Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Free email alerts!

NewsBusters logo
May 23, 2013
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Take Action
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • Obama Targets Fox News
  • IRS Targets Tea Party
  • Censoring the News
Home » Blogs » Matthew Balan's blog
  • MSNBC’s Chris Hayes Hypes ‘LGBT Injustice’ During Interview With 18-year Old Woman Charged With Sex With Minor
  • Network Evening Shows Don’t Name Islam in London Terror Attack
  • MSNBC’s Finney On IRS Scandal: ‘Why Didn't Romney Make More Of A Big Deal Of It?’
  • Obama Losing Chris Matthews? Host Rails Against 'Profiling' By IRS: It's Like Targeting Innocent Arabs
  • Jake Tapper Slams Obama Admin for Treatment of Fox News Reporter
  • NBC's Lauer Uses Oklahoma Tornado to Bash GOP Over Sandy Relief
  • New York Times: Obama Administration 'Threatening Fundamental Freedoms of the Press'
  • ABC’s Cokie Roberts Acknowledges Obama’s Contempt for the Press, Blasts 'Presidential Propaganda'

Mainstream Media Try to Pour Cold Water on John Paul II Beatification

By Matthew Balan | May 02, 2011 | 19:04

A  A
Matthew Balan's picture

Several media outlets on Sunday did their best to cast doubt on the legacy of Pope John Paul II as the Catholic Church beatified the late pontiff. NPR highlighted how the pope apparently "alienated many Catholics who began leaving the church in droves." CNN brought on a liberal theologian who claimed that John Paul II "led us backwards rather than forward." NBC played up the "avalanche of claims of sexual abuse by priests" during his papacy.

On Sunday's All Things Considered, Sylvia Poggioli, NPR's Rome-based senior European correspondent, turned to "investigative journalist" Jason Berry midway through her report, who blasted John Paul on his handling of the priestly sex abuse issue: "Someone who was so fearless in his confrontation with the communist empire, I for one do not understand how he could not have engaged in the same fearless introspection about the church internal." More than 3 years earlier, Berry, with the assistance of the Los Angeles Times, falsely claimed in a November 2007 opinion piece that the American bishops "had identified about 4,400 abusive U.S. priests," when that figure is actually the number of priests who faced allegations.

Near the end of the segment, Poggioli, acknowledged that the now-beatified pontiff was a "people's pope who became a spiritual superstar," but then touted how "other critics cite the crackdown on dissident theologians as one of the many contradictions in a complex papacy" and claimed that John Paul's "orthodoxy alienated many Catholics who began leaving the church in droves."

"Crackdown"? This ultra-exaggerated term conjures up an image of a dictatorial regime violently suppressing a peaceful demonstration, instead of a pastor trying to protect his flock. Also, it's not surprising that a liberal news organization would play up the dissent against the Catholic faith, which aides their promotion of secularism, instead of the many prominent converts the Church has gained for its unyielding stances on abortion and marriage, such as the recently deceased former abortionist Bernard Nathanson.

Earlier in the morning, as CNN offered live coverage of the beatification ceremony in St. Peter's Square in Vatican City, anchor Jonathan Mann brought on Boston College professor Thomas Groome, a former priest and advocate of the ordination of women. Early in the segment, Mann contended that "there's so much still uncertain about how he led the Church and how he treated, frankly, some of its overlooked members, the victims of sexual abuse, the women who feel he was never entirely fair to them, many other Catholics who were never entirely comfortable with the doctrine that he proclaimed." Groome wholeheartedly agreed and launched his accusation against John Paul:

GROOME: ...I think it's a common perception that he was not as aggressive in addressing that issue, in encouraging bishops throughout the world to address that issue and not simply to respond to it, but actually to ask the questions why was it happening and why was it allowed to continue happening at such a rate that indeed it's so often the morning paper story about another sex abuse scandal, and they never quite got the seriousness of that.

There are responsible people that would say he never quite embraced the spirit of renewal and reform that was launched by the Second Vatican Council, that, in some ways, he launched a reform of the reforms and led us backwards rather than forward. So he's not without controversy, and in that sense, the Church is taking a risk, perhaps, in moving so quickly to beatify him. The Church is 2,000 years old and has learned lots of wisdom from its experience over those years.

Later, the CNN anchor hinted at his ignorance on Catholicism when he asked, "How many popes do end up ending- after their lives, end up at saints? Not to be glib about it, but is this, frankly, a final promotion that every pope could expect, and that Benedict XVI might on this day expect?" The theologian referenced his generally negative view of the papacy in his answer:

GROOME: Well, the pattern hasn't been to canonize every Pope. In fact, one of the popes that has been leapfrogged over by beatifying John Paul so quickly is Pope John XXIII, who'd be a much less controversial figure at this point in time. But there have been lots of popes that have not been canonized. It shouldn't simply be a pattern that if you're a pope, you are automatically going to be a saint. Indeed, the history of the papacy indicates that lots of the popes were far from sainthood and never would deserve that honor.

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

On NBC, correspondent Ann Thompson followed in the footsteps of her colleagues at NPR and CNN and twice played up the sex abuse scandal. During a report on NBC Nightly News, Thompson stated that "the priesthood still reels from the sex abuse scandal critics accuse John Paul of ignoring."

Earlier, during the 8 am Eastern hour of the Today show, the NBC reporter played a clip from George Weigel, author of a biography of John Paul II, who stated that "Europe's in a spiritual cultural funk right now. Maybe this [the beatification] will break people out of it." Thompson continued by claiming that the "funk [was] exacerbated by an avalanche of claims of sexual abuse by priests, the same scandal that rocked the American church almost ten years ago. It is why American survivors say the Church should slow the Pope's path to sainthood." She followed this by playing a clip from Barbara Blaine, president of the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests, who stated that "At a bare minimum, we believe that all of this is just going too fast and we don't yet know all of the implications of his inaction."

About the Author

Matthew Balan is a news analyst at the Media Research Center. Click here to follow Matthew Balan on Twitter.
  • Christianity
  • Culture/Society
  • Religion
  • Ann Thompson
  • Barbara Blaine
  • George Weigel
  • Jason Berry
  • Jonathan Mann
  • Pope John Paul II
  • Sylvia Poggioli
  • Thomas Groome
  • All Things Considered
  • CNN
  • Los Angeles Times
  • NBC
  • NBC Nightly News
  • NPR
  • Radio
  • Today
  • Other CNN
  • Matthew Balan's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Comments

claimed that John Paul II

Submitted by motherbelt on Mon, 05/02/2011 - 7:45pm.

claimed that John Paul II "led us backwards rather than forward."

Of course he did.  He didn't reverse the Church's stance on divorce, abortion, and women priests.

His orthodoxy alienated many Catholics who began leaving the church in droves."

Really?

From EWTN News:

From 1978 to 2004 the world's Catholic population grew by 45%, from 757 million to 1,098 million.

For the record, John Paul became Pope in 1978, and died in 2005.

Perhaps the Church IS taking a risk by beatifying him so soon, but it certainly isn't for these liberals with own agenda to make that judgment.

 

  • Login to post comments

MB, well said in all respects

Submitted by lotr on Tue, 05/03/2011 - 1:07pm.

Although he probably meant that JPII's orthodoxy caused many of the "modernist Catholics" to leave in droves, a "modernist Catholic" isn't even Christian, let alone Catholic.

While I loved JPII and have no doubt he is now counted among the blessed in heaven, I do think that the beatification is a little early. Strictly speaking there is supposed to be a "wait period," and, as with any "wait period," there are good reasons for it. In the meantime, we have beautiful examples out there still waiting, like Blessed Ka-ter-i (a Native American Mohawk convert who lived a life of heroic faith) who was first declared Venerable by Pius XII.

  • Login to post comments

Modernist catholic + Kennedy

Submitted by Soldat44 on Tue, 05/03/2011 - 3:49pm.

Modernist catholic + Kennedy catholic + cafeteria catholic = 0

'One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church'
  • Login to post comments

What liberals mean by moving

Submitted by ForeverOnTheRight on Mon, 05/02/2011 - 7:37pm.

What liberals mean by moving 'forward" they mean compromising with the World and abandoning Bible based teaching of God's Word. If anything I would trust the Pope was doing what he should, keeping the church grounded in the doctrine of the RCC.

"Perhaps the Church IS taking a risk by beatifying him so soon, but it certainly isn't for these liberals with own agenda to make that judgment." Liberals just love to tell us what to do Catholic or Protestant, and they also just love to tell us who we are and what they expect us to be. IT"S none of there business, especially since they do not have a clue as to what Christian doctrine is. Who we are and what we are to believe is between us and God.

Right is never wrong, Left is never right.
  • Login to post comments

The Church has many enemies,

Submitted by rbosque on Mon, 05/02/2011 - 8:02pm.

The Church has many enemies, from the very beginning until now.

"FOR THERE WILL COME A TIME WHEN THEY WILL NOT ENDURE THE SOUND DOCTRINE; BUT HAVING ITCHING EARS, WILL HEAP UP TO THEMSELVES TEACHERS ACCORDING TO THEIR OWN LUSTS, AND THEY WILL TURN AWAY THEIR HEARING FROM THE TRUTH AND TURN ASIDE RATHER TO FABLES."
2Timothy 4:3-4

"It may be true that you can't fool all the people all the time, but you can fool enough of them to rule a large country"......Will Durant
  • Login to post comments

Cool Arrow predictable and

Submitted by Liberallies on Mon, 05/02/2011 - 8:25pm.

Cool Arrow predictable and ignorant attack on John Paul II and the Roman Catholic Church in 3....2....1... LOL

Let us hope that the "Conservative" anti-Catholics do not use this forum as a chance to make silly and unscriptural attacks on the Church.

The Church has many enemies and many of them lie on the Right, in the Conservative movement. Liberals are wrong in their attacks against the Church, but these attacks do not only come from the Left.

  • Login to post comments

Orthodoxy?

Submitted by russedav on Mon, 05/02/2011 - 8:39pm.

As if I ever needed any proof that "conservatives" are as ignorant & dangerous as "liberals." For those few who aren't Biblically and historically illiterate, John Paul II may have been a wonderful "conservative" (whatever that is) guy, but he was still a heretic nonetheless. For the few who have a clue as to the Protestant faith that founded this Christian nation John Paul II and his "church" rejected it then and reject it today, chiefly founded on justification by faith-grace-Christ alone in a Biblically informed context nearly absent now, the reason for so much ignorant pro-papist schmooze that sounds so "conservative" but woefully blind to how it was the "conservative" Pharisse leaders who happily joined with the "liberal" Sadduccees and politically-minded Herodians to crucify Jesus that no genuine Christian can accept, why the strength of the church and this country has always been in independents (e.g. tea partyists (not "partiers" in this gravely serious enterprise)), like George Washington, who despised factions/parties, as he said in his revered Farewell address:
http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Washington%27s_Farewell_Address#20
"20... Let me ... warn you in the most solemn manner against the baneful effects of the spirit of party, generally.
21 This spirit, unfortunately, is inseparable from our nature, having its root in the strongest passions of the human mind. It exists under different shapes in all governments, more or less stifled, controlled, or repressed; but, in those of the popular form, it is seen in its greatest rankness, and is truly their worst enemy.
22 The alternate domination of one faction over another, sharpened by the spirit of revenge, natural to party dissension, which in different ages and countries has perpetrated the most horrid enormities, is itself a frightful despotism. But this leads at length to a more formal and permanent despotism. The disorders and miseries, which result, gradually incline the minds of men to seek security and repose in the absolute power of an individual; and sooner or later the chief of some prevailing faction, more able or more fortunate than his competitors, turns this disposition to the purposes of his own elevation, on the ruins of Public Liberty.
23 Without looking forward to an extremity of this kind, (which nevertheless ought not to be entirely out of sight,) the common and continual mischiefs of the spirit of party are sufficient to make it the interest and duty of a wise people to discourage and restrain it.
24 It serves always to distract the Public Councils, and enfeeble the Public Administration. It agitates the Community with ill-founded jealousies and false alarms; kindles the animosity of one part against another, foments occasionally riot and insurrection. It opens the door to foreign influence and corruption, which find a facilitated access to the government itself through the channels of party passions. Thus the policy and the will of one country are subjected to the policy and will of another.
25 There is an opinion, that parties in free countries are useful checks upon the administration of the Government, and serve to keep alive the spirit of Liberty. This within certain limits is probably true; and in Governments of a Monarchical cast, Patriotism may look with indulgence, if not with favor, upon the spirit of party. But in those of the popular character, in Governments purely elective, it is a spirit not to be encouraged. From their natural tendency, it is certain there will always be enough of that spirit for every salutary purpose. And, there being constant danger of excess, the effort ought to be, by force of public opinion, to mitigate and assuage it. A fire not to be quenched, it demands a uniform vigilance to prevent its bursting into a flame, lest, instead of warming, it should consume. ..."
George Washington, truly the father of our country.

  • Login to post comments

Geez, it never fails. the

Submitted by Liberallies on Mon, 05/02/2011 - 8:47pm.

Geez, it never fails. the looneys and the crazy anti-Catholics come out of the wood works when an NB post is about something Catholic.

How truly sad.

The Radical, Crazy Fundamentalist "Christian" Right is as dangerous as the Radical, Crazy atheist, secular Left.

  • Login to post comments

Fut

Submitted by Blonde on Mon, 05/02/2011 - 10:34pm.

We were discussing this today....Our Lady of Guadalupe.

While on our trip through Mexico, I saw the image thousands of times. A truly fascinating story, and the man to whom the Virgin Mary made her wishes known, Juan Diego, was himself beatified by John Paul II in 1990.

In looking this up, on the site I linked above, I find we took almost the same path as Cortez during part of our journey last year.  I didn't go to the Basilica in Mexico City, but understand it is the most visited site in Catholicism.  Aca related a story that when he visited, there were pilgrims there who had travelled hundreds of miles on their hands and knees to see it.

Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)

  • Login to post comments

The Walls Are Breathing

Submitted by stratman on Mon, 05/02/2011 - 8:54pm.

You should not take LSD and post on NewsBusters.

  • Login to post comments

"Festive Spinach Queso Dip"

Submitted by SickofLibs on Mon, 05/02/2011 - 10:01pm.

1/2 pound hot pepper jack cheese, cubed 
1 pound Monterey Jack cheese, cubed
10 ounces frozen spinach, drained well and chopped
2 ounces pimento peppers, drained
1 medium onion, chopped and sauteed
1 cup milk
1/2 teaspoon garlic powder
1/8 teaspoon salt 1/2 teaspoon pepper
1 cup Daisy Brand Sour Cream.

Mix all of the ingredients, except for the sour cream, in a large bowl. Microwave on low heat, stirring often until the cheese melts and the mixture is smooth. 7-10 minutes before serving, stir in the sour cream.

Who says cutting & pasting can't be fun?

  • Login to post comments

No Comment

Submitted by Chris Norman on Mon, 05/02/2011 - 9:07pm.

I know that media bias against many religions and churches must be exposed, but I must admit I dread what I'll read in the threads below the posts. Religion and politics - and the media - just don't mix. I'll discuss and argue politics and media bias, but never - never - religion. Nothing good ever seems to come of it.

Let's make the 2012 campaign: "The War on Error"
  • Login to post comments

I learned the hard way that

Submitted by ForeverOnTheRight on Tue, 05/03/2011 - 6:39pm.

I learned the hard way that you can' t discuss religion on a blog site. I tried to discuss celibacy and the priesthood with a Catholic. They became defensive thinking I was attacking. They became rude, arrogant etc. And now they are indirectly calling me looney and crazy. My behavior went from bad to worse, not my proudest moment to say the least. Never will I do this again, it was ugly.

Right is never wrong, Left is never right.
  • Login to post comments

"NB: Exposing and Combating Liberal Media Bias"

Submitted by lotr on Tue, 05/03/2011 - 7:02pm.

This is precisely why it cannot be overstated or repeated enough what the explicit purpose and mission of NB is, and thus why it's important not to take our eyes off the ball.

NB is not here to debate/argue/rehash the tired old sectarian differences in Christian worship practices, nor what are the very minor differences in doctrine.  And it is certainly not here as a forum to denigrate the beliefs of others.

The point of NB is to expose, and comment on, the reality of liberal media bias, which is a crucial undertaking, given that the mass media exert a certain degree of social thought control through biased propaganda disguised as "objective news."

And thus, NB would be completely remiss if it did not report on what is arguably the worst bias there is out there: Anti-Christianity in general and anti-Catholicism (being the largest single Christian communion) in particular.

  • Login to post comments

Thanks lotr, you are right.

Submitted by ForeverOnTheRight on Wed, 05/04/2011 - 8:38am.

Thanks lotr, you are right. Unfortunately the mission of NB was not in mind, otherwise it may have been nipped in the bud.

Right is never wrong, Left is never right.
  • Login to post comments

ForeverOnTheRight, Well, to

Submitted by Liberallies on Wed, 05/04/2011 - 1:10pm.

ForeverOnTheRight,

Well, to be honest, I felt that you were the one being rude, arrogant and came in that forum with an air of superiority. Interesting how different things look when one bothers to see them from someone else's view.

1) I apologize for being rude and arrogant. That is not my intent. But I will defend my Faith, The Roman Catholic Church, and all the teachings, theology, dogma's of the Church with out ceasing when I see someone else attacking them. If I remember correctly, we both walked away gracefully. I am sorry that I made you feel otherwise.

2) There are unfortunately, too many Right wingers on NB whose purpose is to attack the Roman Catholic Church. They aren't interested in peaceful, knowledgeable debate. They go a bit looney when they attack the Catholic Church. They are reasonable outside of Catholic forums, but once inside one of these forums, they are like the Birthers, Truthers, Racers. No amount of factual information is good enough for them. To them The Church is wrong and evil and it must be attacked at all cost. I am not saying this is you, but just this week, in another forum, a well known anti-Catholic did this for a whole day. It gets tiring and boring.

3) This is why NB has forbidden this type of attacks and discussions. But it just seems that certain NBers get away with it with no consequences!

  • Login to post comments

Liberallies 1) I accept your

Submitted by ForeverOnTheRight on Wed, 05/04/2011 - 4:44pm.

Liberallies

1) I accept your apology, and would like to offer my apology for my rude and un-Christian behavior. My intent was to discuss, not to attack or put you on the defensive. I'd rather put this behind us and move on. I think what is a danger on a blog site is this sort of mess.

2) I have honestly seen the media's attack on the Roman Catholic Church an attack on Christianity as a whole, Catholic and Protestant. We are better off trying to understand each other and perhaps learning from each other than trying to convince the other. How does that sound to you?

Right is never wrong, Left is never right.
  • Login to post comments

ForeverOnTheRight, Agreed.

Submitted by Liberallies on Wed, 05/04/2011 - 5:27pm.

ForeverOnTheRight,

Agreed. We go much farther attempting to learn from each other than attempting to prove one another wrong. And of course, your apology is also accepted.

The Conservative movement would be much strong if Christians stopped fighting amongst ourselves when it comes to our religions.

  • Login to post comments

"The Conservative movement

Submitted by ForeverOnTheRight on Wed, 05/04/2011 - 6:02pm.

"The Conservative movement would be much strong if Christians stopped fighting amongst ourselves when it comes to our religions." I think I could even find a verse or two that would support that. If Christians as a whole, "rightly divided the Word" their would be much less division amongst those who claim Jesus as their Lord and Savior.

Right is never wrong, Left is never right.
  • Login to post comments

Amen brother.

Submitted by lotr on Thu, 05/05/2011 - 10:25pm.

Amen brother.

Here's another fact to keep in mind: The real battle within Christianity is no longer between traditional Catholicism and Protestantism -- that's so 19th Century.

No, the real battle is between orthodox (i.e., belief in the atonement, bodily resurrection, Bible as inspired Word of God, etc.) and modernist (Jesus was a socialist teacher who was a "pacifist revolutionary" [sic] who died and who's body rots in the ground).

This is where the real battle lines are drawn.  And this is why I get irritated to no end with the boring old sectarianism on a site dedicated to liberal bias.

  • Login to post comments

→ I liked him

Submitted by Cool Arrow on Mon, 05/02/2011 - 9:11pm.

He seemed to be a good man who didn't mind thumbing his nose at the Soviet Union.

Teamed up well with Reagan and Thatcher.

  • Login to post comments

Fulton Sheen

Submitted by LaVallette on Tue, 05/03/2011 - 4:19am.

.To paraphrase Bishop Fulton Sheen; There are millions of people who hate the Catholic Church for WHAT THEY THINK IT IS, but only a handful for WHAT IT REALLY IS. Anti-Catholic commentators on post such as this regularly demonstrate that observation. The ignorance is appalling.

. Liberation Theology was condemned by Pope John II because Jesus came to save everybody and not just the poor and he did not take up arms against anybody on behalf of the poor or try to justify the right for any one to do so.. Consequently in both its philosophy and practice, Liberation Theology is Un- Christian.

By definition Progress and/or Modernism involve the rejection of the very traditional values on which Western Culture including that of the USA is founded. Consequently Modernists want nothing more than the destruction of the Judeo Christian civilization as we know it.

The "Spirit of Vatican II" did not give any individual or group within the Church the right to arrogate for themselves their own individual Magisterium or teaching authority or to the right to create a Church or a Catholicisms according too their own individual vision. In the total scheme of things and history of the Church, it got rid of cobwebs and accretions which owed much to historical political prejudices then biblical/ religious vision. It was an "aggiornamento" not a "cominciamo da capo", and "update" not a "new beginning".

  • Login to post comments

Beautiful! Thank you.

Submitted by Soldat44 on Tue, 05/03/2011 - 3:42pm.

Beautiful! Thank you.

'One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church'
  • Login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Editors' Picks

  • Deputy kills PBS NewsHour staffer (Washington Examiner)
  • Oklahoma disaster was tragic, but larger ones have occurred (USA Today)
  • Mainstream Media Scream: Today’s Savannah Guthrie questions GOP ‘overreach’ (Paul Bedard, Washington Examiner)
  • Desperate Carney complains asking about scandals like asking about birth certificate (RCP)
  • Look at NYT's partisan-hack rewrite of the IRS hearing (Draw and STRIKE!)
  • Study: Christians who tithe have better finances than those who don't (TGC)
  • The media are willing accomplices to Obama (PolitiChicks)
  • FBI has suspects in mind in Benghazi; Obama prefers to try them in court (AP)
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Ann Coulter Column: When Did We Vote to Become Mexico?
Chuck Norris's picture
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris Column: Why Tim Tebow Is an Ultimate Clutch Player
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: Hating America
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Malkin Column: Obama's Emptiest Benghazi Talking Point
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Coulter Column: Sorry, Sen. Rubio, But Your Immigration Plan Is Still Problematic
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Stop Censoring The News!

Gosnell's Just the Tip of the Iceberg
more cartoons
  • IRS Charged With Unfair Scrutiny of Pro-Life Groups' Prayer Events, Protest Signs
  • Ex-AccuWeather's Bastardi Slams 'Ambulance Chasing' by Global Warming Theory Activists
  • Howard Dean Dismisses Benghazi Scandal as ‘Laughable Joke’
  • NYT Lawyer: Obama Worse Than Nixon, 'Worst President Ever' on Press Freedom
  • Letterman: 'Obama's in So Much Trouble Politically He's Thinking of Killing Bin Laden Again'
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2013 NewsBusters.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use