CNN is the bottom of the barrel....and Jack is a perfect example of why that is.

Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart

that creepy guy sitting at the bar always talking dirty about the cute bartender. I bet all the female interns at CNN think he is the biggest jerk around and  I can picture him always trying to get his nieces to sit on his lap at family gatherings.

What a loozer.  I suspect that Wolf is as much a dud with the ladies as well.   That is of course assuming he likes girls.  Cafferty is angry because he knows that a good woman like Sarah Palin wouldn't give him the time of day....just like in high school.  He never got over it.

Hey Janet Napolitano...I'm proud to be a Right-winger.

   Don't be too hard on these old coots.  There's a lot of spinning around and around just before you disappear down the drain.

I'm glad I read all of the comments, lest I step on the comments of supercon. Every time I hear about Cafferty, all I can think is the lyrics to the song"sitting on a park bench, eying little girls with bad intent" That is Cafferty. Has to be a closet perv.

Again another CNN program with no ratings, but capable of saying hurtful things about the subject.

I believe what the right needs is a great comedy writer who can be downright nasty and ridicule the left, but get's away with it by saying I am only a comedian.

How would we ever survive without them?

-Dave

"Obama's health care 'reform' plan is to blow up the building in order to fix a leak in the roof." - Herman Cain

Hol' up, hol' up a sec.  Let me read again.........

ok ok, I read it right.  Ok, let's see......Jack Cafferty called Palin lame.  Jack.....Cafferty, called someone lame.  Umm.....yea, uh.......Jaaack, umm Caaaffer-tee......Jack....Ca' who?

How many people even heard him say that?

I'm beginning to wonder if this site will have any relevance much longer?

One of the 34% who thinks George W. Bush was a great President. One of the 61% who wants to bring back the stock and pillory (yep...approval for Congress now at 39%...do you believe that!?).

Didn't Cafferty really say, that indeed it was Jack whom is lame! CNN is very lame these days. When PMSNBC beats them, you know it is time to panic!

BTW, the loons in Alaska have filed another "ethics complaint!"

Even better, they are now recycling! This one has already been thrown out once! 

http://www.conservat...

I am firmly convinced that if someone in the media doesn't go up there and expose these people the way 60 minutes and Mike Wallace used to, and starts doing it nationwide to the crazies, we are going to end up in a shooting war!

Not that I condone that, but with all of the safegaurds of society breaking down, something is going to give. You can only push things to the breaking point and hold them there for so long.  And we have been there for some time.

I weep for our once great nation. 

Just spent an hour on the Alaska state web site downloading news articles about Palin's ethics challenges.  In each one, someone mentions the cost of money and time stolen from the citizens of Alaska and the personal cost to Palin.  She is not as rich as other governors.  She gave up her raise this year.  The challenges are just plain ridiculous. 

She - and the state of Alaska - are being harassed by Alinsky's Rules for Radicals #4:  make someone walk their talk. Palin has made her name from the ethics reforms she brought forth in the state so she is being harassed with phony ethics violations. 

Once filed, they are supposed to be private until resolved.  The bloggers who file them - paid for by DNC - then make them public contrary to the law.

I can see the concern of Palin and those who have to deal with the charges - 15 silly ones so far - with more on the horizon.  If only the State could sue those bloggers who file them but they can't.  Ironically, Palin runs a transparent government.  Her web site reflects her ability to govern.  Take some time to review her newsletters and the photo section to see why she was a successful governor with higher positive numbers than Pelosi and Obama.

It also contains her speech.  She didn't use a teleprompter and I remind everyone to go to the You Tube sites with Obama losing it when his teleprompter broke down.  He couldn't even continue.  I think there are 3 or 4 examples.  Having read the transcripts of many of his speeches - I've concluded he is not very articulate.  I can see why he uses a teleprompter.  Of course, I also realize that public speaking is the one thing people fear the most - more than death.  They are not actors on the stage so I expect human sounding speeches and don't mind a few gaffes.

He gets my vote. No single media type has been able to harness more from his alcoholism than "Mad" Jack.

I'm drinking tonight in his honor.

doo·fus

NOUN:
Slang pl. doo·fus·es An incompetent, foolish, or stupid person. See “Jack Cafferty”

I like to imagine Cafferty's head as a watermelon and Sarah Palin as Gallagher.

So what if she helps win back many seats back in the 2010 elections? Is that a thumbsucker? What if I consider her a serious 2012 contender (millions along with me) and skip donating to the RNC? What if SarahPac.com raises more than any other Republican Pac? Is that a thumbsucker? Or should we let liberal democrats and Beltway RINO's decide who's a thumbsucker? Pundits should stop sticking themselves in the eye with the thumbs that they are sucking on.

This both sucks and blows.