CNN anchor Soledad O’Brien disavowed any knowledge of a bias on her network against Republican vice-presidential candidate Sarah Palin, particularly concerning the issue of her five children, during a segment on Wednesday’s Newsroom program. She moderated a segment with two bloggers, a conservative and a liberal, both of them mothers. When the conservative, Rachel Campos-Duffy of "The Real World: San Francisco" fame, stated how "journalists even on this network say things like, you know, can she really -- is she up to be vice president because she has five kids," O’Brien replied, "I have not heard one journalist who works for CNN, if that's what you're talking about, say that at all. We've interviewed people who said that and ask some similar questions about, isn't that sexist? So I'm not sure exactly who you're referring to."
Well, let’s refresh Ms. O’Brien’s memory. As John McCain was getting to announce his choice of Sarah Palin on Friday, her colleague John Roberts asked correspondent Dana Bash about Palin’s youngest son and how he might be neglected if the governor became vice president: "There's also this issue that on April 18th, she gave birth to a baby with Down's Syndrome.... Children with Down's syndrome require an awful lot of attention. The role of Vice President, it seems to me, would take up an awful lot of her time, and it raises the issue of how much time will she have to dedicate to her newborn child?"
Campos-Duffy and her counterpart, liberal blogger Erin Kotecki Vest, debated the issue of how sexism has crept into the discussion and news coverage surrounding Palin. As the two disagreed on the extent of sexism, O’Brien asked Campos-Duffy about Palin’s experience: "...[D]iscussing someone's fitness for office -- we're going to have to assume for either vice presidential pick that they potentially could wake up one morning and guess what, you're now the president, because something terrible happened to the guy who was president -- is discussing someone's experience. Why is that considered sexist and off-bounds?"
When Campos-Duffy insisted that Palin did have experience, O’Brien countered, "With all due respect, Rachel, everyone says, you know, she's got experience on a lot of issues, you know, governmental executive, and then it kind of stops. I mean, Alaska has 670,000 people and a $6 billion budget, which is small. You know, Governor Bush, which he was governor before he became president, that was 24 million people, right? I mean, in all fairness." Campos-Duffy countered by bringing up Obama’s short list of experience, but O’Brien brushed that argument aside: "Yeah, but that's another argument. I'm talking about your candidate. Let's talk about your candidate, the V.P."
After the conservative mother and blogger explained Palin’s experience, Vest chimed in and brought up her concerns about the Alaska governor’s knowledge of foreign affairs. Campos-Duffy replied to this by stating how she thought there was a double standard with Palin: "I think that the sexism comes because she's not being held -- she's being held to a higher standard because she's a mom than I think she would be otherwise." O’Brien asked her what she meant by that, and when Campos-Duffy brought up "journalists even on this network," O’Brien issued her denial.
The transcript of the relevant portion of the segment, which began 9 minutes into the 10 am Eastern hour of Wednesday’s Newsroom program:
RACHEL CAMPOS-DUFFY: ...I think that the sexism comes because she's not being held -- she's being held to a higher standard because she's a mom than I think she would be otherwise.
SOLEDAD O'BRIEN: So, okay. Let me get you to clarify. Why is that a higher standard? I mean, how is that a higher standard?
CAMPOS-DUFFY: Well, I've heard -- well, I’ve heard journalists say, well, how can she -- I've heard journalists even on this network say things like, you know, can she really -- is she up to be vice president because she has five kids? You know, Senator Rick Santorum has six kids. I've never heard anybody ever say that --
O'BRIEN: I have not heard one -- I have not heard one journalist who works for CNN, if that's what you're talking about, say that at all. We've interviewed people who said that and ask some similar questions about, isn't that sexist? So I'm not sure exactly who you're referring to.
CAMPOS-DUFFY: Well, they're asking the question -- they’re asking the question. Again, I've never heard senators or congressmen with lots of kids being asked that sort of question. I think it's something that's reserved for mothers.
[H/t: Phone tip from Ray Robinson.]
—Matthew Balan is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.





















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
LMAO......
September 3, 2008 - 22:37 ET by BadassBuckeyeShe said it was another topic when Obama was brought up. You're right O'brien...its the Presidency not the VP. And he has less than our VP canidate. LMAO....it's like they all are connected to one single brain. Every Lib I talk to says that same line. But just remind them...if she doesn't have enough(exp.) to be VP...then how can Obama have even close to enough to be President. The answers they give will make you laugh your ass off....just like this CNN jester.
Then why...
September 3, 2008 - 22:55 ET by tpmintxIf CNN does not have an anti-Palin bias, then why did they carefully position a camera so that we could all see the teleprompter text scrolling by? I wish I had a picture...
I see we have the same eye tpmintx...
September 3, 2008 - 23:15 ET by HeavyChevyI saw the same thing on communist span...err I mean c-span.
"9 out of 10 doctors agree that flag burning is the number one killer of liberals."
Isn't that the problem?
September 3, 2008 - 23:39 ET by JWF"I have not heard one journalist who works for CNN, if that's what you're talking about, say that at all."
We have all these journalists/anchors/reporters/talky-heads asking question after question about Gov. Palin, none of them bothering to check if anyone else is asking similar questions.
And it adds up to one big feeding frenzy. They are no longer covering the news. They are now the news.
OT a little bit.......
September 3, 2008 - 23:50 ET by connmanhow's come no one on CNN or any other alphabet channel that I remember ever asked how John Edwards could run for POTUS and not stay home and care for his wife home with TERMINAL CANCER?
Just asking.
This town needs an enema! - The Joker
Might as well keep going on the Edwards theme
September 4, 2008 - 01:45 ET by Damiano- Or if Edwards had enough experienced to be VP as a 1st term senator with zero previous policital experience. Before that, he was a trial lawyer
- Of how if he was experienced enough to be President with zero more credentials
But, according to The One's argument, the experience developed by running for President qualifes you to be President.
So... am I to take that as his endorsement for Nader? Nader has run for President more times than anyone and as the nominee for more than one party.
Well it does prove one thing
September 4, 2008 - 00:37 ET by KC MulvilleIt proves Soledad O'Brien doesn't watch CNN.
I just love the ladies
September 4, 2008 - 01:18 ET by jkwtradingI just love the ladies getting into cat fights..each day they show mpre and more no one on these shows should be using any judgement for any American.
My god, why don't you guys
September 4, 2008 - 01:18 ET by buddycMy god, why don't you guys demand she watch a replay of John Roberts two episodes. Put pressure on her. She is an out and out liar.
Soledad O'Brien was hired
September 4, 2008 - 01:53 ET by R D HelmSoledad O'Brien was hired for reasons other than her qualifications.
-Dave.
John McCain's choice of Sarah Palin, governor of Alaska, as his running
mate finally gave Republicans a reason to vote for him -- a reason,
that is, other than B. Hussein Obama.- Ann Coulter
Hey, apparently Soledad and
September 4, 2008 - 01:58 ET by dodecahedronHey, apparently Soledad and I have something in common...neither of us watches CNN.
Keep it up, Soledad, and
September 4, 2008 - 02:09 ET by maggieqpublicKeep it up, Soledad, and you’ll find yourself the centerpiece of a YouTube McCain/Palin ad… with a supporting cast of CNN (ahem) professionals.
Soledad O’Brien is Clearly a Liberal and a Democrat
September 4, 2008 - 03:36 ET by Rush FanAnyone who has watched Soledad O'Brien knows she is a mouthpiece for the Democrats. Here is an example.
Wednesday Soledad was interviewing Patrick Sammon, who is president of the gay and lesbian group known as the Log Cabin Republicans. Here are some of Soledad's questions from that interview:
O'Brien: When you take a look at the 2008 Republican Party platform, there are lots of people who would say, some of the issues that are explicitly in that platform seem to go against what many gays and lesbians would want. Why are you, as a Log Cabin Republican, supporting the Republican Party?
O'Brien: You mentioned the wedge issue. I guess, I would say well, you talk about Senator McCain, on the other hand of that is what is clearly an explicitly called for in the platform for the Republican Party is a constitutional amendment that would define marriage as a union between a man and a woman, a constitutional amendment. Obviously Senator John McCain, as the nominee -- official later, of course -- has signed off on that platform and is in agreement with that platform. That doesn't give you pause?
O'BRIEN: But for all those statistics you just cited for me, if you were to go look on the Democratic side, you'd probably see those numbers significantly higher. It seems to some degree that Democrats would have more in common with your core issues and your core values than the Republicans. So why not support Democrats?
Here is the full transcript of that interview.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
The liberal media continues to sacrifice ethics and morals for the greater cause: This time for the Election of a Democrat to the Presidency of the United States.
Soledad Doesn't Watch CNN
September 4, 2008 - 06:47 ET by allanfI guess Soledad doesn't watch CNN. She had the "I can't think" part just right.