Glass Houses: Soros-Funded Alternet Accuses GOP of 'Treason'
Usually, it's easy to dismiss the moonbat ravings of the far left. But when liberals, always ready to indignantly accuse conservatives of "questioning my patriotism," start suggesting their political opponents are "committing treason," the hypocrisy merits notice. Doubly so when the allegation of treason is made on a website that takes money from George Soros.
In a July 20 column on Alternet, Cliff Schecter, "president of Libertas, LLC, a progressive public relations firm," joined the echo chamber of liberals lamenting that the Republican Party had become radicalized by "the forces of the anti-American, gun-toting, religious and corporate Right that have taken over the GOP."
There's nothing new there - standard talking points for the left - except for this bizarre charge of anti-Americanism. Schecter expounded on his claim saying: "When facing changes to this nation that make them uncomfortable, they choose national hate. When facing ideological worship versus the greatness of the U.S., the former always wins the day. When facing a choice of what is good for the U.S. or their personal bank accounts, they inevitably go with the latter. Every. Single. Time."
Schecter claimed that some of the ways the GOP "work[s] to undermine America" are with "simplistic calls for 'austerity'" from "small-minded men such as Representative Paul Ryan of Wisconsin." All are left-wing boiler plate, beneath debate.
But the charge of treason is rich coming from Alternet, and from Schecter. Alternet is in the pocket of left-wing billionaire George Soros, and as part of a liberal group called the Media Consortium, has taken $425,000 from his Open Society Institute. The Media Consortium is a propaganda apparatus that creates an "echo chamber" "in which a message pushes the larger public or the mainstream media to acknowledge, respond, and give airtime to progressive ideas because it is repeated many times."
Some of Schecter's Libertas LLC clients are also recipients of Soros largesse. The Alliance for Climate Protection got $5 million from Soros in 2008, and Brave New Films is also part of the Media Consortium. That's not to mention the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee and the Democratic National Committee - both are listed as Schecter clients and both have received money from Soros for more than a decade.
None of that would matter much, except that George Soros doesn't like America (which took him in after WWII ) or its economic system (which has made him one of the richest men in the world). And he's actively trying to tear them down.
To Soros, "the main enemy of the open society, I believe, is no longer the communist but the capitalist threat." So he has called for and even taken steps to bring about a "new multilateral system based on sounder principles" in which America isn't so dominant. "The postwar order," Soros wrote in 2009, "which made the U.S. more equal than others, produced dangerous imbalances."
His megalomaniacal vision would "reconstitute the International Monetary Fund" and reorganize the UN to America's detriment: "Reorganizing the world order will need to extend beyond the financial system and involve the United Nations, especially membership of the Security Council," he wrote. "That process needs to be initiated by the U.S., but China and other developing countries ought to participate as equals."
Why? "[B]ecause a declining superpower losing both political and economic dominance but still preserving military supremacy is a dangerous mix."
George Soros holds no position in the U.S. government. He holds no position with the UN or any of the international economic bodies (that liberals believe confer authority). He is a private citizen on a self-proclaimed mission to neuter American power. His tools are his myriad foundations that fund a media empire full of fellow liberals whose many conflicts of interest are ignored.
Anyone associated with Soros should be careful about slinging around the charge of treason.
- Matthew Philbin's blog
- Login to post comments















Comments
Wow. Leftisis really ARE flakey, are they not?
Submitted by johnsonl on Thu, 07/21/2011 - 1:55pm.
How could God fearing, gun toting Americans be anti-American?
Oh, yeah...the whole liberal "projection" thing.
Because--and this is not me talking
Submitted by Quasi-socialist on Thu, 07/21/2011 - 2:15pm.
--you stand in the way for America to be truly great. You're "anti-American" because people who are turned away from emergency rooms for a lack of private healthcare are Americans and you don't care if they live or die.
And let me pull something else out of that same crevice: Mexicans are "Americans" too. America is the continent, so if you don't want to fund healthcare for somebody simply because they are Mexican (obvious strawman), you're "anti-American".
Proof by word-association and stream-of-consciousness...or something.
Interesting.
Submitted by Newsbubba on Thu, 07/21/2011 - 4:07pm.
Send us a list of everyone you know who was "turned away by an emergency room."
And while you're working out of "that same crevice," Mexicans, along with all Central Americans, South Americans, and Canadians are americans. They just aren't U.S. citizens. So why don't you suggest that the americans in Mexico go see the americans in Canada, because they have a great healthcare system!
If those americans in Mexico want a really good deal, suggest that they go see their boy in Cuba, like Hugo did. Now there is a fantastic system!
By the way, Americans are different from americans.
Again, like I said, it's not me talking
Submitted by Quasi-socialist on Fri, 07/22/2011 - 12:40am.
I'm just using the same stream-of-consciousness, free-association that liberals do. But you would capitalize the type of American that Mexicans are, because we capitalize European and Asian in the same way.
Hey, like I said in my own post, I don't see how catching up with Canada makes us "great".
"When facing changes to this nation that make them uncomfortable
Submitted by Quasi-socialist on Thu, 07/21/2011 - 2:18pm.
"they choose national hate."
Or...their vote, and their voice . How scandalous that a dissenting group cannot try to vote the country away what makes them uncomfortable?!
Maybe. But they chose that. And perhaps they don't consider what you have planned "greatness"? And they use their influence to stand in the way of "greatness" defined by you?!
That's treason. Yeah, it would be so much better if we hung people over violating a narrow paradigm, not getting out of the way fast enough, or just not shutting up.
"Treason" is just another word for "I don't like how you affect this country". It's a strong word, and so the liberal invective machine reaches for it. I doubt that they'd hang us for it, and thus through the mechanism of liberal emotional invective, "Treason" loses its teeth...as it pretty much has already.
What's really ironic is that there are countries that have 1) socialized medicine and 2) gay marriage. If they are great, aren't you really saying that America is less great for the lack of these things. And how does America achieve "greatness" simply by catching up?
Somebody's not checking their math.
"When facing changes to this
Submitted by Beukeboom on Thu, 07/21/2011 - 2:29pm.
"When facing changes to this nation that make them uncomfortable, they choose national hate. When facing ideological worship versus the greatness of the U.S., the former always wins the day. When facing a choice of what is good for the U.S. or their personal bank accounts, they inevitably go with the latter. Every. Single. Time."
Wow! Cliff Schecter just accurately described Obama and his cronies.
Conservatives are "anti-American"?
Submitted by Phryj1 on Thu, 07/21/2011 - 2:33pm.
I've noticed progtrolls using that meme lately, and I figured out why. See, the proggies idea of 'American' is welfare, food stamps, wealth redistribution, and a big, powerful, authoritarian nanny state making sure the individual is subservient to society. They actually think those things are what makes a country great, and anyone trying to stop those things is 'anti-American'.
The proggies are completely backwards. They take money from foreign interests to transform the US into an authoritarian welfare state, and they consider us traitors for trying to stop them.
If you look at things objectively, you see that what the Progressive left is doing is arguably traitorous, and their worldviews are anti-American on a fundamental level.
Progressives seem to be completely averse to facts and logic. Apparently, reality has a conservative bias.
If taking foreign money from a known America-hater...
Submitted by Dave. on Thu, 07/21/2011 - 2:40pm.
...and using it to promote the destruction of America as it was founded isn't treason, then what is?
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
Ain't dat da truf?
Submitted by Newsbubba on Thu, 07/21/2011 - 4:18pm.
I know that we have laws against "eliminating" foreign rulers, but is there any reason that the CIA or SEAL Team 6 can't whack an "economic terrorist" like Soros who has already proved that he will collapse the economy of a country for his own gain.
The man is a bigger Fascist now than he was when he worked for Hitler!
Best part would be, Bambi wouldn't know what the hell to do the morning after it happened with no hand up his sock puppet butt.
Not just a fascist
Submitted by Mutantone on Fri, 07/22/2011 - 12:48am.
Well he is after all a friend to Fort BREENDONK.