"If someone said to you...I don’t think you should have the right to get married, wouldn’t you be ticked off?”

But Perez Hilton does have the right to get married. He just can't marry a pig, a cow, his dog, another man, three women, or a lamppost. What part of this doesn't Jane Velez-Mitchell understand?

“Why is it that people should be very polite when they’re told that they’re second-class citizens?"

Perez Hilton isn't a 2nd-class citizen. He's a no-class, rude little punk.

___________________________________ 

The challenge is to follow a consistent plan despite inconsistent prices - Sarah Palin, State of the State of Alaska speech

Marriage has been between a man and woman for many centuries and, SUDDENLY, in 2009, it's America that is "oppressive" and "close-minded" for not allowing men to marry men and women to marry women!!!  BAD, BAD, BAD AMERICA!!!

Oh, and we're all, of course, treating these poor people like 2nd class citizens.  The Aggrieved Victim Card, well-worn, in play again.  Hysterical.

BTW, can you imagine if some conservative blogger or celebrity was on the judging panel (yeah, fat chance, I know) and asked a contestant if she was pro-life or pro-2nd amendment....No need to take it any farther than that.  Can you IMAGINE the absolute $H*T storm that would ensue from the left, CNN, MS-NBC et al based on that question being asked alone?

So, it'd be OK to call Obama the "c" & "b" word  (or choice vile slang with a more masculine tilt) and to .. "f" off? 

Barack Obama opposes same-sex marriage. And a number of other leading Democrats and 'loved by the left' recognized folks aren't too comfy with gay marriage.

I wish someone had told me I couldn't get married.  It would have prevented a lot of headaches and heartaches.

CNN, pleeeeeez go under, and soon.

What used to be a cool innovation is just so tired and 'hackish' now.

One of the 34% who thinks George W. Bush was a great President. One of the 61% who wants to bring back the stock and pillory (yep...approval for Congress now at 39%...do you believe that!?).

I don't care what your personal feelings or views are on the subject of same-sex marriage.  Perez Hilton's YouTube rant was hate-filled, dispicable, bigotted and foul.  His self-absorbed tirade is the best example of what a real hate crime is, because there is nothing but hate spewed on this video.  And Velez-Mitchell is a fool to support this disgusting person.  The homosexual's intolerance for anyone who doesn't support their position is disturbing, but no one has the cajones to call them on the carpet for spreading hate.  It's a vicious double standard.

Why was that maniac Hilton judging a beauty contest? That
is kind of like asking Hannibal Lechter if he would judge the vegetable displays at the county fair. Both of these pukes are man eaters and you know the judging will be biased.

VELEZ-MITCHELL IS RIGHT. ***Disclaimer for the morons*** I DO NOT SUPPORT HOMOSEXUAL MARRIAGE. ****

That said, Velez Mitchell is right! If someone told any of us that we couldn't get married or that our marriages should summarily be annulled, all hell would break out and I doubt that any of us would be civil.

The problem is not Perez (hellbound homo) Hilton, no sir. The problem is ALL OF US who have lost the ability to object to PERVERSION and who CRAWL around like neutered CURS mumbling about "states rights"! That's the PROBLEM. The problem is that we think we can deny people something that we have NO LEGAL REASON to deny them and expect them to be fine with it! There is a CLEAR violation of the equal protection clause which if anything, just shows the FLAWS in the constitution which is man made and not sent from God. The problem is that we no longer have the BALLS the great hairy swingin' pair to say , "Homosexuals are a ABOMINATION in the sight of God and we will not tolerate their rise in our society and we CERTAINLY will NEVER change the definition of MARRIAGE to include the perversion they inflict on one another". 

It is ridiculous to expect people to agree with the limitations you seek to place on their lives, that however, does not change the fact that some limitations must be placed! I don't care how some FREAKCTY like Hilton "feels" I don't care about his sissy fit, I care about the courageous young girl who in faltering fashion found the courage to say, "this far and NO FURTHER".  

If you slide around looking for vague legalistic reasons to oppose something, about which your opposition is not really "legal" aren' t you just a LIAR? I don't know ANYONE who dislikes gays, their infiltration into our schools, their teaching of perversion to our children and their elimination of the words MOTHER AND FATHER from California textbooks, who does so on the basis of "law". If for instance you were suddenly in the minority, if the liberals brainwashed everyone and magically CHANGED THE LAW. Or if in five years, the libs manage to "win the hearts and minds" of the country and EVERY STATE has a majority which is FOR queer union, would you then be FOR IT? Would all of your moral and religious objection disappear now that you are in the minority? Sadly, this is probably true for a lot of folks, the "band-wagoneers", if you will. But most folks who object to homosexuality or gay marriage wouldn't be swayed by the popular or LEGAL opinion of others! Which means that the objection in the end, al fin, as they say in español, is that homosexuality is wrong BECAUSE GOD said so. Period. 

By relying on legalisms to oppose something morally you have already weakened your argument. Even "debating" the issue does your side a disservice because logically you have no real reason to object. It's as TRANSPARENT a DODGE as Al Gore's weakly offered, "there is no controlling authority" , when discussing his illegal acceptance of Commie dollars!

The Catholic Church has this right AND it's even in LINE with biblical teaching, rare for them, I know! Homosexuality is a DISORDER, a DEFECT, a perversion of the natural order to that which is against nature ( Romans 1:22-32). If a man had not invented a condom most homosexual men and a whole bunch of lezbos, would be DEAD from AIDS.  

To argue that a lifestyle which cannot be practiced BUT FOR a technological invention, is in anyway "natural" is an absurdity. When there are natural prohibitions like a disease which would wipe you all out as well as religious prohibitions against a behavior ( Gen 19, Sodom and Gommorah) it's just plain WRONG. 

We shouldn't slide around and try to protect peoples "feelings" when giving an answer. Their feelings are being manipulated by Satan in the first place to desire the overthrow of God's natural order. So they are going to hate you for your opposition no matter how much cotton candy you pack it with.  

Hello! Mr. Balan it's OK.. Thanks  for your  Column.-

Who is this individual PEREZ HILTON? I'LL BETCHA

he is not any Hilton probably his name will be under the RUG

or butter up all your NEWS /FOX . STUPID, STUPID, STUPID.

FOXNEWS & PEREZ, BOTH FOR BEING "VERGOGNA" or VERGUENZA.(ANCHOR).-

Thanks & Cooperation

Charles H. Garrido, Miami Fla.-