Nick's Big Green Hype


Chuck E. Cheese's, the arcade/pizza restaurant chain popular for children's birthday parties, has a marketing slogan: "Where a kid can be a kid." It's a nice, simple phrase that punctuates its TV ads. And it's highlighted by contrast when the ads appear on the children's network Nickelodeon.

It's not that that Nick has replaced "Sponge Bob" or "Fairly Odd Parents" with adult programming - Nick's entertainment fare is still fun and silly. It's that Nick has launched "The Big Green Help," a multimedia campaign that encourages the network's young viewers to become junior environmentalists, and major finger-waggers. "Nickelodeon's Big Green Help is all about helping YOU find simple, positive ways to protect the Earth every day," explains the home page on Nick's Web site.

The Big Green Help is filled to the brim with throbbing dance music, bright colors (green most prominent, of course), grinning teen celebrities and feel-good phrases, Nick is indoctrinating kids into the secular cult of environmentalism, and it wants them to indoctrinate you in turn.

Where a Kid can be a Pawn

Nick is a very successful family of kid- and teen-centered channels, part of the MTV Networks owned by media conglomerate Viacom, which claims Nickelodeon is "the most-watched television network by kids in the United States, and basic cable's #1 network overall."

Nick achieved its success by understanding what kids like and knowing how to convince them to like its wares. Done for profit, this is called marketing and branding. Done for politics, it's propaganda. The Big Green Help is propaganda.

According to a press release announcing the launch of the initiative, Nickelodeon/MTVN Kids and Family Group Executive Vice President of Public Affairs Marva Smalls said, "With The Big Green Help, we want to provide them with the necessary tools and information so they can become part of the environmental solution."

If kids can be part of the solution, there must be a problem. Obviously, The Big Green Help takes it as a given that a) global warming is real and b) humans are causing it. Nick doesn't acknowledge on the site or in the ads run continuously on the network the considerable skepticism of and disagreement with these views. That might not sit well with Nick's partner in the campaign, the radical Natural Resources Defense Council.

NRDC, who's Board of Trustees includes liberal celebrities like Robert Redford, Leonardo DiCaprio and Laurie David, boasts a staff of "more than 350 lawyers, scientists and other professionals," and spent about 59 million on "environmental programs" including lobbying in 2007.

A glance at NRDC's Web site is evidence enough of the council's extremism. Humans, through greedy uncaring business interests, are slaughtering species, polluting the oceans and destroying the planet with our greenhouse gasses. The global warming we're creating contributes to all sorts of scary - but unproven - phenomena, including coastal flooding, more frequent and damaging wildfires in the western United States and stronger hurricanes.

NRDC's answer? It advocates massive, compulsory disruption of the U.S. economy to cut CO2 emissions. The Group's Web site calls for new laws, regulations and technology mandates for industry, and even wants government to regulate the "appliances and equipment in our homes and offices to reduce our electricity needs." That the cost might run to trillions of dollars and diminished liberty is of no consequence. Funny, though, just about the only measure NRDC doesn't propose is increasing use of mostly carbon-free nuclear power.

Not that you'd learn any of that from The Big Green Help. In fact, it doesn't offer kids much information at all beyond a few factoids ("About 20% of CO2 emissions in the United States comes from cars. That's a lot.") and environmentalist platitudes ("Too much of the Earth's energy and precious natural resources are wasted every day." And "Humans have created a lot of things that send too much CO2 into the Earth's atmosphere.")

On the Web site, kids can take "The Big Green Quiz." Depending on how well they answer multiple choice questions like "Recycling an aluminum can saves how much of the energy needed to create a brand new can?" and "Recycling one ton of paper saves how many trees?" they can earn the title "eco-warrior." Nick provides few sources and no context for the information it uses. The site doesn't give evidence or even provide links to educational resources.

It certainly doesn't offer a hint of doubt about green pieties.

But it does have games! All motion, lights and sounds of the video game industry are brought to bear to drive home the eco messages. From the urgent ("Battle CO2 monsters in 3D!") to the prosaic ("Help Bessie build a backyard habitat!"), players get to be environmental good guys who pick up trash and conserve water for fun and points.

