CNN senior political analyst David Gergen gushed over Al Gore’s speech at Invesco Field on Thursday evening during the network’s coverage of the Democratic convention as he urged viewers to go back and read the text:
I think the Gore speech, he -- while it was way too rushed in delivery, had an awful lot to offer, and was one of the first times anybody in this campaign has spoken seriously to the nation about the potential catastrophe coming from global warming.... I think it's really was worth for a lot of people going back and actually reading the text of Al Gore's speech.
He then mentioned Abraham Lincoln’s "brief time in politics before he became President" in an indirect reference to Barack Obama’s short political career.
Host Wolf Blitzer asked Gergen for his take on Gore’s speech, as well as that of Susan Eisenhower, the granddaughter of President Eisenhower who has endorsed Obama. He praised both speeches, which came in the midst of extended musical performances by celebrity supporters of Obama such as Sheryl Crow: "Well, I must say, Wolf, that as much as all of us enjoy the music, I'm really glad that we've had Al Gore and Mrs. Eisenhower out here speaking so we have some substance to this..." After lauding Gore for taking global warming seriously, he chided both Obama and McCain for not being serious enough on the issue: "I don't think any -- either one of these candidates has really seriously addressed what has to be done, how much sacrifice is going to be required, how rapidly this is moving in on us."
After acknowledging that Eisenhower was a "long-time friend," Gergen rambled on about how both speakers apparently connected Obama to Martin Luther King and Lincoln: "It was interesting that both went back to Lincoln through -- on a night we honor King, went back through King to Lincoln, and helped us to frame these choices tonight." Just before this, he mentioned how both speakers referenced Lincoln’s political career before becoming president: "Both of them... evoked memories of what Lincoln faced -- his brief time in politics before he became president, only eight years in the state legislature in Illinois, just one two-year term in the Congress. That's all the experience he had before he got to the Oval -- got to the White House and yet, became one our, you know, perhaps, our most historic president.
Gergen concluded by highlighting the "memorable" nature of the two speeches and making his recommendation about Gore’s: "So I thought both speeches were memorable, and I think it's really was worth for a lot of people going back and actually reading the text of Al Gore's speech, because a lot of it went by so quickly." It must have been so "memorable" that the viewers didn’t get a chance to absorb it the first time around.
The transcript of Gergen’s remarks, which came 15 minutes into the 9 pm Eastern hour of CNN’s Democratic convention coverage on Thursday:
WOLF BLITZER: Let me get some insight from David Gergen right now. Susan Eisenhower speaking at this convention -- what do you make of it, David?
DAVID GERGEN: Well, I must say, Wolf, that as much as all of us enjoy the music, I'm really glad that we've had Al Gore and Mrs. Eisenhower out here speaking so we have some substance to this too, on an evening, and what was -- I think the Gore speech, he -- while it was way too rushed in delivery, had an awful lot to offer, and was one of the first times anybody in this campaign has spoken seriously to the nation about the potential catastrophe coming from global warming. I don't think any -- either one of these candidates has really seriously addressed what has to be done, how much sacrifice is going to be required, how rapidly this is moving in on us. But -- it was also interesting to me to hear both Gore and Susie Eisenhower tonight -- and Susie is a long-time friend -- go back, on a night when we're all talking about Martin Luther King, and remembering that Martin Luther King stood that historic day at the feet of Abraham Lincoln. Both of them tonight have gone back to Lincoln in their speeches and to -- and have evoked memories of what Lincoln faced -- his brief time in politics before he became president, only eight years in the state legislature in Illinois, just one two-year term in the Congress. That's all the experience he had before he got to the Oval -- got to the White House and yet, became one our, you know, perhaps, our most historic president. It was interesting that both went back to Lincoln through -- on a night we honor King, went back through King to Lincoln, and helped us to frame these choices tonight. So I thought both speeches were memorable, and I think it's really was worth for a lot of people going back and actually reading the text of Al Gore's speech, because a lot of it went by so quickly.
BLITZER: Yes. He did rush through that speech.
—Matthew Balan is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Remind you of anyone?
August 29, 2008 - 02:28 ET by magicalangelicusThinking of Obama, I was reminded of a big hit by a band called "Living Color":
http://www.youtube.c...
-- and have evoked
August 29, 2008 - 04:29 ET by MidAmerica-- and have evoked memories of what Lincoln faced -- his brief time in politics before he became president, only eight years in the state legislature in Illinois, just one two-year term in the Congress.
