CNN's Johns on Gun Provision: 'How Did the Credit Card Bill Get So Hijacked?'

Photo of Matthew Balan.
  • Bookmark and Share

CNN correspondent Joe Johns included a seeming lament in his report on Friday’s Situation Room about the inclusion of an amendment to the so-called credit card reform bill which expands gun owners’ rights in national parks: “How in the world did the credit card bill get so hijacked?” He also only included one pro-gun rights sound bite in his report, as opposed to three from proponents of gun control [audio clips from the report are available here].

Johns introduced his report by juxtaposing beautiful imagery of Yellowstone, Yosemite, and Mount Rushmore with a picture of a handgun on a rack: “Just imagine: along with the sweeping views of natural beauty at Yellowstone and Yosemite, mixed in with history at Mount Rushmore, that some of the tourists toting diaper bags and binoculars might also be packing heat.” He continued by labeling this juxtaposition, and outlining how congressional opponents of the provision felt about its inclusion and passage: “Extreme perhaps, but absurd is in fact how it looks to some congressional Democrats -- they’re almost apoplectic about how the gun lobby slipped a provision into, of all things, the credit card reform bill, a provision that really has nothing to do with the rights of credit card holders, and a lot to do with the right to bear arms.”

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

The correspondent then played sound bites from Democratic Representative Sam Farr, a critic of the gun rights amendment, and Larry Pratt from the Gun Owners of America. Johns’s “hijacked” question followed the clip from Pratt, and he continued by explaining that “Senator Tom Coburn, who gets kudos back home in Oklahoma for standing up for the rights of gun owners, is the guy who put it in, with help from lots of Democrats who’ve learned the hard way, that opposing gun rights can be a bad career move.”

Johns did not include any more bites from gun rights supporters, and played an additional clip from Representative Farr, along with another Democrat, Representative Carolyn Maloney from New York. He further explained that “the White House never threatened a veto. The president doesn’t want to set off gun owners who already fear he’ll take away their weapons.  So if you can’t beat them, join them.”

The CNN correspondent concluded with a “keeping them honest” analysis: “Democrats are crying about being outmaneuvered by the gun lobby, but you should know this: the amendment was supported by 105 House Democrats. After all, it’s not like someone put a gun to their heads on how to vote.”

The full transcript of Johns’ report, which aired at the bottom half of the 5 pm Eastern hour of Friday’s Situation Room program:

JOHN ROBERTS: The credit card reform bill that President Obama signed today includes a measure that will allow loaded guns in U.S. national parks and wildlife refuges. The Interior Department says that won’t take effect for another nine months. CNN’s Joe Johns reports on how Congress found a way to connect loaded guns with credit card reform.

JOE JOHNS (voice-over): Just imagine: along with the sweeping views of natural beauty at Yellowstone and Yosemite, mixed in with history at Mount Rushmore, that some of the tourists toting diaper bags and binoculars might also be packing heat. Extreme perhaps, but absurd is in fact how it looks to some congressional Democrats -- they’re almost apoplectic about how the gun lobby slipped a provision into, of all things, the credit card reform bill, a provision that really has nothing to do with the rights of credit card holders, and a lot to do with the right to bear arms.

REPRESENTATIVE SAM FARR, DEMOCRAT, CALIFORNIA: I think this is the most embarrassing amendment Congress has ever been passed. To be -- to take a credit card bill and have the NRA use that as a vehicle to allow people to carry guns in national parks -- it’s ridiculous. It makes no sense. It’s not the purpose of national parks.

JOHNS: NRA -- the National Rifle Association, and the rest of the gun lobby, are naturally, pretty happy about it. They say guys with guns have been getting locked up for years on parklands, and that it’s just not right.

LARRY PRATT, GUN OWNERS OF AMERICA: This is something that’s been an ongoing harassment, and it’s an immoral policy -- telling people you shouldn’t have a gun. You shouldn’t be able to protect yourself.

JOHNS: But how in the world did the credit card bill get so hijacked? Senator Tom Coburn, who gets kudos back home in Oklahoma for standing up for the rights of gun owners, is the guy who put it in, with help from lots of Democrats who’ve learned the hard way, that opposing gun rights can be a bad career move. Plus, the president wanted the credit card reform bill quickly approved.

REPRESENTATIVE CAROLYN B. MALONEY, DEMOCRAT, NEW YORK: It’s regrettable that a dangerous and totally unrelated provision was added to a very important consumer protection bill, and you should not pass a consumer bill in the barrel of a gun. It’s really wrong. But that’s the way the system was.

PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA: And our approach to (fade-out) --

JOHNS: And the White House never threatened a veto. The president doesn’t want to set off gun owners who already fear he’ll take away their weapons.  So if you can’t beat them, join them.

Meanwhile, a lot of people on the Hill are now expecting more attempts to push through the pro-gun wish list.

FARR: I expect we’ll see gun amendments in almost every major bill. I think it’s the failure of the leadership in -- the Democratic leadership in both the House and the Senate to allow these amendments to get adopted. It’s -- it’s embarrassing.

JOHNS: But taking a step back in keeping them honest -- Democrats are crying about being outmaneuvered by the gun lobby, but you should know this: the amendment was supported by 105 House Democrats. After all, it’s not like someone put a gun to their heads on how to vote. Joe Johns, CNN, Washington. 

—Matthew Balan is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I guess no one is reading

I guess no one is reading these bills still

Kangaroo...Oh, they read

Kangaroo...

Oh, they read this one.

Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart

yea but after it was passed

yea but after it was passed and not before right

ummm

it's a stick up -- Isn't that how it's done.

10... Yep...one of those

10...

Yep...one of those Hit Me With Your Best Shot deals....  ;-)

Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart

This happens all the time but usually

This happens all the time but usually it's the dems slipping in a zinger. Kind of fun this time to hear them howl, and knowing that they don't have the intestinal fortitude to try to remove it.

 

Actually, I don't care which

Actually, I don't care which side is doing this.  It's stupid to slip irrelevent measures into a bill.  Can we have bills that actually do as their names imply?  Oink oink.  Pork belongs on the dinner table, not in legislation.

→ Tru Dat ThatDude

It's like slipping a few billion bucks for ACORN into a Stimulus Bill.

 

  • General Motors - You get what we pay for

 

Whoa there TD...that was

Whoa there TD...that was not slipped in, it was an amendment to to the bill...it was VOTED on in the Senate.

This was not pork by any measure.

You have dem congress-critters up for reelection...they love The 2nd Amendment when it is convenient to their own survival.

Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart

it's not pork, but rather unrelated

TD - rather than describing add-ons such as this as an "irrelevent measure", I agree with your sentiment that non-related items should be voted on independently and allowed to pass/fail on their own merits.

                  ~~save your tea, dump congress~~

X

In further news congress approved abortions in all public rest areas to compensate for gun ownership...

Yeah, let's just imagine for a moment, shall we?

The liberal CNN jackass says “Just imagine: along with the sweeping views of natural beauty at Yellowstone and Yosemite, mixed in with history at Mount Rushmore, that some of the tourists toting diaper bags and binoculars might also be packing heat.” Making it sound sinister, of course. That diaper-bag toting tourist is obviously a criminal-in-waiting, according to dims.

But if a dim is thinking this -- so are the real criminals. Do they know which tourist is packing heat? NO. But the fact that some are is a great detererent, isn't it? It's much easier for the criminal when he knows that law-abiding citizens are prevented from toting guns. But when citizens are allowed to, it's a different and dangerous story -- for the criminals, not for all the other tourists.

It never ceases to amaze me how totally nanny-ish these libs are.

___________________________________ 

The challenge is to follow a consistent plan despite inconsistent prices - Sarah Palin, State of the State of Alaska speech

guns

If I'm on a hiking trail in a national park...say, 20 miles and several hours away from ANY law enforcement...you're darn sure I want to be able to protect myself. But these clowns in Congress and the MSM, who have probably never been outside to get a suntan, have only a superficial view of this subject.

a big 10-4

Excellent post!

These morons forget there are four legged predators out in the wild too. All bears are not Yogi, and they use brute force, not humorous conniving to get picanic baskets.

You know that these clowns would be the first to yell and scream about somebody failing to protect them should something rude occur.

Personal responsibilty doesn't seem to be in their vocabulary.

I think that would be THE scariest moment

I think that would be THE scariest moment in the world when you're "on a hiking trail in a national park...say, 20 miles and several hours away from ANY law enforcement"...

...and Bubba and his bucktooth half-brother step out of the bushes onto the trail 30 feet in front of you...both wearing filthy overalls, greasy baseball caps twisted sideways, a lopsided grin...and both carrying a double-barrel 12 gauge...whoops... 

Hey! Hey! Hey!

Who the hell is reading bills in Congress?!!! I want him outta here! We stopped reading these things in January!

Did Joe Johns just fall off the turnip truck yesterday?

LOL-The dems have done this for years. Where has Joe been hiding?

-Dave

It actually makes sense. 

It actually makes sense.  Credit card companies have lots of money so they probably own outright lots of congressmen from both parties.  They probably had more input into the writing of that bill than congress.  And their creatures will not hold back their owner's legislation.  All of this makes for a very safe vehicle for a pet amendment.

Re owning Congressmen

Fox News pointed out today that Joe Biden (from Delaware) has been the credit card companies' man in Congress for decades, and for this bill signing he just happened to be out of the country.

Deputy Barney Fife Biden

I was wondering were Deputy Barney Fife Biden was.

Let me guess...they didn't

Let me guess...they didn't read the bill before voting? No speed reader?

The Vermont Exemption?

Most stories and opinion pieces on carrying firearms in national parks paint it as a very bad idea, that it will lead to mayhem brought about by gun nuts visiting the parks. So how does that fit in with life in Vermont?

Vermont, the state that many class as the most liberal/progressive state (and filled w/many a nut), basically has no gun control laws. The only requirements that residents need to carry concealed are a gun and a warm body. No permits required. Considering that Vermont can also be viewed as a big wooded park that attracts tourists from across the nation, why do they not have continual mayhem? Why do the liberal anti-gun folks leave this particular state alone? Why don't they attempt to force the VT citizens to disarm, be a role model for the rest of us?

And while we're at it, why do the libs continue to dump on Texas for attempting to reaffirm their 10th Amendment rights, suggesting secession? After all, it is Vermont that has beat the "secede" drum for many years and louder than any other state. Just a few years ago the Daily Kos folks polled over 61% in favor of Vermont independence. And there was the time when then Lt. Gov. Howard Dean attended numerous townhall meetings across the state, discussing the issue and recording the numbers of residents who wanted to secede. Nary a negative word from the media or Democrats.

So what is it about Vermont that makes them such an exemption?

Re The Vermont Exemption

Easy answer, it's acceptable to talk about secession under a Republican President.

When Bush Was President, Secession Talk Was Cool: http://legalinsurrection.blogspot.com

Very true......

Very true, but not lost on me.

Guess my point is that we do need to pound the media on these issues, write the emails, etc. I've always done so, sometimes get a reply, but the numbers need to be greater. That is a problem for Conservatives, Libertarians, Republicans and Independents. We don't use a bullhorn! The opposition does!

Every article I read about gun control I email the author about Vermont. This really is the do-as-I-say, not-as-I do-state. Not surprisingly, many journalists just assume that firearms are tightly controlled in VT w/o an ounce of research.

Since I do know that liberals do visit this site and make comments, any willing to address VT? Is there a reason why you believe that residents there should have full 2nd Amendment rights including the right to carry concealed? By not attacking VT first, by remaining silent on the issue means that you do somehow believe that Mr. Dean's state is an exception. I'd just like to know the why, the justification for these very special Americans? And on the issue of secession...........

Outstanding! Credit cards and guns...

Outstanding!  Credit cards and guns...

The Beretta 92 that would've cost me $550 will now cost me close to $1000...$550 for the gun, and $450 for credit card interest and fees...

Guess I better buy two of them...

Don't bother...

You can't get ammo anyway.

In California...

  In So. Cal, when you go into a National park the park rangers will warn you about staying aware that you may run into places where they're growing marijuana, or possibly see a tent set up for making meth - these people will shoot you to protect their 'investment', so you have to be careful. I think it's only right that we have the ability to defend against both 4 legged and 2 legged animals in our national parks!

 

 

 

 

"If I had a world of my own, everything would be nonsense. Nothing would be what it is, because everything would be what it isn't."