CBS Trumpets Justice Dept. Leak Cases 'More Than Previous Administrations Combined'
Norah O'Donnell spun the recent controversy over national security leaks in the Obama administration's favor on Tuesday's CBS This Morning, touting that "the Justice Department...points out that they have launched six cases since 2009 to investigate these leaks. And interestingly...that is more than all previous administrations combined."
O'Donnell also forwarded the White House's talking point on the issue, that "the President said he has zero tolerance for these leaks, and that's why he said he's sure it wasn't anyone in his White House."
Anchor Charlie Rose emphasized the political component of the controversy during his promo at the top of the 7 am Eastern hour: "A capital showdown looms over alleged White House intelligence leaks." He continued this five minutes later as he introduced the correspondent's report: "President Obama's White House has been on the defensive for nearly a week now over classified information that was reported by the press. Republicans claim it was leaked by Democrats for political reasons."
O'Donnell led with her first mention of the administration's talking point: "Well, you've heard the President say -- he said it's offensive to suggest that anyone in his White House leaked information. But Senator [John] McCain says that is exactly what this White House did. And that's why today, Senator McCain is introducing a Senate resolution calling for a special counsel."
The CBS journalist just briefly touched on the seriousness of the leaks, and, like Rose in his promo, played up the partisan bickering over the issue. She did, however, include a clip of her tough question to White House Press Secretary Jay Carney at a press briefing on Monday:
O'DONNELL: The leaks involve highly classified information: one about the President's approval of drone attacks to target a secret kill list of terrorists; another included details about a joint American/Israeli cyber attack on Iran's nuclear program.
MCCAIN: This is one of the most serious breaches since anyone can remember.
O'DONNELL: Senator John McCain accuses the Obama administration of intentionally leaking the information to make the President look tough in an election year.
MCCAIN: Whenever there's a leak, look at who benefits, and then you can usually find out who did the leaking.
O'DONNELL: The Department of Justice quietly announced late Friday that it would appoint two U.S. attorneys - not an independent special counsel - to conduct a criminal investigation. But that is not enough for critics like Senator McCain, who are argue that these investigators still work for Attorney General Eric Holder.
O'DONNELL (on-camera, from White House press briefing): The President says he has zero tolerance for these kinds of leaks. Then, why not support a special prosecutor?
JAY CARNEY, WHITE HOUSE PRESS SECRETARY: There is no need for, you know, a special counsel. These things have consistently been investigated when that's appropriate.
At the end of her pre-recorded report, O'Donnell spotlighted that "the last special counsel was Patrick Fitzgerald, who investigated the Bush administration for leaking the name of CIA operative Valerie Plame. Fitzgerald, as a special counsel, had all the powers of an attorney general, and could subpoena whomever he wanted."
Rose then brought on the correspondent for a live segment on the controversy. The anchor set her up to trumpet the Obama Justice Department's supposedly proactive approach to the leaks, while O'Donnell twice used the administration "zero tolerance" talking point:
ROSE: Does the administration agree that there have been serious leaks, and these things are serious, and they want to see something done about them?
O'DONNELL: The President said he has zero tolerance for these leaks, and that's why he said he's sure it wasn't anyone in his White House. The Justice Department also points out that they have launched six cases since 2009 to investigate these leaks. And interestingly, Charlie, that is more than all previous administrations combined. There have been about three other prosecutions of leaks before that.
ROSE: But does the administration agree with Senator McCain, when he says this is the most serious breach that he can remember?
O'DONNELL: I don't know that they agree with that. I think there have been other serious breaches. But I think what this White House is saying - and the President has said - zero tolerance; it's got to stop; and that they've been tougher on prosecuting these leaks than anybody else. But I think you also have to remember - and many people would be surprised - there's actually no law against leaking classified information. Those people who have been prosecuted in the past - it's actually been under the espionage -- an espionage statute. That's what Daniel Ellsberg, with the Pentagon Papers, was prosecuted under. So it's very tough to get one of these convictions.
- Matthew Balan's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
If he has zero tolerance for leaks then why does his National
Submitted by dscott on Tue, 06/12/2012 - 2:24pm.
