CNN: Conservative Guests are 'Controversial;' No Labels for Liberals
CNN, whose new ad claims that they "keep them all honest, without playing favorites," actually played favorites on Monday's Parker-Spitzer. Hosts Kathleen Parker and Eliot Spitzer failed to give ideological labels to their liberal guests, while clearly identifying Tim Phillips as being president of "Americans for Prosperity, a right-wing group" and labeling Bjorn Lomborg a "controversial author."
Parker and Spitzer's first guest was liberal Congressman Anthony Weiner, who appeared two minutes into the 8 pm Eastern hour. The former liberal governor introduced Weiner as merely a "Democratic representative from New York." The American Conservative Union gave the congressman a zero rating in 2008 and 2009, with a lifetime rating of 5.14. The left-of-center Americans for Democratic Action named Weiner one of their "ADA Heroes" in the House in 2009. Clearly, the New York politician is a liberal, but neither host identified him as such.
Twelve minutes later, Spitzer introduced Lomborg: "Our 'Person of Interest,' today, is Bjorn Lomborg, a controversial author with a global reputation as a skeptic on climate change. A business professor and founder of the Copenhagen Consensus Center, Lomborg argues that the consequences of climate change are vastly exaggerated, and that money spent on climate change policy would be much more effective if it were used to fight major global problems like malaria eradication or water sanitation" This wasn't the first time the former New York governor gave him this label, as he referred to the Dane as a "controversial global warming skeptic" at the top of the hour.
The author isn't even the "skeptic" that the liberal CNN host made him out to be, as he stated during the segment that global warming is "manmade and it is a problem we need to tackle." But since he isn't an alarmist like Al Gore (Parker described Lomborg as the "anti-Al Gore"), the author was still given the "controversial" label.
Just before the bottom of the hour, the two hosts brought on liberal activist and founder of Def Jam Records, Russell Simmons. Parker identified him as a "hip-hop and fashion mogul, financier, animal rights activist, avid Obama supporter, reality TV star, and author of the upcoming book, 'Super Rich.'" But even with the mentions of Simmons's animal rights cause (he criticized the media for not highlighting the "10 billion suffering farm animals") and his support for the President, the CNN hosts couldn't give him an ideological label.
Parker and Spitzer brought on Philips, an ideological conservative, immediately after their segment with Simmons. The liberal host of "Client Number Nine" infamy made his guest's political leanings immediately clear from the outset:
SPITZER: Our 'Headliner' tonight is Tim Phillips, the president of Americans for Prosperity, a right-wing group who Barack Obama claims was at the center of questionable Republican campaign spending in 2010. He called out the group at least 19 times in campaign speeches, a highly unusual level of attention from the President.
PARKER: Phillips is a major player in the rise of the Tea Party. His organization has invested heavily in the fight against health care reform. Welcome, Tim.
PHILLIPS: Nice to be here.
PARKER: How do you feel about being identified as a right-wing activist group? Is that accurate?
PHILLIPS: (laughs) I think 'free market' is the word, but we'll take whatever.
The two CNN hosts concluded the hour with their regular panel discussion segment which they call "Our Political Party." The panel consisted of Max Kellerman, a CNN contributor and HBO boxing analyst; The Daily Beast's Elise Jordan, whom Parker described as "a former speechwriter for Condoleezza Rice and also travels frequently to Afghanistan;" and John Avlon, also of The Daily Best, who regularly bashes conservatives. Despite this record, the pseudo-conservative host labeled Avlon an "aggressive centrist."
This favoritism towards liberals isn't limited to the Parker-Spitzer program. The MRC's Rich Noyes pointed out on November 12 that CNN also played "favorites" during the last four weeks prior to the midterm election. The network's liberal guests during this period outnumbered the conservative guests by a more than three-to-two margin, 61% to 39%.
- Matthew Balan's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
These two morons are still on
Submitted by Van Halen on Tue, 11/16/2010 - 3:19pm.
These two morons are still on the air? Parker, who said she led the attack on Sarah Palin now has to see Palin's TLC ratings go through the roof on her opening night while weeks into Spitzer/Parker the only one to see the show is the cleaning lady walking by - and she's probably a Mexican illegal so she doesn't understand the language and probably doesn't realize how lucky she is.
