HuffPost’s Rosen Brushes Off Palin on CNN as Unqualified, Not Like Hillary

Photo of Matthew Balan.
  • Bookmark and Share

[Update, 8:25 pm ET: Audio link added below.]

CNN frequent contributor and Huffington Post's political director Hilary Rosen slammed John McCain's vice-presidential pick Sarah Palin as being unqualified on Friday's Newsroom program and accused the Republicans pandering to women, especially Hillary Clinton supporters: "Senator McCain obviously thinks this is going to go a long way to help those women who are attracted to Hillary Clinton. I think if you were attracted to Hillary Clinton, in many ways, it was because she's a qualified woman" (Rosen put emphasis on "qualified" by practically yelling the word). She later accused the GOP of trying to "change skirts and put it on another woman, and have it be an acceptable thing" (audio available here).

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Anchor John Roberts asked Rosen just before noon, minutes before McCain made his official announcement of his pick in Ohio, about what "folks in the Obama campaign" were saying about Palin. She stated that the Democratic campaign was taking an "on the record" stance of being "cautiously optimistic," but added that they were "pretty thrilled" off the record. She added that she was "intrigued with a politician who will do something that's out-of-the-box." Rosen then described how, in her view, it wasn't "smart" of the McCain campaign to not warn their women surrogates, since she noted that Kay Bailey Hutchison apparently "couldn't find anything to talk about on CNN" about Palin. She then made her first dig at Palin as not being a "qualified woman."

Just over an hour later, at the beginning of the 1 pm Eastern hour of Newsroom, Roberts again asked Rosen about the Obama campaign's take on Palin, and used Rosen's "out-of-the-box" term. The Huffington Post political director thought that the GOP "might still be captive to the social conservatives and couldn't pick a V.P. nominee that was outside of that box." Rosen then claimed that the U.S. has moved on from issues important to social conservatives such as "only abortion and gay rights."

Seconds later, she made her second attack on Palin's apparent lack of experience, in comparison to Hillary Clinton: "She [Palin] directly invited a comparison with Hillary Clinton. I think that's a mistake. The reason women liked Hillary Clinton was because they sort of got the first qualified woman ever to be a presidential candidate. I don't think you can just, you know, change skirts and put it on another woman, and have it be an acceptable thing." After Roberts and correspondent John King laughed at this remark, she added, "I think in some respects, it's almost dismissive of women to suggest that it's just about gender, and she's going to have to answer that, and she's invited that comparison herself."

The transcripts of Rosen's first remark on Palin just before noon on Friday's Newsroom, and her subsequent comments at the beginning of the 1 pm Eastern hour:

-11:59 pm EDT

JOHN ROBERTS: Well, let's see what it's like -- what it's like on the Democratic side of things. Hilary Rosen from Huffington Post is with us. You've been talking to folks in the Obama campaign. What do they say?

HILARY ROSEN: Well, the Obama campaign is cautiously optimistic, I would say, on the record. I think off the record, most of them are pretty thrilled on, on -- for a couple of reasons. First, I have to say, I'm always intrigued with a politician who will do something that's out-of-the-box. You know, we just might have some surprises from Governor Palin that the country doesn't know. The fact that Senator Kay Bailey Hutchinson, one of the most respected Republican women in the country, said this morning, I just don't know anything about her. She couldn't find anything to talk about on CNN -- I thought was probably not a good sign, and clearly, not smart on the McCain campaign to not warn their key women surrogates. The women are the undecided vote in this election. There's no question about it -- undecided older women and undecided suburban marrieds. And, you know, the McCain -- Senator McCain obviously thinks this is going to go a long way to help those women who are attracted to Hillary Clinton. I think if you were attracted to Hillary Clinton, in many ways, it was because she's a qualified woman.

-1:05 pm EDT

JOHN ROBERTS: Hilary Rosen, how is the Obama campaign looking at this? Are they saying, you know, 'We thought that he was going to pick either Mitt Romney or Tim Pawlenty. They were known quantities. This is a real out-of-the-box pick. This could change the dynamic'?

HILARY ROSEN: Well, I think the Republican Party might still be captive to the social conservatives and couldn't pick a V.P. nominee that was outside of that box. But most of the country has moved past the issues of only abortion and gay rights, and sort of want a president that's thinking about bigger picture. I think John McCain probably shook up the race a lot today -- only I think the way he shook it up is he almost made Joe Biden and Barack Obama a safer pick, you know, a more known pick. And that's not what he intended to do, but I think it is what they ended up doing today. The -- look at the speeches. She directly invited a comparison with Hillary Clinton. I think that's a mistake. The reason women liked Hillary Clinton was because they sort of got the first qualified woman ever to be a presidential candidate. I don't think you can just, you know, change skirts and put it on another woman, and have it be an acceptable thing.

(Roberts and correspondent John King laugh.)

ROSEN: So -- I should say pant suits. But the -- so, you know, I think in some respects, it's almost dismissive of women to suggest that it's just about gender, and she's going to have to answer that, and she's invited that comparison herself.

ROBERTS: Yeah, but there's still -- all right, I mean you can't get around the fact that there are a substantial number of disaffected Hillary Clinton voters. Our CNN polling that was out earlier this week suggested that 27 percent of them will vote for John McCain, rather than vote for Barack Obama. That's an increase of 11 points in just a couple of months. Does this now -- if those people were thinking about voting for John McCain, if they get a woman, in addition to Senator McCain, does that lock up that segment of the vote?

ROSEN: I don't think so. I think it keeps them in play for a while. But those are traditionally, the people who decide the last in an election in the last two weeks. So clearly, that's going to be the target for the next couple of weeks. But I don't think he's given very much energy to that today. You know, I heard two things. She's a mom, and she's for oil and gas, and my guess is over the next several weeks, they're going to try and avoid this foreign policy debate, which they clearly cannot win with her. They're going to try and avoid the risk issues, and they're going to try to hammer on those two issues: she can do energy and she's a mom like you. I'm just not sure that's going to be enough.

—Matthew Balan is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Unqualified

Rosen didn't get the memo from the high command. Obama/Biden have released new orders to the troops not snipe at Palin. Apparently, they had a mini ephimany and realized that the word "unqualified" cuts two ways.

Look for these attacks to diminish as the commands filter down to the apparatchkiks.

Sarah Palin is at least as

Sarah Palin is at least as qualified as Geraldine Ferraro was when Walter Mondale picked her.

Palin has been an executive as a Mayor and as a Governor. Ferraro's experience was as one member of a 435-person body. How many important decisions do you think she had to make?

And if Senators (like Clinton) are so qualified why do Senators running for President (usually against Governors) almost never get elected? I think the last one was JFK .

This is the same excuse the libs use against black conservatives...they are tokens, unqualified....being used. They need a new hymnal.

And she's more qualified than Obama!

that's the biggest thing. He's been a do nothing senator for two years and she's racked up many accomplishments. Unlike Obama - she has challenged her own party.

This is so great. I hope they capitalize on these baseless attacks on her at the convention.

It's funny - the come together crew are attacking her for no good reason. McCain didn't attack Biden. Plus he just congratulated him on his milestone and all the Obama campaign can do is attack.

Hillary

 

I just don't understand where everybody gets that Hillary is so qualified. At what?  Being a senator? Big deal. To me qualifications are thoes that are earned from experience,not bestowed by liberal suckups.

Bill wasn't and still isn't qualified. Just look at N Korea and Iran. The messes he sidesteped there and left for Bush. Iraq.

Then there was 9/11.  

He almost ran us out of bombs in Bosnia. They are still at war 16 years later. N Korea built a Chinese bomb while he dallied in the Oval Office.

P.S. I believe it was a Chinese bomb Korea detonated looking for a EMB. 

Hillary was qualified with

Hillary was qualified with zero executive experience?  Really, what state was she governor of?  What city or town was she mayor of?   What was Hillary's foreign policy experience?  Being faux shot at flying to Bosnia?

Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, starving the poor one gallon of ethanol at a time. Fill your tank with E85 and cull a village.

And Palin didn't earn her

And Palin didn't earn her political credentials as a victim of her more politically popular filandering husband.

If Hill hadn't married Bill, we'd all be saying Hillary Rodham who?

Arriana?

 

Arriana Huf.  Shouldn't she get back to the Green Acres set?

Everytime I hear inexperienced...

I want to yell back if experience is so important to you then why are you voting for Obama?  For Obama it was a plus that he was inexperienced in their eyes...for some reason which makes no sense to me the VP, essentially the back up QB, is supposed to be more capable and experienced than the QB according to the Democrats and their Media machine?  It seems that after 4 -8 years as VP she will have all the experience she needs to be the Prez.

For democrats, it's the

For democrats, it's the same thing with military experience...it only matters when their guy (or gal) has it. They will cheerfully proclaim it worthless when their guy doesn't have it (Clinton) and claim that it's the most important attribute when their guy does (Kerry).

And they don't even see the contradiction.

So to say experience in a Presidential candidate doesn't matter, but in a VP candidate it matters a great deal, is no stretch for them.

how to make a maverick into a follower

according to what I've been hearing (from both Andrea Mitchell on MSNBC and McCain Campaign spokesperson Nancy Pfotenhaueron Fox news), it's unclear how well McCain even knows Palin, which makes the choice--which was completely unexpected--seem like it is an attempt to get women voters.

 Now, that's a curiously problematic issue for McCain: even when he's doing something unexpected (giving the nod to a relatively unknown woman), it looks like he's following the Democrats and trying to capitalize on what they've already done.

 And some people keep making the connection with Geraldine Ferraro (as if that were a good thing--last I looked, it didn't work out so well for Mondale, although it's hard to imagine what would have worked out for him), when really, a more apt comparison might be Dan Quayle--a relatively unknown figure who happens to make the candidate look 1000x older.

 And that's one reason why this was a dumb choice. The other is that it won't work as an attempt to court women voters who would have voted for Hillary, since Palin's politics are in no way similar to Clinton's. (The women who would vote for McCain anyway will still vote for him, but Palin won't bring any new votes in.)

 In any case, an anti-corruption Republican from Alaska (unlike Ted Stevens) who is married to her high school sweetheart (unlike the cheating, adulterous McCain [referring to his first marriage]) is a breath of fresh air, and it's exciting to know that by this time next year either a black man or a white woman will be in the White House. (Who knows, maybe we'll see a black Jewish woman as president during my lifetime.)

Only the uninformed...

...see Palin as an unknown. Admittedly, much of the public at large is uninformed, but they will be informed in a hurry.

"This
liberal would be all about socialize -- uh, uh, would be about
basically taking over and the government running all of your companies."-Maxine Waters 2008

I strongly disagree.

The soccer moms in the suburbs - these are highly sought after by both parties.    This woman, campaigning for McCain, will be a strong attraction for them, because she can relate to them.    She's a working mom with five kids - one with Downs Syndrome, another going off to Iraq.   She didn't get her job through her husband (like Hillary basically did).   

identity voters

You may have a point, mwfsu84--people who want to see a woman in the White House, regardless of that woman's politics, will vote for McCain-Palin. But those soccer/hockey moms who were interested in Hillary's candidacy because of her support of abortion (to name one issue) probably won't be swayed. And those women who are already against abortion would vote for McCain anyway. (But as I said, you may be right, and it will be interesting to see how this plays out.)

(As for Palin being a relative unknown, restless 1, I'll admit, maybe I am uninformed when it comes to first-term governors of least populous states. As you said, we'll all get informed in a hurry, but whether or not we like what we see is another issue. For instance, as for the issue [raised below] of her having leadership experience, I'm not sure I'd want to lean on that too hard, especially considering the messy personal personnel fight she's in [about the abuse of power investigation regarding a state trooper married to her sister].)

Compared to obama, she is

Compared to obama, she is plenty experienced. Besides, that obviously means nothing in this race, or obama would be watching from home.

I didn't mean uninformed in a bad way. I was mostly referring to those that do not pay as much attention to politics as we, and others on other sites, do.

Finally, experience is important in the long run, but it's not like she's running for president or something. She can afford some on the job training as a veep. Many others have done this. And if being mad at a former brother in law is her worst sin, then she stacks up well with this bunch. Innocent until proven guilty, right?

"This
liberal would be all about socialize -- uh, uh, would be about
basically taking over and the government running all of your companies."-Maxine Waters 2008

Hillary's qualifications are marginal at best.

Hillary's qualifications are marginal at best. True, she organized and sent her hit team out to handle Bill's women, but that irked many women throughout the country. Many were ashamed because Hillary didn't do enough to remedy her betrayal--and thus, the betrayal of American women. Many do love her, many don't.

Palin is more qualified than Hillary in a number of ways.

settle down

here's the deal, take a few big breaths and consider what has happened - an American woman with conservative values has been named to the ticket!  quit with all the plotting and planning for just one day - enjoy this moment.  I am thrilled  that a decent person may actually go on to be vice president.

unqualified

lets see now.  it is apparently bad that the republican VP nominee has as much foreign policy experience as the Democrat presidential nominee.  That is assuming McCain sends her to the middle east for a week.

Also she has more that 145 days experience in the Governorship.  oh yeah, and she commands the national guard in Alaska.  How many troups has obama commanded?

if he keeps comparing himself to the VP nominee he will prove he may not even be qualified for that job.

 

 

She has already been to

She has already been to Iraq, before she was even mentioned for the ticket. She went not as a photo op.

"This
liberal would be all about socialize -- uh, uh, would be about
basically taking over and the government running all of your companies."-Maxine Waters 2008

HRC's only two qualifications are being a crooked lawyer and...

...running for office.

-Dave.

The Democrat talking point

The Democrat talking point - that Palin is inexperienced - is going to be the undoing of Obama's campaign.  The sheer idiocy of the argument that the Top of the Ticket doesn't need experience (Obama), but that the Bottom of the Ticket (Palin or Biden?) does, is bizarre, at best.

Not only can it rationally be argued that Palin has more relevant type of experience than Obama, but she has the kind of wholly-responsible, executive-type experience that Biden lacks completely - Never having run anything other than a meaningless Senate committee.

Bring it on?  Yeah, bring it on.  Let's do compare the level of experience of Palin versus Obama! 

sean robins
blog.seanrobins.com

PANDERING

What the left and the cheerleading flank of the DNC (msm) are muttering is that McCain is pandering to the Hillary voters.  Uh, nominating to the top of your ticket an empty suit with no resume because of white liberal guilt, media manipulation, and skin color is called pandering.  What, she worked her way up to a executive position from city council?  She didn't work the community activist, political machine, terrorist route?     

 

Clean, articulate, and smokin' hot, that's a storybook man.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.