CBS's Wragge: Will Obama 'Lick His Chops' Over GOP Primary Strife?
On Thursday's Early Show, CBS's Chris Wragge bizarrely wondered if the dissatisfaction with the current GOP field of presidential candidates would give President Obama an edge: "Is this just primary politics, or does this make candidate Obama kind of lick his chops, thinking he's got a real advantage here?" Mr. Obama actually trails a generic Republican candidate in two recent polls.
Just moments before Wragge dropped his question, correspondent Jan Crawford had explained during a report that such dissatisfaction from primary voters wasn't unusual in either party from a historical perspective. Crawford cited the Democratic presidential fields in 1991 and 2003 as examples:
CRAWFORD: ...[N]one of this searching and hand-wringing is new. In nearly every nearly presidential election, voters at this stage are dissatisfied with their choices, often when they're trying to beat an incumbent. In the latest CBS News poll, just 43% of Republican voters say they are satisfied with the field. But around this time in 2003, only 40% of Democratic voters were satisfied with their choices to unseat President Bush. Senator John Kerry lost to Bush.
But voter dissatisfaction early on doesn't mean a loss in the general election. In 1991, Democrats were begging top politicians, like Senator Ted Kennedy or New York Governor Mario Cuomo, to jump in. Only 18% of Democratic voters were satisfied with their options, which, at the time, included an obscure Arkansas governor, Bill Clinton.
Recent polls also give no reason for President Obama to "lick his chops," to use the CBS anchor's term. Gallup has the Democrat's approval rating at 39%, and he trails three to four percentage points behind a generic Republican presidential candidate, according to the last polls from Rasmussen and NBC News/Wall St. Journal.
The transcript of the Chris Wragge/Jan Crawford segment from Thursday's Early Show, which began nine minutes into the 7 am Eastern hour:
CHRIS WRAGGE: Now to politics- several big money Republican donors say they're unhappy with the current crop of GOP presidential candidates, but Republican voters will have to decide this race.
And CBS News political correspondent Jan Crawford is in Washington with a look at how they really feel about the race at this time. Jan, good morning.
JAN CRAWFORD: Good morning, Chris. You know, we thought this field was pretty well settled, but then, Texas Governor Rick Perry had that big stumble in last week's debate, and that, of course, has started Republican insiders talking again and again about finding yet another candidate to get in this race. But the polls show that this kind of thing happens almost every presidential election.
[CBS News Graphic: "Race For 2012: Inside Look At GOP Dissatisfaction"]
MITT ROMNEY, 2012 REPUBLICAN PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE (from campaign event): How are you? Good morning!
CRAWFORD (voice-over): Campaigning across the country, the candidates who are actually running for president, like former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney, downplay all this talk about someone else.
ROMNEY: I think we recognize that it's very important we get this right, and I appreciate the fact that it's taking a lot of careful consideration. In the final week or two, it's going to really narrow down, and people will decide who's the person who will have the best shot of replacing President Obama.
CRAWFORD: That may be because none of this searching and hand-wringing is new. In nearly every nearly presidential election, voters at this stage are dissatisfied with their choices, often when they're trying to beat an incumbent. In the latest CBS News poll, just 43% of Republican voters say they are satisfied with the field. But around this time in 2003, only 40% of Democratic voters were satisfied with their choices to unseat President Bush. Senator John Kerry lost to Bush.
But voter dissatisfaction early on doesn't mean a loss in the general election. In 1991, Democrats were begging top politicians, like Senator Ted Kennedy or New York Governor Mario Cuomo, to jump in. Only 18% of Democratic voters were satisfied with their options, which, at the time, included an obscure Arkansas governor, Bill Clinton.
CRAWFORD (on-camera): Now, of course, Cuomo and Kennedy never got in that race, and that second-string candidate, Bill Clinton, became a two-term president. Chris?
WRAGGE: Jan, as we get closer to the primaries, what is an actual cut-off date for a candidate- a potential candidate, like a Chris Christie, to get in? There's got to be a time where you just can't- it's just too late in the game.
CRAWFORD: That's right, and it is right around the corner. I would say in about six weeks, and that's because you're going to have these filing deadlines in key states, like Florida and South Carolina, to get their names on the ballot. So these guys, Chris Christie, Sarah Palin- they're going to have to make a decision sooner, rather than later, which means, of course, all of this talk is going to stop soon enough.
WRAGGE: Like you said- in the graphic you showed in the piece, there's this perceived dissatisfaction with the current Republican field. Is this just primary politics, or does this make candidate Obama kind of lick his chops, thinking he's got a real advantage here?
CRAWFORD: Great question- it's primary politics. It happens almost every four years, as all these polls show, and the lesson here- I think what's important to keep in mind- is that these candidates, who are in this race right now, are going to look a lot stronger as this race goes on over the next few months- more debates, they're going to be tested. So the eventual nominee is going to look like the nominee.
WRAGGE: All right. CBS's Jan Crawford in Washington for us this morning- Jan, thanks. Good to talk with you.
- Matthew Balan's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
I don't think
Submitted by killa37 on Thu, 09/29/2011 - 6:52pm.
I don't think moooooooooooooooooslems are supposed to eat pork.
What strife?
Submitted by Mister Orange on Thu, 09/29/2011 - 6:56pm.
It's primary season. The candidates are supposed to beat each other up, just not so far as to release too many skeletons. This idea that they're all supposed to get along and play nice because they all have the same ultimate goal - defeating Obama - is a joke. We learn nothing from the candidates similarities.
I'm left curious over the dissatisfaction insinuated, because what I've seen is great amounts of enthusiasm over candidates such as Perry and Bachmann, even the possibility of Palin joining the lot.