Well... as a person from the land of Lincoln and in fact I live in an area frequented by Mr. Lincoln as a lawyer I must say this notion that Lincoln's resume and life experiences was as thin as obama's is a little annoying.
Yes I wonder...
August 29, 2008 - 05:25 ET by BadassBuckeyeDid Lincoln conduct shady land deals or hang out with domestic terrorists? Or did Lincoln get on his knees at a house of worship that preaches biggotry?
I think the answer to those questions are no. Make those comparisons MSM.
Shrillness
August 29, 2008 - 05:44 ET by allanfWithin days of taking office, Lincoln precipitated one of the deadliest wars in US History. Several of the Southern states offered to act as intermediaries and told Lincoln they would not succeed from the Union if he did not launch a war through their territory. Is that really the record Barack aspires to?
I agree, to build on that
August 29, 2008 - 05:46 ET by USA4freedomI agree, to build on that idea, Did Lincoln have to deal with terrorist? Atomic Bombs, Chemical or Biological bombs? C4, neave gas, airplanes to drop bombs, submarines, a luntic part of America that HATES US?? Etc etc..
Ronald Reagan, 1962: I did not leave the Democratic party, the party left me.
Insert: your name, 2008, and the Republican party.
Lincoln
August 29, 2008 - 08:45 ET by Copperhead RidgeThe Tyrant! The War of Northern Aggression! The Lincoln stuff probably won't play to well in the South.
But, Lincoln actually did practice law. He could debate and didn't have the luxury of teleprompters in his day. He didn't look down his nose at anybody, and he knew that Kentucky borders Illinois. Lincoln didn't do a bunch of coke when he was young, instead he split rails. He was probably the best writer to be president and didn't depend on a team to craft carefully worded speeches.
Abraham Lincoln was determined to end slavery, and Barack Obama is determined to make all men slaves to the government.
Yes
August 29, 2008 - 07:27 ET by cvgbuckeyeGood to hear from a fellow Buckeye.
Great rebuttal!
August 29, 2008 - 06:32 ET by motherbeltGreat rebuttal!
Besides that, the equivalent Lincoln story would have had him being elected to the House of Rerpresentatives in 1846 and running for President in 1848.
But Lincoln was clearly lacking. I don't see "community organizer" in there anywhere!
is there anyone else
August 29, 2008 - 05:37 ET by HeavyChevyObama reminds the MSM of?? for the love of Pete get a life and a clue!I wonder how much KY jelly they go through when they talk about him...seriously enough is enough.
"9 out of 10 doctors agree that flag burning is the number one killer of liberals."
Go to Gergen
August 29, 2008 - 05:46 ET by allanfI remain confused by Gergen. He used to be the go to "Republican" for the MSM if you wanted praise for a Democrat. He is clearly not a Republican. Who is he?
You must realize that
August 29, 2008 - 06:11 ET by pocomocoYou must realize that Gergen, over the years, has had jobs in a number of media outlets.
Today, he is in between a rock and a hard place because if he loses his job at CNN, there is no where else for him to go as the media are in the final throes of their existence.
He must, therefore, follow CNN’s political line or die. What little objectivity he used to have is now gone.
Gergeeeeen
August 29, 2008 - 06:57 ET by elvato62What the heck were you listening to? The Same Al Gore? The problem with the liberal news is they always have to open their mouths and say something? Gergen....what a loser. I can't wait for McCain to whip Obama's behind.
This is the same twit that
August 29, 2008 - 08:16 ET by mattmThis is the same twit that PBS tried to pass off as the conservative answer to Mark "maxi" Shields, and then he ends up working for Clinton, now he's back at the "journo" schtik.
David Gergen: "[T]he Gore
August 29, 2008 - 08:24 ET by TEDavid Gergen: "[T]he Gore speech ... was one of the first times anybody in this campaign has spoken seriously to the nation about the potential catastrophe coming from global warming ...."
"[T]he potential castastrophe coming from global warming"?
The leftists at PBS actually had this clown serving as their house "conservative".
What would MLK think?
August 29, 2008 - 09:02 ET by nkviking75I suspect that Martin Luther King would not be pleased that the first black nominee of a major party is such a lightweight. I also don't think he'd approve of the shameless way he plays the race card, or that 95 percent of blacks are marching in lockstep to vote for Obama. I think Obama has used his race to get as far as he has. Democrats being the kind of people they are, many of his primary votes probably came from people who wanted to brag about supporting this historical president. In the end, Obama's lack of qualifications will likely set blacks back a couple of decades.
When you put the clowns in charge, don't be surprised when a circus breaks out.