ABC Shamelessly Boosts Leftist Group's Report on 'Extremists'; Hypes Violence Threat
ABC broadcasted two completely one-sided reports on Thursday's World News and Nightline on the supposed "huge spike in the number of Americans operating in the shadows, trying to take down the U.S. government even with violence," as anchor Diane Sawyer put it. Correspondent Dan Harris's main external source for his reports was a media favorite, the left-wing Southern Poverty Law Center [audio clips available here].
As she introduced Harris's first report on World News, Sawyer trumped that "a new study finds there are now nearly 1,300 militias and other extremist groups in this country, an increase from 149 groups in 2008. And one of the fastest-growing groups is called 'sovereign citizens.'" However, an examination of the SPLC's report in question find that many of these supposed "extremist" groups have been around for longer than four years, and the only change is that the leftist organization recently designated them as such.
[Update, 09:27 pm Eastern: audio added above; video below the jump]
Besides obvious and actual extremist associations - the KKK; neo-Nazis; and white and black nationalists - the SPLC identifies what they label as "anti-gay groups," "anti-Muslim groups," and "radical traditionalist Catholicism" in their broad "hate group" category, and lump in mainstream conservative groups in each. To them, the Family Research Council is the same as the troop-hating Westboro Baptist "Church," Robert Spencer's Jihad Watch is a hate group like the Hitler-idolizing National Socialist Movement, and the New Hampshire-based Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, whose chapel is recognized by the local Catholic diocese, are akin to Aryan Nations 88.
Harris singled out the "sovereign citizens' during his report, and began by highlighting three violent incidents supposedly associated with their movement:
HARRIS (voice-over): Sixteen-year-old Joe Kane emerges from a vehicle and kills two police officers. Then, he and his dad, in that white van, die in a blaze of bullets in a Walmart parking lot. Joe Stack flies his small plane into an IRS building in Austin, Texas. And Brody Whitaker leads police on a high-speed chase, exchanging fire, escaping through the woods.
BRODY WHITAKER (from 2010 trial): I am not an American citizen. I don't recognize these-
UNIDENTIFIED MALE LAWYER: Whatever advice (unintelligible)
WHITAKER: I am my counsel.
HARRIS: All of them members of the 'sovereign citizens' movement, estimated at 300,000 strong. They believe the laws of America do not apply to them.
However, what the ABC News correspondent omitted is that all three events occurred back in 2010. Apparently, he couldn't find an incident from 2011 or from the first two months of 2012. Also, Whitaker outlandishly claimed he was the "grandson of God" and acted at his own attorney during his trial, pointing at severe mental illness as the cause of his rampage, instead of a blind devotion to an extreme political agenda.
Harris did the SPLC's bidding throughout his report, hinting a vague connection between mainstream conservatives, who see the growth of the federal government as a threat to individual liberty, with the organization's purported "extremists":
HARRIS: ABC News was able to get inside this movement, starting, of all places, at this diner near Tampa, where instead of men in camo, we found a diverse group, who argued the real threat is not them, but the U.S. government....Most insisted they are non-violent, but not all of them ruled it out.
UNIDENTIFIED MAN 2: I don't want to come here with this bullcrap about trying to impress the news- impress ABC News- about how friendly we are. I don't give a crap how friendly anybody is. If they come at me with a gun, I've got a gun, too, okay? That's what I'm about.
HARRIS: What sets 'sovereigns' apart from militias is, for the most part, they are not using guns, but instead, legal theories based on obscure laws, the Constitution, as well as the Bible- all of it used to justify flouting the law and avoiding paying their debts and taxes.
Near the end of the World News segment, Sawyer asked the correspondent, "What does law enforcement plan to do about this growing number?" Harris replied, "Quite a bit now- the FBI recently came out and said this is a top priority for them. And the Southern Poverty Law Center, the group that issued today's report on hate groups...recently made a DVD for local law enforcement officials who might encounter 'sovereign citizens.' In the last year alone, they said they got 90,000 requests for that DVD from cops."
Later in the evening, the ABC News journalist filed an extended version of his first report on Nightline, which included a more detailed outline of the ideology and tactics taken by the "sovereign citizens":
HARRIS (voice-over): [Donald Joe] Barber, who's a former photo copier salesman, has made himself into a scholar of sovereign ideology, a bizarre hobbling together of passages from obscure law books, along with parts of the Constitution and the Bible, all to justify flouting the law. People all over the country are now using sovereign theories to justify failure to repay their debts, and even to occupy foreclosed homes. And when police, prosecutors, and judges stand in the way of a sovereign, like Donald Barber, they often resort to a classic sovereign weapon called 'paper terrorism,' flooding officials with paperwork....
"Paper terrorism"? Is that something like death by a thousand papercuts? Back in December 2011, CNN boosted Occupy Wall Street's illegal tactic of "squatting" in foreclosed homes. Anchor Suzanne Malveaux asked the Marxist former Obama administration czar Van Jones how their occupation of the homes might help their leftist activism. One might guess that the media thinks it's okay for the far left to squat, but not for the "sovereign citizens."
After giving examples of the so-called "paper terrorism," Harris brought in the specter of the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing:
DONALD JOE BARBER, "SOVEREIGN CITIZEN": Benjamin Franklin [sic] stated that there should be a revolution every 20 years, okay? We're long time past due.
HARRIS (on-camera): Do you think we need a revolution now?
BARBER: I think we need a revolution, but not a violent one.
HARRIS (voice-over): Sovereign citizens do have a history of turning violent. Terry Nichols, co-plotter of the Oklahoma City bombing- a sovereign citizen....Joe Stack, who flew his small plane into an IRS building in Austin, Texas- a sovereign citizen. And then, there's Jerry and Joe Kane, a father and his 16-year-old son, who used to drive around the country, teaching people how to use sovereign legal theories to get out of debt....When they were pulled over in West Memphis, Arkansas in 2010, Joe Kane burst out of the car with an assault rifle and killed two officers....The Kanes were later cornered and shot to death in the parking lot of a Walmart.
There's a problem with identifying Nichols as a "sovereign citizen." When you use the term in the SPLC's search engine, the earliest mention was an article about a white nationalist group in Montana written about three years after the Oklahoma City bombing. Most of the other search results were written during the Obama presidency. Harris also gave the bomber this label in his 2010 reporting on the Kanes' rampage in Arkansas.
The left-wing organization tried to spotlight the "sovereign citizens" about a year ago as well. The March 7, 2011 edition of CNN's Newsroom brought on SPLC spokesman Mark Potok and touted him as an "expert on extremism." During the segment, Potok ripped the hearings that Rep. Peter King was holding about the thread from radical Islam, and claimed that the "biggest domestic terror threat...clearly comes from the radical right in this country." The "expert" went on to mention the "sovereign citizens" and the West Memphis shootings.
As the election-year debate continues over the controversial ObamaCare mandate that compels religious organizations to cover abortifacients, sterilization, and contraception in their health care plans without a co-pay, some Catholic bishops in the U.S. are calling for civil disobedience against what they see as an unjust encroachment on religious liberty by the federal government. It is completely plausible that a left-wing organization like the SPLC will go so far to label the Catholic Church itself an "extremist" group, and that they will have the willing cooperation of media outlets like ABC.
- Matthew Balan's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
Sam Adams is feeling a bit
Submitted by jkwtrading on Fri, 03/09/2012 - 9:31pm.
Sam Adams is feeling a bit proud tonight, the second generation Patriots are coming to life.
Sounds like
Submitted by Bob K on Fri, 03/09/2012 - 9:59pm.
they are talking about the OWS crowd to me.
@ Bob K. Indeed, OWS is the big brand here. .
Submitted by Gary Hall on Sat, 03/10/2012 - 12:54am.
Just listen to the big wigs. .
SEIU wants to wipe out capitalism
Others in the OWS movement. As reported by Jonah Goldberg:
Brian Phillips is the head of communications for the NYC General Assembly, the group primarily responsible for occupying Wall Street. I learned about him while listening to National Public Radio’s “Morning Edition.” According to NPR, Phillips is “an ex-Marine with a bachelor’s in computer science. Today he is wearing a sock on his head.”
“My political goal,” Phillips says, “is to overthrow the government.”
I'd guess that wouldn't be newsworthyy to ABC News.
(;~/ gary
agreed
Submitted by oldfart on Sat, 03/10/2012 - 7:15am.
They were looking the mirror when these comments were made.
That OWS (or a renamed organization) do not realize is that they are expendiable useful idiots that the Pretender-In-Chief will throw to the wolves to get his way.
Wow, so now the militia groups whose history is of ones
Submitted by gmaniac1 on Fri, 03/09/2012 - 10:50pm.
that fought off an oppressive government and gave us liberty is somehow a hate group. Hmmm, now that the liberals have gotten their hides tanned over the Limbaugh/Fluke fiasco, they are going down this road. What a bunch of morons!
Unfortunately ....
Submitted by NL207 on Fri, 03/09/2012 - 10:56pm.
The left won the Sandra Fluke fracas. If you were to talk to any population of 18-24 year olds, you'd know this. A great many of these kids now believe Rick Santorum wants to ban contraceptives and that insurance companies should be forced to give them free contraceptives. None of them are at all focused on what a shambles the Democrats have made of the economy.
How so?
Submitted by gmaniac1 on Fri, 03/09/2012 - 11:52pm.
Demographics aside, they are taking a beating over this, more specifically the advertisers that have bailed on Rush when they didn't do the same to left wingers who have said worse. Is there a poll or some documented information on 18 to 24 year olds? The only people that believe that are ones that will never agree with Rick Santorum or conservatives regardless. They are obviously losing the debate when liberals are coming out eating their own in the public spectrum. How you can tell is by who is on the defensive, i.e. liberals. Rush apologized and closed the debate on his behalf. He came out as the bigger person with no excuses. Now that they have lost the debate on this as I originally asserted they have to conjure up "hate" on the right elsewhere. Otherwise, they'd still being playing the gender card against the conservatives at a much higher level. This is all in black and white.
Now as far as the economy, the republican candidates are wisely staying on point and sticking it to Obama. It has gotten so bad that Obama is shooting himself in the foot by making false assertions. So I'm not sure anything has been lost on the conservative side of things and I'm a little more confident, but that's just my nature.
How many 18-24 year olds do you ....
Submitted by NL207 on Sat, 03/10/2012 - 1:15am.
have any meaningful contact with? Any? I've talked to quite a number of them recently and I am appalled at how misinformed they are on this topic. They are totally focused on this red herring the left has thrown out at them.
That being said, when reminded of the national debt they will inherit from us, most of these young people I come into contact with are sobered by it, but do not fully comprehend how it will impact their lives and futures. We, the conservative movement, need to educate these young people about two important subjects : (1) They need to understand what havoc Obama and his followers are wreaking on prosperity in America. (2) They need to understand what the prosperity Americans enjoyed in the heyday of the 50's and 60's was truly like. These young people have no real first person experience with the Reagan years much less Eisenhower's time. I am constantly asked by them if the 50's and 60's were really as idyllic as Ward and June Cleaver made it seem. They can't fathom how a single paycheck family could live like that and simply disbelieve it.
Hmmm, you should be careful with the "how many..."
Submitted by gmaniac1 on Sat, 03/10/2012 - 2:42am.
when you start off of any question. I guarantee I come in contact with many more than you do to be honest. I work at a university and I run a men's clothing line where I scout models to do our fashion shows. I would say that qualifies me as more than knowledgeable so your point is just that, your point. What I have come across is that some are misinformed and some are not. The ones that are misinformed are craving knowledge and the ones that are not are generally conservative thinkers, for the most part. There are some that are just balls to the walls liberal but even they are willing to listen. It's when they get more towards middle age that I come across the ones that just want to be right and not so much factual.
Only a jerk ....
Submitted by NL207 on Sat, 03/10/2012 - 2:56am.
operating in ignorance would make this statement :
"I guarantee I come in contact with many more than you do to be honest"
What do you suppose I do for a living? Our government thinks I am far too old to fly a jet fighter these days. Could I possibly teach college age students? Or are you the only human being here who works in a University?
I don't see you disagreeing with me about how these kids are programmed coming out of high school. Many of them are totally preoccupied with sex and themselves. The Democrats do focus groups. They would not have staged this ploy unless they had research data telling them there were voter groups who would be deceived by it.
Well only a jerk would assume that I do not have an
Submitted by gmaniac1 on Sat, 03/10/2012 - 3:41am.
idea what a specific age group has to think about things. Nobody asked you to push your personal opinion on here to them and leave the personal insults for your family. I don't care for them. If you don't like the response you got then don't start a discussion with a condescending remark. It seems like you were looking for an argument regardless, typical and very arrogant.
Nothing to add?
Submitted by NL207 on Sun, 03/11/2012 - 4:16pm.
I think I have characterized what the 18-24 set thinks about this phony contraception issue the Democrats have raised to the exclusion of all else. The kids have been successfully distracted from the larger issues of this election. I think the left has shot their bolt on this now in attempt to eliminate Rick Santorum, making their desired opponent, Romney, the nominee.
You have not offered any meaningful description of what students told you about this that is in conflict with any of my observations or contradicts my premise that the left has succeeded, with the collusion of the MSM, to frame the debate. Why don't you go back to Men's Wearhouse, S&K or wherever it s you do your work and think about this implication : the left was still able to frame the debate unfavorably for conservatives in spite of the new media.
More to add than you that's for sure
Submitted by gmaniac1 on Sun, 03/11/2012 - 5:34pm.
you questioned my credentials and acted like a complete child when you got called out on it. It's nice to know that you finally came out of your drunken stupor to regurgitate your same nonsense. Smarmy people like yourself only know how to do a couple of things... argue not debate and call people names when their feelings get hurt. Good luck on your hangover and know when to quit before making yourself look more like a fool.
I wonder why you rely so much on Democratic focus groups? Hmmm, interesting indeed.
new diet
Submitted by CJohnson on Fri, 03/09/2012 - 11:39pm.
Just watch her and you will have difficulty swallowing for 8 hours.
Really
Submitted by KornKing on Sat, 03/10/2012 - 12:28am.
must have been a real sloooooow day for Ms. duckface
What the left fails to mention
Submitted by UpNorth on Sat, 03/10/2012 - 12:49am.
is that every time the "sovereigns" try their BS, the last thing they hear is a Federal judge saying "i sentence you to 4 to 10 years on each count, to be served consecutively".
Potok is more concerned about combat vets returning to the U.S. I guess he thinks that the government should find an island and send all those ready to go off vets there. Maybe to Guam, then they can overload it and make it capsize.
And, I was thinking, there's no way that Nichols was involved in this, he was way before this ever became the cause du jour of the left.
ABC news
Submitted by oldfart on Sat, 03/10/2012 - 7:19am.
Come to think of it I think there were actually making reference to people who vote every election, but don't vote "D" as people lurking in the shadows to overthrow the government. That is what a truly free election does.
Extremists
Submitted by oldfart on Sat, 03/10/2012 - 8:05am.
So if I believe in the following I am a potential extremist?
1. Rule of law (The Constitution)
2. Freedom of religion.
3. Self-sufficiency
4. Personal responsibility
Lenin, Stalin, Pol-Pot, Chavez, Castro et. al. would be proud of what the current administration is doing.
Every election year...
Submitted by octavioj on Sat, 03/10/2012 - 12:26pm.
Did not we hear the same thing in 2010????
Sovereign Militias
Submitted by CobraMan on Sat, 03/10/2012 - 12:36pm.
Sovereign Militias, is that like the Crips, the Bloods, MS13, or any other territory obsessed, highly violent, and totally criminal organization, who's member routinely ignore state and federal law, seize and control their own "hood," their own sovereign territory, and who also get into "shootouts" with the police?
You know, these so called "experts' love to highlight the dangers of "right wing extremists," but NEVER seem to be concerned with the actual extremists with-in our own society. Like the extremists who shoot each other simply for being in the "wrong" neighborhood or wearing the "wrong" colored clothing, or having the "wrong" tattoos. Those are the people who are actually extreme in their behavior, as they murder, rape, steal, and deal illegal substances. Those are the ones who are actually a threat to people.
I'll take a million "right wing extremist" groups over a hundred minority gangs, every day of the week. The "right wing extremists" are the safer, saner lot! Sure, the "right wing extremest" have their occasional maniac, the delusional person who becomes violent and "strike out against society," but that's the exception and not the rule. The gangs, on the other hand, make their prospective members shoot someone as an initiation! Tell me again who the dangerous ones are?
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution
Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court
Or Anwar al-Awlaki.
Media: "Sovereign Citizens" = "TEA PARTY"
Submitted by gopcongress on Sat, 03/10/2012 - 3:10pm.
That association inference was as blatant as anything I've seen.
"The news and truth are not the same thing." -Walter Lippmann (1889-1974) FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER
"sovereign citizens"
Submitted by ant on Sun, 03/11/2012 - 1:31am.
Gee, wasn't that the exact same language the administration and the DHS used to describe those that 'disagreed' with government policy? It's a'comin', and THEY are the ones bringin'it...guaranteed.