ABC anchor Chris Cuomo played the liberal emotion card and asked California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger during an interview on Wednesday’s Good Morning America if Republicans were “playing politics” with President Obama’s health care “reform” proposal, and whether this was turning into a “little bit of a reckless situation” on the part of the GOP. [audio available here]
Cuomo first put the health care issue in the context of California’s budget woes, and started out of the gate with his plea to people’s emotions in his first question to the governor: “Your state is somewhat of a window into the reality of health care. You’ve been pictured at your desk with a big knife, having to cut the budget- over $1 billion in health care cuts. It’s going to affect low-income families. It’s going to affect the coverage that children get. Is this absolutely necessary?”
After Schwarzenegger’s answer, the ABC anchor then turned to the president’s proposal for health care “reform,” and asked the liberal Republican governor why he supported it. The former actor clarified that he didn’t 100% support Obama’s plan, “because I don’t know exactly what is in that bill. It changes all the time, as you know.” Cuomo followed up by asking if he was leaning towards supporting it. Schwarzenegger again didn’t give a solid answer.
Following a couple of questions on the possible rise in taxes on the top tiers of income earners to pay for the president’s plan, Cuomo played a clip of Mr. Obama accusing his Republican opponents of “dust[ing] off that old playbook” from the 1990s when the GOP opposed former President Clinton’s health care plan. The ABC anchor both appealed to the governor’s apparent political reputation, and returned to his use of the emotion card in his following question: “You’re always honest about both political parties. Governor, do you believe that the Republicans are playing politics here, at the risk of people’s health care?” When Schwarzenegger answered by agreeing to his central point, Cuomo, seemingly unsatisfied by his response, pushed forward by asking his “reckless” question: “Of course, there’s always politics going on. The question is, is it upstaging the need to help people right now? Is this getting to be a little bit of a reckless situation?”
The ABC anchor concluded the interview by asking the governor, who is married to a member of the Kennedy clan, if President Obama “needs to call out the ‘lion’ ...Senator Ted Kennedy? This is not surprising, as Cuomo is obviously a member of another family of Democratic politicans.
The full transcript of Chris Cuomo’s interview of Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, which began six minutes into the 7 am Eastern hour of Wednesday’s Good Morning America:
CHRIS CUOMO: Now, obviously, this health care push is going to be mean a lot for states- they’re already slashing their budgets. This is especially true in California, where Governor Schwarzenegger is facing a $26 billion shortfall- that means putting funding for health care on the chopping block, and his state is in the red-hot center of the health care debate as a result. I asked him about what he’s doing there, and what he thinks about the president’s prospects for change.
CUOMO (from taped interview): Your state is somewhat of a window into the reality of health care. You’ve been pictured at your desk with a big knife, having to cut the budget- over $1 billion in health care cuts. It’s going to affect low-income families. It’s going to affect the coverage that children get. Is this absolutely necessary?
CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER: Well, you know, when you have a $26 billion shortfall in revenues, then you have to go and do a combination of things. And one of the things you have to do is make deep cuts in various different programs. But the important thing, at the same time is- is that the cuts are not just cuts. They’re also coming from reforms- very important reforms in welfare, for instance, or in in-home services. So, there were good things that happened. But also, it was, without any doubt, a tough budget, but a necessary budget.
CUOMO: Many governors do not support President Obama’s health care bill because of what it will mean to their budgets. You do support Obama’s bill. Why?
SCHWARZENEGGER: Well, first of all, I cannot say that I support exactly everything that is in the health care bill because I don’t know exactly what is in that bill. It changes all the time, as you know. What I have said was- and I told this to the president- that I would support him 100% in health care reform because I think it’s necessary. It’s inexcusable that we have 48 million people in the whole United States that are uninsured. So I think we need health care reform, and it has to be done the right way.
CUOMO: Well, just to be clear, are you leaning towards supporting what the president has been talking about? I mean, he’s put out lots of information. Which way are you leaning at this point, Governor?
SCHWARZENEGGER: I’m leaning towards reforming health care in America, and I think the whole idea of having everyone insured is a great idea, and I think it’s also important to put a lot of emphasis on cost controls, because we’ve got to bring the costs down. I think that he’s right on the mark on that one, and I also like his whole idea of prevention.
CUOMO: And what do you think about what it could mean to the tax burden? There are estimates that for the top level of Americans in their tax bracket, over 55% of their money could go to one government agency or another. I don’t have to tell you, as a top earner yourself, how big a burden that could be. What do you think of that?
SCHWARZENEGGER: Well, first of all, I don’t think that you can get anything like that done without paying for it. So, we have to pay for it somehow. I think the trick is just to find a way of doing it so it makes sense.
CUOMO: Well, if that is the reality, that the top tier of earners in America is going to be paying over 55% in taxes, do you think this bill will make it?
SCHWARZENEGGER: I don’t think so. I think that you have to come up with interesting ways of funding this health care, and we have, for instance, done different things here in California. We have tried to do- you know, go to the tobacco industry, and try to get some money- some money from the hospital association- some money from the employers. So, we kind of spread it and sprinkled the responsibility all over, so that no one particular category gets hit too much.
CUOMO: There’s a lot of politics going on here that may determine the fate of the bill. Let me play you some sound here of what the president said about what may be going on in DC.
PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA (from PBS interview): There are folks who think that- you know, we should try that- you know, dust off that old playbook. What they don’t recognize is that, this isn’t about me. It’s about the American people, and things have gotten worse since 1993.
CUOMO: You’re always honest about both political parties. Governor, do you believe that the Republicans are playing politics here, at the risk of people’s health care?
SCHWARZENEGGER: Well, hello? (laughs) I mean, since when has there anything been done in Washington or here in Sacramento, or at any capital where politics didn’t play a big role in the- in the outcome? I think that- yes, politics is in there. I think that it is very clear that it’s a sensitive issue, and Republicans will use that, if you raise taxes.
CUOMO: Of course, there’s always politics going on. The question is, is it upstaging the need to help people right now? Is this getting to be a little bit of a reckless situation?
SCHWARZENEGGER: Well, look- I think that it is nothing unusual because every time you try to address big issues like that, you always run into this problem- that people make decisions based on what’s- you know, good for the politics.
CUOMO: Do you think the president needs to call out the ‘lion’? Do you think this takes your wife’s uncle, Senator Kennedy? Do you think he needs to get involved for this to be successful?
SCHWARZENEGGER: Well, the question is, if Senator Kennedy is capable to be out there and campaigning, because, as you know, he’s fighting brain cancer. But I think that he was a very important player to get it as far as it is today, and so, I think he has done his share. I think that now, the people on Capitol Hill and the president have to pull it off, and just- you know, close the deal.
CUOMO: All right, governor. Thank you so much.
SCHWARZENEGGER: Thank you very much.
—Matthew Balan is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.





CHRIS CUOMO: Now, obviously, this health care push is going to be mean a lot for states- they’re already slashing their budgets. This is especially true in California, where Governor Schwarzenegger is facing a $26 billion shortfall- that means putting funding for health care on the chopping block, and his state is in the red-hot center of the health care debate as a result. I asked him about what he’s doing there, and what he thinks about the president’s prospects for change. 














Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Amazing Arnold hemming and
July 22, 2009 - 11:08 ET by eaglewingz08Amazing Arnold hemming and hawing about a liberal democrap proposal. I'm sure Cuomo was shocked that Arnold wasn't hewing to the liberal party line. Maybe that solar eclipse restarted some of Arnold's internal electronic programs?
July 22, 2009 - 11:38 ET by jessieHThe "Terminator" isn't stupid. He knows that to say he is for obamacare is political suicide. Elections coming up soon.....
Freedom??
July 22, 2009 - 11:55 ET by iveseenitallAmericans don't trust the likes of Arnold or Mario Cuomo's son. You see the "government of the United States" in action on t.v. and you either snicker or get sick to your stomach. You understand that the "truth" be damned in the media and the governmet. It's all become a power game and more average Americans are having the epiphany they should have had a long time ago. These people are running lives, thoughts, and words and want more from us every day. Our freedom is under attack from within. God help us all.