CNN isn't known for truth in
Submitted by Beukeboom on Tue, 11/16/2010 - 3:35pm.
CNN isn't known for truth in advertising.
Client Numero #9 Has a Nerve to Make Comments on TV!
Submitted by gruyere cheese on Tue, 11/16/2010 - 3:39pm.
Good grief! What is this world coming to? How can anyone give Spitzer any credibility after his colorful episode with a..umm..lady of the night, to put it nicely?
Only in America folks! This is why I love this country and unfortunately these nitwit liberals don't get it!
I, sometimes wish that they could be dropped off in Venezuela for a short (CNN) international assignment stint, as part of their job interview. There is no "freedom of the press" in Hugo Chave'z country. Maybe then, they will truly understand what this country is all about.
We are not a perfect country, we have good and bad people, but in the end; America is the best country to live because of our CONSTITUTION!!
"Swallow-Spitzer"
Submitted by bigdaddy on Tue, 11/16/2010 - 3:54pm.
Would be a more appropriate title for this show and better describes the "Psuedo-Conservative" co-hostess.
Off topic, but I thought I
Submitted by jdhawk on Tue, 11/16/2010 - 4:03pm.
Off topic, but I thought I would throw this out there . . .
Jeff Foxworthy on Muslims: If...
1. You refine heroin for a living, but you have a moral objection to liquor.
You may be a Muslim
2. You own a $3,000 machine gun and $5,000 rocket launcher, but you can't afford shoes.
You may be a Muslim
3. You have more wives than teeth.
You may be a Muslim
4. You wipe your butt with your bare hand, but consider bacon unclean.
You may be a Muslim
5. You think vests come in two styles: bullet-proof and suicide.
You may be a Muslim
6. You can't think of anyone you haven't declared Jihad against.
You may be a Muslim
7. You consider television dangerous, but routinely carry explosives in your clothing.
You may be a Muslim
8. You were amazed to discover that cell phones have uses other than setting off roadside bombs.
You may be a Muslim
9. You have nothing against women and think every man should own at least four.
You may be a Muslim
10. Your cousin is president of the United States .
You may be a Muslim
11. You find this offensive or racist and don't forward it.
You may be a Muslim
Lomborg = Flat-Earther? No way
Submitted by Galvanic on Tue, 11/16/2010 - 4:37pm.
Spitzer's label of Lomborg as a "global warming skeptic" couldn't be further from the truth.
Lomborg believes that global warming is occuring and is at least partially attributable to human carbon-producing activity.
What Lomborg does do is . . .
A) Challenge exaggerated Doomsday-2100 claims by the likes of Gore and friends
B) Explain how most of the climate change investments advocated by the AGW-Left are both cost- and outcome-ineffective, and would result in global economic collapse with no significant effect on climate change.
But as we've witnessed in the past, anyone who challenges the accepted-and-unchallenged wisdom of the AGW Elites is labeled as a skeptic or flat-earther, to be ignored or scorned.
Hey, Mr. Weiner......
Submitted by almostacowboy on Tue, 11/16/2010 - 4:47pm.
How's that Glenn Beck- Goldline investigation coming? No controversy in Congress implying some evil doing between Beck & Goldline. Gold's only up 98%.
Lomborg, right or wrong, will
Submitted by cc1975 on Tue, 11/16/2010 - 8:16pm.
Lomborg, right or wrong, will always be labeled "controversial" because of the response to his book by the "offiicials" in his native Denmark, which basically concluded that he didn't know enough about the subject to make an educated argument about it. He was practically taken to court for his views, and that's the kind of thing that follows you around for a lifetime. Unfortunately I don't think he'll ever shed that label. While it's silly to name-call someone just for having a minority opinion, he has a documented history showing some obvious controversy. In this case, referring to him as "controversial" I think actually makes sense.
Parker/Spitzer had Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal as a guest
Submitted by Rush Fan on Wed, 11/17/2010 - 2:10am.
tonight (Tuesday), and was interviewed by RINO Kathleen Parker. I was VERY disappointed that Jindal, who I admire, started the interview by saying this about Palin-basher Parker: