Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Free email alerts!

NewsBusters logo
May 18, 2013
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Take Action
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • IRS Targets Tea Party
  • Benghazi Fiasco
  • Gosnell Trial
  • Censoring the News
Home » Blogs » Matthew Balan's blog
  • Bozell Column: 'Progress' Gets Canceled
  • CNN's Banfield: 'Take Me Off the Ledge' and Tell Me IRS Audits Weren't Political
  • NBC's Williams Ready to Move On: 'It's Tough to Know the Staying Power of Any Given Scandal'
  • Video: Bozell, Hannity Amused That Obama Sycophant Chris Matthews Worried Obama's White House Filled with Yes-Men
  • Luke Russert: 'Smart' House Republicans Aren't The 'God, Guns & Guts People'
  • Tea Partiers Confront Comcast CEO: Why Would a Conservative Want Their Money to Pay Al Sharpton's Salary?
  • Bob Schieffer Spins Obama Scandals: White House Not Like Nixon's, Which Had Burglars and Bomb Plots
  • NBC's Todd Warns: If GOP Investigates Obama Scandals, 'The Voters Will Punish Them'

CBS's Morning and Evening Shows Hype Vatican's 'Inquisition' of Dissenting Nuns

By Matthew Balan | May 31, 2012 | 17:23

A  A
Matthew Balan's picture

CBS made little effort to hide that it was siding with liberal dissenters inside the Catholic Church on Wednesday's CBS Evening News and Thursday's CBS This Morning. Scott Pelley hyped that there was a Vatican "crackdown on America's 57,000 nuns." Gayle King touted how "some Catholics compare it to the dark days of the Inquisition, a crackdown on a prominent organization of nuns accused of being radical feminists."

King and co-anchor Charlie Rose sympathized with the group of dissenting sisters during an interview of left-wing public radio host Sister Maureen Fiedler, and hinted that the Catholic hierarchy was "out of touch." Correspondent Wyatt Andrews also overwhelmingly slanted towards the disobedient religious and their supporters during his reports on the two programs, and played only one brief soundbite from a spokeswoman for the bishops.

Pelley used his loaded term in his introduction to Andrews' first report, and spotlighted the apparent outrage at the Vatican's action against the sisters: "Pope Benedict is feeling a backlash from American Catholics, angry over his crackdown on America's 57,000 nuns. A letter from the Vatican warned them that the group that represents most of the nuns is straying from Church teachings on abortion and homosexuality. That group is meeting in Washington this week to consider a response."

The following morning, King and co-anchor Charlie Rose gave their own slanted introduction to the second report from the CBS journalist. Rose stated that "leaders of the Roman Catholic Church are targeting an unlikely group for harsh criticism: an influential organization of nuns in the United States." The close associate of Oprah Winfrey heartily replied, "Unlikely is right."

During his two reports, Andrews featured clips of Sister Karen Schneider, who works as an emergency physician at Johns Hopkins Children's Center in Baltimore, and pointed out how she "makes frequent trips to treat children in Haiti and Guyana." He also gave a biased outline of the dispute between the Catholic religious and the bishops:

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

ANDREWS (voice-over): While many Catholics remember nuns as habit-wearing school teachers, Sister Karen is the new version of Catholic nun. Most are highly educated, and are managers of schools, colleges, and hospital chains. It explains why many nuns were stunned when the Vatican accused their leadership of promoting 'radical feminist themes' and of being too 'silent' on issues like 'the right to life.' In daily life, most nuns see those questions as outside their mission.

The correspondent left out that the recent document from the Church's Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith outlined that the annual meetings of the Leadership Conference of Women Religious "manifest problematic statements and serious theological, even doctrinal errors." One sister gave an address where she proposed "'moving beyond the Church' or even beyond Jesus." The document concluded that "this is a challenge not only to core Catholic beliefs; such a rejection of faith is...incompatible with religious life." He also failed to mention that there was another organization of Catholic sisters in the U.S., the Council of Major Superiors of Women Religious, that formed because of the radical atmosphere inside LCWR.

Andrews also played up the recent demonstrations that were held in support of the LCWR, highlighting that "hundreds of Catholics have rallied behind the sisters," and that "protests in support of the nuns have been held in almost 50 cities for the last three weeks. They see the nuns doing the work of the Church - running schools and charities - and not as a group in need of reform." However, a May 22, 2012 CNN report noted that "about two dozen parishoners and former clergy gathered in front of St. Patrick's Cathedral" in New York City. Apparently, this minuscule protest in a city of millions is newsworthy, but the March for Life in Washington, DC, which draws hundreds of thousands of pro-lifers (mostly Catholics) every year, gets ignored year after year by CBS and other liberal media outlets.

