Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani faced liberal lines of questioning from CNN’s Wolf Blitzer and Gloria Borger during the 6 PM EDT hour of The Situation Room before the network’s Thursday night coverage of the Republican convention. In particular, Borger pressed Giuliani on his differences with Sarah Palin on social issues: "Last night, you spoke before Sarah Palin, a woman who -- with whom you have very little in common on the social issues, right? She's pro-life.... [L]et's just say she's a heroine to the right wing of this party, and you're not their hero, okay?... [M]y question is, has the big tent of the Republican Party, which you always talk about -- has that gotten a little narrower?"
Click here for mp3 audio.
Host Wolf Blitzer first asked the former mayor, "Why should the American people trust the Republicans, who have been in charge of the executive branch of the government for the last eight years -- the White House, and all of the agencies, and in charge of the legislative branch of the government for the last 12 of the past 14 years?" Giuliani narrowed the stakes of the election between John McCain and Barack Obama, and not between their two parties. Blitzer followed up with questions about the Democrats’ lead on a generic ballot and how, according to Obama spokesman Robert Gibbs, "if you take a look at the votes over the last eight years, John McCain has voted with President Bush 90 percent of the time."
When Giuliani brought up McCain’s record of bipartisanship, Blitzer insisted that Obama also had a track record of working with the other party: "He's worked with Senator McCain on comprehensive immigration reform.... He worked with Senator Lugar on nuclear proliferation, and he worked with Senator Coburn on ethics reform."
Borger then pressed Giuliani on his difference with Palin on social issues, focusing on her pro-life stance. Blitzer then followed-up Borger’s questioning by asking about the issue of "gay rights" and referred to Giuliani’s support of "abortion rights:"
GLORIA BORGER: Last night, you spoke before Sarah Palin, a woman who -- with whom you have very little in common on the social issues, right? She's pro-life.
RUDY GIULIANI: (Unintelligible)
BORGER: Well, she's pro-life.
GIULIANI: Well, those are two issues out of 100.
BORGER: Okay, but --
GIULIANI: On 95 others, we have a lot in common.
BORGER: But let's just say she's a heroine to the right wing of this party, and you're not their hero, okay? Can we say that?
GIULIANI: That's fine.
BORGER: The question is --
GIULIANI: But we agree on 95 percent of the issues.
BORGER: Okay. But my question is, has the big tent of the Republican Party, which you always talk about -- has that gotten a little narrower?
GIULIANI: I think it got a lot bigger when Joe Lieberman addressed the convention yesterday. I didn't see a prominent Republican addressing the Democratic Convention.
BORGER: But what about with Sarah Palin and the choice of Sarah Palin and those differences on the cultural, social issues?
GIULIANI: Sarah -- Sarah Palin gave a speech last night that appeals to a broad base in the Republican Party. We have differences of opinion on some of the social issues. But we're big enough to overcome those.
BLITZER: But on those social issues --
GIULIANI: We're a party that has room for lots -- you're going to see Tom Ridge tonight. Tom Ridge has the same views on these social issues as I do. You saw Lieberman the other night. He has the same views on the social issues that I have. So we're a -- we're a big party, at least those of us who support John McCain.
BLITZER: But you support -- you support gay rights. She doesn't. You support -- you support -- you support abortion rights.
GIULIANI: Not gay marriage.
BLITZER: But you support that gay partners should be able to visit each other in the hospital.
GIULIANI: Of course.
BLITZER: But she doesn't go that far.
GIULIANI: Well, okay. We disagree on some things.
Towards the end of the interview, which began 4 minutes into the 6 pm Eastern hour of CNN's The Situation Room, correspondent John King asked the former mayor about the "generational contrast between these two guys:" "At a time when the country so much wants change, you have a 47- year-old guy, who is vibrant and full of energy, running against a man who is full of energy, but would be the oldest man ever elected to the office. Do you think that hurts John McCain?"
Giuliani answered that "the Republican ticket has it in the right order. We have the much more experienced candidate first. We have the younger, new generation candidate second. They have a candidate with no experience first, and they have the older-generation candidate second. I think we have it in the right order for the person who's going to walk in there and be Commander-in-Chief on day one."
Borger, as Carl Bernstein did the night before on CNN, responded to Giuliani’s answer by bringing up the issue of Palin’s capability to take charge if she and McCain were elected and McCain were suddenly incapacitated: "Well, is she ready to step in as Commander-in-Chief, though, if, God forbid, something should happen to John McCain?" Giuliani replied, "...I think she has more than exceeded expectations. I thought that she handled herself very well the first time. I thought she handled herself very well last night. She's been put under unrelenting attack from the moment she has been nominated, and she -- seems to me this is a very tough woman."
—Matthew Balan is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.



















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
I wonder why they don't
September 5, 2008 - 00:45 ET by RainsfordI wonder why they don't mention what happened to that immigration reform, or the fact that the other legislation was stuff that people in the viewing gallery could have gotten passed on the floor.
