CBS's Glor Calls Out David Axelrod For His 'Extreme' Attack on Romney
CBS's Jeff Glor confronted David Axelrod on Friday's CBS This Morning over his most recent attack on presumptive Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney: "You said that Mitt Romney was the most secretive candidate since Richard Nixon....I think that would strike a lot of people as extreme. Do you stand by those comments?"
Glor also pressed Axelrod on the Obama campaign's "outsourcer-in-chief" attack ads on Romney: "Fact Check, as you know, looked at this, found no evidence that Mitt Romney, while he was still running Bain Capital shipped American jobs overseas. Is it fair to keep those ads on the air?"
The journalist, along with anchor Erica Hill, interviewed the Democratic presidential campaign senior adviser eight minutes into the 7 am Eastern hour. Hill also played a little hardball with her guest in her lead question: "We just heard...the President charging Mitt Romney with playing politics over use of the word 'tax,' when it comes to the mandate. The President, of course, adamantly denied that it was a tax in 2009, when he was trying to sell this. The Supreme Court says otherwise. How do you reconcile that now as you try sell a tax to the American people?"
When Axelrod answered, in part, that "whatever you call it - whether you call it a mandate, whether you call it a tax - what it is is a penalty" and attacked Romney for "folding" to "Rush [Limbaugh] and the right and the guys in the Republican caucus on Capitol Hill," the CBS anchor took him to task: "But if you say it doesn't matter, the word that you use, then why does it matter if he [Romney] switches words, to your point?"
Glor stepped in once the Obama campaign official answered Hill's follow-up. He lead with his hardball question on the "outsourcer-in-chief' attack, and concluded the segment with his challenge to Axelrod. The Democratic pundit got almost a minute and a half to defend his "extreme" attack:
GLOR: David, you keep calling Mitt Romney the 'outsourcer-in-chief'. We heard what the President said on the trail, indicating that he sent jobs overseas. Fact Check, as you know, looked at this, found no evidence that Mitt Romney, while he was still running Bain Capital shipped American jobs overseas. Is it fair to keep those ads on the air?
AXELROD: Yeah, it absolutely is. First of all, those ads are based on reporting -- assiduous reporting, by the Washington Post, based on documents from the securities and exchange commission. So, we take issue with that particular fact check. The other issue that's in contention is Governor Romney keeps contending that he was not involved with Bain Capital after 1999, and, in fact, he remained as the chief executive and sole owner until 2001, and documents reflect that as well. So he -- you know, he can't run on his record and run from his record at the same time. And we're not going to allow him to do that.
GLOR: David, last night, you said that Mitt Romney was the most secretive candidate since Richard Nixon. You said this to CBS News Radio. I think that would strike a lot of people as extreme. Do you stand by those comments?
AXELROD: Oh, I absolutely do. Listen, you mentioned the $100 million that Mitt Romney raised. You know, he's the first presidential candidate since that time -- in recent years, Republicans and Democrats have all revealed who's raising money for them - the so-called bundlers. You have no idea, as we sit here, who is raising this money for Mitt Romney. He's the first candidate, Republican or Democrat, who hasn't released a series of years of tax returns. His father was a pioneer in this, when he ran for president, and said, you have to release multiple years or else, people can hide some of what they're doing. We just learned the other day, Jeff, from the Associated Press that Governor Romney has this Bermuda business, and he transferred it to his wife's ownership the day before he became governor of Massachusetts, so he wouldn't have to put it on an ethics form.
This is the most secretive candidate since Richard Nixon. What happened after Nixon was, we, as a country, said we need a higher level of disclosure, so people know who their candidates are, what their entanglements are and we can make judgments on it. Governor Romney and his campaign have stonewalled, and they're trying to turn the clock back 50 years on transparency and disclosure. So I absolutely stand by it, and the real question is, you know, is the news media going to press him on it? And I know that Jan Crawford had an interview with him the other day, and she had a very brief time with him. But I'd like to see those questions asked of him.
- Matthew Balan's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
uh oh
Submitted by Jnoble on Fri, 07/06/2012 - 6:16pm.