Where a Kid can be a Scold

When they tire of "regreening" the virtual landscape with The Avatar Earth Healers, young visitors can "Pledge it!" that is, "Help battle CO2 in the in the real world by pledging Big Green Help actions." These actions fall under four categories:

  • Slow the Flow -- Educating kids on how to curtail the waste of energy and natural resources.
  • Recycle and Pre-Cycle -- Encouraging the use of items which can be recycled.
  • Curb the Car -- Encouraging kids to get where they're going without automobiles.
  • Grow the Green -- Planting trees and preserving our natural resources, kids can create a greener planet and also spread the word.

Within four theme categories, kids can pledge separate actions that, they are told, will remove a certain amount of CO2 from the atmosphere. Each of the "pledges and CO2 offsets [were] developed in collaboration with the National Wildlife Federation."

Under "Slow the Flow" of resources, kids can pledge to "Replace 5 ordinary light bulbs with compact fluorescent bulbs (CFLs)" and save 563 lbs. of carbon per year. Under "Curb the Car," a child can save 420 lbs. of CO2 per year by walking or biking four miles a week. In "Recycle/Precycle," he or she can "Skip bottled water & drink filtered tap water instead." (Coincidentally, the Natural Resources Defense Council is no fan of bottled water, even though 100% of plastic water bottles can be recycled, according to the International Bottled Water Association.)

Nick isn't put off by the necessary inclusion of and deference to adults in these pledges. Big Green Helpers shouldn't be shy about insisting others behave in an environmentally suitable manner.

A young "eco warrior" can eliminate more than 700 lbs. of CO2 per year by reminding "parents to turn off the engine when their [sic] waiting in the car" and reminding them to "keep their care tires properly inflated every month." If Little Tommy can "convince one person each month to replace five ordinary light bulbs with CFLs," you're talking almost 6800 lbs. a year (along with a corresponding drop in his popularity.)

The Big Green Help wouldn't be a proper environmental initiative if it didn't give your little eco-nags an avenue for self congratulation and righteous indignation.

Hence, the site's message boards, which, with appropriately child-like sincerity, give ample evidence that Nicks indoctrination is effective. Here's a post from Evergirl44 [all posts appear with their original spelling, grammar and punctuation]:

"I love living on the earth it gives us oxygen and the things we need I think saving electricity and helping the earth should be something that every person should have to live by." [italics added]

Polly 164, was obviously in high dudgeon when she started a thread with this post:

"OK ANYBODY THAT IS A HONEST TREE HUGER THAN SEND ME COMMENTS. WE NEED TO STOP THIS KNOW. THEY ARE DESTROYING THE FOREST.WE ETHEIR NEED TO STOP THEM OR WEN PLANT MORE.
BY 2011 WE WILL HAVE NO MORE TREES BY THEN!!! SEND ME MAIL AND TELL WHAT YOU THINK!!"

Polly must have been encouraged by this response from democrat33:

i really am an honest tree huger almost all my shirts are made out of organic cotton and i already planted a tree, i protested at school, signed 5 petitions,and i have an artificial christmas tree!!!

And finally, H20sponge4 has clearly internalized The Big Green Help's message:

This is getting me mad!

kids just leave their trash everywhere--i see trash everywhere!!!!!!

they don't care about global warming or nothing!!!!!

we need to fix out earth!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

who agrees??

R&R&R

Charming.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Nickelodeon = propaganda

I used to be a big fan of Nick precisely because they had Rated G programming intelligent enough for an adult to enjoy. But their liberal agenda has gotten out of control.

From showing a villain named Hal E Burton to The N featuring a series about teen lesbians, I've gotten to the point that I can't support them anymore. Parents don't realize that they use extra profits from Spongebob and Dora to fund progressive content elsewhere. 

Long past time for conservies to start boycotting these propaganda machines. 

 

I'm a typical white person.

Learning PC's before ABC's

I've said for years that Nickelodeon, PBS, and all the "educational" children's shows on the nutworks all have one purpose: to teach kids their PC's before their ABC's.
Decades ago, children's TV used to be fun as well as educational, but today, the shows are grim and obnoxiously PC.

Here's a simple solution for parents, especially those with conservative leanings, who worry about this kind of moral and mental pollution. Turn off the set!

PC's before their ABC's

Polly 164 proovs your poynt.

I remember in the '70s it

I remember in the '70s it was Woodsy the Owl and his "Give a Hoot--Don't Pollute" campaign that indoctrinated kids.  They loved it because the local forestry office would give 'em tons of free stuff--mostly worthless, but kids love free stuff. 

For all their accusatory rhetoric directed at capitalism, libs certainly buy into the advertising aspects of capitalism when it comes to indoctrinating kids.

"Beauty is only skin deep, but liberal's to the bone." - me

Litter 

Litter  offsets

Limited Disclosure:  I used to belong to the Sierra Club untill they went crazier. Worse of all, I was bribed by Exxon with free New Orleans Saints glasses with fill ups in the 70's.

LOL!

Maybe we could tell the kiddies, "Hey, it's OK to leave the car running, the water running, etc.- we've bought offsets!". 

"The future is not set.  There is no fate but what we make for ourselves."

michaelyon-online.com

70s

I used to get all that free stuff at the county fair.  I had a "Give a Hoot..." bumper sticker.

I also remember the one where the Indian was shedding a tear over pollution.  We laughed at that because we knew that Indians were tough and didn't have time to stand around crying.  The older kids told us that was just an actor, not a real Indian.

And as I mentioned below, there was also the one that taught kids to point their fingers at someone littering and yell "Litterbug".

Off the deep end

Dear conservatives, I hate to break it to you, but you have lost your freakin' minds!  Man made global warming may be debatable, but what in the world could possible be controversial about teaching young folks to recycle???  What in the wrold could possibly be left wing about promoting saving energy, or making sure your tires are properlly filled with air?  What in the world could possibly be left wing hippie dippy communist crap about putting in a little effort to make the world a little cleaner?  I hate people who litter on my block, and when I find litter, I pick it up and throw it away.  If it is plastic , I throw it in the recylcing....not really a big deal.  It makes my block look nicer, and it makes the world a little cleaner.  If this makes me a far left wing communist, then somebody better mail me a card.  There are many things I wonder about fringe conservatives...I hope you realize that your children's children's children will inherit this world. 

 nothin' wrong with a cleaner world

"somebody better mail me a card"

You want it to your PO Box or home address? ;-)

Let's make the world a

Let's make the world a cleaner place. Let's get rid of all that  dreadful DDT. Ignore the millions that die of malara.

Another mindless feel good helping of the world.

Limited Disclosure:  I used to belong to the Sierra Club untill they went crazier. Worse of all, I was bribed by Exxon with free New Orleans Saints glasses with fill ups in the 70's.

critic

Nothing is wrong with teaching kids to conserve resources....what we object to is the incessant eco-nazism and scare tactics employed by the media (and now corporations) and the idiot warmer cant of Al Bore & his posse.

Many here are ardent sportsmen & women (read my bio)....trust me, we know all about conservation of resources, and practice it, too.

Make sense?

 

not so much critical

You are missing the point of Nick's green hype. Yes picking up litter is a harmless request that does teach children to be considerate, and if Nick stopped with that I'd be fine. But they don't stop with that.

Take a moment to visit Nick's page and see how progressive it is. Children are learning that the government needs to control our thermostats, caps should be put on water consumption, and if your parents don't like it you should scream at them until they know better.

It has nothing to do with picking up litter to make the earth a little nicer. This is preparing the next generation to accept a lower standard of living.

 

I'm a typical white person.

Well put...

You hit the nail right on the head. If they would just limit their actions to promoting a cleaner environment, i.e., picking up trash, turning off unused lights, etc., it would be fine, but unfortunately they can't restrain themselves.  It's not enough for us to believe only some of what they preach, we must believe it all...OR ELSE! Eerily similar to what we hear from many who practice the "religion of peace", huh?

