CNN's Borger & Gergen: Obama Comes Across as 'Pragmatist' and 'Shrewd'

Photo of Matthew Balan.
  • Bookmark and Share

Gloria Borger, CNN Senior Political Analyst | NewsBusters.orgCNN’s two senior political analysts, Gloria Borger and David Gergen, reacted favorably to President Barack Obama’s performance at his first press conference on Monday night. Borger highlighted how the Democrat apparently “came across as real pragmatist.” Later, Gergen stated that it was a “classic and shrewd exercise of presidential power.”

The two analysts participated in the network’s post-press conference programming, which took up the entire 9 pm Eastern hour on Monday night. Five minutes into the hour, Borger made her “pragmatist” comment, and continued with what she gathered from the president’s remarks: “What I heard tonight was somebody who kept saying I can’t afford to see Congress play the same usual political games. But the interesting fight that we’re setting up here is whether the new president really understands the role or can cope with the role that ideology now plays in our politics today.”

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Fourteen minutes later, anchor Anderson Cooper asked Gergen for his take on the press conference, introducing him as someone who has “advised presidents, Republican and Democrat.” The analyst played up how President Obama was going to win in the end:

ANDERSON COOPER: What do you think this president’s staff is saying to him tonight? What would you say to him tonight after this press conference?

David Gergen, CNN Senior Political Analyst | NewsBusters.orgDAVID GERGEN: Well done, pour it on -- Anderson, I thought it was a classic and shrewd exercise of presidential power. Only the president has the bully pulpit, and tonight, at a critical moment in his presidency, he seized that bully pulpit, dramatized the economy for the country, took his case to the people, and I think put pressure on Congress to get it passed. And I think it’s going to work and work in the way that the White House has clearly set this up. He goes to Elkhart [Indiana]; he brings Elkhart into the conversation [unintelligible] repeatedly in order to personalize it. But he -- by setting this up as a big test of power, in the next few days, he’s going to win. He’s going to get a bill through the Congress. One way or the other -- he may not have many Republicans, but he’s going to get a bill. I think we all know that, and about a week to ten days from now, there’s -- everybody in Washington is going to be talking about a major presidential victory, which he helped to set up with this press conference tonight. And people -- it’s going to enhance his power to deal with these tough economic days ahead. So I thought it was a good way to go on offense, and also I think it was a way to enhance his own power, so he can get other things done well beyond this stimulus package.

During the hour, CNN had their anchors and analysts sit at one table in their studio and their partisan talking heads at another, just as they had done during the presidential debates. But given the way that both Borger and Gergen were reacting (not to leave out two of the others sitting with Borger: Soledad O’Brien, who compared Obama to the Hudson River pilot; and senior legal analyst/resident Obama spokesman Jeffrey Toobin), you might have a hard time telling the difference between the two.

—Matthew Balan is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I hate it when BARRKY points his finger while he talks ...

... It just makes me want to BREAK IT OFF!  Damn you BARRKY!

 Shrewd? He sounds to me

 Shrewd? He sounds to me like an angry, spoiled child.

Obama is not a

Obama is not a pragmatist.  He's an aspiring Marxist dictator dressed up as Malibu Ken.

"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." -Winston Churchill

Bully pulpit?

I was fighting to stay awake! Even O'Reilly, who has done a few KA shooters in my opinion, said whoa, boring! Obama controls the lectern--but this guy, WTH, he talks, then starts to go sideways...veers...yaks...talks... You forget where you are, much less what was asked. And how pragmatic is it to not see that this bill is a loser prepared by someone else--and take control? Not very pragmatic. And what about reassuring or comforting--yes, this can be phony, but no trip to Kentucky, no mention of the pizzen peanut butter...just how sad it was FOR HIM to sign letters to the families of dead soldiers. Oh, we're sorry--we are doing the best we can to make this nice for you.

I heard this blathering BS

I heard this blathering BS last night.

Can't do it again today.

One thing about all of this, Gergen and the other talking heads that just adore O, had better be careful about saying 'we all know the Prez is going to have a bill to sign on his desk in about a week or ten days or so"....

If Susan isn't happy with what Pelosi/O put back in the bill during conference, she won't vote for it...along with her other RINO Komrades.

Hi bt Did you happen to

Hi bt

Did you happen to catch O'Reilly last night? He had on some really great guests who, as usual, couldn't get  two words in edge-wise before he cut him off to tell them HIS opinion. My loathing of this man grows daily and the fact that he has on great guests whose appearances are totally wasted makes it worse. I'm always tricked into watching by the announced line up (I'll stop what I'm doing to catch Bernie Goldberg) and the hope against hope that somehow, the episode I'm watching will be different - and everytime I'm fooled. Does O'Reilly even have the ability to shut up and listen?

 

The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.

Afternoon Chris... No I

Afternoon Chris...

No I decided to skip him last night, for the very reasons you posted.

I didn't listen to much at all after the Hollywood production of O's, I just happened to have it on CNN when the news conference was going on and caught Gergen/Borger ect.

I also turned it off soon after....stuck to NBs for the remainder.

My patience is very thin with all this BS going on, it was hard enough to listen the Senate all week long, let alone the phone call making I did...I would'nt let myself get angrier listening to the interrupting blow-hard last night...I'm like you, if I know what segments is going to be on, I try to catch it, but time and again, they say this is what is coming next, and it isn't.

I get sick of the teases to stay tuned...last night was one of them.

bt,Goldberg was visibly

bt,

Goldberg was visibly annoyed with O'Reilly last night. I wish he would go on Greta Van Susteren's show (I know you gave her good reviews early on). Not that she's a conservative (and that's okay) but she asks intelligent questions, always respectfully allows her guests to speak without interrupting them, and her segments with them are longer - sometimes spanning over a commercial. I find myself watching her show more - well, when she's not covering the Natalee Holloway case at any rate... :)

The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.

Chris... Exactly right...

Chris...

Exactly right... that is why I always liked her shows, she is known to be a liberal, but she lets the other guests talk, I did listen to Hannity last night on the first half of her show for that very reason.

Quite a few people cut her short without really watching all of her shows in my opinion.

Heck, I've watched her since she was on CNN, then got her own half hour show...which she was very angry about the big-wigs telling her what to do, what to say ect.

I didn't know what to expect when she came to Fox, but I enjoy her shows most times when it comes to politics...

Plus I'm a true crime buff, always have been, but when all of the msm including her go over and over the same things daily/night after night and there is nothing new, I too do not watch.

bt - Last question:

Since I haven't watched her that much in the past, I'm not sure - is she focusing somewhat less on crime and more on politics these days?

The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.

Greta VS

 Is just topical. If a crime is the hot story, then she goes with that. Lately, the politics have rooted that out, for the most part. She is a lib, a Scientologist, and lives in the DC bubble, but she is always a fair interviewer. I think Chris Wallace is, also. They don't add their politics to the conversation. That is why Fox is so successful. I have to think that most people watch O' Reilly to see if he will go postal. Just when I think he is starting to make a good point, or be heading in the right direction, Boom! He's right in the crapper. And nothing cracks me up more than when he says "So and so won't come on my show. They know I will grill 'em."  Suuurrre. Like you did Barry O, Billo? I really think BOR is probably not a total ass, I think he is probably nicer in person. Or at least I hope so. Have you ever noticed that Megyn Kelly doesn't let BOR push her around? She eats his lunch everytime she comes on. Now that, is worth watching. And Dennis Miller.

 

 

All a Democrat needs is the upper-story window of public attention and the chamber pot of rhetoric. How else to explain the rise of Joe Biden?  P.J. O' Rourke

BOREilly is a closet lib

BOREilly is a closet lib working in a conservative network.  Blowhard showed his true colors during the campaign when he  invited candidate Obama to his show.  Remember the "tough talk" he aimed towards BHO during the teasers?  Where was that during the interview?  I lost respect for Blowhard O'Reilly since then.

sf, I'm with you there,

sf,

I'm with you there, but I lost a lot of respect for him when he went after Jesse Jackson and his taxes etc. for over a year, finally had him on his show and all but kissed his arse.

I will never forget that.

bt, if I could only name

bt, if I could only name more lib journalists and politicians who help gravitate this country towards anarchy and chaos I would....

I love this country 2 much to see it go to waste.

sf... You aren't alone.

sf...

You aren't alone.

butler, No matter what the

butler, No matter what the personality or the issue, Bill O'Reilly makes it all about Bill O'Reilly.

The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.

Chris... Politics. We

Chris...

Politics.

We also listen to Jeopardy during the first half, so sometimes I have to catch the repeat later.

bt, Thanx. The "Mainstream"

bt,

Thanx.

The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.

BOR was waaay over the top

BOR was waaay over the top last night, even more than lately. Nobody could get a word in edgewise with his pontificating. Even my 16-yr old daughter, who was not paying that close attention said to me "Why does that jerk even bother having guests on if he won't let them finish a sentence?"

But when he shut down my beloved Mary Katherine Ham 20 times in a row that was it - I switched the channel and won't be watching anytime soon. 

SoL... ...and he does

SoL...

...and he does that to her ALL of the time to-boot.

It is infuriating, I wished she would say something to him when he does this to her constantly.

O'Reilly shows absolutely

O'Reilly shows absolutely no respect for his guests or their opinions. He reduces them to just props. 

The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.

BT, yeah, she absolutely

BT, yeah, she absolutely should speak up, and I bet she does next time.

Imagine doing your prep for the segment ahead of time, getting all dressed up, driving to the studio, getting makeup, waiting in the green room...

then have this blowhard not let you finish a thought or even a sentence? (but he still hypes your appearance) 

O'Reilly shut up long enough...

I heard Goldberg say Junior was a great communicator and a populist...huh? I was barely awake as the man rambled on, looking back and forth, back and forth...

I don't think Goldberg meant

I don't think Goldberg meant "populist" in a necessarily complementary way. As for the O's speaking, apparently a lot of people think he is a great communicator - and maybe he is - I just don't believe what he's saying at all - communicated greatly or not.

The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.

Pragmatist huh? That is

Pragmatist huh? That is a word for all Americans to ponder when applied to a president.  One of the first "pragmatist", and openly so was Woodrow Wilson.  President Wilson was also our first openly fascist president.

I am aware that CNN is using this word as a bonus concerning Obama.  It is not.  Wilson, like Obama, was/is a democrat, they were both acadamians. Wilson used "secret police" to let him know the mood of the country and report to him on anyone talking about him directly or his administration.  Which resulted in that person either being roughed up by Wilson goons, thrown in jail and most times, both. Even book/magazine publishers were punished under Wilson for daring to print anything negative about him, to the point of being run out of business.   The jury is out on Obama concerning this, but do not be surprised. But with our present MSM that problem has been resolved a long time ago.

If you were not "sufficiently patriotic" Wilson's goon's would rough you up.  Again, jury is still out. Well needless to say, since Obama is a direct desendent of Wilson's (politically) and Wilson's protege was FDR, it will be interesting to see just how far Obami will go limiting our civil liberties.  As Conservatives, we have no one advocating for us.  The ACLU was created as a leftist organization who, agrees with Wilsonian style politics.  We just have to remain vigilent.

ConRex

 Excellent post, excellent point. I thought the presser was a joke. First we had teleprompter Jesus, then duhhh Jesus. Using the prompter for the first half, did not look good. BTW, he is the first Pres to use one at a presser. Also, it was excrutiatingly boring. He never really answered questions, and used the questions as a tee to go off on his next point. So basically they were not needed. He could have just came out and spoke. I'll bet 97% of all Americans watching it, thought, what did he just say? Remember, Bush was supposedly a horrible speaker. What's Obama's excuse?

 

All a Democrat needs is the upper-story window of public attention and the chamber pot of rhetoric. How else to explain the rise of Joe Biden?  P.J. O' Rourke

May God not strike me

I even missed the little Texan a tad--his leaning in the podium, cracking comments out of the side of his mouth, his clunky sarcasm...

Borger and Gergen gave

Borger and Gergen gave Obama a good review? Why, that's so unusual. Because, usually they're pretty tough on Democrats and - oh, I can't go on with this.... 

The "Mainstream" Media: By liberals. For liberals.

missed it

I guess I must have missed the 'shrewdness' and 'pragmatism' among all of the ummmmm's and ahhhhhhh's.  He was starting to sound like Caroline Kennedy there.  Not so good without a teleprompter now is he?

This was not a press

This was not a press conference, it was a filibuster.

But they didn't notice. 

Probably a stand-up routine

Probably a stand-up routine audition for when everything catches up to him when he might end up being impeached.....lol

Let the brown-nosing

Let the brown-nosing continue!

David Gergen

is one of themost boring talking heads out there. He is the very defintion of the term "courtier",  always trying to suck up to the power establishment. He is also as much of a conservative as Kathleen Parker, David Brooks, Peggy Noonan, Randy Andy Sullivan, etc are. Notice how many people who worked in the Reagan, GHW Bush White Houses have shown themselves to be phony conservatives and how many of them endorsed in the past Kerry and Obama? Republican adminsitartiosn are particualry prone towards hiring traitors.