Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Free email alerts!

NewsBusters logo
May 23, 2013
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Take Action
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • Obama Targets Fox News
  • IRS Targets Tea Party
  • Censoring the News
Home » Blogs » Matthew Balan's blog
  • MSNBC’s Finney On IRS Scandal: ‘Why Didn't Romney Make More Of A Big Deal Of It?’
  • Obama Losing Chris Matthews? Host Rails Against 'Profiling' By IRS: It's Like Targeting Innocent Arabs
  • Jake Tapper Slams Obama Admin for Treatment of Fox News Reporter
  • NBC's Lauer Uses Oklahoma Tornado to Bash GOP Over Sandy Relief
  • New York Times: Obama Administration 'Threatening Fundamental Freedoms of the Press'
  • ABC’s Cokie Roberts Acknowledges Obama’s Contempt for the Press, Blasts 'Presidential Propaganda'
  • Chuck Todd: Obama Administration Wants to 'Criminalize Journalism'
  • Al Hunt On Rosen Outrage: Obama 'No Better Than Nixon'; Holder Should Take Hike

Unbelievable: NPR Cites Planned Parenthood's Poll But Omits Its Name On-Air

By Matthew Balan | February 08, 2012 | 14:36

A  A
Matthew Balan's picture

On Tuesday, NPR somehow thought a poll commissioned by abortion behemoth Planned Parenthood on the controversy over an ObamaCare birth control mandate was newsworthy enough to play up on its website. But later in the day, on All Things Considered, a show that reaches millions in the U.S., the media outlet spotlighted how the "new polling...suggests most voters, including Catholics, support the measure."

Correspondent Scott Horsley noted the "survey released today by Public Policy Polling," but completely failed to mention Planned Parenthood's name during his report. Horsley also highlighted a disturbing strategy from the pro-mandate camp without: "Supporters of the new policy are belatedly trying to refocus attention in a more popular direction, away from religious freedom and towards women's health care."

Host Audie Cornish introduced the correspondents report by stating that the federal mandate "would require most employers, including Catholic hospitals and universities, to include birth control in their employees' health insurance. Catholic leaders have denounced the policy as an assault on religious freedom." But Cornish then added the line about "new polling...suggests most voters...support the measure."

After briefly summarizing the controversy between the Obama administration and the Catholic Church, and how it has been picked up in the Republican presidential race, Horsley continued with the poll results: "A survey released today by Public Policy Polling suggests most voters agree [with the HHS mandate], including 53 percent of Catholic voters and 63 percent of women."

During his report, the journalist followed the example of colleague Frank James in his earlier NPR.org article by playing two sound bites from PPP pollster Tom Jensen, who played up how the results might help President Obama in his re-election campaign with Catholics and women: "These are obviously groups that are going to be really key for the election this fall- swing voter groups- and they're all quite supportive of the birth control benefit." Jensen specified the possible effect on Mitt Romney in the second clip:

JENSEN: He's [Romney] sort of playing with fire here. This is definitely an issue that has the potential to be pretty resonant this fall, and it's one where congressional Republicans and Mitt Romney really may pay a price at the polls if they try to take this benefit away.

The Public Religion Research Institute also released a poll on Tuesday, which actually found that a slim majority of Catholics- 52%- oppose the mandate. But NPR didn't mention it on the air. On the other hand, CNN highlighted it online, along with the PPP poll. It should also be pointed out that another poll from PPP indicated that Romney was going to win big in the Colorado Republican caucus. Instead, Rick Santorum won the Rocky Mountain state.

Horsley also played two sound bites from White House Press Secretary Jay Carney, who obviously defended the new policy, and another from Lanae Erickson of the "centrist Democratic think tank" Third Way, who supports the eyebrow-raising strategy to shift to focus away from the essential liberty of freedom of religion:

HORSLEY: ...[S]upporters of the new policy are belatedly trying to refocus attention in a more popular direction, away from religious freedom and towards women's health care. Lanae Erickson of the centrist Democratic think tank Third Way says that argument is especially persuasive with the independent voters who helped elect Barack Obama three years ago.

LANAE ERICKSON, THIRD WAY: Obama independents were much more secular than independents generally, and much more secular than Americans generally. They were more female, and they were much more moderate.

It sounds like these so-called "Obama independents" actually lean left, and Erickson, with the correspondent's help, is trying to disguise that.