Premises
September 5, 2008 - 00:58 ET by KC MulvilleWhen the media asks questions of Democats, the question assumes the Democrat's premise, allowing him or her to simply verify or extend the point. With Republicans, the questions usually deny the GOP's premise, and demand that the interviewee rebut the denial before making any point of his own. It's the media's way of placing stumbling blocks in the GOP's way, while smoothing the carpet for the Democrats.
Giuliani has to deny the premise that the GOP is "narrow-minded" before he's allowed to say anything positive.
True
September 5, 2008 - 01:03 ET by well99Pravda would be proud of the MSM.
Also interesting that
September 5, 2008 - 05:49 ET by ThisnThatAlso interesting that Blitzer can immediately list (for all of our convenience) Obama's talking points -- but continuously has to ask about the Republicans'.
___________________________________
If you can read this, thank a teacher. If it is in English, thank a Soldier. - My barber
Hmm let see
September 5, 2008 - 01:01 ET by well99Let see Joe Liebermen runs and Dems dont support him.Lincoln Chafee runs and Repubs did support him.Who has the big tent?The Dems seem to have traded theirs for a pup tent.With a sign of NON Left Wing Elitist Need Not Apply!
......and how, according to
September 5, 2008 - 01:33 ET by MidAmerica......and how, according to Obama spokesman Robert Gibbs, "if you take a look at the votes over the last eight years, John McCain has voted with President Bush 90 percent of the time."
Yes but.... the democrats in Congress, after they are allowed to make all kinds of noise against President Bush, mostly voted with Bush for legislation when it concerned authorizing and funding the Iraq War and security legislation. The democrats have not been whole-heartedly anti-war, just anti-Bush. They saw a political opportunity in appearing to be anti-war but would only play brinkmanship with Bush but not actually pursue actions that would tie them to the outcome of the war. I believe obama really was anti-war and would have sought retreat and defeat as a policy.
Ah, this old canard
September 5, 2008 - 02:04 ET by mastersofdeceitThe old "voted with Bush XX% (depending on the time of day) of the time."
Again I say who cares! Anyone who knows anything about the senate knows that most votes are along party lines. This is just a cheap, democrat, foam at the mouth point that Woof is barking.
It's just like the "Mccain is clueless on the economy" horses*** that gets thrown around. We will see how many idiots buy into this crap come Nov.
Bear in mind the number is only based on 2007 data:
" The claim is true...in 2007 McCain voted in line with the president's position 95 percent of the time – the highest percentage rate for McCain since Bush took office – McCain's support of President Bush's position has been as low as 77 percent (in 2005), and his support for his party's position has been as low as 67 percent (2001)" Also keep in mind JMc voted against Reagan for sending troops.
Dems are dumb to play this game. McCain has a senate record that can be gone through with a lice comb. The RNC needs to actually get JMc's dissent votes front and center, quick fast and in a hurry if they want to seriously counter BO's generic "change" theme.
So to sum up, McCain has indeed voted to support the unpopular Bush 95 percent of the time most recently, but less so in earlier years. And Obama has voted pretty close to 100 percent in line with fellow Democrats during his brief Senate career.
Short Change you can believe in, tagged along by a senator since the Nixon era.
Smaller?
September 5, 2008 - 05:51 ET by ThisnThatPerhaps Blitzer is simply concerned that the Republicans, unlike the Democrats, aren't including Europeans inside their tent, so the Republican tent just seems to be smaller, by comparision.
___________________________________
If you can read this, thank a teacher. If it is in English, thank a Soldier. - My barber
" and you're not their
September 5, 2008 - 07:41 ET by danbo" and you're not their hero, okay?... " Hey Ms Borger. Ruddy is our hero. His actions made him Americas hero. Believe it or not evil republicans voted for him. I didn't support McCain. And I disagree with him and Ruddy on many issues. But like Ruddy, he's still a hero and he won the nod.
It seems you have a small mind.
Borger is just whining because Ruddy rocked at the convention. And her tiny mind is hurting from the slaps behind the head.
The media won't die of extinction. They're committing suicide.
Limited Disclosure: I used to belong to the Sierra Club untill they went crazier. Worse of all, I was bribed by Exxon with free New Orleans Saints glasses with fill ups in the 70's.
Hey I disagree wtih Rudy on
November 19, 2008 - 17:07 ET by andophiroxiaHey I disagree wtih Rudy on some fundamental things. I haven't seen Rudy really throw anyone under the bus for saying things--unlike McCain. (Correct if that's not true, by the way.)
I really thought he showed very good leadership when it came to 9/11. Remember when that terrorist attack happened about 7 years ago?
Oh wait, the news has pretty much stopped playing that footage. In fact, they show a double standard of not showing 9/11 footage but showing terrorists kill our guys. Duh, I forgot.
“You have enemies? Good. That means you’ve stood up for something, sometime in your life.” ~ Winston Churchill
Hey, Borger! If the GOP
September 5, 2008 - 11:14 ET by marpelHey, Borger! If the GOP is getting "narrower" (whatever that means), then your A$$ is getting wider....
Signed,
A Working Mother Who Has a Tremendously Successful Adult Son!