I seem to recall Hillary and
Submitted by Reaver on Thu, 09/29/2011 - 7:13pm.
I seem to recall Hillary and Barry went at it pretty hard in ’08 and look how that benefitted McCain. Wait…
The dissatisfaction with the repub field is another media meme. Pollsters have said their not seeing it in their polls.
McCain had his own problems
Submitted by Mister Orange on Thu, 09/29/2011 - 7:41pm.
Such as being a republican.
McCain's problem
Submitted by Radical1979 on Thu, 09/29/2011 - 8:01pm.
was that isn't a Republican, he's a RINO.
If McCain had fought as hard
Submitted by Reaver on Thu, 09/29/2011 - 9:31pm.
If McCain had fought as hard against Obama as he did against his fellow republicans in the primary he might actually be the President now.
Pfft....McCain
Submitted by TheAngryConservative on Thu, 09/29/2011 - 10:48pm.
IIRC, McCain had a campaign manager that said he'd quit if anyone criticized Obama personally.....and I think it ended up happening.
My jaw hit the damn floor when I heard that. That's like the manager of a KFC slaughterhouse saying "You better not hurt any chickens".
Whoever runs against Obama needs to...AND SHOULD....personalize this....link the policies and ineptitude to the man. Any campaign manager who is that much of a chicken**** needs to pick a different profession.
The media (most of it, anyway) sure as hell isn't going to do it.....
Conservatives knew four years ago that this guy was a empty suited Marxist....but he won because he had a media that was beyond sycophantic and a populace that was ignorant enough to elect him.....just like a bumper sticker I've seen....
One
Big
A$$
Mistake
America
We have, I fear, confused power with greatness. ~ Stewart Udall
Dude, We're gonna kick his
Submitted by ex buff e-dub on Thu, 09/29/2011 - 6:59pm.
Dude, We're gonna kick his a$$. We're just trying to decide who's gonna do the kicking...
Bo's chop-licking
Submitted by Bodini on Thu, 09/29/2011 - 7:39pm.
will be short-lived because come November 2012 he and a butt-load of his Marxist Democrat cronies will be LICKING THEIR WOUNDS ... and to add to their excruciating culinary and political experience I'll gladly rub in some salt.
Notice that Wragge said...
Submitted by USMC8411 on Thu, 09/29/2011 - 8:29pm.
"Is this just primary politics, or does this make candidate Obama kind of lick his chops, thinking he's got a real advantage here?"
Obama has a real "advantage" during a primary, where any one of those candidates will get the nod. Unless someone else jumps in of course. And for Obama's sake, it better not be Mr. Generic....
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/us/general_electi...
Advantage gone. Opponent identified. Obama left to run on his "record." Something tells me that "Bush did it!" and "I inherited.." ain't gonna float....
Dream on, Wragger.
Submitted by drsamherman on Thu, 09/29/2011 - 9:15pm.
And tell that smirking Jan Crawford (does she have an older sister Marcia?) that her last Botox treatment must have paralyzed not only the forehead muscles but her brain too.
To quote El Rushbo....
Submitted by TheAngryConservative on Thu, 09/29/2011 - 10:33pm.
...I would vote for Elmer Fudd if he was the GOP nominee.
To be serious, unless the nominee is a moron, it won't matter who it is.
If it's Cain and he is able to sway the black vote from 90/10 Dem, it will be very messy....
Rubio as the veep....OMFG.......Mon-dull, anyone?
We have, I fear, confused power with greatness. ~ Stewart Udall
Not sure?
Submitted by MidAmerica on Thu, 09/29/2011 - 10:52pm.
The real reason Republicans are not completely sure of the Republican candidates? Its because they are very aware of the seriousness and the importance of getting rid of obama that they know they cannot make a mistake in picking the best candidate.
Will CBS's Wragge ...
Submitted by Fredy on Fri, 09/30/2011 - 12:23am.
... lick Obama's butt on national TV tomorrow? Or will he just kiss it like today?
heh
Submitted by Jnoble on Fri, 09/30/2011 - 7:00am.
Good one! But to be fair to Wragge, that would just be ensuring 'job security' at C B.S.
Stop Wraggin on the Repubs
Submitted by gwalt on Fri, 09/30/2011 - 8:06am.
The constant drumbeat has been the field is unexciting blah blah. We are FIRED up! Everyone in the field excites me ( except Huntsman lol). This is the Communist media's way of ramping down enthusiasm. When will NB go after "news" anchors like Wraggie boy by name and call them out?
"A lot of briefing for a 2 hr. special with Dan Rather. Saw the show & wonder why we bothered". Ronald Reagan
As the Magic Media loves to say:
Submitted by sherlock1 on Fri, 09/30/2011 - 9:17am.
"Hot diggity-dawg, dem Pubbie debbils shore be fightin' theyselfs all dey time."
Well, how'd it work out the last election, Chris?
Submitted by Great Debater on Fri, 09/30/2011 - 9:50am.
In the second-half of the last Presidential primary election cycle, McCain had already secured the Republican nomination. However, Obama and Clinton were locked in a very tight battle for the Democratic nomination. You REALLY want the answer to your question, Chris? The answer is this - how did that "advantage" turn out for McCain?
That said, it's still, admittedly, a bit of an apples to oranges comparison, as McCain's biggest problem came in 9/2008 with his handling of the banking crisis - he "suspended his campaign" to rush back to DC to help forge a resolution (and just looked silly), while Obama got to do nothing and look cool, calm, and collected. The polls showed they were VERY close until then, but it was a downhill slide from then on to a 7.3% defeat in the popular vote.