Rose and King brought on Sister Fiedler just after Andrews' second report aired on Thursday's CBS This Morning. They introduced the sister as merely "an activist for social justice and racial and gender equality for more three decades," and asked her leading and sympathetic questions:

KING: ...[D]id you ever think we'd ever come to a time where the Vatican is criticizing nuns, and there are rallies around the country in support of nuns?

Sister Maureen Fiedler; Screen Cap From 31 May 2012 Edition of CBS This Morning | NewsBusters.orgFIEDLER: ...[T]his is about a lot more than just the Vatican versus the nuns. This is about what kind of a Catholic Church we're going to be, because when I hear that Vatican mandate, what I hear is the voice of the Church of the 19th century; the voice of the Church before that wonderful reforming council, the Second Vatican Council in the 1960s, when it was exhilarating to be a Catholic in those days; when the windows were open and the fresh air was let into the Church. And that's what nuns today have embraced, is that kind of a church - not a dictatorial one, but a collaborative one.

ROSE: So the question comes, how are they going to enforce these accusations?...

FIEDLER: I don't know. I don't know. They say in their mandate that they're going to send in an archbishop and two bishops, who will work with the nuns in order to -- but get this: revise their statutes; their handbook; their plans and programs; their conferences, their speakers - everything. If this were the corporate world, I think we'd call it a hostile takeover. (Fiedler and King laugh)

ROSE: ...Do you read the Vatican's accusations as saying that, we want you to be more concerned about same-sex marriage and those issues, than we want you to be concerned about poverty?

FIEDLER: Yes, that's what they're trying to say. And yet, I think nuns, embracing the teachings that came from the Second Vatican Council, have become deeply involved in issues of poverty, injustice, in peace, in the environment. We're very concerned about those things. Those are our whole lives, that -- our vows call us to give our lives to other people. And if we're at all concerned about people of a gay or lesbian orientation, we believe they're equal, too.

ROSE: What will it take for the Church to change in the way that you would like to see it change, and other people who believe as you do - other nuns?

FIEDLER: Well, what I would like to see is a truly collaborative model of Church, where the laity, who have, in wondrous numbers, come out to support us, have a real voice in the Church; where we begin to develop more democratic decision-making structures at the parish level, at the diocesan level....

KING: You know, it's interesting that the nuns are being accused being out of touch. Could it be that, perhaps, maybe, the Vatican is out of touch on this particular-

FIEDLER: It could be. Yes, I think so. Right now-

ROSE: Could be or is?

KING: Yes- (laughs)

FIEDLER: All you've got to do is look at the statistics, at least for Catholics in the United States. Ex-Catholics are the second largest denomination in the United States today - ex-Catholics. And it's because of these structural issues, their lack of voice in their parishes and in their church; and because they, frankly, disagree with the hierarchy on some issues like contraception, for example.

It should be pointed out that Fiedler made her loyalties clear back in 2002, when she attended the "ordination" of seven women on the Danube River, all of whom were automatically excommunicated. She also never recanted signing a 1984 ad sponsored by the pro-abortion Catholics for Choice (then called Catholics for a Free Choice). As you might expect, CBS never got around to mentioning these details on the air.

About the Author

Matthew Balan is a news analyst at the Media Research Center. Click here to follow Matthew Balan on Twitter.
  • Abortion
  • Anti-Religious Bias
  • Bias by Omission
  • Birth Control
  • Christianity
  • Conservatives & Republicans
  • Feminism
  • Homosexuality
  • Labeling
  • Liberals & Democrats
  • Pro-choicers
  • Pro-lifers
  • Protestors
  • Culture/Society
  • Religion
  • Sexuality
  • Gayle King
  • Maureen Fiedler
  • Scott Pelley
  • CBS
  • CBS Evening News
  • CBS This Morning (debuted 9 January 2012)
  • Matthew Balan's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Comments

And some consider Gayle to be a sane heterosexual.

Submitted by drsamherman on Thu, 05/31/2012 - 5:27pm.

Same leftwing fringies as the ones saying the Vatican is doing an "Inquisition" on American nuns.

  • Login to post comments

Monty Python jokes in, one, two, three....

Submitted by CobraMan on Thu, 05/31/2012 - 5:37pm.

Monty Python jokes in, one, two, three....

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution

Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court

Or Anwar al-Awlaki.

  • Login to post comments

Put those heretics in....

Submitted by almostacowboy on Thu, 05/31/2012 - 8:45pm.

.....the COMFY CHAIR!

  • Login to post comments

We are of this world, but not part of it

Submitted by SeniorD on Thu, 05/31/2012 - 5:44pm.

One thing this regime can't understand is that those who believe Judeo-Christian or Christianity itself know we are called out of the world. We live in this world, we joke, play, criticize, rebel within it, but we are not part of it. Yes, we give our taxes to Ceasar and Rome, but our hearts, our minds, our souls belong to Heaven.

“I can imagine no more rewarding a career. And any man who may be asked in this century what he did to make his life worthwhile, I think can respond with a good deal of pride and satisfaction: 'I served in the United States Navy.'" John F. Kennedy
  • Login to post comments

SeniorD

Submitted by oldfart on Thu, 05/31/2012 - 5:54pm.

Excellent response. Afterall no one holds a gun to a nun's head and tells her she has to stay.

The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane.” – Marcus Aurelius
  • Login to post comments

There are always those...

Submitted by almostacowboy on Thu, 05/31/2012 - 8:48pm.

who want the world and God (LOL!) to conform to their non-Biblical beliefs.

  • Login to post comments

SeniorD

Submitted by oldfart on Thu, 05/31/2012 - 5:54pm.

Excellent response. Afterall no one holds a gun to a nun's head and tells her she has to stay.

The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane.” – Marcus Aurelius
  • Login to post comments

**LIKE**

Submitted by dyardley on Thu, 05/31/2012 - 8:58pm.

Senior, I don't believe they will ever understand. It's sad, really.

directionforourtimes.org
  • Login to post comments

hhmmmm...

Submitted by MidAmerica on Thu, 05/31/2012 - 5:48pm.

Just my guess but I have the sneaking feeling that the Nun problem and the Priest problem are related to the same core issue.

  • Login to post comments

"Some Catholics..."

Submitted by CobraMan on Thu, 05/31/2012 - 6:26pm.

"Some Catholics compare it to the dark days of the Inquisition, a crackdown on a prominent organization of nuns accused of being radical feminists.".

Other Catholics compare it to the bright days of the Enlightenment, a reasonable attempt at combating "feminist" rhetoric with Papal knowledge.

See, I can play the "some say" game too.

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution

Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court

Or Anwar al-Awlaki.

  • Login to post comments

Huh?

Submitted by CobraMan on Thu, 05/31/2012 - 6:35pm.

"Ex-Catholics are the second largest denomination in the United States today - ex-Catholics."

Huh? What does that even mean? There's no such thing as a "denomination" of "ex-Catholics!" The idea itself is absurd! I mean, really, when was the last time you heard of The Church Of Ex-Catholics? Wouldn't they be know as "Protestants?"

By the way, you idiot, the second largest denomination in the US are Baptists, at 16 percent!

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution

Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court

Or Anwar al-Awlaki.

  • Login to post comments

Amen for Baptist!

Submitted by almostacowboy on Thu, 05/31/2012 - 8:54pm.

So, what place do the "ex-Baptists" come in? ;->
By the way, we were were never part of the Protestant movement. Just sayin'.

  • Login to post comments

I've never met an "ex-baptist."

Submitted by CobraMan on Thu, 05/31/2012 - 9:05pm.

I've never met an "ex-baptist." Is there even such a thing? Most of the Baptists I know are the most devote people on earth, next to the Latino Catholics, that is. Now THOSE people are devout! Many Latino convicts even put shrines to the Virgin Mary in their cells! You can't get much more devout than that!

No wonder Obama's struggling so hard for the Latino vote. Hes alienating them through his attacks on the Catholic Church! That's a mistake that will cost him the election, but you'll never hear the liberal media admit that.

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution

Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court

Or Anwar al-Awlaki.

  • Login to post comments

The closest thing we have to a shrine...

Submitted by almostacowboy on Fri, 06/01/2012 - 7:41am.

...is a buffet line! :-D

  • Login to post comments

Ms Fiedler

Submitted by cocodrie on Thu, 05/31/2012 - 6:35pm.

You better read a bible soon.
Noah and his family submitted to the dictatorial edicts of God while everyone else lived by the collaborative style you love. Familiarize yourself with that outcome.

Sodom and Gomorrah were collaborative societies with democratic decision making structures. Worked out really fine for society then too didn't it?

You might also visit the tower of Babel.

We need a 1st century church without any collaboration or contamination by liberals. God does not run an equal opportunity club with a bring your own sin policy.

 

Jesus Loves You so much He died for you

  • Login to post comments

Is she really this arrogant?

Submitted by motherbelt on Thu, 05/31/2012 - 7:34pm.

.... our vows call us to give our lives to other people.

Um, no.

Your vows call you to give your lives to God.

The vows are poverty, chastity, and obedience. There is no vow of "service" or "charitable work."

You are supposed to be, first and foremost, a NUN!!  What the heck is so difficult to understand about that?

You could be doing exactly what you're doing, with the same group of women, without being a nun.

You can work among the poor, or for "social justice" (however you define it) without being a  nun!

So obviously there's supposed to be more to it than your work.

I honestly don't know why women like this don't  just establish communes and make up their own set of rules.  Why on earth do they want to be nuns in the first place?  Has anyone ever asked them?

  • Login to post comments

She seems to have forgotten her Vow of Obedience.

Submitted by CobraMan on Thu, 05/31/2012 - 7:42pm.

It's interesting to note that she has seemed to have forgotten her Vow of Obedience, the one in which she promised to Obey the Will of God and the commands of her Lawful Superiors, like the Bishops, the Cardinals, The Pope. It seems that, to her, the Solemn Vow of Obedience is meaningless.

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution

Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court

Or Anwar al-Awlaki.

  • Login to post comments

She should either shut up and

Submitted by motherbelt on Thu, 05/31/2012 - 7:47pm.

She should either shut up and do what she's supposed to do, or ask to be released from her vows. Then she can do what she wants, how she wants, and no one will bother her.

  • Login to post comments

What, and lose that High Horse?

Submitted by CobraMan on Thu, 05/31/2012 - 8:06pm.

But that would make her a, gasp, "commoner!" She wouldn't have that high horse in which to tower over the rest of us any more. Which tells us just how much she values her Vow of Poverty, by the way. She's supposed to shy away from material things, like her catering to her own ego by appearing on TV! You can;t get much more material than a TV appearance!

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution

Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court

Or Anwar al-Awlaki.

  • Login to post comments

And if she did, the media

Submitted by motherbelt on Thu, 05/31/2012 - 8:42pm.

And if she did, the media wouldn't be interested in her for very long.

Just like Nancy Pelosi and Joe Biden won't give up their status as "even Catholics."

  • Login to post comments

You got that right.

Submitted by CobraMan on Thu, 05/31/2012 - 8:48pm.

You got that right. She's forgotten just what it means to be a Nun. It's not longer about God, or Jesus, or religion, it's all abut her. She doesn't want the Church to tell HER what to do. Well, God has an answer for that. It's called eternal damnation. God doesn't like being upstaged by an arrogant, selfish heretic who has violated their own Vows, no matter what gender they are. Hasn't she ever read the Old Testament?

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution

Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court

Or Anwar al-Awlaki.

  • Login to post comments

I'm with you guys*

Submitted by cajun2 on Thu, 05/31/2012 - 9:06pm.

This woman is going to tell a 2000 yr old Church we need to make changes? God gave us these rules to live by. When did God die and make her God that she can now dictate our beliefs? The arrogance of these people is astounding. These are not the kind of nuns I have known and certainly dont ever want to know. The problem with these radicals in the church as well as ex catholics all have the same problem. Their particular life style and beliefs may fit under the category of "sin". Therefore, rather than admit guilt and move on they rather believe they have to change the Church and then can continue their sinful ways with Church "acceptance". Not as long as I am Catholic they wont. Of course, the media will never allow people like us to have a voice. They want very much to push the hedonistic agenda into our society regardless of religion.

  • Login to post comments

She can start her own Church.

Submitted by CobraMan on Thu, 05/31/2012 - 9:22pm.

I don't understand her obsession with changing the Church doctrine to fit her own agenda. Why can't she start her own Church, complete with her own doctrine? Its that too much to ask of someone who claims to have Faith?

If she believes so strongly that her "calling" is driving her to defy her own Vows, to oppose the doctrine which existed when she first became a Nun, then she should do the right thing and start her own religious denomination, as most people would do. No, she can't seem to bring herself to actually oppose the Church by competing with it. She needs to have it conform to HER beliefs instead. I guess she doesn't have that much Faith after all.

Arrogance? Willfulness? Pride? She has a lot of that! Actual Faith? Not so much!

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution

Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court

Or Anwar al-Awlaki.

  • Login to post comments

It's simple, really. If you

Submitted by seanrobins on Thu, 05/31/2012 - 8:16pm.