Now that Jeff Glor has dared to question the Regime and, as Rush would put it, "commited a random act of journalism', don't be surprised if he's suddenly downgraded to covering local dog shows, asking random people how they "beat the heat" or standing in a rainslick reporting live in the middle of a massive blowing hurricane while holding precariously onto a flag pole. There are some lines you should know you don't cross, rookie.
Ax
Submitted by Jersey Girl on Fri, 07/06/2012 - 6:32pm.
All the left has is lies lies and more lies.
Most secretive candidate vs most secretative White House
Submitted by Gary Hall on Fri, 07/06/2012 - 7:28pm.
Most secretive candidate vs most secretive White House - why only discuss one?
Shortly after this exchange between the ex-veteran and radical liberal WH reporter, Helen Thomas, she laid out exactly how "non-transparent" and secretive this Obama WH has been:
Helen Thomas lays in to Robert Gibbs
July 1, 2009 that Obama's grip on the media is even greater than that of Richard Nixon.
Nixon didn’t try to do that. They couldn’t control [the media]. They didn’t try that. What the hell do they think we are, puppets? They’re supposed to stay out of our business. They are our public servants. We pay them. ... I’m not saying there has never been managed news before, but this is carried to fare-thee-well--for the town halls, for the press conferences. It’s blatant. They don’t give a damn if you know it or not. They ought to be hanging their heads in shame.
And, who could possibly argue that it's gotten better?
(;~/ gary
Secretive and non transparent?
Submitted by Redrowan2000 on Fri, 07/06/2012 - 7:43pm.
Still no conclusive proof of birthplace, citizenship,college transcripts, college papers, falsifying a biography, fast and furious, a penalty or a tax and perhaps the latest and greatest scheme the false social security number. Transparency, ok David just go transparent on any of those issues and I would want Romney to release the last 10 years, on 2 of those issues Romney should release 20 years, but you manchild won't open up on any of them.
"Don't let the bastards grind you down."
Nixon? Are you referring to "Executive Priviledge" there...
Submitted by paratisi on Fri, 07/06/2012 - 7:57pm.
Mr. AxelFraud?
Ok, if you want to change the subject to the Murder and Presidential Cover Up of the Murders of U.S. Agents Brian Terry and Jaime Zapata, as well as the Murders and Cover Up of the Murders of hundreds of Mexican Nationals and the Murders and Cover up of the Murders of thousands of Honduran Nationals, by your man ObamaTax and your, OH SO, "transparent" attempts to circumvent the 2nd Ammendment and obscure ObamaTax's Murderous acts under executive priviledge, then by all means. You start....
➚ Right on, paratisi
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Fri, 07/06/2012 - 8:13pm.
Seems the liberals get a thrill out of dead Mexicans, piled up like firewood. It's utterly disgusting that the Democrats don't know, and don't care, who gave the authority.
But you'll notice our local Liberals get real mousy and scurry off when it comes to the Obama Administration facilitating the murders of hundreds of Mexican citizens IN MEXICO.
Mexico is a bit distracted with the election problems,
Submitted by drsamherman on Sat, 07/07/2012 - 5:37pm.
but when it finally gets through these, the new President really needs to put the screws to Obama demanding answers as to why the guns were allowed to walk, why dealers in the US were coerced to allow these purchases and why Obama publicly refuses to take any responsibility.
I know all too many families down in the Valley who are frightened to death about what might happen next to their friends and loved ones. That the US government is doing ZIP to secure the border against incursions and the level of violence we have seen is just shocking. No other country on earth would put up with that, but our vote-prostituting Preezy doesn't give a damn. If he did, Holder would be gone in an instant along with all of his top lieutenants for allowing this travesty.
My guess is the new Mexican president will . . .
Submitted by Galvanic on Sun, 07/08/2012 - 11:21am.
. . . put the screws to Obama over Fast & Furious, but not so much publicly. He'll use it quietly to (a) leverage more money out of Washington, and (b) get Obama to reduce immigration enforcement even more.
