On Friday’s American Morning, CNN anchor Kiran Chetry used the liberal talking points about Wanda Sykes and Rush Limbaugh, the two “Wingnuts of the Week,” according to John Avlon of The Daily Beast, Tina Brown’s Huffington Post knock-off site. After playing clips from Sykes’ now-infamous routine which bashed the talk show host and wished him dead, Chetry replied, “So, some would say, wait, she’s just a comedian, and she was trying to get laughs at the correspondents’ dinner. So what’s the harm in her joke, and why do her comments qualify her for wingnut of the week?” Later, the anchor asked Avlon concerning Limbaugh, “He’s certainly really dominated the voice of the GOP for -- for the past several months, and, you know, the left has been saying he’s the new voice of the Republican Party. Why did you pick him as the wingnut of the week?” [audio excerpt available here]
The CNN program began the “Wingnut of the Week” last week with Avlon, as a proposed regular segment on Fridays targeting, in his words, “the professional polarizers, the unhinged activists, the folks who are trying to always hijack our debates and divide us.” His picks last week were Representative Michelle Bachmann, for her recent anti-Jimmy Carter remark, and former Representative Cynthia McKinney, for comparing herself to Rosa Parks and referring to Washington, DC as a “Zionist-occupied government.”
This week, at the end of the 6 am Eastern hour of American Morning, Chetry brought back Avlon, whom she introduced as an “independent analyst,” as well as “a columnist for TheDailyBeast.com, and the author of ‘Independent Nation,’” for his picks. Avlon who proclaims himself as a man of the center, took the easy route and picked Wanda Sykes as his “wingnut” on the left, and since Sykes attacked Limbaugh, he, of course, had to pick him as his “wingnut” on the right.
After the sound bite of Sykes’s Limbaugh-bashing route, Chetry asked her “she’s just a comedian” question. Avlon first hinted that there may have been a hint of truth in her outrageous joke, but continued by stating it was still appropriate:
AVLON: I think even with the generous discount for edu-comedy, Wanda Sykes went over the edge. It should always be too soon for a 9/11 joke, especially with the president an arm’s length away. And when a roomful of folks -- the White House correspondents, folks who are supposed to add to the civility of our debate, are laughing out loud to jokes about somebody’s kidneys failing or somebody -- somebody’s drug addiction, I think it’s a sign of the way that we start to dehumanize people who disagree with us in American politics.
Chetry then played a “sampling” from Limbaugh’s program from earlier this week. When she asked her “new voice of the Republican Party,” the “independent analyst” decided to not only bash the talk show host, but also get in a shot at Dick Cheney:
CHETRY: All right. There you have it. He’s certainly really dominated the voice of the GOP for -- for the past several months, and, you know, the left has been saying he’s the new voice of the Republican Party. Why did you pick him as the wingnut of the week?
AVLON: Well, because the man is a professional polarizer. That’s what he does, and he is the source of a lot of the GOP’s problems, even if they don’t fully get it. And it’s not just the left who are saying Limbaugh is the face of the Republican Party -- it’s the newest -- the newest dittohead Dick Cheney. So this is a real problem. This guy is adding to this hunt for heretics -- this obsessive social litmus test that’s going on in the Republican Party, that’s leading them to try to excommunicate any folks who differ -- screw with them, including members of the McCain family. So, you know, if they don’t make a bigger tent, all that’s going to be left is the circus, and they’re going to be wondering why they are a declining party, preaching to a shrinking base. It’s because they’re focused on the past, not the future.
CHETRY: The problem is that he’s not an elected official within the GOP. He’s just a radio talk show host.
AVLON: Yeah, and that’s a sign of the deep dysfunction of our politics right now, that he has such a disproportionate influence, that members of Congress are afraid of being attacked by Rush Limbaugh. That is a sign of a politics that’s gone completely off-center. And taking on Rush Limbaugh is going to be an important role for whoever’s going to lead the GOP to the next generation -- really building beyond the base, reaching back into the center, and really appeal to some independents, who they should be able to build bridges with. But not as long as deeply polarizing political figures are their face.
Speaking of the “obsessive social litmus test,” Avlon must be unaware of how the momentum on one social issue is shifting towards the typical Republican stance. Gallup released a poll on Friday which indicated that for the first time, “more Americans [are] “pro-life” than “pro-choice” on the issue of abortion. 51% of respondents considered themselves to be against abortion, while 42% considered themselves to be for “choice” on the issue. But that probably won’t discourage Avlon, the former deputy policy director for notoriously “pro-choice” Rudy Giuliani’s 2008 presidential campaign (not to mention his work for Clinton’s 1996 campaign), from continuing to press for the Republicans to become a “bigger tent.” That must be why Kathleen Parker is such a big fan of this “independent analyst.”
—Matthew Balan is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.





AVLON: I think even with the generous discount for edu-comedy, Wanda Sykes went over the edge. It should always be too soon for a 9/11 joke, especially with the president an arm’s length away. And when a roomful of folks -- the White House correspondents, folks who are supposed to add to the civility of our debate, are laughing out loud to jokes about somebody’s kidneys failing or somebody -- somebody’s drug addiction, I think it’s a sign of the way that we start to dehumanize people who disagree with us in American politics.














Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Oh to me this is
May 15, 2009 - 12:48 ET by bigtimerOh to me this is funny...typical CNN to-boot.
Cheney is the newest ditto-head...oh puhleeze....Cheney has been on Rush's show plenty of times previously...plus Cheney is his own man...
CNN really needs to get a grip...oh wait a minute...they can't do that...after-all, they are never happy, their agenda is never fulfilled, leftists are always empty, nothing satisfies them.
Nothing.
Even the destruction of this country wouldn't be good enough, and lord knows they are trying their best.
The left is always telling the RNC how to speak, who to pick to run ....blah blah blah...
...and Tina Brown and the Daily Beast....what a joke...no bias there now is there?
Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart
CNN and friends aren't
May 15, 2009 - 13:38 ET by CortillaenCNN and friends aren't hardly even pretending to be more than political activists anymore. As for Mr. Cheney, the WaPo article against him yesterday was bad enough that it even got me to rip it apart. It's ironic that people think painting Mr. Cheney as the new face of the Reps is a bad thing when he's just doing what they all should be.
www.daybydaycartoon.... Proving that conservative comedy is very real.
"With your mind as high as Mt. Fuji you can see all things clearly. And you can see all the forces that shape events; not just the things near to you." - Miyamoto Musashi
You are exactly right as
May 15, 2009 - 13:45 ET by bigtimerYou are exactly right as far as I am concerned Cort...you hit the nail right on the head.
Plus did you see this today?
Hope they are happy.
Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart
No, I hadn't gotten around
May 15, 2009 - 14:10 ET by CortillaenNo, I hadn't gotten around to my news sites yet, but that doesn't surprise me at all. What would surprise me is if any of the major media save fox report that Obama, after releasing the damaging information, refuses to release the vindification and validation of everything that was done. If people knew that this "torture" has already saved lives, they might not be as quick to demonize Reps as heartless and whatnot.
EDIT: Holder - "It is not our intention to try to advance a political agenda or to hide things from the American people." Wow. Just, wow. That is possibly the most bald-faced, blatant lie I've ever heard.
www.daybydaycartoon.... Proving that conservative comedy is very real.
"With your mind as high as Mt. Fuji you can see all things clearly. And you can see all the forces that shape events; not just the things near to you." - Miyamoto Musashi
Cort... Your reaction is
May 15, 2009 - 14:22 ET by bigtimerCort...
Your reaction is exactly how I felt when I read it.
Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart
I'm supposed to be lazy,
May 15, 2009 - 15:43 ET by CortillaenI'm supposed to be lazy, and here you go making me write updates. At this rate, I may actually end up posting more than once a year. XD
www.daybydaycartoon.... Proving that conservative comedy is very real.
"With your mind as high as Mt. Fuji you can see all things clearly. And you can see all the forces that shape events; not just the things near to you." - Miyamoto Musashi
Kiran Chetry as with all the other MSMers are hoping RUSH
May 15, 2009 - 12:52 ET by upcountrywaterWill mention then on his show, if only 1% of Rushbo listeners tune in the MSM ratings will get boosted by 50%..
All about ratings folks.
Reagan VS 0bama
I think there's a healthy
May 15, 2009 - 12:57 ET by Chris NormanI think there's a healthy dose of jealousy, hatred, and politics in there also.
The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.
"So what’s the harm in
May 15, 2009 - 12:55 ET by Chris Norman"So what’s the harm in her joke"
Either Chetry is making a caricature of a "neutral" journalistic question, or she, too, has a mean streak in her. I wonder if she would be so "neutral" if Sykes had wished Jack Cafferty would get liver disease or said Roland Martin was the twentieth hijacker - not that many people know who these CNN jackasses are.
The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.
I don't remember CNN or
May 15, 2009 - 12:57 ET by eaglewingz08I don't remember CNN or others coming to the defense of Don Imus when he made his unfunny and tastless, 'nappy haired hos' and I don't remember Obama coming to Don Imus' defense with the claim that he's a comedian. Double standards? Twisted standards from liberals? Even though Imus apologized again and again, Sykes and her defenders have not uttered a word of apology for her tasteless and unfunny comments. I mean where would you even get the thought that Rush in his wildest dreams would think about hijacking a plane and blowing up the WTC or any gov't building? Doesn't comedy rely upon at least some tangential relationship between the truth, the premise and the supposed 'punch line'. So what was it that about the punch line of Sykes joke that made Obama laugh? The same things that made him laugh at Rev. Wright's sermons? You know the ones he never really actually evah heard? Can't you picture Obama laughing the same way when he 'heard' the 'chickens are coming home to roost?
Not much of a stretch after seeing him at the WHCD. Has that abbreviation now changed into "White House Crackers Demonizers" ?
Does the "Wackiness on Both
May 15, 2009 - 13:11 ET by BKeyserDoes the "Wackiness on Both Sides" banner refer to the anchor desk?
Dumped by Fox News
May 15, 2009 - 13:17 ET by slickwillie2001Chetry is a brainless twit. She was at Fox News until a couple of years ago when they figured it out and decided not to renew her contract. Good riddance.
CNN political analysis is an oxymoron
May 15, 2009 - 13:22 ET by GalvanicCNN's analysis consists of receiving and regurgitating talking points from the White House-Media Matters-MoveOn information factory.
Rahm Emanuel and his ilk decided that while the most important (i.e. biggest) government spending decisions of our lifetimes were hastily being rushed into legislation, they needed a distraction that would rally their supporters and demonize the GOP to independents: Rush Limbaugh is the face of the GOP.
The networks and CNN have run with this ludicrous carp for weeks now, and what passes for political analysis in these news organizations continues to rest on it.
Well, let's make Jeaneanne Garofalo the Face of the Democratic Party. Hell, why not?
Hey Galv... She does fit
May 15, 2009 - 13:30 ET by bigtimerHey Galv...
She does fit that picture perfectly!
Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart
It's interesting how
May 15, 2009 - 14:02 ET by fitzfongIt's interesting how CNN/Daily Beast names Rush Limbaugh as "wingnut of the week" for being attacked. Last I checked, he hadn't even commented about Wanda Sykes' jokes, so he's a "wingnut" for not responding? And to the intellectual infant at the Daily Beast, the split between conservatives and the McLame family has NOTHING to do with a "social litmus test". It has everything to do with the economic illiteracy McLame/Grahamnesty/Snowe/Collins/Crist/Schwarzenegger wing of the party and their laziness in not getting properly educated on the subject.
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." -Winston Churchill
Scratch a liberal ...
May 15, 2009 - 14:32 ET by KC MulvilleWho the hell are these idiots to exclude people from the public debate? Who elected these idiots to decide who gets to speak?
This little segment is designed to pick out, target, ostracize, ridicule, and attack anyone who forwards arguments that the "hosts" don't like. They target their opponents. To retain a public sense of balance, to suggest that they're not being partisan, they pick out people from both sides. But that doesn't mean a damned thing - they have no right to do it in the first place. No thank you. CNN is not offering a public service by acting as censor.
The most arrogant part of journalism is the idea that they have the right to censor the public debate. They want to frame it, present it, and completely control it. That's fascism.
"And it’s not just the
May 15, 2009 - 14:40 ET by winston smith"And it’s not just the left who are saying Limbaugh is the face of the Republican Party -- "
Okay, and the new "wingnut" face of the Democrat party is Nancy Pelosi --- and What a face that is! And please John Avlon, cite one iota of proof that members of Congress are "afraid of being attacked by Rush Limbaugh". You can't because you have none. Just more liberal media spin. Also cite proof that the GOP is "losing their base" because of Rush Limbaugh. If the GOP is losing their base, it's because they've moved left, not right. GOP voters are more concerned with their party turning into some kind of Democrat Party lite, than they are about a radio talkshow host. Everytime I hear a liberal Democrat start giving advice on how to better the GOP, that's when I belly-laugh and switch the channel.
Hah !
May 15, 2009 - 15:30 ET by lmarie373I have a really profound respect to the NB journalist they sacrifice by watching CNN, ABC,CBS,PBS, and all the other left bias media in order to give us the truth in what the press pass as "news" no amount of money would make me watch this @#$*!
*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
napolitano must resign!
http://www.grassfire...
Via Free republic!
http://www.freerepub...
Think of it as a sitcom instead
May 15, 2009 - 16:14 ET by gopcongressIf you think of it as a sitcom rather than as news, then you can report the news just like another comedy show. At least WE know it's comedy...sick comedy at best, admittedly.
______________________
Moderate... Democrat... Liberal... Progressive... Socialist... Communist—The progression is clear as day.
The Mainstream Media is Neither
May 15, 2009 - 16:09 ET by gopcongressRemember the tiresome catchphrase back in the 80's when the socialists stated "The Moral Majority is neither"...?
Well, the same analogy can be given for the new double-M phrase. It is now quite logical to state:
"The Mainstream Media are neither."
(Note: "Media" is plural for "medium", although many people, including myself, tend to think of it as a singular term. I've been told that it is also considered as an "abjectified noun," which allows media to be used as a singular entity. But I digress.)
_____________________
Moderate... Democrat... Liberal... Progressive... Socialist... Communist—The progression is clear as day.
Kiran Chetry at one time worked for Fox.
May 15, 2009 - 16:11 ET by jawebster1I guess they figured they did not need a female Alan Colmes. I take that back. Alan Colmes is Liberal, but as far as I know he isn't mean and doesn't think that Rush Limbaugh dying is funny. One more example why I watch Fox and not CNN or worse, MSNBC. Jim Webster
He gives no proof that
May 15, 2009 - 16:11 ET by snaggletoothieHe gives no proof that members of congress are afraid of Limbaugh. But I believe they are. No one outside of the MSM, DC and NYC have any respect for the pack of theives in congress. So they are wise to not anger someone who is respected by many Americans. Members of congress are weak because by their own actions they daily make themselves objects of disgust.
Kiran
May 16, 2009 - 02:06 ET by BondPlainBondFox News is well rid of Ms Chetry. She's being successfully channelled through Shepard Smith, though.
She Was Never Like This On Fox
May 17, 2009 - 08:31 ET by EdCoyneKiran Chetry was never like this while she was on FNC. However, she goes to CNN and becomes a lefty mouthpiece? She was either always a lefty and was forced to keep her mouth shut, by FNC or she's not really a lefty and instead is just a political whore to whoever employs her.
It's a shame, too, because I used to love her on FNC.
Ed Coyne
www.PoliCalc.com