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Overall, Horsley slanted towards the supporters of the ObamaCare mandate by playing the two clips from Jensen, along with three other sound bites from backers, versus only two from Mitt Romney, one of which was a crack made by the former Massachusetts governor during a Republican debate.

About the Author

Matthew Balan is a news analyst at the Media Research Center. Click here to follow Matthew Balan on Twitter.
  • Bias by Omission
  • Birth Control
  • Campaigns & Elections
  • Christianity
  • Conservatives & Republicans
  • Liberals & Democrats
  • Medical Insurance
  • Polling
  • Pro-choicers
  • Pro-lifers
  • 2012 Presidential
  • Regulation
  • Culture/Society
  • Health Care
  • Religion
  • Sexuality
  • Scott Horsley
  • All Things Considered
  • NPR
  • Radio
  • Matthew Balan's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Comments

Why doesn't NPR care that

Submitted by MrSnuggles on Wed, 02/08/2012 - 2:51pm.

Why doesn't NPR care that most Americans oppose gay marriage? Oh you mean opinion polls only matter when they support leftist causes?

  • Login to post comments

New Surveys show support for same sex marraige

Submitted by Max Frisson on Thu, 02/09/2012 - 12:39pm.

Several polls from different organizations (including one from Public Religion Research Institute where my numbers come from) found a slim majority support for same-sex marriage in 2011.

Majorities of 5 major religious groups and the religiously unaffiliated favor allowing gay and lesbian couples to marry, compared to 3 against it. Supporting same-sex marriage; the religiously unaffiliated (72 percent), majorities of Jews (76 percent), Americans affiliated with a non-Judeo-Christian religion (63 percent), white Catholics (56 percent), Hispanic Catholics (53 percent) and white mainline Protestants (52 percent). Together, these groups make up approximately 55% of the US population. Those opposed, large majorities of white evangelicals (75 percent), Mormons (75 percent) and black Protestants (63 percent). These groups represent about 32% of US population.

A generational gap shows that in time, this resistance will fade away. Among white evangelicals, 39 percent of Millennials favor allowing same sex marriage, that is more than 20 points higher than that of white evangelicals ages 30 and older (18 percent). The same is true of Catholics: 66 percent of Catholic under 30 favor allowing gay and lesbian couples to marry, 15 points higher than Catholics ages 30 and above (51 percent).

The only age group that is strongly opposed are the OVER 70 folks at 65% and they won't be with us much longer. Same sex marriage is inevitable, resistance is futile.

Disobedience is man’s original virtue. -- Anti-theist with no firm moral compass. Situational ethicist, a libertine hedonist, pragmatic isolationist with eugenic tendencies, liberal libertarian with socialist leanings and a climate change agnostic.
  • Login to post comments

Where have I heard that before

Submitted by Matthew Balan on Thu, 02/09/2012 - 3:25pm.

Same sex marriage is inevitable, resistance is futile.


 

  • Login to post comments

The Borg

Submitted by Max Frisson on Thu, 02/09/2012 - 5:11pm.

yes, that was my reference

Disobedience is man’s original virtue. -- Anti-theist with no firm moral compass. Situational ethicist, a libertine hedonist, pragmatic isolationist with eugenic tendencies, liberal libertarian with socialist leanings and a climate change agnostic.
  • Login to post comments

They're on the defensive, but counter-attacking

Submitted by Galvanic on Wed, 02/08/2012 - 3:19pm.

The Obama strategists and Planned Parenthood were briefly knocked back by Komen's decision, but they rapidly recovered and are now trying to change the subject to women's health.

They are also going to destroy Komen. One of the NOW executives "predicted" that Komen will disappear as a result of this, without explaining how. Afterall, when an organization depends on contributions, it's still alive ass long as some people are still contributing.

  • Login to post comments

counter-fold

Submitted by Agnostic on Wed, 02/08/2012 - 3:20pm.

I would say IRS and tax status but they have already caved

. . Socialist = Modern Liberal = Parasitoid
  • Login to post comments

Most people makes violating your rights ok?

Submitted by retrocon on Wed, 02/08/2012 - 4:00pm.

Since when did a consensus of "most people" make violating your rights OK?

Most people oppose gay marriage.

Most people once supported slavery.

oh, wait, this is now a socialist democracy, so "most people" can just take anything, money, possessions, children, homes, even the ability to defend oneself, away from anyone they darn well feel like.

nevermind.

  • Login to post comments

Exactly...

Submitted by Matthew Balan on Wed, 02/08/2012 - 5:01pm.

