Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Tell the Truth campaign logo
NewsBusters.org logo

May 26, 2012
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • Anti-religious Bias in the Media
  • Same-sex Marriage
  • 2012 Presidential Race
Home » Blogs » Matthew Balan's blog
  • Ashley Judd to NBC: Republicans Are 'Really Dumb,' Obama Has 'Flowered'
  • Bozell Column: Canada's 'Scientific' Museum of Smut
  • CBS: 'Troubling Signs' For Obama, Like Bush in '92, But President 'Cannot Control' Economy
  • On and On It Goes: Networks Cover 'Predator Priests' As They Stay Silent on Catholic Liberty Lawsuits
  • NBC's Williams Touts L.A. Banning Plastic Bags As Effort to Keep Them 'Out of the Natural World'
  • Bozell, Carlson Note Media's Silence on Obama Supporter's Bribe to Hush Rev. Wright
  • Very Annoyed Matthews Rips ‘Horse’s Ass Right-Wingers’ Who Cite ‘Thrill Up My Leg,’ Calls C-SPAN Host a ‘Jackass’
  • CNN Asks Tony Perkins 'Why Do Homosexuals Bother You So Much?'

Chris Matthews Asks If GOP Platform ‘Inclusive Enough’ on Abortion

By Matthew Balan | August 29, 2008 | 01:39

Change font size:  A |  A
Matthew Balan's picture

Chris Matthews, MSNBC Anchor & Kay Bailey Hutchison, Texas Senator | NewsBusters.orgDuring his normal "Hardball" program on MSNBC on Thursday evening, Chris Matthews asked Texas Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison if the "Republican party platform is inclusive enough on the issue of reproductive or abortion rights." Hutchison, whose name has been floated as a possible vice-presidential nominee for John McCain, didn’t give a straight yes or no answer, and mentioned that in her view, "...both the Republican and the Democratic platform generally have areas that are not mainstreamed, and I don't think that you can agree with either platform in its entirety, and I think you just have to understand that a candidate’s views are going to prevail and I think people choose the candidate."

Hutchison has a mixed record on the abortion issue. While she has a generally pro-life voting record (she has been given poor marks by NARAL and mostly good marks from the National Right-to-Life Committee), some pro-lifers point out that the senator did vote for an amendment to the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003 which found that the Roe v Wade decision was "appropriate and secures an important constitutional right; and such decision should not be overturned." She has also voted for federal funding of embryonic stem cell research.

One wonders if Matthews would ask pro-life Democrats if their party platform was "inclusive enough" on abortion, or if the party in general was "inclusive enough" or tolerant enough of pro-lifers. Only one supposed pro-lifer, Senator Bob Casey, Jr. of Pennsylvania, addressed the Democratic convention this week (Casey’s endorsement of radically pro-abortion Barack Obama early in the primary season has undermined the senator’s credibility on the issue for pro-lifers), and his father, the late governor of Pennsylvania, was barred from speaking at the convention in 1992.

The transcript of the exchange between Matthew and Hutchison, which began 19 minutes into the 5 pm Eastern hour of "Hardball" on Thursday:

CHRIS MATTHEWS: Do you think the Republican party platform is inclusive enough on the issue of reproductive or abortion rights?

KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON: Well, I believe that that is a very personal issue, and I think that we ought to acknowledge that people in the same family can differ on that issue, people who are the closest friends can be different on that issue. And I think we should have standards, but I don't think we should eliminate people, or say you can't be welcomed in our party if you have legitimate and -- views on that issue. But, Chris, I do think that both the Republican and the Democratic platform generally have areas that are not mainstreamed, and I don't think that you can agree with either platform in its entirety, and I think you just have to understand that a candidate’s views are going to prevail and I think people choose the candidate. The party, of course, in the overall priorities is a factor. It's important. But you can't agree on every issue in a platform, and you wouldn't with your wife or your mother or your husband or your children, and so, I don't think we should be -- you know, really, a litmus test on either party platform.

Share this

About the Author

Matthew Balan is a news analyst at the Media Research Center. Click here to follow Matthew Balan on Twitter.
  • 2008 Presidential
  • Abortion
  • Conservatives & Republicans
  • Culture/Society
  • Liberals & Democrats
  • Bob Casey Jr.
  • Chris Matthews
  • Kay Bailey Hutchison
  • Hardball
  • MSNBC
  • Matthew Balan's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Donate to NewsBusters

  • Is liberalism dead? (Roger L. Simon)
  • The media's next move on same-sex marriage (Get Religion)
  • Senate Dems pay women staffers less than male staffers (Washington Free Beacon)
  • Left targeting Chief Justice Roberts in attempt to save ObamaCare (IBD)
  • Walker's chance of defeating Wisc. recall looking great (Ace of Spades)
  • Ex-prez Bill Clinton poses for pic with porn stars (Fox Nation)
  • Protests against conservative group ALEC draw pitiful numbers (YouTube)

Donate to NewsBusters Today!

This form needs Javascript to display, which your browser doesn't support. Sign up here instead

User Shortcuts

Log in

  • My account
  • My buddylist
  • Log in to check messages
  • RSS feed
  • About NB
  • Contact us
  • Jobs
  • Advertise on NB
Scott Rasmussen
Rasmussen Column: 'Austerity' Talk Is Just Political Cover for More Government Spending
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter Williams Column: Should Black People Tolerate This?
Cal Thomas's picture
Cal Thomas
Cal Thomas Column: The Media's Religion Deficit
Chuck Norris's picture
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris Column: IRS Gives Billions in Tax Refunds to Illegals
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Michelle Malkin Column: How the Gay-Marriage Mafia Slimed Manny Pacquiao
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Recent comments

  • ➚ That truth is self-evident
    1 min 23 sec ago
  • one big problem
    10 min 15 sec ago
  • Say What?
    14 min 25 sec ago
  • Someone should tell him to look at crime statistics
    16 min 6 sec ago
  • This is the excuse?
    20 min 22 sec ago
More >

More Like Farcebook
more cartoons
  • Howard Stern Hasn't Been 'King of Prime Time'
  • All Purpose Weekend Open Thread
  • NPR Celebrates Transgender Olympics Hopeful as Hammer-Throwing 'Jackie Robinson'
  • Bashir to Facebook Co-Founder: Go 'Play with the Traffic'
  • Piers Morgan Whacks 'Little Wretch' Who Says He Taught Phone-Hacking
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Lachlan Markay
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2012 NewsBusters. Terms of Use.