently when they did the Halloween skit where people kept complimenting Hillary on her witch costume.
About sums it up in a
March 13, 2008 - 15:42 ET by bigtimerAbout sums it up in a nutshell...when the right complains about bias or omissions, it is ignored, made light of, when the left complains about one of their own, it is taken care of immediately if not sooner...comedy shows or otherwise.
Nah...no agenda driven hypocrisy here.
MADtv blows SNL into the weeds.
March 13, 2008 - 16:06 ET by R D HelmTheme for Election '08: I want my mommy!
As I stumble across it while I'm surfing.....
March 13, 2008 - 16:10 ET by Prester John....I have yet to find anything remotely amusing on MadTV. Watching an Infomercial would be a better use of time.
PJ,
March 14, 2008 - 21:36 ET by R D HelmOkay, I guess my sense of humor is a little different than most.
Besides, I haven't watched it much in the last couple of seasons.
Theme for Election '08: I want my mommy!
So, How much longer
March 13, 2008 - 16:21 ET by JayTeeSo, How much longer can the MSM and company continue to Ignore the Critique from the Right, or the decreasing numbers on the Viewer scale ?
If Sales Shrink, Corporations Respond with Re-Orgs. If MSM has Profits drop via Ad Revenue, the Corporate Offices have to react.
Somewhere there is a Flash point, Business Trends are sitting out in the open for easy observation, as are the Ad Revenue trends.
The MSM's lack of Truth on Global warming, IRAQ being Ignored, the possibility of the MSM predicted Recession not materializing, all may be exposed one day, as a PERFECT STORM comes together.
The MSM will no longer be looked at as a keeper of the Public Trust. . . Only FOX O'Reilly brags "I got your Back", and acknowledges errors in his Reporting. HE Corrects. MSM Ignores their flaws . . . . but one day the Ad Revenues will have their way with them.
Matthew, SNL has been doing this for eons
March 13, 2008 - 21:54 ET by BlondeChevy Chase as a bumbling Gerald Ford....sticking an ice cream cone in his ear and falling over his own feet.
I disagreed with Noel last weekend over the SNL Obama/Hillary thing. I thought it equally skewered both of them. But that was just my take.
And, I found a transcript of the original Bush/Gore skit (Luoooock-box, Strategery)....the SNL stuff, when they are hitting their stride, is seriously funny (if you can find the vid with your superiour search engines, I'd love to watch it again). I truly believe the SNL crew don't have an axe to grind, other than making idiots look like fools.
IMO, the SNL writers just look for targets of opportunity....too bad, so sad, right now it's B. Hussein & Her Highness.
David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive
Al Franken ADMITTED it Blonde
March 13, 2008 - 22:08 ET by exLibE! Channel used to have these hour-long shows that were highlights of different eras of SNL each hosted by a different person from that ERA.
In one of the hour-long shows Al Franken either hosted it or was asked some questions about the way the show decided what it was going to do and naturally Al had to display his partisan and arrogant self.
He said that when they HAD to do skits on Jimmy Carter they all revered and respected him so much that they wouldn't go after him in the ordinary way so instead just made fun of his "massive intellect". Like a skit where Carter did a radio show where a caller to the show took bad acid and of course Jimmy was an expert on "brown acid" vs other kinds and helped talk the guy down from a bad acid trip.
Meanwhile they loved attacking Ford and then Reagan personally.
Consider the time when
March 13, 2008 - 22:12 ET by balboaConsider the time when Franken started at SNL. Just coming off Watergate and Vietnam, the most cutting edge comedy show of the day was going to skewer Republicans differently. SNL was the rebellious show, and the Republicans were the natural target.
Bal Jimmy Carter was horrible
March 13, 2008 - 22:41 ET by exLib.. and deserved to be lampooned from any and every angle possible.
I have to both laugh and get fighting mad whenever I see someone with either a T-Shirt or Bumper sticker that says Bush "worst president ever".
I always think that by every standard and statistic they use to measure Bush lacking Jimmy out-distances Bush by at least 4-1.
I think there have been several worse
March 13, 2008 - 22:48 ET by JerI think there have been several worse than either. But, Carter was pretty lousy.
Jer
Thanks, ex
March 13, 2008 - 22:19 ET by BlondeI hadn't heard that.
As they say..."beauty is in the eye of the beholder". So, I would have watched that segment thinking "Carter the acid expert".
Just like I recalled the Gore/Bush thing with Gore coming off like the plusperfect idiot (it was only after I read the transcript last weekend that I realized they actually skewered Bush, as well, with "strategery").
As far as Ford getting the skewer....I had an econ professor that did such a good sendoff of it that he had the fire marshall clearing the auditorium of jocks & other non-biz majors on a daily basis. Great memories.
What I appreciate the most about SNL is that they continually get us to pay attention to their political stuff....the rest of the show has been crap for years, but they are GREAT at stirring up the political pot.
David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive
Not saying it wasn't hillarious blonde
March 13, 2008 - 22:38 ET by exLibI think it's all funny stuff and I have come to realize over the last almost 10 years as a conservative that we are able to make fun of ourselves and tend to not take ourselves too seriously.
However, I also have come to realize that for the first 30 years of my life as a liberal MSM-bot I have been trained to think that you don't laugh at the left's sacred cows, while it's perfectly acceptable to attack the right on very personal grounds.
That's why when you look at U-Toob videos of "conservative based humor" the overwhelming response from liberals is that it isn't funny and personally I sometimes feel guilty laughing at it.
ex
March 13, 2008 - 22:45 ET by BlondeYour above commentary says it all....it's time for you to change your name from "exLib" to "theRealThing".
The best part about being a conservative, though, is understanding how hyper-un-funny the liberals really are. They have exactly zero sense of humor.
It's all good. :)
David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive
Well, Blonde...in my
March 13, 2008 - 23:07 ET by JerWell, Blonde...in my opinion, the rigid ideologues of both parties are generally deficient in the sense of humor department--unless it is at the expense of their polar opposites. Laughing at themselves? Very difficult.
Jer
Your point about rest of SNL
March 14, 2008 - 10:17 ET by Matthew Sheffieldis right on. I'd say the other skits are funny maybe 1 out of 15.
In the past, SNL was
March 13, 2008 - 21:59 ET by Free StinkerIn the past, SNL was more-or-less even-handed when poking fun at politicians on both sides of the aisle, but these days they've moved on to borderline active campaigning for Hillary.
Pledge to not support RINOs ever again!
Not really Free
March 13, 2008 - 22:16 ET by exLibin 1996 Chris Rock gave an in-kind contribution to the Clinton for President campaign with an all-out campaign speech for a monologue to start the show. He actually ended the monologue with the quote "So please go out and vote for Clinton".