On Wednesday’s Situation Room, CNN’s Brian Todd actually considered that political correctness prevented earlier action against Ft. Hood shooter Nidal Hasan. Despite referencing “a senior investigative official who...said he has never heard any indication...that Hasan got any favorable treatment...before this shooting,” Todd also cited three others who were certain of the political correctness factor.
The CNN correspondent did not lead his report with any mention of the possible PC treatment the Muslim army major might have receive, a graphic on-screen hinted what was to come later in the report: “Hasan’s Contacts & Behavior Examined: ‘Political correctness’ a possible concern.”
After mentioning the investigation into Hasan’s e-mail conversations with a radical cleric in Yemen, Todd noted that “[q]uestions continue over Hasan’s behavior while in medical training and the response to that behavior, specifically presentations Hasan gave on Muslims in the military, when, according to one classmate, he was supposed to be talking about health issues. The classmate...tells CNN, despite the discomfort of others in the room, he doesn’t believe Hasan’s superiors counseled him about it, and the classmate says he believes it was because they didn’t want to alienate a Muslim soldier.”
The correspondent did try to downplay this allegation from Hasan’s classmate by stating that “while this was his strong belief, he [the classmate] didn’t provide evidence of that.” But Todd continued that “a retired military lawyer, familiar with such investigations, says political correctness does factor in these situations,” and played a sound bite from this former JAG officer.
Near the end of the report, Todd played a sound bite from former Bush advisor and CNN advisor Frances Townsend, who also was convinced that political correctness prevented any further action against Hassan. But he continued that “a senior investigative official who we spoke with said he has never heard any indication, seen any allegation that Hasan got any favorable treatment along the line any time before this shooting because of the fact that he’s Muslim.”
Despite highlighting this statement from the “senior investigative official,” and how Hassan’s classmate’s “didn’t provide evidence” of his political correctness allegation, it is definitely noteworthy that a correspondent for a mainstream media outlet was willing to consider the possibility of a PC climate towards Muslims in the army and played two clips from those who believe it exists.
The full transcript of Todd’s report, which aired 18 minutes into the 4 pm Eastern hour of Wednesday’s Situation Room:
WOLF BLITZER: More questions about the suspect in that shooting, 39-year-old Army psychiatrist Nidal Hasan.
CNN’s Brian Todd is joining us with the latest on the investigation, and it gets more complicated each day.
BRIAN TODD: It certainly does, Wolf. We’re getting more information now on what investigators say are communications from Nidal Hasan to a Yemeni cleric, and also more information about other leads being followed in this case.
TODD (voice-over): A source familiar with the investigation tells CNN, Nidal Hasan not only contacted a radical cleric in Yemen, but it’s believed he also got communications back from that cleric. Investigators say, during that time, that cleric, Anwar al-Awlaki, was the subject of a federal probe, but the source says all the communications seemed innocent in nature, and says officials are following other leads- leads on connections Hasan may have had with other people who would have been of concern to investigators.
Questions continue over Hasan’s behavior while in medical training and the response to that behavior, specifically presentations Hasan gave on Muslims in the military, when, according to one classmate, he was supposed to be talking about health issues. The classmate, who witnessed one of the presentations, tells CNN, despite the discomfort of others in the room, he doesn’t believe Hasan’s superiors counseled him about it, and the classmate says he believes it was because they didn’t want to alienate a Muslim soldier. While this was his strong belief, he didn’t provide evidence of that. A retired military lawyer, familiar with such investigations, says political correctness does factor in these situations.
CAPTAIN THOMAS KENNIFF, FORMER ARMY JAG OFFICE ATTORNEY: In a post-9/11 world, there are a lot of forces in the military that may be very hesitant to give the appearance that they’re singling out Muslim soldiers, even when that individual Muslim soldier may be making statements that are looked at as very incendiary and very questionable.
TODD: A Defense Department official wouldn’t comment on that, and there’s no specific information that Hasan’s superiors didn’t address his presentations with him or that they avoided doing so because he’s Muslim.
I asked former Bush Homeland Security Adviser Fran Townsend, a CNN contributor, if political correctness could have inhibited investigators looking into Hasan’s communications.
FRANCES FRAGOS TOWNSEND: There is no question in my mind that investigators, when they looked at this material, understood very well that, if they decided to pursue this investigation, they’d have to justify why they were- they chose to pursue one of the few Muslim Americans inside the U.S. military, and perhaps alienate him.
TODD (on-camera): Now, a senior investigative official who we spoke with said he has never heard any indication, seen any allegation that Hasan got any favorable treatment along the line any time before this shooting because of the fact that he’s Muslim, Wolf.
—Matthew Balan is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
It will play out this way
November 11, 2009 - 19:57 ET by CO2MakerThe different people in the Army chain of command are guilty of making bad decisions out of fear of PC-based reprisals. The Army people are guilty of compromising their responsibilities to make good judgments.
Not mentioned will be the complicity of the press, who as a matter of course give more than credence to any PC-based claims, they chime in with full-blown indignation and outrage. They've already been playing that string in their fiddle: "Just because Hasan said 'Allahu Akbar' doesn't mean his rampage was caused by his religious convications." "Just because he was a Muslim and went to the extremist mosque doesn't make this a terrorist act." Etc.
Political correctness wouldn't be the effective scourge that it is if it didn't have a scourge to whip people with, namely public opinion, and the media are the ones who wield the scourge. Jackson and Sharpyton and La Raza, etc., wouldn't be anywhere near as effective as they are without their fellow travelers in the MSM.
Note, by contrast, that the hustlers of white supremacism are very ineffective, mainly because the press is against them. There are no Views or GMAs or Harry "Don't I look like Julia Childs" Smiths, no Chris the Wide Mouth Frog or Keith 'I can see Palin's Juneau what from my bathtub" the Sports Boy chiming in like a Greek chorus in support of all the wronged skinhead tattoo freaks who have been done wrong by the system. Nope. No echo chamber for them.
Note, btw, that NPR—that's right the People's News Service—ran a story about the failure of the system, and blamed PC worries as no. 4 on their list.
Hot Air » Blog Archive » Bombshell: Walter Reed shrinks thought Hasan might be nuts since last year
The different people in the
November 11, 2009 - 20:48 ET by motherbeltThe different people in the Army chain of command are guilty of making bad decisions out of fear of PC-based reprisals.
No they're not. Obviously they were operating according to top-down expectations.
Because Gen. Casey appeared to say that screwing up the commitment to diversity in the Army would be even worse than having 13 people dead because of it.
And I'm afraid he was serious.
mb....that comment has me going bonkers!
November 11, 2009 - 20:56 ET by BlondeI've posted it twice here, and linked it....and won't repeat it again.
But I am absolutely furiously angry that the Chief of Staff of the Army should make such an idiotic remark, and not be rebuked by the President, the press, and all Americans. He needs to resign, yesterday.
The finger pointing has begun in earnest. Go figure. The problem lies with political correctness and social engineering...the uber-liberals wishing for their perfect world and trying to impose it (yet again) on the military. Don't ask, don't tell. I can hardly blame those who were directly in Hasan's chain of command, calling his treasonous behaviour (yeah, Chrissy, calling Al Quaeda is against the law) treasonous would have resulted in a witch hunt of "racism" and at the very least multiple diversity lessons and reprimands for whoever had the stones to make an issue of it.
We live in an upside down world. Political Correctness will kill us all if we're not careful. The next time it's liable to cost us a city.
I hope he fails, too.
I agree, B....I had to pick
November 11, 2009 - 21:43 ET by motherbeltI agree, B....I had to pick up an emergency roll of duct tape in Target the other day...every time I thought about that my head started "percolating".....
It's just unbelievable to me that he said that with a straight face and no one questioned him!!
What the hell is wrong with these people ?!?!?!
Maybe now someone will have the stones to make an issue of it, considering THIS and THIS
You know they figured it would be career suicide to bring it up.
Apparently they didn't learn from THIS
This is the money quote, IMO, from the blogger:
If Muslim-American soldiers will put their loyalty to "Islam" above
their loyalty to their country, then Washington, we have a problem and
these people will have to be weeded out of the military!
WOW, mb...this is going to get ugly, fast
November 11, 2009 - 21:59 ET by BlondeThere are (or at least there used to be) ways of nuking a career officer in his tracks. Sounds like there were plenty of warning flags, but I'd imagine none of this group had the firepower to make it stick.
How sad is that? You know what is going to happen though....as do we all. These officers are going to be made scapegoats for the higher ups who demand this PC nonsense. IMO, Casey needs to be the first to resign, since he so very obviously worships at the altar of diversity.
This whole sorry story is a cautionary tale...but with the Bamster and all of the PC liberals in charge....it's going to have a very, very bad ending.
Thank you, though, for the great links. I think we all should channel Rush...and predict the predictible media plays. Piece of cake.
And for those senior members of the military who allowed this shameful seeping of stupidity into the pointy end of our military....SHAME ON YOU ALL. Senior officers not only should have known better, they should have resigned (with full pensions, I might add) before allowing such idiocy.
I hope he fails, too.
Even Michelle Malkin
November 11, 2009 - 22:09 ET by JerEven Michelle Malkin concedes this [PC oversensitivity in the chain of command] was also true during the Bush administration.
By the way, did GWB ever address the lethal grenade incident perpetrated by the Muslim jihadist animal, Sgt. Hasan Akbar, in Kuwait in 2003? I have yet to find evidence of his having done so.
Jer
I cant find anything either Jer
November 11, 2009 - 22:43 ET by general companyWhat are you getting at?
My Gov. thinks I am dangerous, so be careful
"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg
Since Obama was being
November 11, 2009 - 22:58 ET by JerSince Obama was being roundly criticized here for the timing, manner, and content of his Fort Hood response, I thought it might be useful to compare it with Bush's reaction to a somewhat similar incident.
Jer
→ I get it
November 11, 2009 - 23:05 ET by Cool ArrowBecause he spent seven minutes with some school children while collecting his thoughts.
Now, tell us how quickly Obama lurched into action.
LYDSEXICS UNTIE!
Did you read the previous
November 12, 2009 - 00:10 ET by JerDid you read the previous posts? The 9/11 tragedy was not part of the discussion.
Jer
Did you read the previous posts, Jer?
November 12, 2009 - 07:42 ET by ThisnThatNeither was President Bush, until you decided to hijack the thread with a totally irrelevant comment. And now you're offended because someone else decided to take you up on it? Hilarious. And pathetic.
__________
"mmm, mmm, mm. Barrack-Hussain-Øbama↓." - The liberals coolaid drinking song
Yes he was. I
November 12, 2009 - 07:52 ET by JerYes he was. I specifically referred to him. I did so for two reasons. One, inasmuch as Obama has been criticized for his response to the Ft. Hood tragedy, I was curious how President Bush may have responded in a similar situation.
Second, "political correctness" is a central issue in the blog commentary. Malkin has blamed both the current and the previous administrations for their stances regarding what she views as excessively consiliatory attitudes toward Muslims.
Consequently, both Bush and Obama are appropriate subjects of the discussion.
Jer
update: Just noticed you edited your post while I was responding. I have no problem with 9/11 being an issue. But, in my opinion, it is nowhere near as analogous as is the lethal grenade incident in 2003 perpetrated by Sgt. Akbar.
No need to hypothosize.
November 12, 2009 - 08:01 ET by BDNo need to hypothosize. GWB personally travelled to Hood the morning after the shooting and visited those in Darnell Army Hospital - without cameras to record it.
Not surprising. GWB [and
November 12, 2009 - 08:17 ET by JerNot surprising. GWB [and Laura] are persons of character and class. He is also currently a private citizen.
Jer
But it is indicative since
November 12, 2009 - 08:44 ET by BDBut it is indicative since he is a FORMER PRESIDENT. Unlike certain other former presidents he is carrying on approriately.
Not engaging in the verbal tarring and feathering of political opponents in an effort to justify failed presidencies and worse policies.
I am reminded of the
November 12, 2009 - 08:07 ET by ThisnThatI am reminded of the definition of logic, to wit: a particular method of reasoning or argumentation: We were unable to follow his logic.
