Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Tell the Truth campaign logo
NewsBusters.org logo

February 13, 2012
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • RSS
Home » Blogs » Matthew Balan's blog
  • Washington Post’s Ignatius Hails Obama’s Nimble Contraception Policy; Will Zings Bishops: ‘It Serves Them Right’
  • Entire Chris Matthews Panel Says New JFK Sex Revelations Are Totally Irrelevant
  • Santorum Nomination ‘Completely Terrifies’ Economist Magazine’s Economics Editor
  • Evan Thomas and Chris Matthews: Jackie and Serial Adulterer JFK Had a 'Good' and 'Full' Marriage
  • Bozell Column: Another Fleeting Failure for NBC
  • Martin Bashir Implies GOP Too Racist to Have Marco Rubio as VP Candidate
  • Barbara Walters, Shameless Hypocrite: Hits Kennedy Mistress for Greed, Tells Her She Should Have Stayed Quiet
  • NY Times Writers Rush to Obama's Defense Like It's Their Job

Wolf Blitzer Presses Scott Brown: 'What's Wrong' With Passing ObamaCare?

By Matthew Balan | March 19, 2010 | 14:32

Change font size:  A |  A
Matthew Balan's picture
Wolf Blitzer, CNN Anchor; & Senator Scott Brown, Massachusetts Republican | NewsBusters.orgOn Thursday's Situation Room, CNN's Wolf Blitzer engaged newly-elected Republican Scott Brown on his opposition to ObamaCare, and asked him the same question from the left twice in succession: "What's wrong with giving 30 million-plus more Americans access to health insurance?" He also later added, "What's wrong with spending money...if it's going to give access to 30 million Americans?" [audio clips available here; video clips available here]

Blitzer had the Massachusetts senator on just before the bottom of the 5 pm Eastern hour. The anchor first complimented Brown for driving over to the CNN Washington Bureau in his "nice little truck," and immediately asked his slanted question.

After the senator gave his initial answer, Blitzer, seemingly unsatisfied by the response, pressed further, and added another argument from the left: "I guess I should rephrase the question. What's wrong with spending money- the cost, if it winds up costing money, if it winds up raising taxes on  multimillionaires or millionaires, or people even earning more than $250,000 a year- if it's going to give access to 30 million Americans, so they don't have to worry about getting sick- what's wrong with that?"

The transcript of relevant portion of the interview, starting at the 5:27 pm Eastern mark of Thursday's Situation Room:
WOLF BLITZER: If you had to name one Republican who makes Democrats downright nervous right now, it just might be Senator Scott Brown of Massachusetts. He single-handedly deprived the President's party of its filibuster-proof super- sixty-seat- majority in the U.S. Senate. Now, what is he doing for an encore?

One thing he's doing, he's here in 'The Situation Room.' Senator, welcome.

SENATOR SCOTT BROWN: Good to be here. Thank you.

BLITZER: I hope you'll be a frequent visitor in 'The Situation Room.' We're not very far from Capitol Hill.

BROWN: Thank you.

BLITZER: And thanks for driving your pickup truck all the way from Congress here.

BROWN: That's how I get around. It's no secret.

BLITZER: Well, it's a nice little truck.

Let's talk about health care right now, priority number one. What's wrong with giving 30 million-plus more Americans access to health insurance?

BROWN: Well, part of the problem is after a year of doing this, it still raises taxes. It cuts Medicare a half a trillion dollars. It cuts TRICARE for military people. It's going to cost a trillion-plus, and while it's certainly important to provide care for those people, I believe that individual states could do it better, and that we can do it better, because all the carve-outs and all the special interest issues that we were talking about. that we all shook our heads about, a lot of those are still in that bill.

BLITZER: But I- but let me- I guess I should rephrase the question. What's wrong with spending money- the cost, if it winds up costing money, if it winds up raising taxes on  multimillionaires or millionaires, or people even earning more than $250,000 a year- if it's going to give access to 30 million Americans, so they don't have to worry about getting sick- what's wrong with that?

BROWN: There's nothing wrong with that, but more importantly, it does raise taxes and it does raise taxes for people who are earning less. It's going to affect businesses. It's also- once, as I said before- I had felt, as we did in Massachusetts, we provide almost 98 percent of our people with insurance, and individual states would like to have that right to do the same thing and ask the federal government, how can you help us do that? Can you incentivize us to do it better? Maybe they'll do it better than Massachusetts and get costs in- costs under control. But this one-size-fits-all plan really is hurting businesses and hurting individual citizens right now with all the carve-outs is not appropriate.
Share this

About the Author

Matthew Balan is a news analyst at the Media Research Center. Click here to follow Matthew Balan on Twitter.
  • Congress
  • Conservatives & Republicans
  • Health Care
  • Liberals & Democrats
  • Taxes
  • Scott Brown
  • Wolf Blitzer
  • The Situation Room
  • CNN
  • Matthew Balan's blog
  • Login or register to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Donate to NewsBusters

Donate to NewsBusters Today!

This form needs Javascript to display, which your browser doesn't support. Sign up here instead

User Shortcuts

Log in

  • My account
  • My buddylist
  • Log in to check messages
  • RSS feed
  • About NB
  • Contact us
  • Jobs
  • Advertise on NB

 

 

 

  • Colo. Democrat intern fired after "glitter bombing" Romney (AP)
  • Chuck Colson, cardinal, and rabbi oppose HHS mandate (WSJ)
  • Idea of the Democrats better than the reality (Wisc. State Journal)
  • The cynical and self-contradictory Gospel of Obama (Krauthammer)
  • Video: Protesters at CPAC admit they're being paid to protest (Daily Caller)
  • Does the drug 'ella' cause abortions? (Weekly Standard)
  • Does income inequality cause global warming? (Power Line)

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Recent comments

  • wonder what Rachel thinks about Al's thinking
    24 min 4 sec ago
  • Yeah,
    26 min 44 sec ago
  • Understanding the Required Minimum Distribution is on my short
    29 min 28 sec ago
  • After the movie comes out
    48 min 27 sec ago
  • Too bad that he listened
    56 min 42 sec ago
More >

Try a Sweater Vest, Mitt
more cartoons
  • Sarah Palin Totally Rocks Conservative Conference
  • Breitbart Warns MSNBC: 'We’re Watching You to Play the Race Card'
  • Weekend General and Sports Open Thread
  • Mitt Romney's Full Address to CPAC
  • Daily Kos Week in Review: Confusing Ground for Religious Haters
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Lachlan Markay
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Editorial Associate
Aubrey Vaughan

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2012 NewsBusters. Terms of Use.