The Party of Fear: Liberals Love a Good Scaring

Photo of Matthew Sheffield.

In this week's Weekly Standard, writer Noemie Emery gives an excellent look into the mindset of the fearful left, so angry at President Bush for "scaring" the public into Iraq and yet so eager to be scared itself:

"It Can Happen Here," says Joe Conason, in his book of the same name, and in fact it already has started: George W. Bush and his coterie are the very picture of the pious and scheming homegrown fascisti that Sinclair Lewis described in his 1935 novel "It Can't Happen Here." Similarities abound. In Lewis's novel, "Buzz Windrip" (Bush), an illiterate dweeb with sleazy charm and low animal cunning, backed by Lee Sarason (Karl Rove), a smooth and duplicitous political mastermind, becomes president, cooks up a fake war to extend his own power, cows Congress, corrupts the courts, bankrupts the country, and all but destroys the free press. The core of his power is a sinister nexus of theocrats joined at the hip to corporate interests, and you can tell how evil they are by their proclaimed love of country, and their incessant talk about God. In their endeavors, they are backed by the Hearst newspaper empire (Fox News), the only one left after all other outlets have been shut down.

Fox News looms large in the liberal panic about creeping fascism--an immense smoke machine pumping poison gas into the atmosphere 24/7, against which there is neither escape nor defense. This theory of the pervasive malevolent power of Fox rests on a quip by anchor Brit Hume that the network played a decisive role in the 2002 midterms, which Conason seems to take seriously, and the scholarly output of two obscure professors arguing that Fox swung the presidential elections of 2000 and 2004 as well. "Citing what they call 'The Fox Effect,'" Conason informs us, "professors Stefano Della Vigna of the University of California at Berkeley and Ethan Kaplan of the University of Stockholm found that the network convinced 2 to 8 percent of its non-Republican viewing audience to 'shift its voting behavior toward the Republican party.'" If they say so. But there is no corresponding mention of the NBC-ABC-CBS-Time-Newsweek-New York Times "effect," and what its impact on voters might be.

At the same time that Conason is looking back to a fictional past in America, Naomi Wolf--last heard from in 2000 advising Al Gore to dress in earth tones--is looking back to a real past in Europe, and seeing troubling parallels. In 4,600 overwrought words, she explained to the readers of the Guardian that there are ten steps to "Fascist America" and Bush is taking them all. He has whipped up a menace (the war on terror); created "a prison system outside the rule of law" (Guantánamo, to which public dissidents, including "clergy and journalists" will be sent "soon enough"); developed "a thug caste .  .  . groups of scary young men out to terrorize citizens" (young Republican staffers who supposedly "menaced poll workers" during the 2000 recount in Florida); set up an "internal surveillance system" (NSA scanning for phone calls to and from terrorists). An airtight case, this, and leading to just one conclusion: "Beneath our very noses, George Bush and his administration are using time-tested tactics to close down an open society. It is time for us to be willing to think the unthinkable .  .  . that it can happen here."

Well, this explains many things. It explains why poor Cindy Sheehan is now sitting in prison; why Bush critics like CIA retiree Valerie Plame have been ostracized by the corporate media and are wasting away in anonymity; why no critic of Bush can get a hearing, why no book complaining about him can ever get published, and why our multiplexes are filled with one pro-Bush propaganda movie after another, glorifying the Iraq war and rallying the nation behind its leader.

Meanwhile, back on planet Earth, Cindy Sheehan is running for Congress; Valerie Plame is rich and famous; the young Republican "thugs" made all of one appearance seven years ago--chanting "Let us in!" when Miami-Dade County vote counters planned to move to a small inner room with no observers present; and press censorship is now so far-reaching that you can't even expose a legal, effective, and top-secret plan to trace terrorists without getting a Pulitzer Prize. "What if the publisher of a major U.S. newspaper were charged with treason or espionage?" Wolf asks breathlessly. "What if he or she got 10 years in jail?" Well, journalists have been harassed, pressed for their sources, and threatened with prison, but not by George W. Bush and his people. Back in the real world, only one prominent journalist has been jailed by the federal government in recent memory, and that was Judith Miller, imprisoned for 80-plus days for contempt by prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald, the great hero of the anti-Bush forces for having indicted Vice President Cheney's chief of staff.

—Matthew Sheffield is the creator and editor of NewsBusters.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Not another fictional book for liberals

Oh Mr. Sheffield, PLEASE not another fictional book liberals are digging through quoting it as Scripture.