And of circular argument: any discussion in which one argues the conclusion as a premise; a discussion that makes a conclusion based on material that has already been assumed in the argument.
You're probably going to ask me to give you an example. Ok, here's one:
Jer -- see the logic involved here?
__________
"mmm, mmm, mm. Barrack-Hussain-Øbama↓." - The liberals coolaid drinking song
I see your logic, as well
November 12, 2009 - 08:14 ET by JerI see your logic, as well as mine [and Malkin's]. In this instance, I stand by mine and Michelle's.
Jer
Well Jer,
November 12, 2009 - 09:03 ET by general companyI am a little surprised you agree with Michelle, as even I am a bit torn in the discussion.
Also I dont think folks had a problem with Obama's timing, I no for me, it was the callus behavior before mentioning the murders. I thought you were wanting to compare Bush and his remarks. I am comfortable knowing Bush would had given this situation the proper tone and respect.
My Gov. thinks I am dangerous, so be careful
"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg
general company
November 12, 2009 - 16:56 ET by JerI said I agree with Malkin's logic. As far as the content of her argument, I, like you, am a bit torn.
Regarding a comparison between Bush's and Obama's remarks about and reactions to similar incidents, that is exactly what I was seeking.
Jer
The Grenade attack occurred
November 12, 2009 - 07:59 ET by BDThe Grenade attack occurred on the eve on the invasion of Iraq. Tough to justify a focus on one event in what would later become a much more significant event.
Similarly the NCO from the NYNG who shot his commander or the wackjob signal NCO who shot up the mental health clinic in Bagdhad.
And all were in theater where casualties are expected if not desired.
Granted, BD...
November 12, 2009 - 08:08 ET by JerGranted, BD...but an attack by an American soldier/Muslim extremist on his fellow soldiers produced casualties which were neither expected nor desired. In that sense, the two incidents are strikingly similar albeit one occurred at a US military base in Kuwait and the other at Ft. Hood.
Jer
Also granted. But the
November 12, 2009 - 08:16 ET by BDAlso granted. But the unit was preparing to move to contact. Things were a bit busy.
On a seperate note, I wonder when the media will start contacting Poor Little Chaplain Yi to ask if all the abuse being heaped on prisoners at GITMO is what caused the islamic soldier to go Jihadi?
I hate illogical crap like that.
BD...
November 12, 2009 - 08:20 ET by JerGotta run, but FTR, just who is Chaplain Yi? Thanks in advance.
Jer
He is the islamic Convert
November 12, 2009 - 08:50 ET by BDHe is the islamic Convert of asian descent who joined the army to serve as a Islamic Chaplain. He was assigned to Gitmo for a year to serve as the islamic chaplain to the community there and was relieved for cause.
He returned to the US, wrote a book about his life at GITMO and whitewashing his actions that caused his relief and went on a speaking tour to include campaigning for Obama in the last presidential campaign.
Let us just say that he would consider lukewarm lemon chicken with basil sauce presented to a detainee a jihad worthy cause.
In other words by BD speak, a WACKJOB.
NPR will likely dig him up to discover horrendous anti Islamic racism in the army by friday.....
BD...
November 12, 2009 - 16:57 ET by JerMuch obliged for the info.
Jer
General/Flag Officers must
November 11, 2009 - 21:07 ET by Dan DiegoGeneral/Flag Officers must have good political skills to maneuver through the Pentagon and Congressional bureaucracies. The good ones serve the nation, the others serve themselves.
Don't forget the role that
November 12, 2009 - 07:39 ET by ThisnThatDon't forget the role that lawyers, judges, and the ACLU played in setting these abominable PC expectations. Even today, if a "muslim" was ahead of Hansen at the airport and singled out for a security screen, this would let Hansen slip right through. You can't screen lots of people from the same group -- middle east, muslims, etc, because the ACLU will sue you. You have to also screen infants and 80-year old grandmothers before you can screen the next "muslim".
And you watch -- there are going to be a lot of liberals screaming "don't change our security posture, lest you begin to discriminate", thereby ignoring the reality that the muslim religion invites and encourages these types of behaviors.
