CNN Panel Tries to Push Republicans Into Saying Cheney Should 'Just Shut Up'

Photo of Matthew Balan.
  • Bookmark and Share

Roland Martin, CNN Anchor; Jessica Yellin, CNN Correspondent; Drew Griffin, CNN Correspondent; & Lisa Bloom, truTV anchor | NewsBusters.orgThree CNN personalities and one regular commentator on Monday’s No Bias, No Bull program all tried to get Republicans Bay Buchanan and Kevin Madden to disown former Vice President Dick Cheney, and agree with some unnamed Republicans who call for him to “just shut up.” Host Roland Martin characterized Cheney’s multiple media appearances recently as “turning into a big problem for the family of Republicans” and that “some Republicans wish the former V.P. would just shut up.”

Correspondent Jessica Yellin and Drew Griffin saw no good in the politician’s media tour, with Yellin labeling Cheney “one of the least popular figures in the Republican Party, aside from Rush Limbaugh.” She asked Buchanan, “Why is it good for him to speak out as such an unpopular guy?” TruTV’s Lisa Bloom agreed with the unnamed Republicans: “I think a lot of Republicans probably wish Cheney was secured in an undisclosed location right about now.”

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Martin began the segment, which began ten minutes into the 8 pm Eastern hour of the CNN program, by playing three sound bites from some of Cheney’s recent interviews. After introducing his two guests, he asked Buchanan, “Now, Bay, the Republican leader in the Senate, Mitch McConnell, recently called the Bush presidency a ‘millstone around our necks.’ Does having Dick Cheney out on the talk show circuit help Republicans in any way?”

Buchanan thought it did help: “We have to speak out against the president’s policies when we disagree with them. And so on two points, Cheney should be out there. Number one, he believes that what Obama is doing is damaging this country’s security....And secondly, he can get through the groupies in the media -- the Obama groupies -- he can be heard....So, he represents many, many of us who believe that somebody’s got to take on these policies of Obama, and let Americans know that’s not where Republicans would go.”

Yellin then interjected, telling Buchanan, “Okay, Bay, let’s get real. Dick Cheney is one of the least popular figures in the Republican Party, aside from Rush Limbaugh. Now he is aligning himself with Limbaugh, attacking one of the most popular figures, Colin Powell. So, the question is, why is it good for him to speak out as such an unpopular guy, especially when the former president himself has said it’s time to keep our silence and let the new president do his job?”

Buchanan answered by criticizing Powell, and tried to correct the correspondent’s assessment: “You know, Colin Powell...when it was to his advantage to associate with Republicans, he did so. And when it was to his advantage to abandon us, he did so. He does not agree with our economic policies. He does not agree with our social policies. He agrees with Obama, and now he says we should embrace this idea that, you know, go the Obama way....Why do we even need us if we’re going to agree with Democrats? And so to suggest he is some popular figure in the Republican Party is a complete mistake, is an error.”

Martin responded to Buchanan as he prompted Madden for his take: “Kevin, first of all, when Cheney says, well, we don’t need to moderate, you have to have moderates in a party. You have to have more than just folks who are on the far-right, and so is it nuts for Bay to say that, well, Colin Powell agrees with nothing? He is a Republican.” The Republican strategist understood the anchor’s point, but didn’t entirely agree:

MADDEN: No. Well, two points. First of all, I have worked up on Capitol Hill, and when I was in -- I worked when we were in the majority, and the reason we were in the majority, Roland, was because we governed through the moderates. You look at many of these suburban areas, in places like Columbus, Ohio, places like Philadelphia -- seats that are now held by Democrats were once held by Republicans. So the way to govern a majority is through the moderates. Secondly, I think, look, I don’t think there was an attack on Colin Powell. I think that Vice President Cheney and Colin Powell have had their differences. Those differences are now public. But I do believe that, if we’re going to again regain the majority as a party, we have to look at the loss of Colin Powell as emblematic of our struggles with independents and moderate Democrats on national security issues and economic security issues. So as a party we can’t -- we don’t necessarily have to moderate. I agree with Vice President Cheney on that. What we have to do is modernize our message on issues like health care, energy, education, so that we reach this larger swathe of the American electorate.