It's simple, really. If you are a Catholic nun, then you act like a Catholic nun, you believe what Catholic nuns believe, and you follow the rules that Catholic nuns (and all good Catholics) follow. It's not rocket science. If you don't believe what Catholics believe, that don't be Catholic. Why do these media fools have so much trouble understanding simple things like this. For example, a "pro-Abortion" Catholic, is not, by definition, a Catholic. You cannot be a good Catholic and believe in free-for-all abortion. And this same principle applies to all other important aspects of Catholic faith and values. If you don't believe in them, just don't Catholic. That goes for errant nuns also, if they are no longer interested in being Catholic. I don't see the big confusion at this point.

sean robins 

  • Login to post comments

What's the "we" crap? You got a mouse in your pocket?

Submitted by CobraMan on Thu, 05/31/2012 - 8:42pm.

"This is about what kind of a Catholic Church we're going to be."

Man, what an arrogant woman! Get this through that thick skull of yours, lady: YOU ARE NOT THE CHURCH! You serve the Church. It doesn't serve you. So, ether serve it or leave it. It's not up to you to control it.

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution

Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court

Or Anwar al-Awlaki.

  • Login to post comments

She's actually right,

Submitted by motherbelt on Thu, 05/31/2012 - 9:07pm.

She's actually right, Cobra..."we" are the Church.the people make up the Church.

But that doesn't mean everyone gets a say in doctrine and teachings.  Certain people are called (by God)  to that office. 

If she's right, I must have missed the announcement that the Church is taking a world-wide vote of Catholics to decide in which direction we should go.

If she and her compatriots decide that "they" want to be a Church that concentrates only on physical and social issues, and doesn't worry about stuff like doctrine, they are certainly welcome to depart and do that.

But it won't be a "different kind" of Catholic Church.  It won't BE the Catholic Church.

  • Login to post comments

People make up the Church....

Submitted by CobraMan on Thu, 05/31/2012 - 9:11pm.

People make up the Church, yes, but she's trying to make up the rules! So, when she says "we, " she actually means "ME!"

By the way, I wonder how she'd feel about male Nuns? Do you think she'd serve under a Father Superior? She seems to have a problem with male authority figures. Why doesn't she just admit she's a lesbian and be done with it.

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution

Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court

Or Anwar al-Awlaki.

  • Login to post comments

Leftist nuns have no place

Submitted by ohio granny on Fri, 06/01/2012 - 11:53am.

Leftist nuns have no place in the Catholic Church. They REFUSE to adhere to the doctrine of the church. They KNEW what the church doctrine was when they became Nuns. If they cannot or will not abide by that doctrine they should be honest and leave the church. Like too many people in todays world they are only interested in changing changing society? church? government? to their idea of what they want it to be. Never mind if the majority of people disagree with them.

To you leftist Nuns, I say shame on you. No one is making you stay in the church. You are free to leave and I am sure you will not be missed.

  • Login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Editors' Picks

  • Is asking about what you pray for inappropriate for IRS? IRS commish not sure (Say Anything)
  • Another fed court invalidates Obama's NRLB recess appointments (Politico)
  • Former SecState Hillary Clinton's record leaves much to be desired (Kondracke)
  • Sen. Boxer is lying about impact of budget cuts on Benghazi security (WashPost)
  • Left-wing actor Cusack attacks Obama, Holder over AP scandal (Twitchy)
  • Dopey Chicago gun laws prevent museum from displaying unloaded WW2 relic (Fox News)
  • New Google Maps is flat, clean, user-friendly (Gizmodo)
  • New Google Maps looks spectacular (Mashable)
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: Hating America
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Malkin Column: Obama's Emptiest Benghazi Talking Point
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Coulter Column: Sorry, Sen. Rubio, But Your Immigration Plan Is Still Problematic
David Limbaugh's picture
David Limbaugh
David Limbaugh Column: Partisan Obama Culture Spawned a More Abusive IRS
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: An Honest Examination of Race
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Stop Censoring The News!

ObamaCare's a Real Pain in the Neck
more cartoons
  • Romney: ‘I’m Not a Fan of the President’
  • Krauthammer on IRS Testimony: ‘You've Got to be a Knave or a Fool to Say That and an Idiot to Believe It’
  • Leno: GOP Should Repeal ObamaCare By Naming it Conservative Non-Profit and Letting IRS Take it Down
  • ABC Drama Warns of ‘Conservative Overlords’ Bringing Anti-Black ‘Salem Witch Trials’ to DC
  • Gay NBA Player’s Twin Brother Gets ‘I’m The Straight One’ T-shirt From Jimmy Kimmel
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2013 NewsBusters.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use