The PRI was a thorougly corrupt political party by the time it was voted out of office. There's no reason to believe that it is any different now that it is back in power.
I hate...
Submitted by GeneralAl on Fri, 07/06/2012 - 8:58pm.
I hate these damn lying Communists!
"Old Soldiers never die, they just fade away"!
Of course, Axelrod is a
Submitted by celator on Fri, 07/06/2012 - 9:13pm.
Of course, Axelrod is a snake. He claims to have cut his ties to his public relations company (ASGK Public Strategies) in 2009, when he became a senior White House adviser. However, to this day he still has an office in the firm, and receives $200,000 a year, as part of his buyout, He and Jarrett are the brains behind Obama's re-election while he sits in his same PR firm's office with his name on the door.
And he says Romney isn't transparent? Now that's purty darned funny.
Here's more on that little story.
http://www.suntimes.com/news/13149087-418/david-axelrod-no-role-in-firms...
If you believe that his "former" firm isn't receiving gazillions of $$$$ pushing the Obama campaign (through Axelrod's connections) then you are lost in the ozone.
Thank
Submitted by grammajane on Fri, 07/06/2012 - 10:28pm.
Mr Glor. You are a true reporter! My only problem is, because of your excellent questions you may be joining the unemployed lines. Only hope, this doesn't happen. One thing for sure, Axel will no doubt in the future turn down a request to be your guest ever again. He and his boss have not a clue what transparenty means and also his bashing of Romney is a clue, he is minus some brain cells. Seems each time these radicals open their mouths more lies come out
Levin highlighted
Submitted by Boudin on Fri, 07/06/2012 - 10:32pm.
On his show yesterday, all of Axlfrauds commie ties. A lot of his shady dealings, and acquaintances. This guy is as big a creep as Obama!
I was lissenin' (Obamaspeak)
Submitted by killa37 on Fri, 07/06/2012 - 10:39pm.
I was lissenin' (Obamaspeak) to Mark 'the great one' Levin tearin' a new okole (that is the Hawaiian word for an Obama orifice) for Axelgrease,and it wasn't pretty either, because he was layin' out the facts and tellin' the TROOF about this insideious, subversive, illegal, unmoral, treacherous fat piece of Kommie Kow Krap - who is one of the puppet-masters for the King Kenyan Kow Krap!!! And Levin flat-out TOLD Axelgrease - right there on his radio show - that he WAS going to be Axelgreases' biggest nightmare in this campaign. I've gotta say, it was pretty nasty stuff.....................but as I've said all along - if you want to get rid of the cockroaches, termites, centipedes, vermin, and snakes............you've got to get down to where they are and exterminate them. Playin' 'nice' will get you nowhere...............and as long as you have TROOF on your side, you don't have to second-guess your methods or techniques........................the 'enemy' sure as hell doesn't care ANYTHING about their own methods, techniques, or 'rules of engagement'!!!
I'd have Axelgrease sittin' right up there at the waiting bench of the guillotine, alongside Baraka, Dracula Soros, Van 'Red-Green' Jones, Ayers, and a number of others..............and I'd make Plugs Bite-Me be the guy pullin' the lever.
Just
Submitted by grammajane on Sat, 07/07/2012 - 12:44am.
heard "the great one" state " what president in history has bashed successful hard working Americans like the way BO and his buddies do" They bash daily the responsible and promise daily he will take care of the free riders , as Poloski called people with no health insurance
Most secretive?
Submitted by Timothy H on Sat, 07/07/2012 - 12:28pm.
Wasn't it President Obama that wouldn't even let us look at his birth certificate when he was running for office, even as it was a requirement of office?
Come on.....I call BS.
Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe. -Albert Einstein
And for blonde:Some days it just doesn't pay to chew through the restraint. -Timothy H
Wait a minute. Who is secretive?
Submitted by needle on Sat, 07/07/2012 - 2:39pm.
Obama sealed every document about his youth he could think of.
- Looking forward to the self-annihilation of the Manipulated Stories Machine.