Also, I think Ben Franklin's famous quote about liberty & safety truly applies to the dispute between the Catholic Church & the Obama administration. If so many Americans are willing to trample on freedom of religion just for the safety of not getting pregnant, they deserve neither that essential liberty, nor that safety. Essential liberties SHOULD NOT BE subject to popularity contests.

  • Login to post comments

Incorrect assumption

Submitted by Max Frisson on Thu, 02/09/2012 - 12:42pm.

see my post above, Most people oppose gay marriage is no longer true and becomes less true everyday

Disobedience is man’s original virtue. -- Anti-theist with no firm moral compass. Situational ethicist, a libertine hedonist, pragmatic isolationist with eugenic tendencies, liberal libertarian with socialist leanings and a climate change agnostic.
  • Login to post comments

"Unbelievable" is right!

Submitted by CobraMan on Wed, 02/08/2012 - 4:48pm.

Maybe one of the liberal lurkers out there can help me? I want to know when pregnancy became a preventable disease, one that is so devastating to our Society in general that it is necessary for medical insurance to cover preventive measures, like paying for contraceptives, as to avoid the "long term costs to society" associated with any major, widespread medical malady? I mean, really, pregnancy is being treated as a dreadful disease, kinda like the Super Flu, complete with "prevention" which MUST, for the sake of society in general, be provided for by all insurance policies. WHEN did that happen?

The way things are going, it won't be long before mandatory sterilization is the necessity of the day, to be paid for at the tax payers expense, of course. I mean, really, just as with the mandatory availability of contraceptives, the fate of our society depends upon it! Isn't that right, liberals? How long will it be until we as a society un-conceive ourselves into oblivion? The way things are going, I don't give us more than 5 generations, max. After all, we're already seeing a decline in birth rates.

As with all true tyrants, each and every person "supporting" this "issue" wants complete control over the lives of others, up to an including the very population count itself. Of course, as is true will every tyrant, that control doesn't apply to them, personally. Just ask Obama with his two children. No birth control needed there, obviously! His own daughters, on the other hand, will never have to face the "burden" of an "unwanted' pregnancy. Obama, himself, will see to that.

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution

Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court

Or Anwar al-Awlaki.

  • Login to post comments

The good news is that abortion is safer than child birth.

Submitted by upcountrywater on Thu, 02/09/2012 - 5:41pm.

What a mantra the young females, can say to themselves as they get vacuumed..

. Abortion Is 14 Times Safer Than Childbirth

Abortion Is 14 Times Safer Than Childbirth

Abortion Is 14 Times Safer Than Childbirth

You Didn't Build That.

  • Login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Editors' Picks

  • Deputy kills PBS NewsHour staffer (Washington Examiner)
  • Oklahoma disaster was tragic, but larger ones have occurred (USA Today)
  • Mainstream Media Scream: Today’s Savannah Guthrie questions GOP ‘overreach’ (Paul Bedard, Washington Examiner)
  • Desperate Carney complains asking about scandals like asking about birth certificate (RCP)
  • Look at NYT's partisan-hack rewrite of the IRS hearing (Draw and STRIKE!)
  • Study: Christians who tithe have better finances than those who don't (TGC)
  • The media are willing accomplices to Obama (PolitiChicks)
  • FBI has suspects in mind in Benghazi; Obama prefers to try them in court (AP)
Chuck Norris's picture
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris Column: Why Tim Tebow Is an Ultimate Clutch Player
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: Hating America
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Malkin Column: Obama's Emptiest Benghazi Talking Point
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Coulter Column: Sorry, Sen. Rubio, But Your Immigration Plan Is Still Problematic
David Limbaugh's picture
David Limbaugh
David Limbaugh Column: Partisan Obama Culture Spawned a More Abusive IRS
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Stop Censoring The News!

Gosnell's Just the Tip of the Iceberg
more cartoons
  • IRS Charged With Unfair Scrutiny of Pro-Life Groups' Prayer Events, Protest Signs
  • Ex-AccuWeather's Bastardi Slams 'Ambulance Chasing' by Global Warming Theory Activists
  • Howard Dean Dismisses Benghazi Scandal as ‘Laughable Joke’
  • NYT Lawyer: Obama Worse Than Nixon, 'Worst President Ever' on Press Freedom
  • Letterman: 'Obama's in So Much Trouble Politically He's Thinking of Killing Bin Laden Again'
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2013 NewsBusters.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use