Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Free email alerts!

NewsBusters logo
May 23, 2013
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Take Action
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • Obama Targets Fox News
  • IRS Targets Tea Party
  • Censoring the News
Home » Blogs » Matthew Balan's blog
  • MSNBC’s Chris Hayes Hypes ‘LGBT Injustice’ During Interview With 18-year Old Woman Charged With Sex With Minor
  • Network Evening Shows Don’t Name Islam in London Terror Attack
  • MSNBC’s Finney On IRS Scandal: ‘Why Didn't Romney Make More Of A Big Deal Of It?’
  • Obama Losing Chris Matthews? Host Rails Against 'Profiling' By IRS: It's Like Targeting Innocent Arabs
  • Jake Tapper Slams Obama Admin for Treatment of Fox News Reporter
  • NBC's Lauer Uses Oklahoma Tornado to Bash GOP Over Sandy Relief
  • New York Times: Obama Administration 'Threatening Fundamental Freedoms of the Press'
  • ABC’s Cokie Roberts Acknowledges Obama’s Contempt for the Press, Blasts 'Presidential Propaganda'

NPR: Conservatives vs 'Women's Health Groups' on Birth Control Mandate

By Matthew Balan | July 19, 2011 | 19:19

A  A
Matthew Balan's picture

On Tuesday's Morning Edition, NPR's Julie Rovner spun the debate over a proposed mandate for private insurance companies to cover birth control without a copay as being between "women's health groups," which were not given an ideological label, and organizations such as the Family Research Council, which she clearly identified as "conservative." A representative from her example of a "women's health group," Planned Parenthood, labeled "unintended" pregnancies an "epidemic."

Anchor Steve Inskeep began the report with an admission about ObamaCare: "President Obama's health care overhaul law touches almost every aspect of health care, including birth control." Rovner first highlighted a woman from Tucson, Arizona who, despite having a "full-time job with health insurance [and] a husband," along with two kids, apparently couldn't afford the $25 a month copay for her birth control prescription. This led to her having a third child, and the woman declared that "while we're happy that she's here, it was not planned, and had we had some better finances, we probably could have made some better decisions."

The NPR correspondent then used her "women's health groups" label as she noted that these typically left-leaning groups were "hoping that families...won't be faced with decisions like that in the future. If the Institute of Medicine agrees that contraception is a preventive service that's necessary for women's health and well-being, it's likely to be added to a list of benefits that all health insurers will be required to offer without deductibles or co-payments."

After spotlighting how "half of all pregnancies in the U.S. each year are unintended," Rovner played her first two sound bites from Dr. Deborah Nucatola of Planned Parenthood, who made her "epidemic" assessment concerning this figure:

DR. DEBORAH NUCATOLA, PLANNED PARENTHOOD: And if we could prevent an epidemic of this proportion, that should be justification enough that contraception is preventive care.

ROVNER: But at the same time, says Nucatola, who's also an OB/GYN, birth control is about more than just preventing pregnancy.

NUCATOLA: We can also use it as essential preventive medicine for the four million women who have babies every year in the United States, because more and more research shows that spacing your pregnancy- babies born at least 18 months apart are going to be healthier than those born closer together, and that closely timed births are risky for their mothers, too.

Later, the reporter grouped birth control with "cancer screenings or childhood immunizations," as she introduced her clips from Jeannie Monahan of the FRC, who stated that one of the reasons why her organization opposes the proposed mandate is because "seven to 10 days before a baby can implant, Plan B can prevent that implantation, and thereby, cause the demise of that baby. So, we'd be opposed to those drugs being included because they act as abortifacients."

Rovner then made a misleading statement about Plan B and other "emergency" contraceptives, followed by a third clip from Dr. Nucatola:

ROVNER: Plan B is one of two emergency contraceptives that have been approved by the FDA. They are different from the abortion pill mifepristone. Neither emergency contraceptive can disrupt a pregnancy that's already established. But Planned Parenthood's Deborah Nucatola says the whole argument about preventing implantation has been overblown by abortion opponents.

NUCATOLA: If people want to postulate on a possible theoretic risk of prevention of implantation, they're entitled to do that, but there is no scientific evidence that that is a mechanism of action.

Actually, one of the ways that Plan B works, as Planned Parenthood's own website discloses, is that it "thins the lining of the uterus. In theory, this could prevent pregnancy by keeping a fertilized egg from attaching to the uterus." So, as life begins at conception, the drug acts to deny the new life from developing further, thereby acting as an abortifacient, just as Monahan stated. So Dr. Nucatola is contradicted by not only her own organization, but by the FDA as well on its website: "Plan B may prevent a fertilized egg from attaching to the womb (implantation)."

Earlier in 2011, the NPR correspondent displayed a similar slant during an April 1 report when she lined up proponents of the federal government's Title X subsidy of contraceptives, and left only 30 seconds for a conservative opponent of the program.

The full transcript of Julie Rovner's report from Tuesday's Morning Edition:

STEVE INSKEEP: President Obama's health care overhaul law touches almost every aspect of health care, including birth control. An independent panel of experts is set to make a series of recommendations tomorrow about preventive health care services for women. The report from the Institute of Medicine will help determine if birth control will have to be covered by every private health insurance policy. NPR's Julie Rovner reports.

JULIE ROVNER: Andrea Leyva of Tucson, Arizona had a full-time job with health insurance, a husband, and two children a couple of years ago. But even so, the $25 a month copay for her birth control was hard for the family to afford.

ANDREA LEYVA: It began to fall into the category of a luxury. Both my husband and I work, but we already had children and a household to maintain.

ROVNER: And so, at age 36, Leyva got pregnant with what she calls her blessed surprise, daughter Alexandria.

LEYVA: So, while we're happy that she's here, it was not planned, and had we had some better finances, we probably could have made some better decisions.

ROVNER: Women's health groups are hoping that families like Leyva's won't be faced with decisions like that in the future. If the Institute of Medicine agrees that contraception is a preventive service that's necessary for women's health and well-being, it's likely to be added to a list of benefits that all health insurers will be required to offer without deductibles or co-payments.

Deborah Nucatola is senior director for medical services for Planned Parenthood. She says Leyva is hardly unique. Half of all pregnancies in the U.S. each year are unintended.

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

DR. DEBORAH NUCATOLA, PLANNED PARENTHOOD: And if we could prevent an epidemic of this proportion, that should be justification enough that contraception is preventive care.

ROVNER: But at the same time, says Nucatola, who's also an OB/GYN, birth control is about more than just preventing pregnancy.

NUCATOLA: We can also use it as essential preventive medicine for the four million women who have babies every year in the United States, because more and more research shows that spacing your pregnancy- babies born at least 18 months apart are going to be healthier than those born closer together, and that closely timed births are risky for their mothers, too.

ROVNER: But not everyone agrees that contraception should be available to the same extent as cancer screenings or childhood immunizations.

JEANNIE MONAHAN, FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: There are two reasons that we oppose the inclusion of contraceptives as a preventive service.

ROVNER: Jeannie Monahan heads the Center for Human Dignity at the conservative Family Research Council. She says the first reason is that requiring contraceptive coverage violates the conscience rights of people, most notably Catholics, who don't believe in artificial methods of contraception.

MONAHAN: Say, for example, that I had a problem with it. I would be paying into a plan that would be covering them. So, it would be objectionable because I would be paying into that plan. In a way, I would be forced to pay for it myself.

ROVNER: The other problem, says Monahan, is the one that often crops up in discussions of birth control: abortion. Specifically, abortion opponents argue that some emergency contraceptives, so-called morning-after pills, can cause very early abortions by preventing the implantation of a fertilized egg into a woman's uterus.

MONAHAN: Those seven to 10 days before a baby can implant, Plan B can prevent that implantation, and thereby, cause the demise of that baby. So, we'd be opposed to those drugs being included because they act as abortifacients.

ROVNER: Plan B is one of two emergency contraceptives that have been approved by the FDA. They are different from the abortion pill mifepristone. Neither emergency contraceptive can disrupt a pregnancy that's already established. But Planned Parenthood's Deborah Nucatola says the whole argument about preventing implantation has been overblown by abortion opponents.

NUCATOLA: If people want to postulate on a possible theoretic risk of prevention of implantation, they're entitled to do that, but there is no scientific evidence that that is a mechanism of action.

ROVNER: Still, it was the divisive politics of birth control that prompted the Department of Health and Human Services to punt the matter to the Institute of Medicine in the first place. Tomorrow, the IOM officially tosses the decision about whether insurers should cover contraception back into the government's lap. Julie Rovner, NPR News, Washington.

About the Author

Matthew Balan is a news analyst at the Media Research Center. Click here to follow Matthew Balan on Twitter.
  • Abortion
  • Birth Control
  • Conservatives & Republicans
  • Labeling
  • Liberals & Democrats
  • Medical Insurance
  • Pro-lifers
  • Regulation
  • Culture/Society
  • Health Care
  • Sexuality
  • Deborah Nucatola
  • Jeannie Monahan
  • Julie Rovner
  • Steve Inskeep
  • Morning Edition
  • NPR
  • Radio
  • Matthew Balan's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Comments

Now wait just a minute....

Submitted by liberalsarefunny on Tue, 07/19/2011 - 7:35pm.

This woman has birth control issues??

Does this include a turkey baster?

  • Login to post comments

Damn it...

Submitted by JPTSO3 on Tue, 07/19/2011 - 7:57pm.

Beat me to it. She needn't worry about making the choice. Nature made it for her, and any man with any self respect, should respect natural selection.

  • Login to post comments

And people wonder why private health insurance has gotten...

Submitted by Dave. on Tue, 07/19/2011 - 7:44pm.

...so hideously expensive.

-Dave

Vote for the American in November

  • Login to post comments

Condoms are cheap

Submitted by CobraMan on Tue, 07/19/2011 - 7:46pm.

This couple claims they couldn't afford birth control? Hay, idiots,condoms are cheap, and they don't come with all the nasty side effects of hormone-based birth control, or "plan "B"," like tripling a woman's risk of stroke. Stop lying to us.

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution

Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court

Or Anwar al-Awlaki.

  • Login to post comments

Cobra...

Submitted by crimsonspark on Tue, 07/19/2011 - 8:09pm.

I was thinking the same thing. Even if she felt like buying them from the store was too much of a financial burden, there are lots of places that give away condoms for free. And a box of condoms sure as heck costs less than raising a kid for eighteen years.

Do you know what the approval rating was of the president before Obama? 34%. So don't blame Obama, he inherited terrible poll numbers!
  • Login to post comments

The fact that Obamacare would

Submitted by rob.man on Tue, 07/19/2011 - 7:49pm.

The fact that Obamacare would force companies to pay for abortion, yes its abortion, through this method is lame, the worst part being that no one has to pay a co-payment for the pills and its just another example of liberals finding new ways to define life and then to deny it. I also find it too funny that a women with a full time job with health care and a husband could not afford to pay 25 bucks for her abortion pills, so blames the evil companies because she is probably living out of her means, if this story is even true which i find hard to believe. She just doesnt want to pay for it, she wants everything giving to her for FREE.

Taking back America one step at a time.
  • Login to post comments

So, kids are a disease?

Submitted by CobraMan on Tue, 07/19/2011 - 7:52pm.

"And if we could prevent an epidemic of this proportion, that should be justification enough that contraception is preventive care."

Don't you just love the mindset of these people? Kids, especially "unplanned" ones, are a disease, one that require emergency treatment and prevention! At someone else's expense, of course. What a bunch of moralless jackasses!

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution

Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court

Or Anwar al-Awlaki.

  • Login to post comments

Good point!

Submitted by Red Jeep on Tue, 07/19/2011 - 8:05pm.

If you are pregnant you have a disease or are diseased.

As in: Her pregnancy grew like an uncontrollable cancer within her. How would she survive this disease without an abortion?

  • Login to post comments

Par for the course

Submitted by crimsonspark on Tue, 07/19/2011 - 8:12pm.

For liberals. After all, they're just following in the mindset of their leader who would hate to see anyone punished with a baby.

Do you know what the approval rating was of the president before Obama? 34%. So don't blame Obama, he inherited terrible poll numbers!
  • Login to post comments

Absolutely. No. Shame !

Submitted by AGreer on Tue, 07/19/2011 - 8:40pm.

Just like laziness, I mean obesity.

  • Login to post comments

How about you feminazis tell your vassals to stop fornicating?

Submitted by Slyrr on Tue, 07/19/2011 - 8:02pm.

How about telling men and women to stop fornicating? That's FREE ya know. No sex out of wedlock = problem solved.

Until liberals get the idea through their thick heads that sex isn't 'free love', things will only get worse and worse until it finally can't get any worse. Of all the so-called 'fixes' for this 'epidemic' that the leftists have proposed, none of them will work.

You can drop condoms out of an airplane, hand out diaphrams like candy in kindergarden. You can clamp schoolkids into chairs and prop their eyelids open with toothpicks and force them to watch 'safe sex' videos at the point of a sword. You can tax and spend and tax and spend until doomsday, but none of that will stop the 'epidemic'.

Only this will work. You men out there: Keep your hoo-has in your pants where they belong. Don't have sex with any woman unless that woman is your wife. And after marriage - never have sex with any woman except the one to whom you are wedded.

And you women out there - quit giving it away to every guy who drops his pants for you. You tell all the men (and boys) out there slobbering after you for sex that they don't get NOTHIN' until they do TWO things: 1) Marry you. 2) Get jobs and support you, and any kids who turn up after the honeymoon. And they must do BOTH or the 'door is closed' so to speak.

To all who think such a solution is naive, what exactly is your solution? More condoms? You're already dropping condoms from airplanes. More education? I laugh. You think kids/adults don't KNOW how to use a condom? They can use ipads, iphones, computers and all kinds of widgets without trouble. You seriously think they can't figure out how to use a rubber tube? More taxes? You've been throwing money at this issue for decades. Has it gotten better? Huh? HUH?

Get off your 'free love' delusions and get real. The only way to 'fix' this is abstinance, morality and abstinance.

If a Liberal/Democrat politician/media figure wants to put their arms around you, or pat you on the back, all they're doing is looking for a good place to stick a knife.
  • Login to post comments

Where's Surgeons General Jocelyn Elders?

Submitted by Red Jeep on Tue, 07/19/2011 - 8:17pm.

She could teach these people about mutual masturbation.

Remember: "Masturbation is Safe Sex" (A Public Service Announcement from YELL The Youth Education Life Line of ACT UP) http://www.actupny.org/YELL/masturb.jpg

  • Login to post comments

their argument back would be...

Submitted by OuttaMyWay on Wed, 07/20/2011 - 9:00am.

keep your morals of my body.... i can do what ever i want with it...

of course, that phrase does not work with anything else...

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Time to update someone's saying: Apparently my talent is no longer on loan from God, it is given to me by the government...the rel
  • Login to post comments

"Rovner first highlighted a

Submitted by JPTSO3 on Tue, 07/19/2011 - 8:04pm.

"Rovner first highlighted a woman from Tucson, Arizona who, despite having a "full-time job with health insurance [and] a husband," along with two kids, apparently couldn't afford the $25 a month copay for her birth control prescription."

Anyone want to guess if they have cable and internet? How about a TV... more than one TV? Anyone want to wager they eat out, at least once a month? Anyone want guess how much condoms cost in Tucson? Anyone...? Anyone this stupid?

  • Login to post comments

For want of $25 a month she's

Submitted by eaglewingz08 on Tue, 07/19/2011 - 8:12pm.

For want of $25 a month she's spending 500 a month on a new kid. I think this story is bs.

  • Login to post comments

Exactly

Submitted by tcm14 on Tue, 07/19/2011 - 8:21pm.

If this person cannot scrape together $25/month to prevent having a child, then she should not be allowed to walk without a helmet on (let alone raise a child).

  • Login to post comments

Probably

Submitted by ckc1227 on Wed, 07/20/2011 - 4:57am.

"I think this story is bs."

Probably. As has been stated before, condoms are cheap, and abstinence is free. And not only that, you can get birth control pills at Walmart for $9.00 a month every day of the week, no insurance necessary. What this tells me is this woman is likely too stupid to figure out how to use the birth control even if it was free.


  • Login to post comments

give me give me

Submitted by grammajane on Tue, 07/19/2011 - 8:29pm.

They want free birth control, free abortions, free babysitters, free formula, free Dr.'s free head start but no free common sense. Grow up and get a life.

  • Login to post comments

Gimmee, gimmee, gimmee

Submitted by Callie369 on Wed, 07/20/2011 - 12:50am.

These liberals and their gimmee, gimmee, gimmee attitude make me ill. At any rate, one less trip to a restaurant, less beer/wine/liquor, etc., and that woman would have had her birth control. And if they were that bad off, she could have gone to a clinic OR PLANNED PARENTHOOD!

I am 70 years old and I'm in pain 24/7. I have to pay a $60/mth copay for my pain medication because my medicare insurance (and I pay over $1500/yr for my insurance after paying in all my working life) no longer will offer a pain med for the regular $8 copay. I take endocet, WHICH IS A GENERIC. The insurance company said that since Percocet patent protection ended, that endocet was no longer considered a generic!!! I might add, that a $60 copay really hurts. I am on social security only. I had a great 401K, but a year before I retired the stock market crashed and I lost everything. I lost $16,000 in 1 week!!!! And there was no time to gain it back, as that was when I broke my back and had to retire.

So watch out folks, because Dumbama and his death panel is going to screw us every way they can.

  • Login to post comments

All that sex education.

Submitted by LaVallette on Wed, 07/20/2011 - 5:59am.

"had we had some better finances, we probably could have made some better decisions."

All that sex education and not a clue about avoiding sex at those times most likely to conceive. A course in Natural fmaily planning costs zilch!!! and no costs to apply it.

But of coure in this modern age it is IMPOSSIBLE for people to control their sex urges: they are no better than animals!!!

  • Login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Editors' Picks

  • Deputy kills PBS NewsHour staffer (Washington Examiner)
  • Oklahoma disaster was tragic, but larger ones have occurred (USA Today)
  • Mainstream Media Scream: Today’s Savannah Guthrie questions GOP ‘overreach’ (Paul Bedard, Washington Examiner)
  • Desperate Carney complains asking about scandals like asking about birth certificate (RCP)
  • Look at NYT's partisan-hack rewrite of the IRS hearing (Draw and STRIKE!)
  • Study: Christians who tithe have better finances than those who don't (TGC)
  • The media are willing accomplices to Obama (PolitiChicks)
  • FBI has suspects in mind in Benghazi; Obama prefers to try them in court (AP)
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Ann Coulter Column: When Did We Vote to Become Mexico?
Chuck Norris's picture
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris Column: Why Tim Tebow Is an Ultimate Clutch Player
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: Hating America
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Malkin Column: Obama's Emptiest Benghazi Talking Point
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Coulter Column: Sorry, Sen. Rubio, But Your Immigration Plan Is Still Problematic
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Stop Censoring The News!

Gosnell's Just the Tip of the Iceberg
more cartoons
  • Leno: Obama Knows Nothing Because They Moved ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ to the White House
  • IRS Charged With Unfair Scrutiny of Pro-Life Groups' Prayer Events, Protest Signs
  • Ex-AccuWeather's Bastardi Slams 'Ambulance Chasing' by Global Warming Theory Activists
  • Goldberg: Scandal Reporting Needs to Focus on Hard News, Not Political Spin
  • Howard Dean Dismisses Benghazi Scandal as ‘Laughable Joke’
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2013 NewsBusters.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use