Bloom and Griffin then entered into the discussion, continuing Martin and Yellin’s earlier points and bringing in poll numbers to support their argument:

BLOOM: Okay. Okay. But, Bay, only 27 percent of voters at this point are identifying as Republicans. Doesn’t the party have to expand its base, and do so immediately?

BUCHANAN: You know, the American people, if you look at that same poll, 33 percent, it has dropped for Democrats as well. And then there was a poll by Rasmussen last week that in a congressional ballot like they -- it was a generic ballot -- what was it? 39 percent went Republican and 40 percent went Democrats. That’s one percent.

BLOOM: Yeah, but the Democrats are not hurting right now. They are not in any trouble.

BUCHANAN: No, you’re wrong. You know, being in power is a tough thing. They no longer have Bush to kick around. They no longer have this idea of change, and so those things are gone for them. They have to run on their record. What they’re giving us is Barack Obama and this extreme agenda of his to spend us into oblivion, and that is going to be something they have to defend. In the meantime, we got to get fresh new faces, so the American people can see the future is these guys. Meanwhile, we got a couple of attack dogs doing some good work for us --

GRIFFIN: So, Bay, Bay, why not just tell Cheney to shut up and let Obama collapse under his own weight --

BUCHANAN: No, no, no -- look, look --

GRIFFIN: And the Republicans will just swoop into power?

BUCHANAN: You know, first of all, you can’t tell the former vice president to be quiet, because he feels a need to get out there and make sure the American people know that what this guy is doing is harmful to this nation. And, secondly, you need attack dogs. You don’t want to use your new, fresh faces as attack dogs. You want the old guys who has been in this and know it is a contact sport to get out there --

BLOOM: But I’ll tell you something, Roland --

BUCHANAN: And what has happened? Cheney now has your attention and Gibbs’ attention.

BLOOM: I think a lot of Republicans probably wish Cheney was secured in an undisclosed location right about now.

Martin let Madden have the last word at the end of the segment. He replied to Griffin’s earlier point about telling Cheney to shut up: “Real quick, to Drew’s point, I don’t remember anybody in the media saying that Bill Clinton and Jimmy Carter should have, you know, just shut up and go away when they were making those arguments....Look -- Dick Cheney, whether the media likes it or not, is a national security expert, and he’s arguing these policies on principle.”

—Matthew Balan is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Speaks volumes about what

Speaks volumes about what these CNN folks consider "no bias", doesn't it.

Who is this moron hosting the show? I thought Campbell Bigmouth Brown had this show. Has she moved on to the White House?

 

 

<sound of duct tape ripping off roll>

Not only CNN...there was woman on Fox with Sheppard Smith just a few minutes ago.  I didn't catch her name, but Smith posed pretty much the same question: should Cheney just go back to Wyoming or wherever? 

And she said (paraphrasing) Well the Democrats, and probably some Republicans [emphasis added, and that's the part I'm certain of] wish he would go away.

How do they get away with this B as in B, S as in S?????

Without offering any examples, she claims that "probably" some Republicans are upset too.

 So now, they are already planting the idea that Republicans want him to shut up!

Talk about "managing" a story!!

Oh, and BTW, Smith led into the interview with some pap about how "it's been a tradition" for former Presidents and VP's....yada yada yada.... Yeah, right, Shep. 

You mean former Republican Presidents etc.

Can you say Jimmy Carter?  Al Gore? Bill Clinton????? Democrats all.  How dare Cheney break the tradition of meek Republicans!!!

They might say "Wow, that sucks!"  But at least they'll say "Wow!"  -Duff Goldman, the Ace of Cakes

From the Democrat Playbook

Don't debate, call the other side names and tell them to shutup. Seems to have worked against Bush so they will keep doing it.

I heard this on Rush today, whose kidneys are doing fine

no thanks to Ms. Sykes.  He had a good question.  If the Republican party is commiting suicide why shut them up?  Normally you allow the opposition to commit suicide.  The left absolutely fears the likes of Limbaugh, Hannity, Cheney, Buchanan, etc.  If they didn't, they would probably be more apathetic.  They're too stupid and too emotional to do otherwise.

 

 

When the people fear the government it's called tyranny, when the government fears the people it's called liberty!

re: the last part of the

re: the last part of the article, I remember MANY people on this site getting very mad at Clinton and Carter for speaking out against Bush policies. 

 

So what if they did?

The point here is the media is acting like they have substantial information from other Republicans asking Cheney to shut up.  I wonder who these people are?

 

When the people fear the government it's called tyranny, when the government fears the people it's called liberty!

True. I doubt there are a

True. I doubt there are a lot of Republicans who have said as much, esp. on the record. 

Its just started

We are just getting started and we need many more people with the clout to stand up to the Dems and PEBO in particular whenever they slander the past president or Repubs in general. 

"For a people who are free, and who mean to remain so, a well-organized and armed militia is their best security."

Remind me of who Bush blamed for anything?

I remember MANY people on this site getting very mad at Clinton and Carter for speaking out against Bush policies. 

There is a little differance between one defending themselves,, and ridiculing their policies for the heck of it. The left proove everyday they have no use for an honest debate. they seem to only be able to dictate and slime.

 

My Gov. thinks I am dangerous, so be careful

"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg

Re defense

Right; VP Cheney didn't speak up out of the blue, he defended himself and his administration from a slanderous attack from the Bamster himself and his administration abetted by the liberal media. The Bamster could have forgotten all his nonsense from the campaign and the liberal media would have let it be forgotten. The Bamster foolishly made the decision to go through this door. To expect VP Cheney to not defend himself is ridiculous.

This in no way compares to Clinton or Carter's grandstanding.

There is a difference in

There is a difference in defending the policies of one's own administration and accusing the present administration of making the nation "less safe".

Jer

If you don't agree with former Vice President Cheney...

...then perhaps you should ask an expert on the outcome of appeasement.

Unfortunately, Neville Chamberlain's dead, so you'll just have to study the results of the tactic instead.

--Mike 

www.thebrattonreport...

Really now Uncle Jer. Really?

  He said the the programs the Bush administration set up kept the nation from getting attacked for 7.5 years.

  He then said the Obama administration is now unraveling those very same programs.

  Jeeze Louise, slap me silly. That is the most groundless accusation ever. Uncle Jer should personally shut him up. Those kind of statements are over the top oh my dear lord I am going to faint please someone help me.

  Thank the lord above we have Uncle Jer watching our back. Uncle Dick might say something that would truly be maddening.

  You stick it to him Uncle Jer! You stick it to him! 

Sincerely,

a Veteran of a 1000 psychic wars.

Well, JWF..

I could be wrong, but something tells me if the circumstances were reversed, you would be "sticking it" to the one making the charges a good deal more vigorously, and employing considerably more flowery language, than have I.

Jer

"I wish" I knew what you "were talking" about.

  But the constant "use" of quote "quotey marks" unquote is "quite" "distracting".

  Do you hate me Uncle Jer? You do. I know. Once again, I had to go look for the actual article just like I would have to do for the t... oh I almost said it.

  Now. I don't watch CNN or crazyMSNBC. I do watch Fox news. So this is where my quote comes from. Nowhere is the article can I find the """"less safe""""" that you found so disheartening, so disquieting, so absolutely bone chilling frightful, you felt it neccessary to surround with the TikTiks for it could escape the fence and kill someone. No. We got 'er roped in with the TikTiks. No harm will come to all.

Bottom line is we successfully defended the nation for seven and a half years against a follow-on attack to 9/11. That was a remarkable achievement. Nobody would have thought that was possible, but it was. I believe it was possible because of the policies we had in place, which they’re now dismantling.

 http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?docID=news-000003115489

  Oh, and my flowery language. I don't recall Clinton or Gore saying George W. Bush was making us " "less" "safe" ". But if you care to look for a comment from me, I might be reminded.

Sincerely,

a Veteran of a 1000 psychic wars.

Delete

Delete

bal, see my comment above,

bal, see my comment above, regarding ex-Presidents.

They might say "Wow, that sucks!"  But at least they'll say "Wow!"  -Duff Goldman, the Ace of Cakes

Regardless of whether

Regardless of whether conservatives liked it or not, you never heard the news media orchestrating a campaign for Clinton and Carter to just “shut up and go away”

Exactly, though we wished they would...

the media normally defends the liberal cause for them.  However, they do have a right to speak out regardless of utterly ridiculous it may be.

 

 

When the people fear the government it's called tyranny, when the government fears the people it's called liberty!

But media outlets such as

But media outlets such as CNN weren't having round table discussions at the time asking if Clinton and Carter should just shut up and then attributing those sentiments to unknown Democrats.

I'm sure many democrats and liberals on blogs are right now asking for Chenney to shut up and go away when they weren't asking for Clinton or Carter to shut up when they were previously bashing Bush's policies.

It's the double standard in the media regarding 2 very similar situations between democrats vs republicans that gets really annoying.

I wonder if FN had such

I wonder if FN had such discussions. I imagine you're right that there wasn't a similar discussion when Clinton and Carter did it, but I'll have to do some digging and see if I can find anything.

balboa the exception that proves the rule troll

  What does that have to do with liberals on CNN trying to act as if they know what Republicans ought to do?

  Personally, I wish balboa the exception that proves the rule troll would shut up.

One wonders...

 

Since I hold the MSM in such low disregard, if they will go away to some undisclosed location and keep their damned mouths shut and let the country enjoy a little piece and quiet, free from all the yammering and gnashing of teeth over what the former Vice-President has to say.

Y'all really don't need to hang around and squeal everytime somebody with more brains than you has something intelligent to say.

 

http://gjresult.com

 

'turning into a big problem for the family of Republicans'

Whose side are they on? Why would they want us to up if we are self-destructing?

JDW

DAILY WAVE

When people fear their government there is tyranny.

When government fears the people there is liberty.

They have to pretend that

They have to pretend that they're actually trying to "help" the Republicans...you know, because they "value" the two-party system....

They might say "Wow, that sucks!"  But at least they'll say "Wow!"  -Duff Goldman, the Ace of Cakes

Value

Their first 100 plus days of success have been beyond comprehension. Allow their party to bath in the warm mothers milk of their efforts and we can reevaluate in 18 months. 

JDW

DAILY WAVE

When people fear their government there is tyranny.

When government fears the people there is liberty.

Let's rename the show.

It should be called "No Bias?  Bull."

--Mike 

www.thebrattonreport...

These Leftist shills don't see Vice President Cheney..

These Leftist shills don't see Vice President Cheney for what he is: a patriot. You might, and they certainly would, argue the point, but there is no doubt where Vice President Cheney's allegiance is. It is with the United States. On the other hand, where is the allegiance of CNN and their propagandists?

This is simply another

This is simply another attempt by the thought police at CNN in concert with the White House to silence all dissent.  Look back to when the dimocrats were out of power and they were all about how dissent was every Americans right. 

Meanwhile, it is Powell who is the least popular in the Republican party not Cheney or Limbaugh.  As Cheney opined, "is Powell still in the Republican party?"  Powell campaigned and voted for the first stupid liberal.  

Of course, we do not want to harken back to a typical Powell statement (he really has not said anything new in his recent pronouncements) when after September 11th and upon visiting Afghanistan, he envisioned a Afghani government with "moderate" elements of the Taliban in it. 

There was talk back in the day of asking Powell to run for VP or president.  I am sure glad that never came to pass.  Obviously, Powell is left of even McCain on most issues.  

I’ll consider buying this

I’ll consider buying this claptrap as soon as they can show me the archive footage of the MSM applauding Joe Lieberman and Zell Miller for holding positions contrary to the Democrat party.

Re buying this

Hannity on his radio show just played that old clip of Hillary literally screaming about how patriotic it is to dissent.

I'd also forgotten how grating she can be, but that's another story.

Yeah, I just heard that as

Yeah, I just heard that as well.  Isn’t it amazing that the media only value dissent when Republicans are in power.

"...with Yellin labeling

"...with Yellin labeling Cheney “one of the least popular figures in the Republican Party..." 

With who - Democrats and the media?

These are the kind of throw away premise lines that aren't true but aren't challenged. Everyone just accepts them as a given because some reporter says it.

As far as these shows go, they may as well video tape the chatter at a Democratic fundraiser in the Upper West Side or LA. That's why I say: 

The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.

