CBS's Rose Cannot Believe Rubio Would Label Obama 'Divisive'
On Thursday's CBS This Morning, Charlie Rose took issue with Senator Marco Rubio recently attacking President Barack Obama for being 'divisive.' When Rubio tried to point to the President's State of the Union address as an example, Rose interrupted and replied, "I saw him honoring the military of America and a lot other things where we should be coming together. That doesn't seem to be divisive."
The Florida Republican continued by trying to cite the chief executive's use of class warfare as a tactic "What about the part that basically implies...that the only way that some people in America can be better off is for other people to be worse off? And that's not true to our heritage." The CBS anchor, however, cut the potential vice presidential candidate short just 11 seconds after he began his answer, in an apparent rush to get to the local weather reports [audio clip available here; video below the jump].
Rubio blasted President Obama during an interview on Fox News on Tuesday night, just hours after the Democrat's speech before Congress. He used similar language as he did on CBS:
RUBIO: I don’t think that ever in modern American history, have we ever seen a national leader so blatantly try to divide Americans against each other- stand up before the country and basically say that the only way that some of us can be better off is to make other people worse off.
The CBS personality likely had this remark in mind when he raised the issue with the Florida senator near the end of the segment.
The transcript of the relevant portion of Charlie Rose's interview of Senator Marco Rubio on Thursday's CBS This Morning, starting at the 17 minutes into 7 am Eastern hour mark:
ROSE: You have often- you have also called him [President Obama], Senator, 'divisive.' What is it about this president that you think is divisive?
RUBIO: Did you see the State of the Union speech where he's basically-
ROSE: Yes- and indeed, and I saw him honoring the military of America and a lot other things where we should be coming together-
RUBIO: Sure-
ROSE: That doesn't seem to be divisive-
RUBIO: Yeah. Well, that part everyone agrees with. But what about the part that basically implies- and not just at the State of the Union, but consistently in his career- that the only way that some people in America can be better off is for other people to be worse off?
ROSE: Thank you-
RUBIO: And that's not true to our heritage.
ROSE: We've got- are up against the clock. I hope you'll understand, and I hope you'll come back. Thanks so much.
RUBIO: Absolutely- thank you.
ERICA HILL: It is 18 minutes past the hour now- time for your first check of your local weather.
- Matthew Balan's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
I Thought Charlie Rose Was Deceased..?
Submitted by Motormouth KOS on Thu, 01/26/2012 - 2:55pm.
You know..
Like watching the movie "Weekend at Bernie's" where they cart around the dead body so they can keep the party going?
Rose gets his talking point in, and then "runs out of time for a comprehensive Rubio response.
Pretty good for a dead guy.
The Obamination... A crisis leading to a catastrophe..(please donate to MRC)
Rose
Submitted by mmilesll on Thu, 01/26/2012 - 3:08pm.
Funny, when a "really smart journalist" can't answer a basic question the answer is always "we're up against the clock". Rubio outsmarted another "rocket scientist journalist". I love it.
Yea, what is with Charlie Rose?
Submitted by Gary Hall on Thu, 01/26/2012 - 4:12pm.
Suddenly Rose is everywhere - acting like the rest of them. Occasionally, on his PBS show, he would demonstrate a bit of impartial curiosity.
Now, I'm wondering. Did the White House literally go out and solicit his support? Was he in on the lefty journalist invites to the White House meetings, recently? Or, is this just the usual knee-jerk reaction from the MSM when their guy is in trouble during an election year?
(;~/ gay
Alinsky
Submitted by tribchet on Thu, 01/26/2012 - 4:24pm.
OK, so this comes from Wikipedia: "...According to Alinsky, the organizer — especially a paid organizer from outside — must first overcome suspicion and establish credibility. Next the organizer must begin the task of agitating: rubbing resentments, fanning hostilities, and searching out controversy. This is necessary to get people to participate. An organizer has to attack apathy and disturb the prevailing patterns of complacent community life where people have simply come to accept a situation. Alinsky would say, "The first step in community organization is community disorganization..." I think if fairly represents "Rules for Radicals".
Obama (and Hillary R. Clinton) are disciples of Saul Alinsky the "father of community organizing". To think that Obama (or Clinton) doesn't want to stir up passions regarding income disparities is naive.
Maybe the MRC can compile a list of Obama's divisive actions
Submitted by OxyCon on Thu, 01/26/2012 - 6:57pm.
That way the media won't be able to get away with what Charlie Rose just did.
Coming from the oxymoron called Charlie "Rose",
Submitted by drsamherman on Thu, 01/26/2012 - 10:59pm.
I would take that as a compliment. The idiot is the Cassandra of the age. He hasn't been correct in all of his years yapping his ignorant jaws on the air. He is worse than smog. At least smog stops when you shut it off. Charlie just keeps polluting like a toxic waste dump.