"he’s an expert at pushing a gay agenda in public grammar schools"

I think 0 KNOWS he's getting voted out in 2012. I think that's always been the plan.

I'm not sure exactly why yet. Maybe this, maybe because the media will ramp it up to be racist, and so send US race relations back to the stone age, maybe something else. Maybe all of the above.

But this guy is AIMING to get voted out in 2012.

___________________________________________________________
Graphical conservative commentary - animations & pictures for posting on forums: http://ubama.org/chu...

Looks like it's time for Jennings to become yet another Obama administration official to undergo one of Glenn Beck's famous blackboard analyses with all the circles and the arrows....

MSNBC - The Place For Lunatics

What in the world is it going take to get the (non-existing) media and a vast majority of AMERICANS to take notice of what the hell is going on with this prez?

There IS something very concerning happening, and for most, just a bunch of zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz's. 

Pretty soon it will be too late. 

What then?

Harvard, as far as I know with a few other IV leagues, were founded by Christians but have been over run by this junk as of late.

I just don't understand how these people can claim to be sensitive and open minded yet at the same time can feel good about sending out this hateful one way mind view. Ignorance must be bliss.

               This guy shouldn't be a czar, he should be in prison. He's a freak.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          

Jennings is in the position that he is in because he is a champion against the bullying of gay students.  Fair enough -- intolorence and violent gay-bashing is a legitimate concern in schools; however, Jennings is a passionate advocate of making gay awareness the focal point of teacher training and school curricula.  He's a one-trick pony:  "Don't pick on gay kids." Right.  Got it.  Move on.  Thankyouverymuch.  I'm not sure that this monomaniacal stanpoint warrants a czar post, though.

I really don't care what Harvard chooses to display in its art musem.  It is a private institution, and as long as no public funds were diverted to this display, so be it.  I always chuckle, however, when Reagan is blamed for AIDS, when it is a matter of historical record that homosexual men in the bathhouses of San Francisco and elsewhere refused to adopt safe sex practices.  It was, after all, their "right" to engage freely in unprotected anonymous sex until they knew with 100% certainty that such practices were the main cause of the spread of the disease.  Jennings's contributions to the exhibit only show what a shallow leftist he is.

As far as I'm concerned, the worst association that President Obama has had is still that nut Van Jones. This guy Jennings seems rather mild in comparison. Unless he did anything to denigrate our troops, I really have a thick skin over him. After all, you talking to someone like me who is a follower of Penn and Teller, and who also believes that the Vatican is about one of the most corrupt cesspools of incompetence and perniciousness.

By the way, are you trying to out-WorldNutDaily WorldNutDaily? As I recall, the first time I heard about this organization Mass Resistance may have been in conjunction to that nontroversey involving the topless mermaid logo for Starbucks coffee. They were apparently the ones who brought it up. I did a little searching and apparently the founder of this group is named "John Connor" and he believes our biggest threats are the Starbucks logo, homosexuality, and the machines. Anybody want to take a guess that this dude's mother is Sarah Connor and that his android guardian is now governor of California? Of course I might be thinking of a similarly-named organization that I may have mislabeled, but I'm too lazy to double check right now.

1) No one should be judged competent or incompetent to do their job based on their taste in art, unless their job is to be an art critic. 

2) This is a historical exhibition exploring an underground culture that most people probably don't know about.  You can find worth in that whether or not you agree with the political message that culture espoused.  I can imagine that for anyone who was part of that community, those images, ideas, that anger and fear, are incredibly powerful and evocative whether or not you actually LIKE any of them.  Art isn't about being nice or pretty, it is about provoking an emotional response.  Don't like it?  Fine, stick to landscapes and skip the visit to the Harvard Art Museum this time.