CNN’s Campbell Brown Rips Sexism of ‘Diva’ Remark Her Network Disseminated

Photo of Matthew Balan.
  • Bookmark and Share

Campbell Brown, CNN Anchor | NewsBusters.orgCNN anchor Campbell Brown criticized the sexism of the "diva" comment about Sarah Palin from a supposed anonymous McCain campaign adviser on Monday’s Election Center program, despite how it was her own network that highlighted this remark. After describing how "it was big news when this story broke over the weekend -- a shocking quote from an adviser to John McCain calling Sarah Palin a ‘diva.’ (correspondents Dana Bash, Peter Hamby, and John King first reported on the anonymous "diva" remark in an October 25 report on CNN.com), Brown decried how it is "a sexist slight, a term that is only applied to women, almost always in a derogatory way."

At the end of her commentary, which led the Election Center program, the CNN anchor attacked the supposed hypocrisy of the McCain campaign and criticized the unnamed McCain campaign official for using the "diva" term: "So, now, for the McCain campaign to be attacking its own candidate in the most overtly sexist way, calling her a ‘diva,’ -- it is beyond ridiculous. Whoever this anonymous adviser is should be ashamed, or, at the very least, have the courage to say it on the record." Since Brown didn’t say anything critical about how her network ran with the comment during her commentary, despite its anonymous nature, one would guess that she isn’t ashamed of CNN’s action in this matter. Isn’t that a bit hypocritical?

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Brown began her commentary by outlining the story Bash, Hamby, and King reported on from their unnamed McCain advisers: "You see, apparently, the McCain campaign is frustrated with Palin. They say she is quote, ‘going rogue,’ not following orders, speaking for herself, without running it past their people first. What her people say that she is doing is trying to quote, ‘bust free of the damaging and mismanaged rollout of her candidacy.’ So, the McCain campaign, in its frustration, is now speaking to the media, trying to put her in her place..." It’s odd to conclude, just from using these anonymous sources, that the "McCain campaign is frustrated with Palin" and that it’s "trying to put her in her place."

Later, after ripping the sexism of the "diva" remark, Brown spent the latter half of her commentary pointing out that "what is really pathetic about all of this, frankly, is the hypocrisy." In her view, the media’s unrelenting posture toward Palin has been justified: "...[T]he McCain campaign has accused the media of sexism, and sure, in some cases, questions were raised that were sexist in nature....But, by and large, the questions raised about Sarah Palin, and certainly the questions we raised about her, were about her qualifications and her experience..."

Brown ended her "cutting through the bull" commentary by complimenting Palin: "As someone who urged the campaign early on to free Sarah Palin...I applaud Governor Palin for finally tossing those shackles aside, because, Governor, if it were Mitt Romney, Joe Lieberman, or Tom Ridge standing in your shoes right now, being mismanaged the way you feel you are, I can assure you they would have tapped into their inner divas and tossed those advisers aside a long time ago."

The full transcript of Campbell Brown’s commentary from Monday’s Election Center, which aired one minute into the 8 pm Eastern hour of the CNN program:

CAMPBELL BROWN: But first, cutting through the bull -- it was big news when this story broke over the weekend -- a shocking quote from an adviser to John McCain calling Sarah Palin a ‘diva.’ You see, apparently, the McCain campaign is frustrated with Palin. They say she is quote, ‘going rogue,’ not following orders, speaking for herself, without running it past their people first. What her people say that she is doing is trying to quote, ‘bust free of the damaging and mismanaged rollout of her candidacy.’ So, the McCain campaign, in its frustration, is now speaking to the media, trying to put her in her place, and what this McCain adviser said is that Sarah Palin is a diva, a diva who takes advice from no one, a diva who is playing for her own future here. This is an exact quote from this McCain adviser here: ‘Remember, divas trust only unto themselves, as they see themselves as the beginning and the end of all wisdom.’

Now, let's just start with the word ‘diva.’ It is obviously a sexist slight, a term that is only applied to women, almost always in a derogatory way. It is usually applied to women who are viewed as overly ambitious. It is applied to demanding women, to women who follow their own path. There's really no equivalent word for men, except maybe successful. So, with that in mind, I would applaud Sarah Palin, or any other woman, for that matter, who believes she’s in a damaging situation, who is busting free and embracing her inner diva.

But we’re going to go easy on the Helen Reddy right now, because what is really pathetic about all of this, frankly, is the hypocrisy. Almost from the moment Sarah Palin was announced as McCain’s running mate, the McCain campaign has accused the media of sexism, and sure, in some cases, questions were raised that were sexist in nature, much the same way that Hillary Clinton dealt with sexism during the primary race. We are not yet a society free of sexism, and this will continue to be an issue for all women candidates. But, by and large, the questions raised about Sarah Palin, and certainly the questions we raised about her, were about her qualifications and her experience, and whether or not she’s ready to be president of the United States, the vice president's job.

So, now, for the McCain campaign to be attacking its own candidate in the most overtly sexist way, calling her a ‘diva,’ -- it is beyond ridiculous. Whoever this anonymous adviser is should be ashamed, or, at the very least, have the courage to say it on the record. As someone who urged the campaign early on to free Sarah Palin, so that the American people could have the opportunity to find out who she is and whether or not she is qualified for the job, I applaud Governor Palin for finally tossing those shackles aside, because, Governor, if it were Mitt Romney, Joe Lieberman, or Tom Ridge standing in your shoes right now, being mismanaged the way you feel you are, I can assure you they would have tapped into their inner divas and tossed those advisers aside a long time ago.

—Matthew Balan is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

"Diva"

It would make sense that the word "diva" relates to women, since its root is derived from the Latin for "goddess." Diva, as I learned it, describes a successful female performer, usually in grand opera (e.g. Beverly Sills). It now properly relates to any successful female performer. Calling someone a "diva" should describe a positive attribute (Madonna notwithstanding); to be negative one would have to add "self-described" or "self-proclaimed." Sarah Palin has never described herself as a diva, but I would argue that she has been a very successful woman. Is she a diva? No, because she is not technically a performer.

Thank you lamb chop

The word "Diva" has been usurped by pop singers imcluding those with ordinary or even sub par voices.

In the opera world however the term Diva was first used to describe an 18th century female soprano who could compete with a Castrato. Contrary to what may be the popular American myth Castrati had massive poweful voices, and looked rather like giant human capons with grotesque rib cages. They were literally singing machines, so any woman who could match one in volume, strength, stamina etc was called super human, a "Diva".

Once the castrati craze made way for 19th century opera, "Diva" was the term used for any accomplished Operatic Soprano.

Because Opera singers were thought to be of loose morality, much like pop singers today, there was a tawdry taint to the term. A Diva was not a respectable lady, but something of a high class whore.

Divas can also be difficult to deal with due to the demands that opera singing creates on the voice and nerves alike.

The classic 20th century opera Diva would not be Sills, who was pretty down to earth, but Maria Callas, who was great but impossible to deal with, and of course famous for being Onassis' mistress. (Jackie stole him from her.)

Now if you want to say that Sarah P. is a Diva because she performs well in debates and on the stump, and can kick the asses of men such as Biden, then yes she is a Diva in the 18th century sense of the word.

There does not seem to be much about her however that is difficult or morally suspect. If anything she has taken her constant abuse on behalf of the press with good humor.

ALERT!!! DOW UP 578????

WOW.

Ster. 

Listen, strange women lyin' in ponds distributin' swords is no basis for a system of government.

Anybody remember 'Divas Live" from a few years back?

Celine Dion, Gloria Estaban, Aretha Franklin, Shania Twain and Mariah Carey had no problems with the word 'diva'. Nor does the opera community.

The last week or so we have seen Campbell Brown fecklessly planning her big 'redemption', now that the Messiah apparently has it in the bag. All of a sudden she's sticking up for women (while simultaneously bashing McC. -  quite a feat). 

I'm not buying it.

Diva Revisited

I remember the "Divas Live" performance. The featured singers were successful female performers and so the term fits and of course they would have no problem being so called. The problem is that neither the unnamed McCain advisor nor Campbell Brown bothered to look up the definition of "diva," and the idea that "divas trust only unto themselves, as they see themselves as the beginning and the end of all wisdom" is completely ridiculous (although granted some divas might see themselves that way, perhaps even Ms. Brown).

Brown's criticism of her own network

Is like my local newspaper endorsing a few Republicans in state & local races so it can be accurately said they're not 100% in the Dem tank.

Campbell Brown

Even though there have been times when Campbell Brown has irritated me with comments, I did appreciate her confronting  her news "buddies" on RNC night.  She did say she thought they were saying things about Sarah Palin that would never be said about men. (Sorry I don't remember the exact quote.)  She also wrote an article recently which I will try to find saying women  were expected to "look better" than men.  

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/22/campbell.brown.looks/index.html?eref=ib_topstories

I gotta hand it to her

She's less pro democrat thatn she is pro woman.

 

Campbell (and Soledad Obrien too) irritated me throughout the RNC with her attitude towards republicans in general. But she seems to have a line to cross. I wish she'd be more unbiased as far as general ideology, but this is a start. She has SOME standards. 

rippleon and JeffWeimer

You obviously have not watched CNN's Campbell Brown as much as I have. Since Gov. Palin was selected CNN and Campbell Brown have been one of the harshest critics of Sarah Palin.

Night after night Brown and her guests unfairly disparaged Gov. Palin and her family. Some of those "hit pieces" have been documented at NewsBusters. No subject was left unturned. CNN sent investigative reporters to Alaska to dig up whatever dirt they could find, and then reported that dirt and innuendoes on Campbell's show.

Campbell Brown received a lot of flack for her coverage of Gov. Palin, even from CNN's Lou Dobbs (although not by name).  

So how did leftist Campbell Brown respond to this criticism? Why she changed her program to No Bias, No Bull and tried to conceal her liberal agenda. It hasn't worked!

You are correct that she has standards. She has liberal standards, through and through. Please don't give her credit she doesn't deserve.

----------------------------------------------------------------

“You’re not going to see me ever be partisan. I’ll never take a position on a candidate or an issue.” ~ CNN ‘s Campbell Brown (shortly after changing her program to No Bias, No Bull)

 

Don't let this woman fool you

Campbelle Brown is the WORST part of CNN (ok, second to Cafferty). She does not have a just bone her body and to the extent that people here are praising her for "speaking out" don't be fooled. She is loving every moment of this and typically will follow these things with her panel slamming Palin. This woman should not, under any cirucumstances, be trusted. She belongs on MSNBC which is the upgrade to CNN in terms of Liberalism (Not to say CNN doesn't follow close behind). Wait until election night when they have there usual 12-2 Dem/Rep ratio, she will be leading the slamming of the McCain campaign...Until, that is, Sarah is finally declared VP and McCain is elected

http://www.voicesint...

Just an excuse to discuss the rumor

This was just an excuse by Campbell Brown to give more air time to the "annonymous" source and discuss what she thinks are palin's shortcomings.  Last night she mumbled "are you kidding" after showing Joe-the-Plumber was campaigning form McCain.  She is dispicable.  I just hope all these "news" people experience defeat next week!