__________
"mmm, mmm, mm. Barrack-Hussain-Øbama↓." - The liberals coolaid drinking song
Reflective of this officer's
November 11, 2009 - 20:01 ET by jdhawkReflective of this officer's performance was a bad Officer Efficiency Report or OER that he received prior to leaving his training in Washington, D.C. Yet, this officer was on orders to be the Chief of Psychiatry for the command in Afghanistan. Tell me that isn't proof of political correctness on the part of the Army? Oh, and they promoted him to Major as well . . .
You are correct about the
November 12, 2009 - 08:06 ET by BDYou are correct about the promotion. While a Medical Officer has an almost certain promotion to Major upon certain tickets being punched, promotion can be denied for those not meeting expectations by their leadership.
It is much like a second Lieutenant being promoted to first lieutenant at 18 months of service. If the 2LT does an adequate job and the battalion leadership approves - the promotion goes through. But if he is a wackjob then the promotion can be held up. I have seen it happen on two occasions.
In neither case were the lieutenants as wacked out as Hasan.
oh really?
November 11, 2009 - 20:24 ET by michiganrutha smidge off topic but had to post: Sally Quinn on O'Reilly just now said that Timothy McVeigh was "probably" a terrorist. really? you think?
this is how the left twists itself into contortions trying to avoid the obvious, and pretend that the Ft. Hood attack was anything but Islamic terrorism.
one lefty colleague at work today said that the massacre "proves why we need more gun control." huh? that's your takeaway from this?
how do you even TALK to people like that?
Patients
November 11, 2009 - 20:30 ET by general companyhow do you even TALK to people like that?
And plenty of Duck tape
My Gov. thinks I am dangerous, so be careful
"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg
→ Matthew Balan
November 11, 2009 - 20:30 ET by Cool ArrowThis long after the event, the only news here that isn't already history is that CNN reported it at all.
Given that we know we can get our news a little more fresh than six-day old regurgitated cud, is it any wonder CNN is sliding off the table?
LYDSEXICS UNTIE!
Has the Fort Hood murderer been executed yet?
November 11, 2009 - 21:50 ET by Red JeepNo? Well why not.
I am so tired of this garbage about why he did it. I don't care.
Swiftly try and publically execute him and maybe that will deter some in the future with a similar plan for infamy.
It is really getting to be silly the lengths some are going to explain what this man did, rather than consider maybe his faith is at the base of the outrage he committed. Let's blame everyone but him.
...pass the duct tape please....
comment about PC
November 12, 2009 - 04:06 ET by sarge329A CNN analyst commenting about the fact that PC concerns might have been a factor in the shootings at Ft. Hood? My God! What's next? Another media analyst making a comment about the lamestream media being a little less than objective? Oops, I'm sorry. I guess I'm asking too much. In my world, PC is that thing that sits on your desk. You know, the thing that looks like a TV with a typewriter in front of it.
Already Alienated
November 12, 2009 - 12:04 ET by miss911ninjaWhat blew me away was reading that the former Homeland Security Adviser believes the military failed to pursue an investigation into Hasan's behavior because it could "perhaps alienate him."
Wasn't there cause for alarm because he'd already demonstrated his "alienation?"
Not a Ft Hood SHOOTER
November 12, 2009 - 07:49 ET by ThisnThatNidal Hasan is a Ft. Hood murderer. I hope Newsbusters gets it correctly stated in all future threads.
And he's not an alleged murderer. And he's not innocent until proven guilty. He's simply alive until convicted and sentenced.
There are some crimes that are obvious. And his lawyer is talking about "not getting a fair trial". What the hell does that mean?
__________
"mmm, mmm, mm. Barrack-Hussain-Øbama↓." - The liberals coolaid drinking song
I imagine the lawyer will
November 12, 2009 - 08:13 ET by BDI imagine the lawyer will say that the witnesses will not be objective and will be prejudiced - because Hasan shot them.
God I hate LAWYERS.
This trial could be conducted today and tomorrow. Enough witnesses are well enough to testify against "The accused" and others can have their testimony taken down from their hospital bed.
Sentancing on Monday. Appeals on tuesday.
Execution wednesday.
And they can all go to Thanksgiving Day dinner at the messhall to celebrate.