Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Tell the Truth campaign logo
NewsBusters.org logo

February 12, 2012
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • RSS
Home » Blogs » Matthew Balan's blog
  • Evan Thomas and Chris Matthews: Jackie and Serial Adulterer JFK Had a 'Good' and 'Full' Marriage
  • Bozell Column: Another Fleeting Failure for NBC
  • Martin Bashir Implies GOP Too Racist to Have Marco Rubio as VP Candidate
  • Barbara Walters, Shameless Hypocrite: Hits Kennedy Mistress for Greed, Tells Her She Should Have Stayed Quiet
  • NY Times Writers Rush to Obama's Defense Like It's Their Job
  • Rachel Maddow Trumpets Inane 'Amish Bus Driver' Analogy for Obama Contraception Rule
  • MRC's Bozell Scolds Media's Reluctance to Cover HHS Birth Control Mandate
  • Chris Matthews Excoriates: Rick Santorum Is a 'Theocrat' and Franklin Graham Is a 'Disgrace'

CNN’s Carol Costello Remains ‘Hopeful’ Over California Gay Marriage?

By Matthew Balan | November 05, 2008 | 13:28

Change font size:  A |  A
Matthew Balan's picture

During a special post-election edition of American Morning on early Wednesday morning, CNN correspondent Carol Costello seemed to be confused as to what California’s proposed Proposition 8 would do and hinted that she was opposed to the effort. The initiative would amend the state’s constitution to ban same-sex "marriage." Costello first stumbled as she tried to explain the proposition: "These are the results that we have -- voting yes means you -- you would overturn -- voting yes means there would be a ban on same-sex marriage -- that's 52%. The no votes have 48%." She then continued as to when the results would be certain, and gave a hint as to where she stood on the issue: "We probably won't be able to call that until much later this afternoon, although we do remain hopeful." [audio excerpt here]

Co-anchor John Roberts introduced Costello’s segment, which began 23 minutes into the 4 am Eastern hour of the CNN program, and stated how, besides the presidential race, "from same-sex marriage to abortion, there were some hot-button issues on state ballots across the country, and our Carol Costello has been tracking the results of those." Costello actually focused on the same-sex "marriage" ballot questions during her report and didn’t mention anything of the other issues.

The CNN correspondent first correctly described what Proposition 8 would do: "...[O]ut in California, they were talking very much about Proposition 8 -- that would be a measure that would ban same-sex marriage in the state of California." She then gave her confused description on what voting yes for it would do, versus voting no, and the percentages for each. After giving her "hopeful" statement, she then described the campaigns for and against the proposed initiative:

COSTELLO: You know, Proposition 8 was the most high profile ballot on -- was the most high profile initiative on the ballot in California. Opponents and supporters spent a whopping $80 million on this issue. Now, those who are in favor of same-sex marriage were hoping that liberal Democrats who came to the polls would overwhelmingly vote in their favor. But apparently, that did not happen, because Proposition 8 also drew the people that were for the ban.

Near the end of the segment, Costello and Roberts briefly discussed how the ballot proposals against same-sex "marriage" in Arizona and Florida and how those past "handily," and then went back to the specific issue of Proposition 8 and what the final results would be. Again, the CNN correspondent seemed confused as to what the proposition would do:

ROBERTS: You know what I’ll do is run the numbers on the ‘Magic Wall,’ as well, and see, you know, where the vote is still outstanding. That might give us some indication of whether or not that gap will narrow, or if it will stay about the same.

COSTELLO: As far as I know, the more conservative areas of California have not been counted as of yet, so it doesn't look good for Proposition 8.

Actually, the poll results did look good for Proposition 8, as she outlined above.

[Special thanks to MRC's Business and Media Institute for discovering this segment.]

Share this

About the Author

Matthew Balan is a news analyst at the Media Research Center. Click here to follow Matthew Balan on Twitter.
  • Campaigns & Elections
  • Conservatives & Republicans
  • Culture/Society
  • Liberals & Democrats
  • Sexuality
  • Carol Costello
  • John Roberts
  • American Morning
  • CNN
  • Audio
  • Video
  • Campaign Watch
  • Matthew Balan's blog
  • Login or register to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Donate to NewsBusters

Donate to NewsBusters Today!

This form needs Javascript to display, which your browser doesn't support. Sign up here instead

User Shortcuts

Log in

  • My account
  • My buddylist
  • Log in to check messages
  • RSS feed
  • About NB
  • Contact us
  • Jobs
  • Advertise on NB

 

 

 

  • Idea of the Democrats better than the reality (Wisc. State Journal)
  • The cynical and self-contradictory Gospel of Obama (Krauthammer)
  • Video: Protesters at CPAC admit they're being paid to protest (Daily Caller)
  • Does the drug 'ella' cause abortions? (Weekly Standard)
  • Does income inequality cause global warming? (Power Line)
  • Jay Carney gets snippy about Super PACs (Verum Serum)

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Recent comments

  • What's next?
    58 sec ago
  • Way to go Cool!
    12 min 30 sec ago
  • Vets,:Gynecologists, Urologists?
    12 min 31 sec ago
  • dang it
    48 min 38 sec ago
  • You're probably right,
    1 hour 50 min ago
More >

Try a Sweater Vest, Mitt
more cartoons
  • Weekend General and Sports Open Thread
  • Mitt Romney's Full Address to CPAC
  • Daily Kos Week in Review: Confusing Ground for Religious Haters
  • Newt Gingrich's Full Address to CPAC
  • Newt Gingrich: As President I'll Repudiate 40% of Obama's Government on Inauguration Day
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Lachlan Markay
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Editorial Associate
Aubrey Vaughan

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2012 NewsBusters. Terms of Use.