...

Where were these B.O.zo supporters when Jimma Carter was making the rounds criticizing President Bush?  He and Al Gore never stopped yapping their traps. 

It's great to see Dick Cheney.  It reminds me of what seems like soooo long ago of having adults in the White House.  We went from a cowboy to a metrosexual and the Taliban know it, so they're amping up their attacks.  God help us.

 They are angry becuase

 They are angry becuase Cheney is their intellectual superior and they cannot offer anything but drivel to counter his arguements.

Yep

Just saw Cheney on Cavuto, he hurt some more feelings today. Thanks goodness he and others (Rove, Delay) are stepping up.

 

My Gov. thinks I am dangerous, so be careful

"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg

I usually only DVR Beck, O'Reilly and Hannity...

but I heard Cheney was going to be on Cavuto's show so I DVR'd it too.  Can't wait to watch it tonight.  Cheney is my favorite elective Republican since Reagan and I have a feeling I don't stand alone.  Jim Webster

Jim - You definitely don't stand alone! I admire Dick Cheney

very much. The drive-by media's treatment of Dick Cheney is one of the primary reasons why I detest them.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

“The media is a disgrace.  You have forfeited any notion that you once had of respect” ~ Rush Limbaugh

Shut Them Up

Why isn't anyone even mentioning the we had to put up with 8 years of that idiot Al Gore as he trashed the Bush Administration at every turn.  Not to mention Carter, Clinton or any number of other KoolAid drinkers in government, the media, etc.

Now, all of a sudden, it's not proper for a VP to speakout.  PLEEEEAAAAASSSSSEEEE!!!! 

 

Dick Cheney is drawing flak...

from the Dems and the media (same thing) for one reason.  He is good.  No Liberal has ever beaten Cheney in a debate and that is why they are doing their best to get him to shut up.  To illustrate how desperate they are to get Cheney to shut up they even invoke unnamed Republicans as people who agree with them.  I will name one of those Republicans.  Colin Powell, or as they are better known, RINOs!  Jim Webster

Awww, the wittle liberals

Awww, the wittle liberals are having a problem with America not buying into their BS about water boarding being effective and not torture.  Let's put this in the proper perspective, the Democrats raised the issue because they wanted a strawman argument about how evil and mean Bush and Cheney were.  Typical of Obama and the Dems, they don't have the depth on the issue and can only succeed with a strawman argument, i.e. putting the words in someones mouth and then knocking them down.  The Strawman had the audacity to stand up and knock the poor little Dems down.  AWWWWWW, poor little Dems, they got knocked on their butts because they politicized the water boarding issue.

Dick Cheney has every right to speak up, as long as the Dems open their yaps and talk about the past, everyone they made to look bad has the right to speak out and correct the record.  To claim Cheney should be quiet in order to look forward, is talking out of both sides of their mouths.  The fact that libs can't even win the argument in front of the American people with Cheney talking speaks to how weak their position is.

Fact:  If standard interrogation methods would have gotten the job done with the 911 mastermind, then the Bush Admin wouldn't have needed to find out how far they could go in their interrogation methods BEFORE it was considered torture. Water boarding was ok as one of the methods according to the DOJ.

Fact: The 911 mastermind had to be waterboarded to foil a plot to crash planes into a LA Bank building.  If he would have given up the info with standard methods (allowed in the Army Field Manual), then no water boarding would have been used, period.

Conclusion:  If Al Gore were running things instead of Bush, we would have had planes crash into the LA Bank building.

Here's the upshot, since Obama is considering water boarding torture and thus won't use it, He is completely responsible for ANY terrorist act.  Especially so if the standard methods didn't get the info to stop it with the person they are holding knew it.

Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, starving the poor one gallon of ethanol at a time. Fill your tank with E85 and cull a village.

Conclusion:  If Al Gore

Conclusion:  If Al Gore were running things instead of Bush, we would have had planes crash into the LA Bank building.

If Al Gore were running things we would not have had planes crash into the LA Bank Building.  All they needed to do was send Gore to yell at the guy,  Now that's torture.

More Cheney, please. A lot more.

I consider myself to be somewhat right of center and I, for one, would like to see a lot more of Cheney, not less.  Same goes for Giuliani and Romney.  All come off as extremely rational, lucid and well-spoken, especially when  compared to the overly emotional and unprofessional "journalists" peppering them with boilerplate lib talking points.

These slanted Obama Worshipers are afraid of Cheney having his say and making his points in such an effective manner.  Thus we get Roland spouting his hysterical wishful thinking about "some Republicans wanting him to shut up".  

Really, Mr. Fathead?  Like who?

I was always amazed to watch Cheney absolutely destroy Russert on Meet the Press, even after Russert and his researchers had had an entire week to prepare what they hoped would be a series of question that would back Cheney into a corner.

By the way, how much lower can CNN go when they have F'ing Roland The Race-Baiter Martin serving as a moderator?  Wasn't James Carville or Donna Brazile available?

 

...

I haven't even seen the video, and I can point out more bias that Matt didn't have time or space to deal with.

 Look at the background:  "Cheney On The Attack"

One of the things you learn in studying political science is that Americans hate conflict.  It's why Congress almost always has lower approval ratings than the Executive branch, and why the Supreme Court usually tops them both.  Saying that Cheney is "On The Attack" is a phrase designed, ironically, to attack.

Al Gore attacks scientists who have hard evidence backing their claim that the globe is now cooling, rather than warming - and attacks them as Holocaust deniers.  Nobody uses the phrase "On The Attack."  Chris Dodd steamrolls in a self-righteous tizzy toward AIG and "overpaid" executives - nobody in the MSM accuses him of hypocrisy, OR of being "On The Attack."  Robert Gibbs...give us this day our daily snark, and forgives us not at all, as he is a biting, sarcastic press secretary - but nobody accused him of being "On The Attack", even when he was lambasting Rush Limbaugh.

Only Republicans go "On The Attack."

That's one heckuva coincidence, I'm sure...

"Attack" ->>> "Negative" / "Hate-filled"

Yep.  Saw the same thing consistently, month after month, during the campaign. Any criticism or disagreement with The Exalted One was always characterized as an "attack", and once they'd "established" that Obama's opponent had, in fact, "attacked" him, the Obama surrogates in the media would gradually make their way to asking "why is <Obama opponent> going negative?"

Labeling any criticism of Obama as an "attack" is a tried-and-true technique for them at this point.

CNN is attempting to remake itself. The cable network has always

leaned (perhaps bent over is a better word) to the left, but has been usurped on the left by far-left MSNBC. Consequently, CNN is losing liberal viewers and ratings to MSNBC.

So what is CNN going to do?  TVNEWSER reports that CNN is attempting to  "Seize the Middle Ground." CNN has created a Wingnuts of the Week segment on American Morning that supposedly highlights persons on the far-right and the far-left.

As CNN's American Morning Blog indicates: It builds on a simple premise – the far-right and the far-left are equally insane. 

Who does CNN define as far-left and far-right? Well, they definitely got the far-left correct. The first charter member of the far-left is the one and only Former Rep. Cynthia McKinney. Unfortunately, liberal CNN doesn't understand those of us on the right. Hence, they named Rep. Michele Bachman as the far-right insane person.

Expect CNN to continue it's ratings slide.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

“Nobody believes what the mainstream media says now anyway.  Except the uneducated, the illiterate, and the uninformed -- which, sadly, is a fairly large number” ~ Rush Limbaugh 

 

No sweat about Cheney...

Let him talk! Of course they want him to shut up -- or to get other people to pressure him to shut up. I find it refreshing that he is speaking up, and I agree with him. And as for it splitting the Republican party, it's bull. The party needs to solidly stand for conservative values if it is to emerge again. Which is precisely why I believe there is such "talk" of it splintering. Again, it's just fear that the party may come on stronger and more solidly conservative -- now that would be scary for liberals. 

CNN

The only people whom need to 'shut up" are the CNN anchors. Along with NBC, CBS, ABC, MTV, PMSNBC and any other network that kisses Obama's ass!

It's the LIBTARDS who want Cheney silenced because he's ...

... making their boys look bad.  They know he would have made a better president than any of the choices we had last election.  He is also making too much sense for them to refute so if you can't compete with the facts silence the messenger.

Cheney and Limbaugh "taking shots" at Powell?

One of the recurring ideas I hear from the corrupted mainstream media is that Cheney and Limbaugh are "taking shots" at Powell for not being a real Republican and that it's a form of "attack" to suggest that he is not really a Conservative.

Likewise, if anyone dares to call a Liberal "a Liberal", then the Media will rail against it as a personal slur that hits below the belt and signals an end of civil public discourse.

Don't these two tendencies of the media suggest that Conservativism is alive and well in our country?

[Good believers in man-made global warming argue that "the debate is over". Good believers in science argue that "the debate is never over". Therefore, the former are anti-science.]

Who the hell is Lisa Bloomers? And who's yo momma?

Yeah like what qualifies her to give an opinion?  Personally, I hope Cheney lives forever!  And, I hope he never shuts up!  So there Bloomers!

We wouldn't even be hearing

We wouldn't even be hearing Cheney if it weren't for these Commies and their never-ending Bush Derangement Syndrome.

If they weren't talking about prosecuting Bush and his people and going on and on and on about this 'torture' nonsense, this thread and many like it concerning Cheney wouldn't even exist.

Cheney is having to defend his president and his administration to this very day and probably well into the future.

And God bless him for it.

One of the 34% who thinks George W. Bush was a great President. One of the 61% who wants to bring back the stock and pillory (yep...approval for Congress now at 39%...do you believe that!?).

I happened to see this

I happened to see this crap. They can't call this show "NO BIAS NO BULL" they have to call it "ALL BIAS ALL BULL" In reality they want Cheney to go away because he is criticizing Obama and exposing the danger he is putting the American people in, period. They also talked about a young man from a conservative private school that took his prom date to another schools dance. He was being disciplined for it and CNN was debating if it was right or wrong to do so. Why should CNN care? What business was this private matter theirs? It seemed a way of bashing conservative Christians nothing more nothing less. It is no crime for a private school to have these agreements with students.

Here is the reason why

Here is the reason why Cheney should just keep talking and raise the issue even when the Dems fall silent: http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/14/pelosi-the-cia-and-the-dems-dangerous-blame-game/

Now Pelosi is accusing the CIA of lying, imagine that, the lying loonytoon of the House is accusing the CIA of lying...  She been caught in the lie and now she has no choice but to flush herself and the Dem Party credibility down the hole defending a blatant obvious lie.

Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, starving the poor one gallon of ethanol at a time. Fill your tank with E85 and cull a village.

Yeah, Her Speakerness is

Yeah, Her Speakerness is flailing...her line has apparently changed to "they didn't tell me, and besides that, they lied about it..."

 They might say "Wow, that sucks!"  But at least they'll say "Wow!"  -Duff Goldman, the Ace of Cakes

Cheney in the media

I believe the media is to the point where they are manufacturing news in order to distract from the mismanagement of the government. Many comments here claim that the media want Cheney to go away and shut up but then how did he get on so many shows. The media want the old targets because they have no new targets. They can't spend all day spinning for the new administration or people will get bored and start to dismiss the spin. They need the distraction of an antogonist to keep the viewing public too occupied on emotions to examine what is actually being said. I hope Cheney keeps talking as well because if it were not for him the media would have to create something akin to the 'right wing attack machine'. Without an actual person talking the media will get RINOs to agree with tangetial points to arguments and use it as proof of an organized attack against their hero - Obama.

A person may be won over with logic and reason but the masses must be bought with spectacle and platitudes. - 2008 Elections

Of course they are!

Check out WTH's recent posts on Gary Sinise for the most recent example....

They might say "Wow, that sucks!"  But at least they'll say "Wow!"  -Duff Goldman, the Ace of Cakes

motherbelt,

I did read the piece on Sinise and I believe that is a different tactic all together. With Sinise, as with Powell, McCain and Specter, the media are trying to define the Republican Party but with Cheney and other created antagonist they are creating a distraction, perpetuating the myth of ‘Evil Republicans’ and creating enough news filler to prevent any one from asking why there is no reporting on the actions of Democrat controlled government.

A person may be won over with logic and reason but the masses must be bought with spectacle and platitudes. - 2008 Elections