During CNN’s Wednesday night coverage of the Democratic convention, the network’s senior political analyst Gloria Borger poked fun of John McCain’s non-answer on the number of houses he owns. When host Wolf Blitzer pointed out that Borger owns homes in Washington, DC and in Montana, she confirmed, "Yeah, that's it, and I write the checks, so I know." (video at right)
One can surmise that Borger, through her snide one-liner, wanted to make the point that McCain is out of touch with the average American, a point frequently repeated by liberal pundits.
Borger’s remark came after an interview of Brian Schweitzer, the Democratic governor of Montana, during the 8 pm Eastern hour of CNN’s convention programming. Blitzer prefaced Borger’s question to Schweitzer by mentioning how she has a home in the governor’s state. Since Blitzer and Borger weren’t sure if Schweitzer could hear them due to the noise from the convention floor, correspondent John King relayed the question to the governor.
Once the interview was complete, Blitzer asked Borger his set-up question: "Let's just ask Gloria this important question -- how many homes do you own, Gloria?" Borger laughed and shook her head in response to the question, and after a few seconds of crosstalk, she gave her snarky reply.
The full transcript of the exchange between Blitzer and Borger, which came 20 minutes into the 8 pm Eastern hour of CNN’s coverage of the Democratic convention:
WOLF BLITZER: Let's just ask Gloria this important question -- how many homes do you own, Gloria?
GLORIA BORGER: (Laughs) I knew you were going to go there.
BLITZER: And we know that you have a home in Washington, DC.
BORGER: I know how many homes I own.
BLITZER: We know --
BORGER: I know.
BLITZER: We know you have one in Montana.
BORGER: Okay, okay, okay.
BLITZER: All right.
BORGER: Yeah, that's it, and I write the checks, so I know. (Laughs)
BLITZER: (Laughs) Gloria Borger knows Montana quite well.
—Matthew Balan is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
When is a gaffe not a gaffe?
August 28, 2008 - 00:00 ET by JWFSen. McCain declined not to answer the question and said to check with his staff. He did not say he does not know.
I suspect he would not answer because the answer is embarrassing. He owns no houses. They are all in his wife's name.
Shot across the bow.....
August 28, 2008 - 00:17 ET by ScrapironMcCain is being smart on the pundits rants about the homes he owns. In a big speach in front of millions he will tell the world he owns no homes but his wife's 'corporation' owns several as investments. Anyone with money invested in anything will understand the stupidity of the liberal democrat media. Funny thing is that my sister who worked as a waitress for years and her husband who worked in the coal mines (worked in, never owned one) have owned as many as 9 homes and currently own 6, one to live in and 5 as rental properties. He**, I own a 4 bedroom, three bath with full basement (don't owe a dime on it and built it with my own two hands) and I'm a retired military enlisted man. Anyone can do it if they have a little get up and go and don't listen to the doom and gloom democrat media hype.
Old, Retired and glad of it.
Speaking of...
August 28, 2008 - 01:06 ET by matthewleonmartinDid anyone watch CNN's coverage of the Obama nomination process?
After it was over, they cut to the panel, consisting of her and Anderson Cooper. Everyone was standing around watching the crying and carryings on, when Donna Brazille walked up to their stage, she was hooping and hollering and pumping her fists toward the crowd.
Right then, the camera showed Borger and Cooper exchange looks like: "She's such an idiot" AC smiled and then the camera cut away quickly.
If they want to worry
August 28, 2008 - 00:13 ET by kgIf they want to worry about houses then look no farther than Al Gore.
"Forget change, I want improvement!"
Ah, yes, Algore....and they
August 28, 2008 - 06:06 ET by motherbeltAh, yes, Algore....and they can check this out:
A Tale of Two Houses
The quitessential hypocrite.