NEVER, NEVER trust a "liberal"
IRS
July 22, 2009 - 11:54 ET by sevenHaving read the bill, I see the IRS will collect premiums for policies and do office visits with docs. I do not want an IRS agent rifling thru my wifes purse for cash when she sees the doc and is up in stirrups. She is in a position that would make it difficult to punch him in the nose.
If your policy lapses, you will get the standard fines and penalties and tax liens that tax cheats riding elephants experience.
Democrats have a different tax code.
Oh what stuff
July 22, 2009 - 11:58 ET by StarAZThe five bills they want to slam together are a mess, the process is a mess, everyone will be hating life--and all this is caused by the Republicans?
Lauer is a tool.
July 22, 2009 - 14:22 ET by motherbeltI agree..Exactly WHO is being reckless...the President who wants to ram this monster through in two weeks without examination (just trust me, folks!), or the Republicans who are trying to stop it long enough to have some real discussions?
If Arnold had any testosterone left he would have said "Reckless?? I'll tell you what's reckless! Insisting on a timeline that prevents anyone looking at the bill; burying the ramifications, mischaracterizing what's in it, and screaming hysterically that we need this NOW!! That's what's reckless! And it isn't the Republicans!
Reckless $!@#!@! I'll
July 22, 2009 - 12:01 ET by jdhawkReckless $!@#!@! I'll tell you what is reckless. Reckless is giving the government any more power in our lives than they already have. Reckless is handing over more control of the health care industry than they already have. Reckless is an estimated $42 TRILLION in unfunded mandates for Medicare/Medicaid alone. And, then heaping even more unfunded mandates on top of that.
$42 TRILLION in unfunded mandates for Medicare/Medicaid and that is after what is laughinly called "cost-shifting." In other words, for decades, our government has been stiffing hospitals and doctors by low balling medical payments and STILL every year the programs have run away costs.
Want reckless? How about causing 43% of Americans NOT to have to pay federal taxes. Oh, wait a minute, that is already a fact.
Want reckless? How about causing the above non tax payers from NOT having to pay FICA as well. Yes, that is the promise of these dimocrats to the rank and file of their party.
Meanwhile, an ever growing part of the electorate not only doesn't pay federal income taxes, but they actually get money back!
Reckless? Yeah, that is what the GOP is - NOT the dimocrats!
Regarding, Schwarzendufus, he might as wel be a dimocrat. He has royally screwed California.
Reckless?!!
July 22, 2009 - 12:03 ET by GalvanicABC anchor Chris Cuomo . . . asked California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger . . . if Republicans were “playing politics” with President Obama’s health care “reform” proposal,"
Don't you just love when self-described journalist suspiciously suggest that politicians may be engaged in . . . in . . . politics?
QUESTION FOR CUOMO: "Considering that you are asking leading questions to prompt a Governor to commit to supporting Federal legislation he has not yet seen (because 5 separate bills are still being drafted), aren't you, Chris, 'playing journalism' and 'turning the national debate into a little bit of a reckless situation?"
". . . and whether this was turning into a “little bit of a reckless situation” on the part of the GOP."
GOP leaders in the House and Senate have declared that they are not going to sign onto any health care reform bill that (a) they don't have the details on (not to mention there are some 5 competing bills), and (b) has no funding. They point to the CBO assessment as a warning about the economic peril.
Meanwhile, our dear President is demanding that the Congress rush through yet another bill -- this one on health care reform -- despite the fact that the nonpartisan CBO -- which Obama used to cite as a paragon of unbiased Truth -- has stated that the various Dem plans being drafted won't do anything to stem the rising costs of health care, and may even suck more revenue from the Treasury. CBO's bottom-line: the White House claims of projected savings are fanstasy.
So, I would ask Chris Cuomo: "Who's really being reckless about health care reform?"
Schwarzengger
July 22, 2009 - 12:05 ET by ToenexMaybe pumping up again and get back at the movie biz would be in order.
Reckless is putting a Rep Rino Governor in power in hopes of fixing anything. No more Rino's
Maybe the democraps'
July 22, 2009 - 12:10 ET by eaglewingz08Maybe the democraps' attempting to pass three unread bills to control thirty five percent of the economy could be construed as just a wee bit reckless, commie Cuomo, dontcha think? The only reason for the capntax and health dystopia legislation is to allow the government total control over the lives of its citizens. They are reckless and dictatorial and must be defeated.
Reforms?
July 22, 2009 - 12:52 ET by iveseenitallThere are "reforms" out there that will work, but our "representatives" will have none of them.
Term Limits - This may cause many "represenatives" to work for the people, not their corrupt buddies.
Tort reform - Some of the largest costs in the healthcare system are from frivolous law suits. The lawyers take the money, everyone else can go to hell.
Reduce Medical Costs in general- stop making excuses. $100 per pill or $100 per doctor's visit don't cut it anymore.
The way doctor's do business--- make all doctors do some low-paying or volunteer work in order to practice. Let 'em do it a few days a month.
Illegals-get them off the dole.
"Government" healthcare - make all government employees, including Barry himself, suffer under the crap they are proposing. Get on line for your next visit, about eight months from now, Mr. Soetoro.
There are thousands of other ideas out there. But the deaf, dumb, and blind (corrupt) jokers and gangsters from Barry on down are making fools us all. Call or write your "representative" and see the reponse you get, if you get one at all. We no longer have a government of, by, or for the people.
NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"
Politics as haggling
July 22, 2009 - 12:48 ET by KC MulvilleYou're playing politics! (Well, of course we are.)
We have to be careful how we react to Cuomo's comment, because it's a standard piece of rhetoric. If we lived in a perfect world, politics would be a perfectly noble system where citizens (through their representatives) haggle with each to come up with a mutually-acceptable plan. Each side tries to make its best case to persuade the public.
How can you tell whether your opponents really believe what they're saying, and have legitimate objections to your policy? Or are they trying to hoodwink the voters by creating unnecessary complaints that they really don't believe?
Too often, when one side is failing to persuade voters, they can't bring themselves to admit that it's because their argument sucks. So they start to resent the opposition. That's when you hear them complaining about "playing politics." They try to demonize the opposition, hoping to blunt the persuasiveness of all those facts, by portraying the other side as sneaky politicians.
So when Obama doesn't answer the actual objections to his plan, and instead whispers that various boogeymen are against him ... it's a sure sign that he's losing the political haggling.
Soetoro
July 22, 2009 - 13:23 ET by iveseenitallLike so many overgrown adolescents, Soetoro is an immature, spoiled brat who has never been told "no". He truly believes that the whole world revolves around him. And along with his evil motives, he's an indoctinated lefty who doesn't know or understand American history because all he's been taught is "God Damn America". He's a "good time charlie" who doesn't want to work too hard. His skin is as thin as paper and he goes off to pout when proven wrong. But he doesn't stay away too long. Like a school-girl, he comes back with his nasty streak to do you in and exact his revenge. What a "leader", that Barry boy!
NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"
Subprime Health Care
July 22, 2009 - 13:47 ET by slickwillie2001Rush Limbaugh used the term Subprime Health Care today. Brilliant. Brought to you by the same people that brought us the financial meltdown.
slick -- gonna have to toot
July 22, 2009 - 13:57 ET by Jack Bauerslick -- gonna have to toot my own horn -- or at least suck it.. I've been calling it Fannie Mae Healthcare for about two months, on NB as well!
Also the Government Healthcare Industrial Complex has a ring too!
Who's playing politics
July 22, 2009 - 13:52 ET by IamTinmanWho's "playing politics"? The party who wants to discuss and debate health care reform or the party and administration that is trying to force a bill down our throats that could bankrupt this country, when they admit they haven't even read it all yet. If that isn't a perfect example of malfeasence I don't know what is.
Arnold Schwarzenegger is
July 22, 2009 - 15:20 ET by fitzfongArnold Schwarzenegger is the personification of the "health" "care" bill. He's big, he's bloated, he's incoherent and Americans were bamboozled into supporting him without properly vetting him because Democrats had created a crisis that required immediate action. And, like Arnold Schwarzenegger, the "health" "care" "cure" will prove far worse than the disease it was promoted to treat.
"I spent a lot of money on booze, birds and fast cars. The rest I just squandered." -George Best