They already have 1984 which they quote on blogger sites like it was given to Moses on the mount. Maybe this is partly my fault in telling Steven Webber and those dolts on Huffington that 1984 WAS ABOUT THEM in being Orwell's condemnation about socialist communists. For that I will apologize, but digging up Sinclair Lewis fiction to try and hammer Bush with that.........when are liberals going to jump into reality and stop looking for a scripture to put their faith in to prove George Bush is a bad boy.

The hours these baseless liberals must invest looking for something........I mean Billy Baldwin was on Kimmel wearing a t shirt living for the day in January Bush is out of office. How can one waste their entire life wading through fiction and looking to an event that will not change a thing.

Emery and Baldwin will still be the miserable mindless meandering moles of the undergrowth the day Bush is not on the scene anymore. Bush will be back in haven Texas like the old man having a good time in life..........and probably surprising Democrats as Clinton did when he went to see Reagan in how to find out how to be president and had Nixon in his secret cabinet and shunning that idiot Carter like the plague.

That is what will happen.....the hate will remain in Democrats and by God's grace they will be hating Fred Thompson in 2008 and beyond..........am looking forward to it though as in knowing Liberals the guys and gals will all be making fun of Jeri's boobs.......which of course means liberal guys will be asking their tarties to silicon it up and we will be seeing all the anchors competing in cup size.

I guess the Sinclair Lewis immoral of the story will be, buy silicon stock.

Man never thought I would get to boobs in a pulp fiction commentary....bet you never did either lol.

 

*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS

Emery

She is a conservative and ought not to be lumped with Baldwin. Otherwise, I agree.

Still looking for...

I'm still looking for a closeup of Thompson's Trophy wife.....You just can't get good coverage from the MSM .........

What good is a Free Press, if it is a False Press ?   David Foote  GoE

IT can happen here

"becomes president, cooks up a fake war to extend his own power, cows Congress, corrupts the courts, bankrupts the country, and all but destroys the free press." 

Add a death toll of 100's of thousands, and you got Saddam Hussein.......That's who the book was about ?  Right  ?

It couldn't be about Bush....he's too smart, he continues to outsmart the Dems....as we see the worm turn in Iraq...

IF the Dems were "True" Americans, they would not be in Trouble over the war...they would be seen as supporting the Troops.  But they are DEMS first, and Americans 2nd.....wait..Uh..Bush haters 2nd, Americans 3rd....wait..Uh...Uh..Liberals 3rd....Americans 4th...wait..uh..uh...well you get the drift. 

What good is a Free Press, if it is a False Press ?   David Foote  GoE

BDS

We need to come up with a new phrase that explains the mindset beyond Bush Derangement Syndrome. Advanced Bush Derangement Syndrome, perhaps.  These nuts go beyond regular BDS.  What parallel universe do they live in?

One I like

is the "alternate reality-based community" after their self-righteous description of themselves as the "reality-based community."

Who was prez in 1935??

I just listened to FDR's first inaugural address (transcript here)
from 1933. Much of it, if translated into spanish, would pass for
a Castro or Hugo Chavez diatribe on the evils of capitalist bankers and
industrialists. Other parts, dealing with expansion of
presidential powers, sound like a set-up for a dictatorship.
Consider that he did end up 'President-for-Life.' Seems like
Sinclair Lewis was writing about current events for his own time, not
some unknown future.

FDR must read

If you tell a lie big enough

If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.

 

"No one ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American Public."

-H.L. Mencken

Uh... so what's the

Uh... so what's the "lie"?

"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...

MM... I was wondering the

MM...

I was wondering the same thing! 

Get Email updates from Fred http://socialnet.imwithfred.com/email_alert_july_26.html

That's why you are

That's why you are republicans, because you can not see the lies and I need not explain them to you.  It is not just one lie, it is a whole pack of lies.  Someday you may figure it out, until then you'll just be an ignorant American, but that's alright, that's the majority of you.

"No one ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American Public."

-H.L. Mencken

Jeeez... I consider

Jeeez...

I consider myself a very informed person, and have read almost everything there is concerning this subject. So far I have not seen any lies. You had better state them categorically or you will be considered just another turd.

Get Email updates from Fred http://socialnet.imwithfred.com/email_alert_july_26.html

Ding ding ding!!

CONGRATULATIONS REPUBLICANDO!

You have won a one-way ticket to a country with an oppressor of your choice!

No longer will you have to suffer living among ignorant Americans.

This message brought to you by:

Troll Alert

We guarantee to rid your blog of trolls by giving them what they ask for. 

Toasted

Without butter.