Security Advisor do it?
National Security Advisor Tom Donilon was the source of the White House security leaks
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2012/06/pat-caddell-names-national-secur...
So…how long until Obama retracts his outrage at our outrage for outrageously spilling the national security beans for political gain???
Note to moderate and independent voters, whenever Obama protests and claims it isn’t him and how dare we point the finger at him…he is admitting his guilt. If you will remember Obama claimed he wasn’t an ideologue, yet for some strange reason acts like one.
http://lonelyconservative.com/2010/01/obama-i-am-not-an-ideologue/
Well either the President is lying or the NYT is lying.
Submitted by c5then on Tue, 06/12/2012 - 2:28pm.
According to the description of the NYT sources, they have top secret access to the material and were with the President in the Situation Room. That is a very small group of people unless they are renting it out for fund raisers now...
Madison and Jefferson and Franklin built a Republic - Roberts killed it!
Spin, spin, spin.
Submitted by KyWriter on Tue, 06/12/2012 - 2:34pm.
It's actually entertaining to watch Norah, Andrea, Soledad and all the other MSM working girls protect their clients. Note I'm not including Madcow in that group; I can't imagine anyone paying for her services.
You just have to know how to "translate" ...
Submitted by Newsbubba on Tue, 06/12/2012 - 2:54pm.
... what Da One say.
When he says that "he has zero tolerance for these leaks," what he means is that he has zero tolerance for the leaks from the whistle blowers to the Congress!
You see, Da One NEVER lies. He just a damned deft and accomplished lying RBFSOB.
Obama Regime leaks like a sinking ship.
Submitted by AFVet on Tue, 06/12/2012 - 4:05pm.
"they have launched six cases since 2009 to investigate these leaks. And interestingly...that is more than all previous administrations combined."
O'Donnell should have noted the previous administrations were not leaking like a sinking ship, which is what the Obama Regime has been doing from day 1, but what should we expect from this leftist. The only leak from the previous administration, which was a not a leak of national security details, was Richard Armitage mentioning the name of a CIA analyst Valarie Plame, who was not an operative, not an under-cover agent, but simply an analyst that sits at a desk at Langley AFB. She drove to work every morning, she drove home every day after work, her neighbors knew who she was, what she did, and who her husband was, it was never a secret.
Her husband, Joe Wilson, went around DC and told everyone that his wife worked for the CIA. From talk shows to cocktail parties Joe couldn't keep his mouth shut about his wife.
Get what the President said correct, Ms O'Donnell
Submitted by jimpryor99 on Tue, 06/12/2012 - 4:05pm.
The President didn't say that the leak didn't come from the White House. The President said "Nobody in the White House INTENTIONALLY leaked the information". That word is very important, and more than admits that the leak came from the White House. If it did not, then he would not feel the need to include "INTENTIONALLY". He would have just said it didn't happen, period. It happened, and the President knows it.
Wording~
Submitted by GG_NB on Tue, 06/12/2012 - 5:27pm.
I've been paying attention to the exact wording as well...and it always seems like there is that tiny bit of word-game wiggle room. Like the Jello is just not being nailed down.
Regardless of that, how can O even state as fact that it didn't come from someone directly tied-into The White House? I mean, how can he absolutely know that? Seems to me the only appropriate/wise response from him should be along the lines of: "This detrimental leaking won't be tolerated, and if I find it came in any way from this administration, I will make sure it is dealt with in the most serious way possible."
Or something like that.
"If not us, who? If not now, when?"
~Ronald Reagan
More corruption calls for
Submitted by richflanj on Tue, 06/12/2012 - 6:33pm.
More corruption calls for more investigations. Or, in this administration, more coverup.
Ratings
Submitted by Indie Dude on Tue, 06/12/2012 - 9:34pm.
Regardless if you're on the Right or Left, Plain ol' regular TV viewers just want to hear dirty deeds uncovered, or yes, I know this sounds crazy....NEWS?
Who the heck wants to tune into a news show where the host and others spend hours telling viewers, there's no wrong doings with this administration, or "there's no news here people, move along." Literally!
Hello?