 

This is preparing the next

This is preparing the next generation to accept a lower standard of living.

By George, I think you nailed it there.  :-)

-Dave

“Them that’s going get on the wagon. Them that ain’t get out of the way.” -Because enough is enough.

Candance

You are on fire tonight! This is your 2nd excellent post of the night.

  I don't object to a clean earth, or a little reminding of kids to be good stewards, we had Woodsy, and the Indian, as mentioned, then we also had Smokey the Bear. Fine. But when you teach kids crap like keeping a diary of their parent's "eco-crimes" and policing their parents and neighbors on how to live, then this is a little too far. Also, as was so well put, this teaches kids the government controls everything, or should, and that's a good thing. Another thing, why is it neccesary for little kids to be worrying over these things, ayway? Don't they have enough to deal with in this screwed up world?  If people want to explain to teenagers more about the earth and responsibility, then fine, but 5 y olds shouldn't be freaking out about #$#$ global warming bs!!!!!!!!!!

Good morning sritical

I looked up "left-wing extremist communist" in websters amd there was your picture. Immagine that.

You're also in the democrat book " The Art of Cheating and Stealing Elections".

Partially agree, partially not

While some of the things are relatively common-sense solutions that are relatively innocuous, the focus on carbon footprints is dubious at best, and some of the solutions (like CFLs) may be more harm than good in the long run (mainly due to the use of mercury in the production of CFLs).  Recycling some materials is more expensive and consumes more resources than creating them anew (the few exceptions are some hard plastics and pretty much all glass and metals).

I have no problem with sensible solutions, but there needs to be some common sense as well as a sense of priority on what really is the most important among them.  Better yet... kids, want a good way of reducing your use of resources?  Turn off the television...  a plasma set can easily consume 350W of electricity, and even a humble small CRT like what might be in your room could use more power than a half-dozen small CFL bulbs...

simple solutions

Teach conservation of the environment not envrimentalism. The enviromentalist have been wrong and caused more harm than they have ever helped. Malaria, Forest Fires, fighting construction projects, alternative fuels and the list gets longer.

It is likely that the next major environmental problem will be associated with the amount of available fresh water but this problem rarely makes a headline.

A person may be won over with logic and reason but the masses must be bought with spectacle and platitudes. - 2008 Elections

We are not running out of energy

Actually only metal is cost effective to recycle and you do not need government to do that.

Bullshit! - Recycling (Video) (29min)

But we are not running out of energy:

- Only 1.5% of the United States electrical generation comes from oil (EIA) (48% Coal, 20% Natural Gas, 19% Nuclear)

Myth: The World is Running Out of Oil (Video) (5min) (John Stossel, 20/20)

So the only reason to cut back is to save money, which is fine but it will not make a difference overall.

Conservation Wastes Energy (The Wall Street Journal)

Carbon Dioxide (CO2) is Not Pollution

There was enough

There was enough self-important, platitudinal gas released in your post to destroy an entire rain forest.  Congratulations, you pick up some litter.  Your good citizen medal is in the mail along with your Communist Party registration card.  All sarcasm aside, you're not particularly special for picking up litter and "putting in a little effort to make the world a little cleaner".  Plenty of responsible individuals, myself included, do just that.  The problem is that schools and television networks have turned into little indoctrination factories, abdicating their responsibilities of educating children on reading, writing and math, instead using peer pressure, pseudo science and phony self-esteem tactics to turn children into mouthy, activist drones.  If you want to teach your children to recycle and pick up litter, good for you.  If you want to pretend like your efforts are saving the planet, well, the self-delusion is probably good for your state of mind.  But the minute you encourage schools and entertainers to abandon their objectives in favor of promoting junk science by viral means...well, now you're trying to interfere in how I raise my kids, and I won't stand for that.

"Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it." -Ronald Reagan

fitzfong.blogspot.com

(un)criticalthinking

The problem is, aside from the fact that the article posted above is pointing out how our children are being brainwashed by the eco-fascists, recycling has been touted by so many as a way to "save the planet."

Phooey. The "benefits" of recycling are largely a myth, often touted by half-thinkers such as yourself, who haven't a clue.

Recycling of plastics is just one of those myths. Paper is another "recyclable" product that often causes more problems than it solves, in that the chemical by-products generated are often dangerous themselves and difficult to dispose of.

I hope you realize that your children's children's children will inherit this world. 

I wonder of those children will enjoy anywhere near the level of freedom that we do today.

-Dave

“Them that’s going get on the wagon. Them that ain’t get out of the way.” -Because enough is enough.

The top ranked eco-warriors

The top ranked eco-warriors win a weekend with their best buds on the Goracle's ultra-mega-mongo houseboat, the "Bio Blowhard One."

Charming?

Tongue in cheek I'm sure.

FRIGHTENING is more like it.  Nick has had an agenda for a long time, it's just been ramped up since the time my kids watched it.  The long march continues:

THE LONG MARCH THROUGH THE INSTITUTIONS
This term refers to the long-term plan of Communists, radicals, and their supporters to work their way into vital establishments that shape opinions. Once again we turn to the work of another foreign Communist,
an Italian Marxist named Antonio Gramsci, who was active during the 1930s. He pondered the historic inability of Communist parties to mobilize workers to seize the means of production and overthrow the
capitalist ruling class, which Lenin had envisioned. Gramsci’s new idea was to focus the attention of radicals on the means of intellectual production
as a new lever of social change. He urged radicals to acquire “cultural hegemony,” meaning to capture the institutions that produced society’s governing ideas.

...Separately, two Marxist theorists-Antonio Gramsci of Italy and Georg Lukacs of Hungary-concluded that the Christianized West was the obstacle standing in the way of a communist new world order.  The West would have to be conquered first.
Gramsci posited that because Christianity had been dominant in the West for over 2000 years, not only was it fused with Western civilization, but it had corrupted the workers class.  The West would have to be de-Christianized, said Gramsci, by means of a "long march through the culture."

...The new battleground, reasoned Gramsci, must become the culture, starting with the traditional family and completely engulfing churches, schools, media, entertainment, civic organizations, literature, science, and history...Reasoning that if Christian sexual ethics could be undermined among children, then both the hated patriarchal family and the Church would be dealt a crippling blow. Lukacs launched a radical sex education program in the schools.  Sex lectures were organized and literature handed out which graphically instructed youth in free love (promiscuity) and sexual intercourse while simultaneously encouraging them to deride and reject Christian moral ethics, monogamy, and parental and church authority

...The end product was Cultural Marxism, now known in the West as multiculturalism.
...Additional intellectual firepower was required: a theory to pathologize what was to be destroyed. In 1950, the Frankfurt School augmented Cultural Marxism with Theodor Adorno's idea of the ‘authoritarian personality.'  This concept is premised on the notion that Christianity, capitalism, and the traditional family create a character prone to racism and fascism.  Thus, anyone who upholds America's traditional moral values and institutions is both racist and fascist.  Children raised by traditional values parents, we are told to believe, will almost certainly become racists and fascists.  By extension, if fascism and racism are endemic to America's traditional culture, then everyone raised in the traditions of God, family, patriotism, gun ownership, or free markets is in need of psychological help. 

Captain Planet on steroids.

"The future is not set.  There is no fate but what we make for ourselves."

michaelyon-online.com

TV

When I was a kid growing up in the 70s, there was a commercial on tv targeted toward children.  It told children that when they saw someone litter, they were supposed to point their finger at the person and yell "Litterbug."  (I never actually saw a kid do that.)

So teaching a kid to be a scold is not a new idea.  I think children take their behavior cues from their parents.  It's more liberal parents that worry me than Nickelodeon.  However, it would be nice if kids could just watch tv for entertainment rather than having to watch it for learning.

Do you remember the Indian

Do you remember the Indian w/the tear in his eye?

The Indian

I remember the Indian.  We used to laugh at that one because we knew real Indians were tough and didn't have time to stand around crying.

One time at school we had a "special assembly" where they played that commercial.  We were more interested in trying to figure out how they could play tv commercials at school.

Truth be told, this is what

Truth be told, this is what happens when parents hand over their child rearing responsibilities to PBS, the public schools, MTV and Nickelodeon.  You get a bunch of functionally illiterate, peer pressured, finger-wagging, obnoxious know-it-alls.  They may think they're preserving the planet for future generations, yet how big a victory is that when they have no functional purpose on earth because they can't read, write or add 2 and 2? 

"Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it." -Ronald Reagan

fitzfong.blogspot.com

Undergoing a retrofit to

Undergoing a retrofit to become a hybrid, Otto the Auto could not be reached for comment, but well known conservative McGruff the Crime Dog weighed in with "How can CO2 be a pollutant if we exhale it?"

Nickelodeon Has A Progressive Agenda?

Last time I checked, I was unaware that any TV network had a progressive agenda, let alone a Marxist agenda. I know what's really going on here: You just hate us animators and cartoonists. You hate us because we have imaginations and you don't. You view us as something akin to ventriloquist dummies and you don't believe we should have the ability to entertain both kids and adults. That is why during the 1980s, we had just about nothing but sanitized dreck spewing from the networks in the form of "The Smurfs", the "Transformers", the He-Mans, She-Ras, and Jems of the world. You hate creativity. I know first hand. When the first glimpse of hope from Saturday morning animation came from the new "Mighty Mouse" back in the late '80s, the Moral Majority in the form of the American Family Association protested over an episode where, allegedly, Mighty Mouse is sniffing a flower a few seconds too long. "Oh, that must imply cocaine use", thought those particular P.C. jerks, so they complained, and the show got cancelled. It took shows like "Ren & Stimpy", "Animaniacs", "Pinky & The Brain", "Freakazoid", and the new "Batman" cartoons to really show that there can be more to them than just keeping children occupied while the parents upstairs can get it on, bang a gong, if you know what I mean.

I could care less if Nickelodeon promotes climate change awareness, and I am a climate-change skeptic, but I am getting sick and tired of you putrid pustule pushers who whine, "Oh, no, think of the children! You can't expose them to violence and toilet humor." Will you whiners SHUT THE (bleep) UP?!!

Well, that's my two cents, and by the way, I am a global-warming skeptic, but when you attack my cartoons, there is going to be hell to pay.

 

-"Outrageous! What Blasphemy! I gotta do something!"

-"Bob, there's nothing you can do."

-"Oh well, then, I guess I'll just have to develop a sense of humor."

-From "A Very Special Freakin' Sweet Family Guy Christmas"

  Wow.  Pay attention

  Wow.  Pay attention parents.  This is what happens when kids watch too many cartoons.

7sticks,

"Last time I checked, I was unaware that any TV network had a progressive agenda, let alone a Marxist agenda."

Wherein lies your overall problem. You can't see the forest for the trees.

And there is nothing even remotely "progressive" about Marxism.

-Dave

“Them that’s going get on the wagon. Them that ain’t get out of the way.” -Because enough is enough.

Great, just great

Islam has the Seven Pillars, and we get the 7sticks.
7sticks up his @ss is more like it.

In order to be pro-choice, one must first be born. Ah, the irony.

You mean that was real?? I

You mean that was real?? I thought it was just a really bad attempt at satire!!

I don't know about some of you, but I also get tired of all the muti-culturalism in cartoons. Why do kids need to learn Spanish from Dora and Diego? Why does every other cartoon have to feature some other culture? Calilou, Sailor Moon, Sagwa Siamese, etc. Where are the plain old regular American kids, or did I miss them?

Didn't you get the memo?

Plain old Americans are BAD. We're Bible thumpin, gun totin RACISTS. Racists, I tell ya!

In order to be pro-choice, one must first be born. Ah, the irony.

racists...

Conservatives are the only ones that took Dr. Martin Luther King seriously when he said to "judge a man by the content of his character, not the color of his skin".

Iran Pulls Strings In Gaza

 

 Making Fun of AGW http://giovanniworld.wordpress.com/  

chose,