Protests Against HHS Abortifacient Mandate in 140 Cities; Will Media Cover?
ABC, CBS, and NBC covered the far-left Occupy Wall Street movement with glee during 2011, devoting 33 stories on the air during the first eleven days of October alone to publicizing the protests. However, the Big Three networks have yet to mention the planned demonstrations in 140 cities across the U.S. today at noon local time against the Obama administration's sterilization, abortifacient, and contraception mandate.
The Coalition to Stop the HHS Mandate, which is being coordinated by the Illinois-based Pro-Life Action League; and includes multiple pro-life, social conservative, and religious groups, including Human Life International, The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, the Alliance Defense Fund, and Priests for Life; have organized the "Stand Up For Religious Freedom" rallies "in defense of religious freedom and STAND UP against the Obama administration's HHS mandate at federal building in cities across the country."
Back on October 5, 2012, NBC's Brian Williams celebrated the arrival of the Occupy movement, describing it as a "massive protest movement" that "could well turn out to be the protest of this current era." One might expect that rallies in 140 cities against the federal government might be describe, at the very least, as a large movement. But given that the media have ignored the annual March for Life in Washington, DC, where tens, if not hundreds, of thousands of people protest against abortion, it will not be a complete surprise if the Big Three minimize or omit covering the pro-religious freedom demonstrations.
The MRC's Rich Noyes pointed out in his April 2010 special report, "Tea Party Travesity," that on "the night of the final vote on ObamaCare in March, for example, ABC's Diane Sawyer cast Tea Partiers as out-of-control marauders, 'roaming Washington, some of them increasingly emotional, yelling slurs and epithets.' CBS's Bob Schieffer also cast a wide net, accusing 'demonstrators' of hurling 'racial epithets' and 'sexual slurs,' and even conjured images of civil-rights era brutality: 'One lawmaker said it was like a page out of a time machine.'''
Given this kind of track record of smearing conservatives, expect the rallies to get similar coverage, if they get covered at all.
- Matthew Balan's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
➚ Will not be covered
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Fri, 03/23/2012 - 12:03pm.
The god of liberalism, Molech, must be fed with fresh human veal daily.
Don't think for a second there is no power in demonic subservience.
The short answer
Submitted by KornKing on Fri, 03/23/2012 - 12:04pm.
Is no-NOW, if three idiots picket a Limbaugh radio station somewhere.....
Only When
Submitted by HardRightTurn on Fri, 03/23/2012 - 12:10pm.
The Occupiers counter-demonstrate, unless they get violent, which there is a 99% chance of.
To more fully comprehend the Left, one must read “Leftism As Psychopathy” by John Ray, M.A., Ph.D. Caution, it might scare you a little bit.
http://jonjayray.tripod.com/psycho.html
Good point
Submitted by Galvanic on Fri, 03/23/2012 - 1:16pm.
The lead-in to the story would be: THE WAR ON WOMEN: AT THE FRONT LINES.
And the pro-life demonstrators would be asked, "Why do you hate women?"
Either of two possibilities
Submitted by c5then on Fri, 03/23/2012 - 12:16pm.
It will be completely ignored by the national media (some of the local stations will have no choice but to cover it), or if they can get good video and some ginned up interviews, they will portray the "mob" as demonstrating against "regular people's rights" and as "right-wing lunatics".
Unless the OWS mob gets involved and creates confrontations and violence, I'm leaning toward the crickets.
Madison and Jefferson and Franklin built a Republic - Roberts killed it!
I can see the headline
Submitted by motherbelt on Fri, 03/23/2012 - 12:46pm.
Opponents demonstrate against "women's health" measure.
The short answer?
Submitted by Tomorama on Fri, 03/23/2012 - 12:57pm.
No.
Story NOT at 11:00.
MSM will ignore. But Happy National Puppy Day, everyone!
Submitted by SickofLibs on Fri, 03/23/2012 - 1:27pm.
.
The simple answer is NO
Submitted by John21 on Fri, 03/23/2012 - 1:38pm.
The simple answer is NO
They cannot do anything but a quick blub with as many negative comments as possible. They are the liberal agenda; they support the “Chicago Jesus” and cannot admit that anyone does not agree with their stupidity. Rights only belong to them and the government.
Facts do not matter, logic does not matter, reality does not matter only their opinions matter. The Constitution is a dead document as far as they are concerned. The Bill of Rights is a punch line to a liberal joke.
The liberal battle cry:
If you have the facts on your side, argue the facts. If you have the law on your side, argue the law. If you have neither, change the subject and question the motives of the opposition.
No. Unless the reporting is
Submitted by rbosque on Fri, 03/23/2012 - 1:54pm.
No. Unless the reporting is skewed to demonize them.
Did my part in Peoria,
Submitted by Soldat44 on Fri, 03/23/2012 - 3:47pm.
Did my part in Peoria, Illinois today. Big turnout!
Media silence
Submitted by Steve Cakouros on Fri, 03/23/2012 - 6:45pm.
Obama owns the media.
Confirmed on one
Submitted by Sefton on Fri, 03/23/2012 - 7:31pm.
I can confirm that Obama's towel boy, Brian Williams, didn't cover it.
Maine Coverage
Submitted by Norto on Fri, 03/23/2012 - 7:33pm.
http://www.onlinesentinel.com/news/Contraception-mandate-sparks-Maine-ra...
This was in Portland today. There was very little pre-coverage, so I did not know about it and I am online a lot.
This media outlet we have here has been in the bailout line for years. Articles about the pipeline to nowhere, and anything Obama does is sugar-coated.
In Jackson, Ms
Submitted by ginagwen7 on Fri, 03/23/2012 - 11:21pm.
we got 45 seconds from one TV station