Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Free email alerts!

NewsBusters logo
May 24, 2013
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Take Action
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • Obama Targets Fox News
  • IRS Targets Tea Party
  • Censoring the News
Home » Blogs » Matthew Balan's blog
  • NBC Fails to Report Its Own Scoop That AG Holder Approved Investigation of Fox's Rosen
  • Video: Bozell's Prediction Pans Out, Media In Full-on 'Move On' Mode in Obama Scandal Coverage
  • The Long Hike: Media’s 13 Years of Bullying Boy Scouts Over Gays
  • Only CBS Notes IRS Official’s Leave, Yet ABC and NBC Have Time to Show Obama’s Prom Photo with ‘Foxy’ Friend
  • Hearing on IRS With Lerner Taking the Fifth? Newspapers Had No Front Page Story Thursday
  • Chris Matthews Trashes 'Morning Joe' for Being 'Open to All People's Points of View'
  • Thursday Morning: Fox Gives 15 Minutes to Latest IRS Scandal Details; NBC and ABC Ignore
  • On Taxpayer-subsidized PBS, Liberal Reporters Lament Benghazi Won't Go Away

No Conservatives in Back-to-Back NPR Reports on Same-Sex 'Marriage' in New York

By Matthew Balan | July 12, 2011 | 18:40

A  A
Matthew Balan's picture

NPR devoted over eight minutes on Monday's All Things Considered to the possible economic and social impacts of the legalization of same-sex "marriage" in New York State during two reports from correspondents Margot Adler and Tovia Smith. Adler highlighted the bridal stores and other vendors who were "upbeat" and positive about the development, while Smith focused on the lesbian demographic who are torn about the decision to hitch or not. Neither correspondent featured any opponents of same-sex "marriage" during their reports.

Host Michele Norris noted in her introduction for Adler's report that "New York City is gearing up to become the premier gay marriage destination" and how the journalist "visited with some very eager bridal shops and florists." Adler expanded on this by highlighting the efforts of NYC's tourism board:

ADLER: No one knows the economic impact of same-sex marriage in New York. One report by the Independent Democratic Conference of the New York State Senate estimates about 66,000 gay couples will marry in the next three years. New York City and Company is the city's tourism and marketing organization. In about two weeks, it will roll out the 'NYC I do' campaign. They say same-sex weddings will add hundreds of millions of dollars to the already $31 billion tourism industry.

After playing a clip from Mayor Michael Bloomberg, a same-sex "marriage" supporter, the NPR correspondent, who is also a Wiccan devotee, devoted the bulk of her report to the vendors who were excited about the new opportunity:       

ADLER: ...Walk into Kleinfeld, a huge bridal emporium: 17 fitting rooms serving 15,000 brides a year. Appointments are made four weeks in advance, and no one asks sexual preference....And since you typically order a dress nine months to a year before the wedding, the clientele I see are women in traditional relationships, looking for that perfect white dress. Kleinfeld has served gays for years. They even have special consultants for same-sex couples....Ronnie Rothstein is co-owner of Kleinfeld, along with his wife Mara Urshel. The new law does something else, he says.

ROTHSTEIN: It legitimizes something that should have been done long ago. This is exciting. Our business has always been good in that community, and I think this will make it better.

REBECCA SHEPHERD: Astrontia, veronica, delphinium-

ADLER: Rebecca Shepherd is buying flowers for a wedding at Associated Cut flowers, a shop in the flower district that's been here for 53 years. Salesman Nicholas Cassandra is upbeat.

NICHOLAS CASSANDRA: More parties, more wedding planning, more flowers. So, we love it here. It's just going to bring in more business.

ADLER: But since most of the flowers are bought by event planners, it's hard to gauge the impact of same-sex weddings. Tom Simmonds and James Bernacki are event planners at Tom James Flowers and Events. They got married in Connecticut. Bernacki says people are still stunned that the law changed. But a lot of gay couples want recognition.

JAMES BERNACKI: They want their day. They want this dream for themselves.

ADLER: And he thinks gay weddings will push the envelope.

BERNACKI: Sharper, edgier, very sophisticated.

ADLER: But that might be a stereotype, says Millie Martini Bratten, the editor-in-chief of Brides magazine. Bratten says marriage celebrations occur 46,000 times a weekend. There'll just be more people.

MILLIE MARTINI BRATTEN, BRIDES MAGAZINE: How it changes the look or the feel or whatever, that's all to be determined, but I would guess not that much.

ADLER: The practical aspects are the same. What do we feed them? Do we have music? What will the invitations look like? And how will a magazine most think of as traditional mesh with this new reality? Bratten says the average reader of Brides is 27.

BRATTEN: They're watching 'Glee' and embracing all the different characters throughout popular culture- 'Modern Family.' They're not separate from what's going on in the world.

At the end of her report, Adler stated that "we don't know some things yet about same-sex marriage in New York, but probably it will be more like a tide than a tsunami." This prediction dovetailed right into Smith's report, who picked up where her colleague left off: "I'm Tovia Smith in Boston, where experience suggests pent-up demand among gays and lesbians does drive an initial wedding windfall, but it's usually short-lived."

For most of the second report, the NPR correspondent focused on the split in the homosexual community between the older generation who see no need for the institution of marriage and those who want to tie the knot. Most of her clips came from the more radical wing of the homosexual movement, who either want to remain "outsiders" or refuse to get married until the same-sex "marriage" is a reality nationwide:

LESLIE COHEN: I'm not sure we'll do it. We may do it, but I'm not sure.

SMITH: That's 65-year-old Leslie Cohen, who along with her partner, 63-year-old Beth Suskin, were the models for a gay liberation statue built three decades ago in New York City. They are literally a symbol of the movement, together 35 years, and definitely committed and in love....On the other hand, Cohen and Suskin say they are products of the '60s, and always believed marriage was just a piece of paper they didn't need. And after decades on the outskirts of societal norms, they say it's hard to suddenly pull a 180 and go all conventional.

COHEN: When you're an outsider, in order to make it okay, you have to embrace that otherness of yourself, you know, that you live on the outside, and many of us unconsciously don't want to totally give that up. I like it.

SUSKIN: Yeah, I do, too- being different.

COHEN: In a way, we get used to being different and being on the outside. And, you know, now with marriage, you're just like everyone else. You know, so there is a resistance to it.

SUSKIN: Right.

SMITH: Like many same-sex couples, Cohen and Suskin also worry that financially, marriage may actually hurt them more than it helps, since their marriage wouldn't be recognized in Florida, where they've now retired, or by the federal government. Indeed, many couples around the nation who want to marry are holding out for full recognition.

JOYCE KAUFMAN: It's like no. It's insulting. You know, until it's the whole loaf, I'm not buying into it.

SMITH: Joyce Kaufman, an attorney in Massachusetts, has been with her partner for eight years, but doesn't want to marry until the federal Defense of Marriage Act is repealed.

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

KAUFMAN: Why would I do that if I'm not going to get all of the rights and benefits that every other married person in the world gets? You know, it infuriates me.

SMITH: Some, however, believe no matter what, same-sex marriages will never approach straight proportions, since many gay and lesbian families just can't fit within such a narrow definition of marriage. For example, says Columbia Law Professor Katherine Franke, in many cases, there are more than two parents in the picture.

KATHERINE FRANKE, COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY LAW SCHOOL: Sometimes, it's a sperm donor, but it can also be just another important person. So, lesbian and gay people have formed very complex families, and need more flexible norms about how we care for one another and who's important to us.

SMITH: Franke says her phone has been ringing off the hook with friends and family wanting to know if she and her longtime partner have set a date yet. But Franke says, they're not going to. She's one of many same-sex couples hoping that winning the right to say I do doesn't also mean losing the right to other options like civil unions or domestic partnerships. Tovia Smith, NPR News.

This isn't the first time that NPR in general and Smith specifically omitted social conservatives from their reporting on homosexual issues. On the April 12, 2011 edition of Morning Edition, the journalist promoted a homosexual activist's tax protest, playing sound bites from the activist and from two other supporters of same-sex "marriage," but none from opponents.

About the Author

Matthew Balan is a news analyst at the Media Research Center. Click here to follow Matthew Balan on Twitter.
  • Bias by Omission
  • Conservatives & Republicans
  • Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA)
  • Homosexuality
  • Labeling
  • Liberals & Democrats
  • Same-sex marriage
  • Culture/Society
  • Sexuality
  • Margot Adler
  • Tovia Smith
  • All Things Considered
  • NPR
  • Radio
  • Matthew Balan's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Comments

Thank you , Matthew, for

Submitted by motherbelt on Tue, 07/12/2011 - 6:43pm.

Thank you , Matthew, for putting "marriage" in quotes.

Calling a tail a leg doesn't make it one.  -Abraham Lincoln

  • Login to post comments

Second that.

Submitted by Bhaal on Tue, 07/12/2011 - 6:52pm.

Second that.

"For evil to triumph it is enough only that good men do nothing".
  • Login to post comments

Lost

Submitted by grammajane on Tue, 07/12/2011 - 7:24pm.

I just lost my dinner after reading this article.

  • Login to post comments

So now they're whining about "possibly losing the rights

Submitted by SickofLibs on Tue, 07/12/2011 - 7:25pm.

to other options like civil unions and domestic partnerships" IF THEY GET MARRIED?

WTF dimension am I in? Why not just declare them "the most exalted citizens of all who trump everyone else" and be done with it.

I really could care less what Leslie and Beth do in their bedroom (gak), I'm just not in the market for a giant legislated suppository.

  • Login to post comments

It's like a different dimension.

Submitted by Boil It Down on Tue, 07/12/2011 - 7:28pm.

They make all this sound like it's as relevant as the civil rights movement of the 60's. It's like a different world where considerations of all the things we find vital in the news take a backseat to this social issue and conservatives have nothing valuable to add to the discussion. Apparently it's much too important an issue to them to even allow any possible challenges that might put them in a bad light.

If we went to a flat tax with no deductions or subsidies, some of  these arguments would evaporate. Traditional marriage would benefit as well. Lots and lots of our problems would evaporate with a flat tax. -bidn-

  • Login to post comments

You are SO right!!!

Submitted by Fenwick on Wed, 07/13/2011 - 11:51am.

A truly pure flat tax - for everyone across the board (including those receiving welfare and other government handouts into which they've made absolutely no investiment), and for corporations as well - will solve innumerable problems in this country. And it should never, ever exceed 15%! First and foremost, it will pull the rug out from under elitist politicians trying to think up ways to rule our lives through legislation. Another added benefit is that the IRS could be trimmed to a mere skeleton crew. Of course, tax accountants across the country would have to find new careers, but so did ice delivery men after the refrigerator was perfected and affordable.

  • Login to post comments

To a liberal, gay marriage is

Submitted by deerjerkydave on Tue, 07/12/2011 - 7:28pm.

To a liberal, gay marriage is a no-brainer....which actually comes quite easily to a liberal.

------------------------ 

"The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the Federal Government are few and defined.  Those which are to remain in the State Governments are numerous and indefinite. -James Madison
  • Login to post comments

i couldn't care less if gays

Submitted by goldwater89 on Tue, 07/12/2011 - 7:43pm.

i couldn't care less if gays want to get married. if it doesn't affect you, why should you care?

  • Login to post comments

Well, good for you, goldwater89---

Submitted by matthewdean on Tue, 07/12/2011 - 8:04pm.

but based on militant gays and their history, your statement should be "if it doesn't affect you YET, why should you care?"

And the answer is the same as the one to the question, "If the Muslim Faith and Sharia law doesn't affect you YET, why should you care?"

I care because I don't want either Gays OR Muslims telling me how I should think or act - upon pain of lawsuit or death.

MD

"The credibility of the story is undermined by the selection of sources." - (h/t Jer)
  • Login to post comments

Of Course

Submitted by Richard.Halavais on Tue, 07/12/2011 - 8:15pm.

Of curse there were no conservative commentators, how else can NPR promote it's sick liberal agenda? You remember how liberals operate, if it doesn't fit their party line censor it, out shout it or ignore it. How else do you think so few liberals make such a big noise and appear to be so many? Look at the rallies in Wisconsin. They had to bus union goons in from other states. The trouble is we're a country of sheeple so whoever appears to have the biggest crowd gets the most support, except we're FINALLY waking up and getting wise to their tricks and it scares them to where liberals are wetting their pants. Were waking up and that's why Sarah Palin draws such huge crowds, they're real people who are sick and tired of being lied to by virtually all politicians.

Richard Halavais
  • Login to post comments

So many things wrong with this...

Submitted by Radical1979 on Tue, 07/12/2011 - 8:50pm.

To start, ADLER: And he thinks gay weddings will push the envelope. BERNACKI: Sharper, edgier, very sophisticated. The purpose of a wedding is not to make a "statement", to be sharper, or edgier.  It is to commit to one another before God and man in a binding vow.  What they are talking about is a fashion statement, not a commitment.

Also, since many gay and lesbian families just can't fit within such a narrow definition of marriage. For example, says Columbia Law Professor Katherine Franke, in many cases, there are more than two parents in the picture. 
This is the next step, to make marriage about more than two people.  They are going to dismantle the institution one step at a time, denying it the entire process.

 

 


 

Proud member of the 53%!
  • Login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Editors' Picks

  • Obama/Holder DOJ's radical departure on press freedom is chilling (Boutrous @ WSJ)
  • Oops: Obama fails to salute Marine, went back to shake hand (Weekly Standard)
  • Deputy kills PBS NewsHour staffer (Washington Examiner)
  • Oklahoma disaster was tragic, but larger ones have occurred (USA Today)
  • Mainstream Media Scream: Today’s Savannah Guthrie questions GOP ‘overreach’ (Paul Bedard, Washington Examiner)
  • Desperate Carney complains asking about scandals like asking about birth certificate (RCP)
  • Look at NYT's partisan-hack rewrite of the IRS hearing (Draw and STRIKE!)
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Ann Coulter Column: When Did We Vote to Become Mexico?
Chuck Norris's picture
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris Column: Why Tim Tebow Is an Ultimate Clutch Player
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: Hating America
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Malkin Column: Obama's Emptiest Benghazi Talking Point
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Coulter Column: Sorry, Sen. Rubio, But Your Immigration Plan Is Still Problematic
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Stop Censoring The News!

Gosnell's Just the Tip of the Iceberg
more cartoons
  • HUH? Slate Editor: Kaitlyn Hunt Case 'Is About Gay Rights. But It’s Not About That'
  • Weekend Open Thread
  • Leno: ‘Not Looking Good for Obama - Today His Teleprompter Took the Fifth’
  • Robert Redford Blasts America's Belief System, Tech Advancements
  • Dennis Miller: 'Nixonian' Obama Will Need Teleprompter to Say 'I Am Not a Crook'
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2013 NewsBusters.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use