Advertisers want to shy away from controversy.  However Murdoch can sell packages that include plays on Fox network, Fox Business and Fox News Channel to larger advertisers.

Of course only a few kooks will actually boycott anyone. But that one stop many advertisers from cringing in fear. 

Murdoch should ban the cowards from the highly rated Fox network shows and from Super Bowl and World Series advertising. 

He can also have Fox News report on the "List of Cowards".

 I am not an advocate of censorship in any way shape or form, or of attacks on free market advertising, but you know the saying, maybe it's time to "fight fire with fire", or " dont' bring a knife to a gun fight".

The last time I checked FNC had way more veiwership than PMSNBC, The Communist News Network, or any other Liberally biased broadcast news mediums.

Just another example of the Lib moonbats not wanting any message to get out to the public but thier own, and the knowledge that thier coveted fairness doctrine will not police television.

Just goes to show these people do not buy into thier own arrogance in believing they have an "overwhelming majority", or a "mandate" for anything, concerning the voters in the United States, therefore the few mediums that draw on Conservatives must be shutdown.

Talk radio's, and FNC's millions upon millions of listeners, and watchers, befuddle, and mystify the Lib's, who do not understand that the general public has grown tired of the outright biased, doom, and gloom, the hate, and the blatant hypocrisy of the far left.

I my opinion FNC isn't a right leaning network anyway. It has it's  fairshare of Liberal pundits, such as Alan Colmes, and Jerry Rivers. In the opinion of Liberals, any medium that's in the middle, and not leaning far far left like all of the other mediums, is far right. 

"You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious. "

                   - Ben Kenobi on  Liberals, and the MSM.

Little Green Footballs has an interesting sidelight to this story-apparently DailyKAOS is claiming credit for Lowe's pulling its ads from O'Reilly's show, but it turns out Lowes bailed on O'Reilly last winter.

This boycott scheme will probably backfire on the Dems. Remember when a conservative housewife from Michigan named Terry Rakolta tried to organize a Fox boycott because she was offended by "Al Bundy"? The show got tons of free publicity, and the show's producers for the rest of the show's run sent Terry a fruit basket at Christmas with a thank-you note!

Stranger than truth, Terry's husband John is now the Treasurer for Mitt Romney's campaign. Her sister Ronna used to be married to one of Mitt's brothers.

These are NOT “loony” leftists, or leftist “moonbats.”

Do not cavalierly dismiss their "work."

They are all part of a group of Socialist or worse, Communist organizations, whose agenda, among many, is to silence the opposition.  Remember Goal #20 & 21 of the Communist Goals, as stated in the congressional Record in 1963:

20. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policymaking positions.

21. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.

We we sit here complaining about what they do, they are actually succeeding in completing their agendas. 

Liberals mounted a 'boycott' on orange juice for similar reasons back in the 90s. Rush just smiled and suggested that his listeners go down to the supermarket where the 4-5 liberal loonies had gathered to stage their protest, and buy all the orange juice the store had in stock.

A grand time was had by all - except the protestors. Listeners went in droves and enjoyed cool, refreshing glasses of OJ, preparing and drinking it right in front of them until the protestors stormed away in disgust.

That's the best thing we can do to these loons and their stalinist tactics - use the new media and free market economics to shove it right down their geeky throats.

Whatever they protest or 'boycott', we should rally to support these products. Chances are, it'll be on stuff that we'd normally use and buy anyway - so why not use the liberal loonies furious opposition as an added incentive to do what we normally do anyway - fuel the american economy?

The more they try to tighten their grip, the more the people of this country will slip through their fingers...

  It just so happens I'm on my way to Home Depot now.  When I get there I bet I see a lot more pick-up trucks than I do those silly little hybrids.  

   It's quite obvious that the left knows their arguments are weak and unconvincing.  So they are doing what leftists have always had to do, shut down alternative viewpoints. 

  The reason leftists always lose the debate is because every time their ideas are implemented they fail.  No country tried harder than China to make socialism and collectivism work.  Millions died.  The country was mired in poverty.  Only after market reforms and the influx of capitalism coupled with competition has China emerged into the modern world.  Socialism couldn't work there because with such a large population there wasn't enough wealth for the government to seize and redistribute. By making everyone equally poor the economy came to a virtual halt.

We should just send the FOX advertisers a copy of the "Screw them" comment made by the Daily Kos founder and ask do they really want to cave in to the demands of a jerk like that.

*Sheehan-vs-Pelosi*
"This could get ugly"

I don't believe we should dismiss these efforts either, even if some of them go no where.  They need only succeed once for their agenda to be advanced (Dr. Laura).  However, there seems to be an overarching theme of money in the libs strategy.  Just as they want to deny money to Fox or any other level headed business, they also want to direct viewership to liberal supporting businesses.  A good example of this is CNN's pushing of Youtube.  Google owns Youtube, and we know anecdotally that Google tends to support the liberal agenda. Again on the flip side, the Dem candidates boycotted the Fox sponsored Debates, I contend this was not simply a petty partisan issue but a deliberate attempt to deny the financial benefit of viewership to Fox and by extension financially benefit the liberal MSM.

Also consider that liberal investments are smarting from the decrease in viewership and circulation in the MSM businesses.  Any increase in viewership for Fox News, New York Post, and conservative news websites is a decrease for them in their view (zero-sum thinking). 

Consider also an interesting case in point with the hype over bottled water.  Who stands to financially benefit with the new craze by libs by shunning bottled water?  Filtered water... of which PUR by P&G a dominant player in this business.  BTW- The Clinton Foundation endores PUR and is supporting the UN agency UNICEF purchasing the PUR water treatment system (at cost).  I submit that just like Al Gore profiting from the carbon credit scam, liberals are also profiting or financially benefiting in some manner.

 Given the attempts to deny non liberal news outlets any share in the public's eye, it behooves all Repub and Conservatives to deny any further debates that involve their candidates on any liberal MSM outlet.  We don't NEED them to reach the public, so why give them the financial benefit or even the legitamcy?

“The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane"