The 'Petraeus Report' Myth

Photo of Matthew Sheffield.
  • Bookmark and Share

Democrats in and out of the media are crying foul over what they see as a nefarious Bush White House plot to artificially bump up its standing by rewriting a report from general David Petraeus on the state of things in Iraq.

Trouble is, the administration is required by law to write it:

In the past few weeks we've heard that the White House won't let Petraeus speak. Then we've heard that he'll only provide input to the September 15th Benchmark report, and the White House will then spin that.

I had the opportunity today to talk with a DoD Legislative Affairs expert who went over the law itself.

The law is the Supplemental Appropriations Law (Public Law 110-28, "U.S. Troop Readiness, Veterans’ Care, Katrina Recovery, and Iraq Accountability Appropriations Act, 2007") which funds the war in Iraq. Within that law are various reports which are mandated. For instance, Section 13-14 mandates the Benchmark report, which is to be submitted on the 15th of the month, by the President. It will, of course, have DoD and State Department input and cover the 18 benchmarks outlined in the law. But again, the law requires the President submit the report, not Gen. Petraeus and not Abm. Crocker.

From the law:

(A) The President shall submit an initial report, in classified and unclassified format, to the Congress, not later than July 15, 2007, assessing the status of each of the specific benchmarks established above, and declaring, in his judgment, whether satisfactory progress toward meeting these benchmarks is, or is not, being achieved.

(B) The President, having consulted with the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Defense, the Commander, Multi-National Forces-Iraq, the United States Ambassador to Iraq, and the Commander of U.S. Central Command, will prepare the report and submit the report to Congress. [...]

Last, but not least, there is no "Petraeus report" due. That's not to say we're not going to hear from Gen. Petraeus. But the law mandates no written report from him or Amb. Crocker. What it does mandate, however, is that Petraeus and Crocker deliver an assessment via testimony to the Congress prior to the Sept. 15th benchmark report to be delivered by the WH. And they will indeed do that in both open and closed session.

In short, none of the spin you're hearing in the media is based on fact. The White House is supposed to write the report and Petraeus will testify before congress. I wonder, though, whether any Democrats will show since last time Petraeus testified before Congress, neither Nancy Pelosi nor Jack Murtha, chair of the House Appropriations Defense Subcommittee bothered to show up.

Don't tell that to Bob Schieffer, though. He's still stuck in his rabbit hole.

—Matthew Sheffield is the creator of NewsBusters and its Executive Editor.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Not an Issue......

Since Petraeus is Testifying on the 11th, in front of Congress, the report will be on the 14th.  The Required by Law Report follows the Petraeus Testimony.....at least that's what I remember the as the schedule of Events.

Congress can't make Political Hay out of that one....Petraeus first, Bush Second....zero complaints...well, legitimate complaints.

Petraeus should open with....."If anyone would like to Surrender, I am accepting white flags at this time"... 

What good is a Free Press, if it is a False Press ?   David Foote  GoE

Mr. Sheffield how responsible of you

Mr. Sheffield do you not care that the entire MSM will probably blow apart because you did something completely unheard of and talked to someone who knows exactly what the DOD protocols are?

Goodness you never had one thing about global warming, how children feel about insurance, the need for higher taxes and an introduction of Bill Clinton at a grape tasting seminar. How can you do a factual story on the Petraeus Report and not have any of the above in it like the MSM always does?

By your only covering the facts what will Keith Olberman do now on Sunday Night Football, but rant about how Michael Vick in dog fighting is linked to the fighting in Iraq and how George Bush "betrayed us" and how "betrayed us" rhymes with "Petraeus", so that means George Bush had a gambling interest in dog fighting and should be impeached.

More people will now trust you and Newsbusters and you will be responsible for turning the dinosaur media into the fossil media.

I hope you are pleased Mr. Sheffield as I could not be more pleased for the standards you set and here am I a bit envious of you actually getting to talk with a DOD rep........always a treat to speak with those people as one always gets the facts from them.

(Oh better put a disclaimer for liberals that the scolding was satire and I am not a liberal nor do I play one to get government handouts nor donations from Chinese from an address in San Francisco.)

 

*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS

BLACKFIVE has an excellent

BLACKFIVE has an excellent summary up about the report and the following assessment.

http://www.blackfive...

Matt, I am shocked that

Matt,

I am shocked that your blog post only received 3 comments thus far.

It is going to be a hugely important topic in a few days.

Okay you NB's....read this and soak it in.  This is important stuff! 

David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive