CNN's Cafferty Replays Two Year Old Commentary to Bash Palin
On Tuesday's Situation Roon, CNN's Jack Cafferty revisited his longstanding Palin Derangement syndrome by rebroadcasting one of his commentaries from September 2008 where he played an excerpt from the infamous Katie Couric interview and disparaged the then-vice presidential candidate. Most of the viewer responses to his 'Question of the Hour' bashed the former Alaska governor.
The commentator devoted his 5 pm Eastern hour Cafferty File segment to his old nemesis, since the Republican stated in a recent interview that she wouldn't "waste her time" doing another interview with the CBS anchor. He replayed the bulk of a September 26, 2008 segment where he highlighted one of Palin's less-than-satisfactory answers during the Couric interview. He concluded at that time that "if John McCain wins, this woman will be one 72-year-old's heartbeat away from being president of the United States, and if that doesn't scare the hell out of you, it should."
Cafferty didn't play the part of the 2008 segment where he ripped the excerpt as "one of the most pathetic pieces of tape I have ever seen from someone aspiring to one of the highest offices in this country." Between August 29 of that year and the day of that commentary, the CNN personality devoted 35% of his Cafferty Files segments to Mrs. Palin.
The CNN personality concluded his Tuesday segment by asking his viewers, "If Sarah Palin runs for president, should she agree to an interview with Katie Couric?" Near the end of the hour, Cafferty read some of the replies from CNN viewers, and only two could be considered either neutral or supportive of Mrs. Palin. As you might expect, the rest attacked her:
CAFFERTY: Bonnie says, 'Anybody who runs for the highest office should answer any question from any journalist. If they can't do that, they shouldn't be running for president. We citizens need to know all about the candidates. So far, I don't think she's capable of anything remotely close to being qualified as president. She only has money on the brain. Would you want her beside the red phone in the middle of the night?'
Lynn writes, 'Sarah Palin should just answer some questions from anyone! She won't run because she isn't qualified, and she doesn't want to work. Loving all this attention, at the very last minute, she will bow out, saying that her family needs her. Wait and see!'
Mark in Colorado writes, 'I hate to blow everyone's Obama bubble, but Palin was more qualified to be president than your Messiah- oh excuse me, the community agitator! Please, Couric is a liberal soldier in the mainstream media's far-left push into our lives. It was a shame how you all treated Miss Palin just because she's from the right.' That's not the reason.
Sue writes, 'Poor, pathetic little girl should stay away from all the big girls who can show her up for what she is.'
Gary in Florida: 'No. If Palin runs, she shouldn't give an interview to anyone. She's better served by doing reality TV, book signings, and having her daughter on Dancing with the Stars.'
Jerry in Toronto: 'Holy mackerel, Jack. Palin's dumber than a 5th grader. Couric did her job, asked basic questions, and Palin failed miserably- period. If Palin decides to run for the presidency, she has no choice but to allow all accredited media the right to question her intelligence, or lack thereof. Enough of this picking and choosing and PR spin- either you're smart enough to be president or you're not.'
And Naveen writes, 'Yes, she should. But don't expect a different outcome.'
The full transcript of Cafferty's segment from Tuesday's Situation Room, which began nine minutes into the 5 pm Eastern hour:
CAFFERTY: Sarah Palin told Fox News that if she runs for president, she will not 'waste' her time on another interview with CBS's Katie Couric. Here's why:
CAFFERTY (from September 26, 2008 commentary): There's a reason the McCain campaign keeps Governor Sarah Palin away from the press. I want to play an excerpt from an interview that Palin did with the CBS Evening News anchor Katie Couric, where she was asked about the bail-out package. Listen to this.
KATIE COURIC, CBS NEWS (from September 25, 2008 interview): Why isn't it better, Governor Palin, to spend $700 billion helping middle class families who are struggling with health care, housing, gas and groceries- allow them to spend more and put more money into the economy, instead of helping these big financial institutions that played a role in creating this mess?
SARAH PALIN: That's why I say I, like every American, I'm speaking with, were ill about this position that we have been put in where it is the taxpayers looking to bail-out. But ultimately, what the bail-out does is help those who are concerned about the health care reform that is needed to help shore up our economy, helping- it's got to be all about job creation, too, shoring up our economy and putting it back on the right track. So health care reform and reducing taxes, and reining in spending has got to accompany tax reductions and tax relief for Americans. And trade- we've got to see trade as opportunity, not as a competitive, scary thing. But one in five jobs being created in the trade sector today. We've got to look at that as more opportunity. All those things under the umbrella of job creation. This bail-out is a part of that.
CAFFERTY: Did you get that? If John McCain wins, this woman will be one 72-year-old's heartbeat away from being president of the United States, and if that doesn't scare the hell out of you, it should.
CAFFERTY (live): That clip has gotten more than 4,150,000 hits on YouTube.
Here's the question: if Sarah Palin runs for president, should she agree to an interview with Katie Couric? Go to CNN.com/CaffertyFile, post a comment on my blog.
- Matthew Balan's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
"...this woman will be one
Submitted by Chris Norman on Tue, 11/23/2010 - 10:44pm.
"...this woman will be one 72-year-old's heartbeat away from being president of the United States, and if that doesn't scare the hell out of you, it should." Well, now, Barak Obama is the president of the United States and he has not only scared the hell out of us, he has destroyed the hell out of us.you're right; the US is
Submitted by charlesandy on Tue, 11/23/2010 - 11:11pm.
you're right; the US is currently destroyed. utter wasteland.
My, from the way people like
Submitted by Chris Norman on Tue, 11/23/2010 - 11:25pm.
My, from the way people like you shrieked when Bush was president, I thought it already was. You mean Barak has fixed all of that? I must have missed it. Where should I look?
By the way, I am sure you are entirely comfortable with Cafferty's claim that we should have the hell scared out of us at the threat of a Palin presidency.
uh, i can't speak for those
Submitted by charlesandy on Tue, 11/23/2010 - 11:26pm.
uh, i can't speak for those who "shrieked" because i was not one.
And I sort of reject the notion that the country is or was ever 'destroyed' or 'broken'.
oh, the second question.
Submitted by charlesandy on Tue, 11/23/2010 - 11:29pm.
No, I'm not scared as hell about Palin getting elected. I don't think it would cause the US to explode or anything.. Really. I think it would be the wrong direction, but I am really not afraid.
You replied to yourself?
Submitted by Chris Norman on Tue, 11/23/2010 - 11:57pm.
You replied to yourself?
Right, comrade charlesandy
Submitted by Dave. on Wed, 11/24/2010 - 12:02am.
After all, we all know just how "progressive," "enlightened" and "intelligent" the form of government that murdered between 200 and 300 million people in the century just past is, don't we?
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
charlesandy,
Submitted by Chris Norman on Tue, 11/23/2010 - 11:56pm.
Oh, now I get it. You're supposed to be one of those very reasonable raging moderates from the far center come here to smugly restrain our rhetorical excesses. Funny, I haven't seen your comments condemning the rhetorical excesses of those in the media like Cafferty, Matthews, Olbermann, Ratigan, Schultz, Maddow, Sanchez, Uygur, Barnicle, et al.
"...from the far center..."
Submitted by Dave. on Wed, 11/24/2010 - 12:09am.
Chris,
That's great.
That beats my "so far out in left field they are in the parking lot."
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
Well Bonnie, Bonnie
Submitted by Radical1979 on Tue, 11/23/2010 - 10:53pm.
Well Bonnie,
Bonnie says, 'Anybody who runs for the highest office should answer any question from any journalist. If they can't do that, they shouldn't be running for president. We citizens need to know all about the candidates.Shouldn't our current president be willing to answer questions from any journalist? Obama is so afraid of Fox, not only won't he answer their questions he's trying to get the entire network censored.
The funny thing is that Jack
Submitted by Barack_must_go..... on Tue, 11/23/2010 - 11:08pm.
The funny thing is that Jack has played that segment over and over again in his mind every night when he goes home to where he lives under the bridge downtown. He just sits there all alone on his litter box eating a can of cat food dreaming of the day he could once more play it on the air.Well that day finally came today you big pussy.I think I could here him purring while it played.
Barack_Must_Go.....
your comment
Submitted by charlesandy on Tue, 11/23/2010 - 11:13pm.
Discourse of the highest degree.
charlesandy---
Submitted by matthewdean on Tue, 11/23/2010 - 11:36pm.
Is that your name, or what they call hall monitors in elementary schools in Massachusetts?
And exactly what level of discourse are you aspiring to reach with your blinding glimpse of the obvious repartee?
MD
matthew - "hall monitor" - I
Submitted by Chris Norman on Tue, 11/23/2010 - 11:45pm.
matthew - "hall monitor" - I like it. Self-appointed, too. I always found those kids to be insufferable, also.
Oh, goody! A new Mao-servicing troll from the People's Repubelic
Submitted by Dave. on Tue, 11/23/2010 - 11:49pm.
...of thoroughly wussified Taxxachusetts, USSA.
Welcome to NewsBusters, comrade troll.
-Dave
.
Vote for the American in November
Dave, if these (as matthew
Submitted by Chris Norman on Tue, 11/23/2010 - 11:59pm.
Dave, if these (as matthew calls them) "hall monitors" wanted to provide a really useful service, they'd confine themselves to spell checking us.
Chris,
Submitted by Dave. on Wed, 11/24/2010 - 12:04am.
LOL - Actually, I'm still waiting for the mass suicide protest.
:-^)
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
Dave,
Submitted by Chris Norman on Wed, 11/24/2010 - 12:14am.
I've never seen his comments before he slapped my wrist. I love these guys and their affected "lah-di-dah" air of superiority they like to project. to us poor slob conservatives They're like over inflated balloons just waiting for the touch of a pin.:).
Chris---
Submitted by matthewdean on Wed, 11/24/2010 - 12:27am.
The wrist slappers generally end up as pill poppers before NB's counterpunchers are even close to being done working them over.
I always picture the last day of school, as a mass of stampeding students steam-rolls over the hall monitors on their way to a summer free of, and from, teachers pets.
MD
matthew, LOL. The ones who
Submitted by Chris Norman on Wed, 11/24/2010 - 12:41am.
matthew,
LOL. The ones who remind the teacher that there was supposed to be a test that day? :)
I don't know whether to laugh or get angry at these pretentious self-appointed "hall monitors" who can't deny the reality of media bias or the failure of liberalism, so they concentrate their efforts on nit-picking our rhetoric. They're like a defense attorney who, when the jury announces a guilty verdict, jump up and say, "Hah! You pronounced my client's name wrong!".
Chris---
Submitted by matthewdean on Wed, 11/24/2010 - 12:47am.
"The ones who remind the teacher that there was supposed to be a test that day."
Boy, does that ever bring on a head rush of memories.
None of 'em good. :oD
MD
We had one of those guys in
Submitted by Chris Norman on Wed, 11/24/2010 - 1:10am.
We had one of those guys in high school that did something similar that drew the ire of some of our resident thugs. The little creep suffered the weight of "thug justice". Of course, back then, "thug justice" was nothing compared to what it is now - involving nothing more than the lowering of pants and a shove into the girl's locker room. :)
thank you all! This is where
Submitted by charlesandy on Wed, 11/24/2010 - 9:04pm.
thank you all! This is where i leave, having extracted a thorough dose of bitterness. god, this site sucks. too many rich white guys.
Right you are, charlesandy---
Submitted by matthewdean on Thu, 11/25/2010 - 12:55am.
with one exception:
You didn't "extract a thorough dose of bitterness", but rather, attracted a serious amount of common sense used to blast your moronic, tried to dish it out but couldn't take it ass, right on outta here.
Another liberal who thinks all conservatives are nothing more than rich white guys.
Well, ass eyes, it's true.
Eat your heart out, there, sissy-boy.
MD
Oooohhhh
Submitted by sentry_99 on Thu, 11/25/2010 - 1:38am.
Please PM me with the id's of the rich white guys you are referring to in your post. I could really use a loan er...a bailout and/or stimulus and would appreciate knowing who to ask. Thanks.
sentry---
Submitted by matthewdean on Thu, 11/25/2010 - 2:15am.
No need for a PM.
007memo, afanofcommonsense, criticalthinking, steve05, nwahs, abeautifulperson, dumbanguish; rich white guys, all.
The fact that they are actually liberal trolls, and were initially pretend conservatives on site, will probably preclude any urge on their part to share anything, monetarily speaking.
MD
Thanks MD
Submitted by sentry_99 on Thu, 11/25/2010 - 2:35am.
Damn, and Christmas is right around the corner.
Chris,
Submitted by Dave. on Wed, 11/24/2010 - 12:33am.
This may be one reason.
Here another.
I come from a huge military family. As such, my tolerance for freedom-hating commie pukes is exactly zilch.
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
Dave, Yikes, thanks for
Submitted by Chris Norman on Wed, 11/24/2010 - 12:54am.
Dave,
Yikes, thanks for that. Looking back through your link, I see that I already had an exchange with him under the "Glee" gay kiss thread - where I asked him not to drop his excrement near one of my comments. He didn't understand what I was requesting. I have to admit, his name and his dumb smart aleck reply to my comment must not have left much of an impression with me. I haven't seen his other comments, but I have seen others like him here and understand your reaction to him now. I can imagine the kinds of things he is capable of typing.. Guys like these like to think they are superior and are toying with us by mocking our principles.
Chris,
Submitted by Dave. on Wed, 11/24/2010 - 1:10am.
Even though I don't have the time I once did to cruise the threads of NB, my troll-sniffer is still well calibrated, especially when it comes to the government-educated who are proud to be residents of one of the states that is well on it's way to being written off, along with California, New York and Illinois.
:-)
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
Dave, Bless your "Troll
Submitted by Chris Norman on Wed, 11/24/2010 - 1:20am.
Dave,
Bless your "Troll Detector" - is it portable or permanently mounted? :) When one proclaims to be proud of being a resident of a liberal sink hole, you know all they have left is the dumb false bravado of an experienced loser.
Funny thing is
Submitted by dirtydan64 on Tue, 11/23/2010 - 11:15pm.
They insisit Palin answer all question and give interviews to everyone in the Media regardless who or what there agenda is, now isn't this quaint, Lovely isn't it !!! Maybe all these people that repsonded to Jack should insist on BO taking question from anyone after he has a presser or holds a presser to make a speech, he should entertain question from the Media immediately there after on the subject of whatever his speech was on or anything in between right ??? Gotta love all the hyprocsy, gotta love it !!!!
Good point dirtydan*
Submitted by cajun2 on Tue, 11/23/2010 - 11:44pm.
Just think of the increase of his approval rating if he actually encountered anyone from FoxNews who would ask him the "tough" questions. If he cant even handle BOR, how are we supposed to believe he is tough enough to handle Kim Jong Il?
Actually, Obama's rambling
Submitted by Chris Norman on Wed, 11/24/2010 - 12:22am.
Actually, Obama's rambling answers could be an effective weapon. By the time he was done answering the first question Kin Jong Il asked him, the old dictator would have died of old age - or of a stroke caused by fatal confusion.
The slowmo man - Obama
Submitted by Trosp on Wed, 11/24/2010 - 1:34pm.
As if Obama and Michelle quarelled and he slapped her face. But before his palm reached Michelle's face, they've already reconciled...They do realize that when
Submitted by Thoreau on Wed, 11/24/2010 - 12:48am.
They do realize that when they harass somebody who ain't in office and ain't running for anything, it looks pretty psychotic. These leftists nuts are going to get her elected to whatever she runs for, and they're too stupid to realize it.
Thanks, Bonnie!
Submitted by Model850 on Wed, 11/24/2010 - 1:15pm.
Bonnie says, 'Anybody who runs for the highest office should answer any question from any journalist.
Thanks, Bonnie! So we can look forward any day now to BHO releasing to the media all his school transcripts and everything else he's had "sealed." I can't wait!
Submitted by Trosp on Wed, 11/24/2010 - 1:58pm.
Is a Slow Week at CNN
Submitted by gruyere cheese on Wed, 11/24/2010 - 5:04pm.
Poor Jack! He could not come up with new material this week, and so, he had to recycle this old one.
NOTE TO JACK: 2011 is right around the corner. 2008 is past.